I doubt this browsing issue has anything to do with
'random_page_cost'... Why on earth would it? This is a PostgreSQL
setting, to which the ESRI software is essentially completely
oblivious.
The ESRI software just sits on top of this PostgreSQL
infrastructure, it essentially doesn't do anything different than
QGIS does, just watch the SQL statements coming in in PgAdmin.
I have been running ArcMap and latest ArcGIS Pro versions against
up to PostgreSQL 13 / PostGIS 3.1 mostly fine using ArcGIS "Query
Layers", including browsing data from the catalogs in ArcMap and
Pro, with a postgresql config optimized for SSD (both run against
SATA and NVMe raid), and an OpenStreetMap "planet" size database
on an HPZ840 dual CPU (S2) workstation that I managed to recently
acquire second hand from a refurbished hardware supplier.
Yes, I have a few bug cases open at ESRI support, including one related to a very specific serious performance issue of one of the geoprocessing tools, but none of that related to 'random_page_cost'. Also, as soon as you start upgrading the technical challenges to OpenStreetMap "planet" size databases, ArcGIS certainly isn't the only software out there running into issues here and there, QGIS does too, as well as many other software packages. Handling > 500M record tables, just requires thought, whatever toolbox you happen to open...
Marco
Brian,
Very interesting observations. I was actually wondering about this same type of scenario recently, A lot of the limits applied on the ESRI side end up being some sort of default setting that can be handled in some form, the biggest piece is finding the setting(s), the next is having control over trying to mitigate them . . .
The newest version (400) of the AutoCAD extension for ESRI allows editing for example but with a bunch of predefined settings that need to be tweaked to make it work effectively. Not exactly the same as editing in Postgres, but similar, so I’m sure there is a path to pursue here.
Bobb
From:
postgis-users <postgis-us...@lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Brian Wilson <br...@wildsong.biz>
Reply-To: PostGIS Discussion <postgi...@lists.osgeo.org>
Date: Monday, May 24, 2021 at 11:32 PM
To: PostGIS Discussion <postgi...@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Does ArcGIS 2.7 Pro work with PostgreSQL 13 / PostGIS 3.1
|
Think Before You Click: This email originated outside our organization. |
Brian,
Also, forgot this little tidbit that we (I?) discovered a while back, don’t even know if it’s a limitation anymore, but ESRI won’t allow much of anything edit-wise against the default database name (postgres) stating that it thinks this is a System database. Have you tried using a different database name, something other than “postgres” for connecting, and to edit? I didn’t pursue things after discovering this other than trying to set up a database alias to postgres, but this didn’t work the way I was expecting it to. It seems like a silly limit though, since we’ve been using the postgres database for our data for over a decade?? With no problems.
Anyway, some food for thought.