--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pollster-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pollster-user...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pollste...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pollster-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pollster-users/7c4cf85a-3337-4aa8-b7ca-ac1cd83ccb55%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Thanks.It broke my model since I've been filtering questions by taking the one that has the most responses given that it has at least Trump and Clinton (so it prefers Trump/Clinton/Johnson to Trump/Clinton, for example.) Previously, all questions did "relate" to the chart in that the '2016-arizona-president-trump-vs-clinton' chart only had questions about Arizona that included Trump and Clinton.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pollster-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pollster-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pollster-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pollster-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pollster-users/106a22bd-a0c2-4d54-a287-fe1c9cff205f%40googlegroups.com.
Hi,I'm in charge of the Pollster site, and I would just like to point out that we are providing the data for free. Adam has been very kind to help with your code. Our obligation is to HuffPost readers first and foremost. We provide the data as a secondary service and try to be very accommodating -- but we cannot anticipate every problem for users. We have to do what works on our end.Thanks,Natalie
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:52 PM, rgo <ost...@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, and topic=2016-president.No offense about the change. Though I don't quite with your sentiment that "we can't predict the assumptions our users will make..." I strongly believe that it's the job of the API documentation to make this unambiguous.
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 5:47:57 PM UTC-4, adam.hooper wrote:On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:37 PM rgo <ost...@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks.It broke my model since I've been filtering questions by taking the one that has the most responses given that it has at least Trump and Clinton (so it prefers Trump/Clinton/Johnson to Trump/Clinton, for example.) Previously, all questions did "relate" to the chart in that the '2016-arizona-president-trump-vs-clinton' chart only had questions about Arizona that included Trump and Clinton.Ah, my guess was close.I hope you don't take offense at this "change". We can't predict the assumptions our users will make about the data our API returns -- and indeed, in this case, that assumption was incorrect.And perhaps I can spot another incorrect assumption. Did you know that some polls that include Johnson don't appear on the 2016-arizona-president-trump-vs-clinton chart?Assuming you want those poll responses, too, you should be using the API like this:
1. Download all polls for 2016-arizona-president-trump-vs-clinton-vs-johnson. Maintain a Set of all the poll IDs you've seen, and extract the relevant poll questions (filtering by question.chart).2. Download all polls for 2016-arizona-president-trump-vs-clinton. Filter out all the poll IDs you've seen (from the Set in step 1), and extract the relevant poll questions (filtering by question.chart).Enjoy life,Adam
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pollster-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pollster-user...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pollste...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pollster-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pollster-users/106a22bd-a0c2-4d54-a287-fe1c9cff205f%40googlegroups.com.