Why we need a new investigation of the mass murder on 9/11.
3 views
Skip to first unread message
DickMcManus
May 9, 2012, 3:34:11 AM5/9/12
to Politics and Electoral Reform Working Group
Why we need a new investigation of the mass murder on 9/11.
Here is the science that points to the truth of 9/11.
Microscopic chips of nano-thermate, an explosive chemical compound
that is twice as powerful a high explosive, were found in the dust. It
can melt and cut steel, And this compound was developed a few years
prior to Sept. 11, 2001 by the Lawrence Livermore Labs for the US
Department of Defense. Four random samples of it were found in the
dust. We need to look for more random samples people collected as
souvenirs after the collapse.
Saying it was the cause of the controlled demotion goes too far
outside the main issue of it being found in the dust. It should not
have been found there.
Microscopic iron or steel spheres were found in the dust. These
spheres could only have gotten into the dust from iron or steel that
was boiled and it vaporized into the air, cooling into spheres due to
air pressure. It takes extremely not fires to boil steel.
One to two inch thick steel beams in the wreckage were found reduce
but sections of it were razor sharp and paper thin. This had to be due
to the vaporizing of the steel. In other words, the steel beam got so
hot the steel boiled into a vapor. Furthermore, this paper thin steel
had the element sulfur frozen in between the molecules of iron. These
sulfur molecules should not have been in the steel. Therefore, some
chemical reaction occurred to mix the sulfur into the liquid (melting)
steel and as the steel cooled, the sulfur molecules were trapped into
the steel. When thermate is ignited in order to melt steel, one of the
byproduct is sulfur.
FEMA documented the “inter granular melting, rapid oxidation, and
sulfidation” of the steel members (beams)in Appendix C of their May
2002 Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) Report, yet offered
no explanation for this phenomena which required temperatures far in
excess of that which office fires or jet fuel could have provided.
Professor Jonathan Barnett wrote. "No clear explanation for the source
of the sulfur has been identified."
Professor Jones points to Thermate, a chemical compound made up of two
percent sulfur, as the most likely culprit. The oxidation and
sulfidation of the steel requires the oxygen and sulfur being
"intimately in contact with the metal at high temperature," Jones
said.
http://911expertsspeakout.org/9-11-evidence/
Prior to 9/11, no high rise building has collapsed due to fire.
Here is a very good U-tube animation showing the 47 core columns of
the Twin Towers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ11i6fi7KQ
You need to watch this to understand why over 1,600 architectural and
engineering professionals say the World Trade Center buildings
collapsed due to a controlled demotion – aka due to high explosives.
What is important to note about these massive core columns, is that
they were four inches thick at the base (first floor) and
progressively got thinner near the tops of the Twin Towers, to a
thickness of 1/4th inch thick. The outside dimensions of 36 inches by
16 inches. Other of these core columns had larger dimensions that
measured 52 inches by 22 inches.
What most people who are not architectural and engineering
professionals don’t understand how much heat and oxygen is required to
cause such steel beams to get red hot and soften or lose their
strength and how long the heat has to be in contact with the steel
column. They do not understand that each of these steel columns was
designed to carry twice their normal load. It fire weakened columns on
one side of the building, the columns on the other side could still
hold up the building. I have enclosed links to teach you about how to
melt iron.
Another issue is that there was not enough burnable hydrocarbon in the
furniture or plastic office equipment to heat the steel. If you want
to melt iron, it takes very large amounts of charcoal burning over a
long time in a furnace and with air forced or blown into the charcoal
to add oxygen so the fire burn hotter.
The melting point of typical structural steel is ~1510ºC (2750ºF).
The yellow material photographed dripping or streaming down from the
fire zone of the Twin Towers is most likely melted steel, as if
someone was cutting the steel with a blow torch.
Here is the temperature at which stuff burns to produce heat for fire.
Acrylics 560°
Nylons 424°-532°
Polycarbonate 580°
Cotton 250°
Polyesters 432°-488°
Polyethylene ld349°
Polyethylene hd349°
Polypropylene 570°
Polystyrene 488°-496°
Polyurethanes 416°
PVC435°-557°
Rubber 260°-316°
Jet fuel 600 F.
