Photoshop Woodlands

[Cris Luczak]

Woodlandphotography, while rewarding, presents a unique set of challenges when it comes to shooting and bagging some banger shots. From intricate compositions to unpredictable lighting conditions, capturing the flow of forests requires skill, patience, and adaptability. For this article, I want to dive into the reasons why woodland photography is considered difficult and explore methods to overcome these obstacles.

Try These: Look at the contrast and play of light within the forest and adapt to them. Utilize techniques such as exposure bracketing and HDR (High Dynamic Range) to capture the full range of tones. Additionally, use this opportunity to tune into the light as it falls either on the floor or as it hits certain leaves or branches around you. This will help you isolate the light as the main subject in the scene and help create more focus on a certain area rather than it being a kaleidoscope of light spreading everywhere. This method can also help you simplify the scene greatly. I would also consider shooting during the golden hours of sunrise and sunset when the light is softer and more diffused, which will help with balancing the potential high contrast as well as adding some additional color overall.

Woodlands are teeming with visual elements, from towering trees to intricate undergrowth. Creating compelling compositions amidst this complexity requires a keen eye for detail and a deep understanding of visual storytelling. Trying to portray the very essence of the scene in a coherent image can be daunting, as the abundance of elements can easily lead to clutter and confusion. The phrase "creating order out of chaos" is easier to say than to actually do, and once again can put many off from trying this genre of landscape photography to begin with.

Try These: Simplify your compositions by focusing on a single focal point or subject of interest. Experiment with different perspectives and focal lengths to create depth and add dimension. Use leading lines and framing techniques to guide the viewer's eye through the image, adding clarity to the story you want to tell. In traditional landscape photography, this in itself can be a challenge, and to be able to do this in the clutter that is often the forest might seem like an intimidating task. But take your time to explore the area and look for elements that you can build on. An example of this might be a fallen branch or tree or a pathway that meanders through the scene. Once you find one, take some time to look at it from many different angles to see if there are any supporting elements to bring it all together. You will of course also need to consider light in this mix, as it can be the missing element you need for the image to work. A good rule of thumb I use here is the 6-inch rule: once you have set your shot, move your camera 6 inches in all directions to see how that slight movement influences the scene. Does it cut out distractions? Does it stop any overlapping branches? Or perhaps it reveals that missing element you needed.

Unlike static landscapes, woodlands are dynamic environments where conditions can change in an instant. Wildlife may dart across the frame, the foliage will most likely sway in the breeze, and light may shift rapidly as clouds drift overhead, which you may not be able to see due to the thick canopy of leaves above you. Capturing the decisive moment with all this flux going on requires anticipation, quick reflexes, and a willingness to embrace the opportunity.

Woodland photography often involves traversing rugged terrain and contending with uneven footing. Carrying heavy gear through dense underbrush or over rocky terrain can be physically demanding, requiring stamina and agility. Moreover, accessing remote locations may require hiking long distances, adding an additional layer of logistical complexity to the process. Be ready to get down and dirty also if needed, as the best shots are ones that you have to work for. However, this very challenge can put many off, as the thought process of "is it worth it" will no doubt creep in, especially when you also think that this genre is hard, which it is.

Try These: Invest in lightweight and durable equipment that can withstand the rigors of outdoor photography. Use a sturdy camera backpack with padded compartments to protect your gear while hiking. Wear appropriate footwear with good traction and consider using trekking poles for added stability on uneven terrain. Scout out a location in advance where possible without any camera gear, as it will make it easier to get around and less cumbersome when it comes to getting into tight spaces or through thick vegetation. Be sure to always bring water with you; it will help when you may mean spending a lot of time getting to a spot and potentially even longer trying to fine-tune that composition. Finally, immerse yourself in the location, and be prepared to get dirty, wet, and up close with your potential subjects.

Woodlands are susceptible to a wide range of weather conditions, from brilliant sunshine to dense fog and torrential rain. While inclement weather can yield dramatic and atmospheric images, it also introduces logistical challenges and potential risks to equipment. Waterproofing gear and maintaining situational awareness are essential precautions when shooting in unpredictable conditions. Wind will also be something you need to be aware of, as leaves will move, and when you are exposing, you most likely will have a longer shutter due to the lower light levels.

