Vaaranam Aayiram San Francisco

[Verline]

Behind every successful man is a woman... so goes the famous saying. Vaaranam Aayiram, a self-confessed tribute from director Gautham Vasudev Menon(the middle name was added to his name after his father passed away) to his dad, showcases a man whose life could be used as an example to alter the aforementioned proverb to say 'Behind every successful man is his father'. Gautham's familiar style dilutes the movie's emotional impact somewhat but it is an honest, heartfelt story that would've probably made his father happy.

Krishnan(Surya), who married his college sweetheart Malini(Simran), is now the proud father of a son Surya(Surya) and a daughter. Surya, while in college, realizes that it is high time he repays all that his father has done for him and finds himself a nice job. During the same time he meets Meghna(Sameera Reddy), who is all set to pursue higher studies in the US and vows that he would wed her. With his dad's backing, he travels to San Francisco to get the woman of his dreams. His life from then takes several unexpected turns but his dad is always there to guide him through them.

The film is an ode to the Dad and in that goal it is similar to Thavamaai Thavamirundhu. But while Cheran's film had the dad as the central figure, Vaaranam Aayiram illustrates a father's importance by keeping him in the background. Though the film begins and ends with Surya, the father, it is Surya, the son, who is at the forefront of the film and it's the twists and turns in his life that we are witnesses to. But we get to see the pivotal role his father plays in all stages of his life. It's his dad who inspires him to choose his career; its his dad who pushes him to grow his romance; its his dad who helps him recover from a big personal tragedy; and its his dad who supports him when he finally realizes his life's goals. By choosing this approach, Gautham manages to convey a message but avert the problem of the film turning into a documentary.

The film's other key relationships are also portayed well. Surya and Simran, inspite of not having a lot of screen time, create a screen couple whose love for each other has only grown over the years. Surya's dogged pursuit of Sameera paves the way for a romance that is both cute and convincing and Surya's reaction to its end is one of the genuinely touching moments in the movie. The Surya-Divya romance doesn't quite have the same impact but that is as much due to the inevitable comparison with the Sameera track as it is due to the widely different circumstances. There is some nice symmetry(like the way Surya and Divya travel far to woo their respective beaus) between the two romances but Gautham does well to not overstress it.

The film works well at the macro level. It is engaging, emotional and effective and succeeds in creating an interesting protagonist and charting an interesting course for his life. But the facade starts to crack if we dig just a little bit deeper. The finer details - whether its in the supporting characters or the period sets or the story transitions itself - are a little flimsy. Like, for instance, the segment that is set in the 60s. The film posters and the wig(for Simran) and the costumes are in place but the whole thing looks and feels like it was done on a set, without much effort going into recreating that time period. The feeling is greater since it wasn't too long ago that we saw Subramanyapuram, which pretty much transported us to the 80s. The character of Surya's sister is another sign of the lack of importance to the smaller details. Starting off as an important character as she helps Surya support his family, she is pushed to the sidelines and turned into a mute spectator (about whom we learn precious little) as he goes through all his crises and crusades.

The film is built on relationships, sentiments and emotions and so the detours into action seem like speedbreakers. These segments - like the kid's rescue and the army mission - are brought in quite cleverly and do constitute an important part in Surya's growth. But inspite of that, they feel cinematic due to their very nature and so they feel alien to the movie.

Gautham really needs to delegate the script-writing to someone who is more in tune with the characters in his movie. Considering that its Gautham who shaped those characters, that may sound a little strange but the problem is that he employs dialogs that he is familiar with and probably uses but they don't fit the characters or settings. While its the characters saying all those things on the screen, its Gautham we hear talking. So it sounds rather incongruent when we hear a middle-class man in the 70s address his son as "kiddo" or the same man's wife speak spontaneously in English when her husband has just coughed up blood in the bathroom. This was a problem in Gautham's older movies too but its more pronounced here since the story is more emotional. There are some genuinely effective lines that are heartfelt(like a father's desire to mend his son's fate), funny(like Surya's question to Sameera about her confidence in taking the next step in her career) and natural(like Divya revealing her feelings to Surya) but these are the exceptions rather than the rules.