Another important issue is that a person was photographed standing in
the entry hole of one of the Towers. This proves that the steel beams
had cooled enough for this person to stand on. This is because fire
moves up and toward a new fuel source. When it runs out of fuel, it
burns out and the steel and concrete flooring cools off.
The easiest case to prove is the way WTC building 7 collapsed.
NIST was forced to change their theory as to why this building
collapsed, that is the pancake theory. They could not explain this,
and they did not give any other theory as to what happened, yet it is
there job to understand why this happened so that it does not happen
again.
For the first 2.5 seconds after the roof of WTC building 7 fell down
at free fall speed. That is roof of the building fell at the same
speed as if you dropped a baseball off the top a buildings and if fell
thru thin air. According to the laws of physics, all objects fall due
to the force of gravity and accelerate faster and faster until they
hit the ground. It does not matter if the object is a baseball or a
steel ball weighing ten times as much.
If fires weaken steel beams, in various sections of the building to
cause the collapse, this can not account for the nearly symmetrical
collapse straight down. And the total time it took for the whole
building to fall, was just slightly slower than freely falling thru
thin air.
World Trade Center building six?
At 10:05 am the south tower collapsed. The official story was that
WTC6 dust cloud was from the collapse.
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies119.htm
here is a photo of the south tower collapsing, and you can see the
darken sides of building six in the left side of this photo. The
darken side of WTC 6 had to be due to fire or an explosion.
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies120.htm
Hole in WTC6 has no debris pile in it, Most likely an explosion blew
all the wreckage to dust.
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies123.htm
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies121.htm
Here is a must see video made by a group,
CitizenInvestigationTeam.com.
Also note the data from the NTSB of the 757 descending flight at 530
knots is physically impossible as the alleged jet moved from 600 feet
in altitude to straight and level flight and into the first floor of
the Pentagon. So the NTSB data is false.
This video documents 10 to 13 eyewitnesses who state the 757 flew
NORTH of the CITCO gas station and therefore, a 757 flying on that
heading could not have hit the Pentagon, but flew near it and just
north of it.
http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html
At the following link you can view video tapes of the second 767
flying into the Twin Towers. The
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html
At least four of these video were analyzed by the below noted experts
and the videos depict the 767 flying faster than the engines of a 767
call push this jet thru the air. That maximum speed is about 300 to
350 mph.
The aerodynamic limitations of the Boeing 767-200 aircraft are such
that it would be unwise to exceed an indicated airspeed of 460 mph at
any altitude. These airspeeds at sea level is well above the maximum
operating speed of the Boeing 767-200 and therefore the pilots would
run the risk of either total structural failure or localized
structural failures, namely wing fairings breaking off, engine
cowlings breaking off, control surfaces breaking off or becoming
inoperative and handling difficulties. It appears from analysis of the
video photos just prior to UA 175 crashing into the south tower, that
someone has used video fakery.
There had to be more than one person or group responsible for the
forgery and / or manipulation of video tapes of flight UA175 moving at
Impossible Speeds.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology- 503 mph
British Royal Air Force- 575 mph
Federal Aviation Administration- 586 mph
National Institute of Standards and Tech.- 546 mph
Federal Emergency Management Agency- 590 mph
Why would people do this? Maybe it was to make it appear as if the
force of the jets (the momentum) was far more than it really was.
http://612ua.0catch.com/
Radar data that was released by the NTSB from flights AA 11 and
UA175,Boeing 767-200 jets that hit the Twin Towers is false. NTSB
radar data show that flight AA 11 flew into the WTC at 430 knots (495
mph) and flight UA 175 at 510 knots (587 mph ) both at very low
altitude where air is very dense.
Boeing Aircraft Corporation states the maximum speed of a 767-200 at
low altitudes (say 1,000 feet above sea level is 360 knots (414
mph).Why do they state this?It is because they have tested the design
of 767s and at test speeds of around 500 plus mph, the wings would be
torn off. Furthermore, the 767 jet engines are not powerful enough to
the airplane going 495 or 587 mph.
Therefore, we know radar data of the speed of AA 11 and UA 175 given
by NTSB is false.
People just do not understand how much training and experience it
takes to fly a 767 or 757. Experienced 767 and 757 pilots stated that
they could not hit the Twin Towers with the 9 mph cross wind blowing
that day or the Pentagon and at these NTSB claimed speeds. Some also
tried to do this in a flight simulation and could not do it.
