Re: U.S. COURT SUMMONS CONGRESS PARTY ON 1984 ANTI-SIKH POGROM
library101
Drooling Bats Claiming Genocide Against Sikhs in Bharat in 1984 ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The compliant against Congress alleges that in November 1984 the
> "organised killing" of Sikhs took place only in States where Congress
> was in power, according to SFJ legal advisor Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.
>
> According to the Government of India s record, a total of 3296 Sikhs
> were killed while a total of 35,535 claims for deaths and injuries
> were received throughout India, he said.
I do not recall any such mass genocide against Sikhs in Bharat at the
time. Somebody would have done something if people got murdered in
such large numbers.
No population can survive such mass murders and go on as if nothing is
wrong.
Something seems to be 'fishy' in these accusations.
There were riots in Bharat following the assassination of the Prime
Minister by her 'trusted' Sikh guard who shot her point blank using
his rifle or weapon right in her office. That is a Drooling Bat case,
if I ever heard of one. She had apparently refused to go against her
Sikh guard after being advised of some security violation of
associating with foreign secret services or something like that. The
foreign secret agency had apparently offered to take care of his
family if something happened to him (?).
I did not hear of such large scale killings of Sikhs over there at the
time. There were riots, I heard of some violent incidents happening in
the town where I was; but, I did not hear of any killings (not at all
any hundreds or thousands, etc.). I do not know how to believe these
kinds of stories without getting to the real facts on the ground.
Are we basing the number of those 'killed' based upon something
obtained from the Air ? Were these people transported to Canada or USA
where they continue to live now under refugee status ?
What is going on ?
Please report the real facts from the ground in Bharat. We cannot go
by such 'crazy' reports.
< Bharat ain't no World War II concentration camp for Sikhs. The
current Prime Minister is a Sikh - Dr. MS. Sikhs are all over the
place in all kinds of roles in Government and elsewhere. They help run
affairs over there as long as they don't exhibit too much Drooling Bat
behavior.
They are just making a fool of themselves, I believe, by engaging in
Court Cases like this !
I simply cannot believe this ! >
- HSN.
------------------------------------------------------
On Mar 3, 9:42 am, use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr.
Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> US court summons Congress party on 1984 anti-Sikh pogrom
>
> IANS
> The Pioneer
> Thursday, March 3, 2011
>
> New York - A US court has issued summons to India s Congress party to
> answer charges of "conspiring, aiding, abetting and carrying out
> organised attacks on Sikh population of India in November 1984."
>
> The US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued
> the summons on Tuesday in a class action law suit filed by Sikhs For
> Justice (SFJ), a US based community group along with several Sikh
> survivors of the 1984 attacks.
>
> The compliant against Congress alleges that in November 1984 the
> "organised killing" of Sikhs took place only in States where Congress
> was in power, according to SFJ legal advisor Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.
>
> According to the Government of India s record, a total of 3296 Sikhs
> were killed while a total of 35,535 claims for deaths and injuries
> were received throughout India, he said.
>
> But "The gravity, scale and specially the organised nature of these
> attacks was concealed by the Indian Government s portraying them as
> November 1984 anti-Sikh Riots of Delhi," Pannun said.
>
> These attacks were neither 'riots nor were they confined to Delhi
> alone. In fact, during November 1984, Sikhs were attacked in 18
> States and more than 100 cities of India in an identical manner and
> the attackers were led by Congress (I) leaders, the complaint
> alleged.
>
> Indian National Congress, the political party in power then and now,
> committed the crime of Genocide against Sikhs as defined in Article 2
> of UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of
> Genocide, 1948, it said.
>
> The Government of India, by painting the attacks on Sikhs in November
> 1984 as "riots" instead of "Genocide" and by failing to punish the
> leaders of Congress (I), violated its duties under Article 1 the
> Genocide Convention, Pannun said.
>
> Seeking relief under Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA) and Torture Victim
> Protection Act (TVPA) is motivated by an interest in seeking some
> form of justice for the victims of November 1984 Sikh Genocide, he
> said.
>
> It will raise awareness to the international community regarding
> denial of justice to the victims and is a means of holding parties in
> power accountable for their gross violations of human rights -- while
> also offering the potential to deter future abuses, Pannun said.
>
> The SFJ complaint also refers to the February 2011 discovery of "mass
> grave" of Sikhs who were killed in November 1984 in Haryana.
>
> http://dailypioneer.com/321519/US-court-summons-Congress-party-on-198...
>
> More at:http://www.dailypioneer.com
>
> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> Om Shanti
>
> o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
> purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
> have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
> poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
> fair use of copyrighted works.
> o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
> e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
> not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
>
> FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
> which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
> owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
> understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
> democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
> that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
> provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
> 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
> profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
> information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
> subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
> go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
> your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
> copyright owner.
>
> Since newsgroup posts are being removed
> by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
> this post may be reposted several times.