Surya carries the movie on his shoulders and shows himself to be fully capable of that difficult task. He is able to slip easily into all the stages of both the characters and gets the body language and the expressions just right for all of them. Simran looks old, especially when she tries to pass off as a college girl, but proves to be the perfect foil for Surya once they grow old. Sameera Reddy grows on us by virtue of her character while Divya doesn't show much variety from her previous roles. Harris Jayaraj once again comes up with a fantastic album that offers a lot of variety. Adiye Kolludhe... is the pick of the numbers with some light but energetic choreography and wonderful locales. Mundhinam Paarthene... is a great number but its modern sound is also one of the reasons for the 60s segment not being too convincing. Ethi Ethi... features superb lyrics and some uninhibited by Surya.

Just got back from the theatre after watching the movie. I really agree with your review, the movie works very well at the macro level. 2 things that didn't work for me in the movie are: the dialogues - it are jarring & Gautam needs a better dialogue writer for sure, and the sister character - while Surya seems to go through a lot in his life, nothing seems to happen in his sister's life... weird.

Nice review, BB!

Going by your Words Gautham must surely read Sujatha's Thirai Kathai Ezhuthuvathu eppadi?

Probably he's waiting for an English Translation.

Dear Gautham:

I know you read Blogs. I just want to remind you of the Golden Rule "If you can show don't Tell".

Dialogues like "I am in Love with you" and "Just do What your heart says" are quite Superfluous to the Context!

Maniratnam and Shankar Delegated Writing to Sujatha and it helped them big time.

Writers are more capable of developing a Character better than Directors.

Thank you.

Anon :)

I saw it today and am glad I did because Gautham has decided to delete a few scenes at the producer's request. He doesn't like it thought and says that is really is not good for the movie (which I agree) but I think it had to be done. I personally loved the movie. There were very few aspects of it that did not work out for me (most of which you have mentioned yourself) but I could not get myself to think about it too much.

The main relationship of the Father-Son was brilliantly depicted in my opinion and that is what I loved. That aspect of the movie I could relate with. I expect most sons rather than daughters to find this movie better at realizing just how much their life has been influenced by their fathers. I also agree with your analogy that TT (which I have not yet seen) concentrated on the father's life and this one concentrated on the son which I thought served better at portraying the influence of dad on son's life. And after quite some time a tamil movie truly brought lumps in my throat in quite a few scenes. You have already mentioned the end of the Sameera-Surya romance which was very good. And quite a few scenes in the second half did the same.

Surya's acting was spot on for the movie. You have already mentioned it and it was really a tour-de-force performance and he carried the movie on his shoulders with ease. I thought some of the makeup for older Surya was a bit off in some scenes but that cannot be said of Surya's body language and dialogue delivery which served very well. I was thinking that he might have studied a bit of the older Kamal's acting from Naayagan to use as an inspiration for VA because I could find certain similarities in Surya's body language inspired by that awesome performance.

The sad thing is that I don't expect it to become a hit here in TN (at least not a blockbuster). Many people (as anon said) exiting the theatre did not think too well of the film (length and a lot of sentiments) and I expect it to be the same in most B and C centers. I guess that is the nature of today's audience though.

VA is my favorite movie of the year so far and Subramaniyapuram comes a very close second. And I know I am being partial to Surya here but I can't help it :)

Balaji Sivaraman

Should go down as a classic in my opinions. Doesn't live up to Forrst Gump or Charcter but will live long.

Srivatsan, got to disagree with you, Thavamai was torture at times with Cheran, who is a poor man's SJ Suryaah. and RTS wasn't directed by Cheran either.

I loved VA, great film making, acting, music etc. Balaji, did you catch Gautham's Hitchcock-esque cameo? And who was the artiste who portrayed the guy at the airport?

My feeling as i walked out was that gautam has made a honest movie.

The first half was very good. BB, you have made a number of good points and I can relate to a lot of those. Most important among them being the 60's feel during the Surya-Simran romance. I believe that it was intentional though. Meant to be fun and it definitely was. My problem with the movie (not that I disliked it) was that the movie did not have a story to tell beyond a certain point. Everything came across as a filler to somehow get the movie to a closure. As well as the action was choreographed, it did not manage to bring out the pain that Surya was going thro' because of his father's demise. Songs were well picturzed. I totally agree with you when you speak of the dialogues. Its important that they be natural but at the same time also be realistic. Too much English (he did justify it by providing some reasons for it by making both of them well educated, forward looking and ones that listen to Hindi songs quite a bit).

Surya was a revelation. His body language was dead on. The best being the one where he speaks to his son about positive energy

Overall, I would definitely watch this movie once... for rathnavelu, gautam's conviction and surya

3a8082e126