Therefore, it was humanly impossible to fly these jets and hit those
buildings.
For more detail see:
http://vimeo.com/6679633
As a result of a FOIA request The NTSB provided, the raw data from
they claim was from American Airlines flight 77's Flight Data Recorder
(FDR). It is on a spread sheet similar to a Microsoft Excel document.
The first problem with this FDR information is that the NTSB did not
include the serial number of the FDR or the cockpit voice recorder.
They stated the no audio was recoverable from the cockpit voice
recorder. The FBI has refused to release these FDR serial numbers and
the serial number of all the four crashed airplane parts.
Dennis Cimino stated; “…two data fields being zeroed out. Without
those, there can... never be any linkage of the FDR to an 'N' (serial)
number in the F.A.A. registry, not because the 'N' number is in the AC
ID field, but the AC ID FIELD number is directly traceable to an N-
Number in the F.A.A. registry, and the FLEET ID shows which carrier
(airlines) it went to. “ All FDR serial numbers are recorded with the
FAA, on installation into an airplane.
Nobody flies with black boxes with that data zeroed out or missing.
Without this data in the CPM [Crash Protected Memory], in the
preamble, there can be no linkage to an aircraft N-Number.
I saw that on the first look.... the test person who extracted that
data should have seen the NO ACFT ID and NO FLEET ID and said; "oh,
this is such bullshit" and then asked his supervisor ….”
When a FDR is put into an airplane, the serial number of the aircraft
is loaded into the FDR. By the NTSB refusing to provide the serial
number of the FDR, there is no way to prove the flight data parameter
information actually came from AA flight 77. Of all major NTSB
investigation reports during the past 20 years, 9/11 was virtually the
only time NTSB did not disclose the serial numbers of the black boxes
(flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders).
Dennis Cimino analyzed the FDR material and found it suspicious. He is
a systems engineer who has worked for 33 years with flight data
recorders, flight management computers, aircraft electronic, SPH-2
RAVIR,video processing , radar, radar recorders, radar signal
propagation, and IFF ( friendly vs. foe= the ID code number that comes
up on the radar scope at the FAA aircraft control center).He is also
is a commercial pilot with some 2,000 hours of flight time.
Cimino states that FDRs are able to record data up till 0.3 to 0.5
seconds in a plane crash. Meaning the FDR is recording data till it is
ripped away from the wires collecting data and wires supplying
electric power to it. So it is possible data may have been recorded by
the FRD even as the 757 was smashing into the building, given that the
FDR is located in the rear of the jet.
The Excel spread sheet that NTSB disclosed noted that some of the data
parameters were unconfirmed of not working. This is not possible
because all parameters are stored in the solid state Crash Protective
Memory Module. If there were gaps in data, there would be missing data
for a give time period, not just a specified parameter or few
parameters.
NTSB is therefore, covering up flight data or they screwed up in print
up the Excel spread sheet. NTSB refused to answer question about this
missing data. It should be noted here that the Crash Protective Memory
Module and the Excel spread sheet and all other evidence that the NTSB
analyzed, was given to the FBI via a chain of custody procedure.
Given that it is impossible for only a few parameters to be missing,
the FBI needs to look into who tampered with the data.
It appears that some UNANIMOUS DISINFORMATION people have been saying
that FDRs have been known to have not recorded the last two to six
seconds prior to an airplane crash. THIS IS TOTAL BS used to explain
why the NTSB did not provide all the data in answer to the FOIA
request and deliberately deleted the data for those last seconds of AA
77 alleged crash into the Pentagon.
Crash Protective Memory Module are tested to withstand fires of 1,100
F. for hours and physical damage. They are virtually indestructible.
The whole FDR maybe damaged but the data is still recoverable from the
Crash Protective Memory Module.
Cimino also noted in his analysis of the FDR that it lost power and
then re-initialized itself (like starting up a computer after it was
shut down).This is a highly unusual thing for a FDR to do and this was
occurring thru out the flight. When this happens a warning tone goes
off to tell the pilot. The warning is also transmitted via radio to
airline maintenance people on the ground so that they immediately
replace this FDR and put in a new one before the jet is allowed to fly
again.
