In addition to that "keep me signed in" box on the sign in page, there is another deep within the Account Site Preferences -- it might be worth checking that box (or unchecking, saving, signing out, signing back in and then checking the box and saving again):
One benefit of installing Chrome Beta is that it installs in parallel to your existing Chrome browser, but does not share any files, so you can keep your old browser while trying out the Beta version. If that works for you, you can import your bookmarks.
@skittlebrau742 Haven't reinstalled Chrome yet. Did notice that it was signing me out of Netflix after each episode I watch so I changed to an incognito window for Netflix as well. No more signout problems there. Also notice that it never signs me out of Yahoo. Whatever the problem is, it is not ebay.
What shocks me is how brazen he was. I mean signing purchase orders and insisting to handle the installations themselves, wouldn't it just be an eventuality before this caught up with him? And 41 devices at that?
Perhaps the switches were the same model that was already in the wiring closet - if you're replacing switches with the same model, they can look the same so no one's the wiser. As for why they're replaced, who knows. Blown ports perhaps
Perhaps they where supposed to be upgraded capacity, faster uplinks (10 Gig), gig-distribution ports. In which case the old 2900s will still work just fine, until somebody starts trying to stream Netflix on too many screens or the access to the Porn stash on the government run server access gets too slow.
Now looking at EBay itself, talk about a law enforcement data mine, just process the data of everything up for sale, look for low count, high price items and then calculate the probability outcome of that person coming by that device legitimately, especially repeat sales, after a few of flags get lit up for repeat sales, start an investigation.
Now the real tough question, is EBay consciously aiding and abetting the selling of illegally obtained items upon a mass scale and what legally needs to be done to stop this. EBay should pay a penalty for every illegal obtained item sold on EBay, considering the scale of the crime they are actively facilitating. EBay the planets fence for stolen items, that shite needs to stop.
How the fuck does Ebay get away with keeping it's piece of the action of stolen goods. Why the fuck did the government not go back to EBay and say, you fuckers that percentage you took, you owe it to us, plus penalties and plus interests (they were receiving proceeds from stolen goods they did not bother to properly vet before aiding the illegal transaction.
Every time EBay gets caught in fencing stolen goods, they should pay back their percentage of the take at the very least and also they should pay a penalty for allowing a criminal transaction. Makes it difficult for them to do business, so fucking what, how about the victims of all the stolen shit EBay sells and their difficulties whilst EBay criminally takes a percentage of stolen goods.
Dozy government, why the fuck have you not recovered the 10% EBay stole for allowing the sale of stolen goods, why the fucking hell do Ebay get to keep it without any penalty, mind you something like $34,500 easy stolen money for EBay, wait it's not, they have to pay it back, dozy fucking government.
3850 is a fairly high end L3 switch. Stackable and with lots of modules available for 10G and 40G fiber. It's not something end users will plug into, more likely used for distribution to other switches, or maybe busy servers.
When our network group has to replace switches it does so either over a weekend or after hours. In the case of after hours, the new switches are already configured and installed. It's just a matter of plugging them in and verifying everything is working. These are switches at one site only.
We have several thousand users who are notified in advance when the replacement will take place and as far as I know, no one has complained about lack of robustness. Even though this criminal was an idiot, if he used
We have several thousand users who are notified in advance when the replacement will take place and as far as I know, no one has complained about lack of robustness. Even though this criminal was an idiot, if he used a similar process, it's doubtful anyone noticed anything.
Sure. It's a bit of a difference between telling your co-workers "no worries I'll just will replace it" and having a change control event potentially affecting thousands of users. I use the same process as you, except it's pretty much guaranteed there will be something behind that 3850 that is more than 5x9 weekdays and someone is likely to notice. I wish I could do it so nobody noticed. Would save a lot of bureaucracy.
Ive heard of worse. Before the days of ebay, a security company got busted ripping off the us postal offices. The guy would buy the cctv equipment and cameras, and then later just before installation they would get /stolen/ from the storage room onsite. The us postal inspectors started investigating and realized that the us government had bought the same cameras more than once for different installations. Literally the same cameras, as the serial numbers on the purchase orders were the same. So they setup a
Though given taxpayers paid for it, most governments have their own auction site for surplus goods where they often sell these things. Taxpayers (you and I) paid for it, so it's really not fair to have someone else benefit, so the surplus sites are set up to recover what
Yes - as an employee at a similar sized county government as Horry, I can say we have a "surplus sale" where essentially anything that was expensive enough to have an asset tag will be sold at the end of its service life. Computers, switches, office furniture, etc. Some of it is just older and works fine - some of it has been used very hard for many years and would truly be better off disposed of but policies require it to go to the surplus sale.
Its not like the cisco gear on ebay lists their serial numbers. Either A) he screwed up and did not blurr out his report of # show ver
Or B) he did not blurr out the serial numbers of the pics he took. He should have used stock photos.
Besides its not the hardware that makes these things expensive as it is the software. Without a smart-net contract on the unit, you cannot download firmware. And that smart-net is only extended to the first buyer, not used gear, and it costs annually to maintain.
I've only been in SC once... I cannot say I noticed anything I would have considered even a marginally viable approximation of a hooker, but I wasn't there looking for them either. HOWEVER, based on the generally available base population from which hookers have traditionally come, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't be anything to look at...
All they are is ARM processors and Broadcom chipsets purchased from a few Chinese vendors. Cumulus demonstrates their OS running on some of these switches, the Huawei knockoffs, the HP and even though some Cisco gear that was never intended to run a third party OS.
When cisco aquired linksys, I had some idiot try to tell me it meant linksys was going to get really good. I tried to explain that if BMW were to acquire Yugo, it in no way means you are getting BMW luxury and performance at Yugo pricing. It just means BMW wants to make more money by selling shit cars to poor people.
What is actually meant is that you got a Fiat built in Yugoslavia with even a lower build quality and dependability than even a branded Fiat. Amazing they even were able to test dive them before they broke.
I'm pretty sure you're thinking of the SG200-08, which I think actually *was* a rebadged Linksys switch. The bigger versions in that line (e.g. the SG200-26) are unrelated hardware, and are somewhere in between. It was designed by a different team (and runs an entirely different OS) than the bigger switches, but I don't think the Linksys team had anything to do with it.
90f70e40cf