In conclusion, woodland photography presents a myriad of challenges, from mastering complex compositions to navigating dynamic lighting conditions and unpredictable weather. However, for those willing to embrace the difficulties inherent in capturing its beauty, the rewards are immeasurable as you know the amount of work you put into bagging that shot. By tweaking your shots, compositions, and techniques, exercising patience, and respecting the rhythms of the natural world, you can unlock the magic of woodland landscapes and share this unique vision with the world.

By implementing these strategies and adopting a flexible and adaptive approach to woodland photography, you can overcome the inherent challenges of the genre and unlock the full potential of the natural world as your next favorite genre. With each obstacle conquered, new opportunities for growth and self-expression emerge, enriching both your journey and the final outcome of your work.

The greatest challenge in forest photography for me is the fact that nature is inherently messy. You call it complex. A patch of dirt here, a broken tree limb there... all kinds of things which disturb the simplicity of the composition that we hope to capture. Everything in the forest is so nice and quiet that a bad picture seems impossible. At least until we start looking more closely at our pictures on the monitor at home, where all kinds of distracting elements appear. However, like any other genre, we need to closely examine everything in the picture beyond just the subject, before clicking the shutter.

I tend to prefer rainy, moody days in the forest. For one thing, it reduces a lot of the harsh contrast in bright sunny days, leading to blown-out highlights or loss of shadow detail. And a sunny weekend afternoon in late September in Colorado feels like Times Square on New Years Eve. Bad weather though, even in popular tourist spots, can make it feel like you have the place all to yourself. So my favorite moments are rainy days, or the time slightly after peak color season, or best of all... both.

Sometimes it's hard to find diagonal lines or leading lines in the forest which create depth in a picture, so we usually have to make a special effort to find them. The fact that there are so many trees packed into one place in the forest makes it difficult to find a picture which is distinctive, and so we end up with flat pictures which all look the same. Look for ways to create depth. As Ansel Adams said, "A good picture is knowing where to stand."

You make good points. Although one could argue that modern art... things like cubism, abstract impressionist, and pop art culture of the Warhol era were all artistic aberrations better left as a sidenote to art history. I have a hard time characterizing some of that as progression. Andy Warhol's pictures seem to mock artistic skill, turning serious art into child's play. Jackson Pollock's abstract drip paintings do no more than psychoanalyze the painter. He should have just written a book about his life and spared us the debate over the symbolic meaning in his paintings. And thanks to abstraction, we have a generation of interior designers buying abstract art for the sole purpose of matching colors between wall decor and home furnishings. For what my opinion is worth, I feel like we've had a hundred years of art regression.

And with regard to Yeo's portrait of King Charles... my first reaction upon seeing it was that the artist had a thing for Britain medieval executions. Obviously an artist can't control everyone's response as viewer. But red is one of the more highly symbolic colors so there had to have been some thought given to its intent in shaping a response. And the head separated from the body by color values? Hmmm... feels creepy to me. Whether Yeo cares or not about public opinion would have to be answered by himself. I can say for myself though that while popular opinion doesn't always dictate what or how I photograph, I do care about the response. It feels good when people like my pictures. Rockwell said as much, and I think it was good for him that public acceptance aligned well with his natural illustrating style. In that case, his editor may have understood him better than he understood himself. We all go through phases that sometimes stick; many do not. Anyway, nice chatting with you.

The thing to bear in mind here is that it is quite easy to find out how and why known artists produce the work they do. There are many books and articles on that. It is not so easy at times to figure it out looking at the works of art without any such knowledge. What I believe happens in certain art circles, is that an artist provides a body of work and explains the rationale behind that body. It happens in painting and photography. Was it an argument against greed, for conservation, against the detrimental effects of poverty, against surveillance and so on? Andy Warhol certainly had a rationale. And why was the body of work conducted at that period of time? Was it to resist certain developments in a field and if so, why? What we see in many photography sites is very often a single image. No rationale behind it, just a one-shot wonder. Make of the photograph what you will, but there is often little explanation of what it means or an associated corpus of work that shows how it all links together and why it was provided at all. And in the process, I certainly begin to understand why there is so much emphasis on the f-stop, the gear, the software, the rule of thirds, and so on, rather than on what is the artist thinking and why? And I absolutely understand why the emphasis mostly is on a pretty picture. Superficial?

3a8082e126