This happened 35 times during the flight of AA 77 (a gross
malfunction) and therefore, Cimino suspect someone faked all the data
on the Excel spreadsheet.“The data is not real,” he says.
These power failure in or to the FDR should also have been noted on
the CSB file (L-3 file), therefore there would have been all kinds of
jumps in the data so that an animation recreation would have been
impossible. Yet, the NTSB provided an animated re-creation of the
flight. In other words, any REAL animation based on the FDR data
should have shown great jumps in altitude, an animated jet flying
straight ahead and then it jumps sideways as in a turn, etc., etc. the
animated movements of the airplane.
The other major problem with the flight data has to do with the light
poles that were allegedly knocked down by the jet. Those moments the
wings hit the light poles would have been recorded on the Excel spread
sheet as changes in flight data.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2052484937239620900#
Another problem with the flight data recorder data is that the data
about the radio altimeter reading shows the aircraft flying at 460 to
480 knots (over 530 mph).This is impossible at sea level where the air
is dense. At these speeds the wings would have been torn off before
the 757 hits the Pentagon. Additionally, at these speeds the radio
altimeter is not capable of working, so its data on the Excel
spreadsheet is false or should be missing. The tracking capability of
the radio altimeter is 330 feet per second, or a little under 200
knots. It is used in landing the aircraft.
The FDR shows that flight AA 77 was flown by a very experienced 757
pilot. This can be easily observed by the FDR data. There is also the
question of why the alleged hijacker just did not fly the 757 into the
section of the Pentagon's accounting department which could not
account for $2.2 trillion, instead of just aiming for the center of
the Pentagon or right into the White House.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Making iron from Iron ore and charcoal and burning the charcoal in a
furnace by forcing air into the fire to get a hot fire of 900 degrees.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8AtgArVZfI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcLhCJfpO3M&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zwgI-pQ6kE&feature=related
to melt steel 1,500 C
heating a slab of steel for 3 hours at 1,200 C.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea_7Rnd8BTM&feature=related
coal is cooked at 1,100 degree into coke.
Mixed with iron ore limestone and heated with igniting the coke and
forcing air heated to about 1,250 C
Pure oxygen is blown into the vat of pig iron to make steel. And
heated 1,600 C
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&v=CfkppiIxztg&NR=1
Learn about the Bronze age. It lasted for about 1,000 yearsended in
800 BC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcLhCJfpO3M&feature=related
Here is the science that points to the truth of 9/11.
Microscopic chips of nano-thermate, an explosive chemical compound
that is twice as powerful a high explosive, were found in the dust. It
can melt and cut steel, And this compound was developed a few years
prior to Sept. 11, 2001 by the Lawrence Livermore Labs for the US
Department of Defense. Four random samples of it were found in the
dust. We need to look for more random samples people collected as
souvenirs after the collapse.
Saying it was the cause of the controlled demotion goes too far
outside the main issue of it being found in the dust. It should not
have been found there.
Microscopic iron or steel spheres were found in the dust. These
spheres could only have gotten into the dust from iron or steel that
was boiled and it vaporized into the air, cooling into spheres due to
air pressure. It takes extremely not fires to boil steel.
One to two inch thick steel beams in the wreckage were found reduce
but sections of it were razor sharp and paper thin. This had to be due
to the vaporizing of the steel. In other words, the steel beam got so
hot the steel boiled into a vapor. Furthermore, this paper thin steel
had the element sulfur frozen in between the molecules of iron. These
sulfur molecules should not have been in the steel. Therefore, some
chemical reaction occurred to mix the sulfur into the liquid (melting)
steel and as the steel cooled, the sulfur molecules were trapped into
the steel. When thermate is ignited in order to melt steel, one of the
byproduct is sulfur.
FEMA documented the “inter granular melting, rapid oxidation, and
sulfidation” of the steel members (beams)in Appendix C of their May
2002 Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) Report, yet offered
no explanation for this phenomena which required temperatures far in
excess of that which office fires or jet fuel could have provided.
Professor Jonathan Barnett wrote. "No clear explanation for the source
of the sulfur has been identified."
Professor Jones points to Thermate, a chemical compound made up of two
percent sulfur, as the most likely culprit. The oxidation and
sulfidation of the steel requires the oxygen and sulfur being
"intimately in contact with the metal at high temperature," Jones
said.
http://911expertsspeakout.org/9-11-evidence/
Prior to 9/11, no high rise building has collapsed due to fire.
Here is a very good U-tube animation showing the 47 core columns of
the Twin Towers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ11i6fi7KQ
You need to watch this to understand why over 1,600 architectural and
engineering professionals say the World Trade Center buildings
collapsed due to a controlled demotion – aka due to high explosives.
What is important to note about these massive core columns, is that
they were four inches thick at the base (first floor) and
progressively got thinner near the tops of the Twin Towers, to a
thickness of 1/4th inch thick. The outside dimensions of 36 inches by
16 inches. Other of these core columns had larger dimensions that
measured 52 inches by 22 inches.
What most people who are not architectural and engineering
professionals don’t understand how much heat and oxygen is required to
cause such steel beams to get red hot and soften or lose their
strength and how long the heat has to be in contact with the steel
column. They do not understand that each of these steel columns was
designed to carry twice their normal load. It fire weakened columns on
one side of the building, the columns on the other side could still
hold up the building. I have enclosed links to teach you about how to
melt iron.
Another issue is that there was not enough burnable hydrocarbon in the
furniture or plastic office equipment to heat the steel. If you want
to melt iron, it takes very large amounts of charcoal burning over a
long time in a furnace and with air forced or blown into the charcoal
to add oxygen so the fire burn hotter.
The melting point of typical structural steel is ~1510ºC (2750ºF).
The yellow material photographed dripping or streaming down from the
fire zone of the Twin Towers is most likely melted steel, as if
someone was cutting the steel with a blow torch.
Here is the temperature at which stuff burns to produce heat for fire.
Acrylics 560°
Nylons 424°-532°
Polycarbonate 580°
Cotton 250°
Polyesters 432°-488°
Polyethylene ld349°
Polyethylene hd349°
Polypropylene 570°
Polystyrene 488°-496°
Polyurethanes 416°
PVC435°-557°
Rubber 260°-316°
Jet fuel 600 F.
Another important issue is that a person was photographed standing in
the entry hole of one of the Towers. This proves that the steel beams
had cooled enough for this person to stand on. This is because fire
moves up and toward a new fuel source. When it runs out of fuel, it
burns out and the steel and concrete flooring cools off.
The easiest case to prove is the way WTC building 7 collapsed.
NIST was forced to change their theory as to why this building
collapsed, that is the pancake theory. They could not explain this,
and they did not give any other theory as to what happened, yet it is
there job to understand why this happened so that it does not happen
again.
For the first 2.5 seconds after the roof of WTC building 7 fell down
at free fall speed. That is roof of the building fell at the same
speed as if you dropped a baseball off the top a buildings and if fell
thru thin air. According to the laws of physics, all objects fall due
to the force of gravity and accelerate faster and faster until they
hit the ground. It does not matter if the object is a baseball or a
steel ball weighing ten times as much.
If fires weaken steel beams, in various sections of the building to
cause the collapse, this can not account for the nearly symmetrical
collapse straight down. And the total time it took for the whole
building to fall, was just slightly slower than freely falling thru
thin air.
World Trade Center building six?
At 10:05 am the south tower collapsed. The official story was that
WTC6 dust cloud was from the collapse.
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies119.htm
here is a photo of the south tower collapsing, and you can see the
darken sides of building six in the left side of this photo. The
darken side of WTC 6 had to be due to fire or an explosion.
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies120.htm
Hole in WTC6 has no debris pile in it, Most likely an explosion blew
all the wreckage to dust.
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies123.htm
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies121.htm
Here is a must see video made by a group,
CitizenInvestigationTeam.com.
Also note the data from the NTSB of the 757 descending flight at 530
knots is physically impossible as the alleged jet moved from 600 feet
in altitude to straight and level flight and into the first floor of
the Pentagon. So the NTSB data is false.
This video documents 10 to 13 eyewitnesses who state the 757 flew
NORTH of the CITCO gas station and therefore, a 757 flying on that
heading could not have hit the Pentagon, but flew near it and just
north of it.
http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html
At the following link you can view video tapes of the second 767
flying into the Twin Towers. The
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html
At least four of these video were analyzed by the below noted experts
and the videos depict the 767 flying faster than the engines of a 767
call push this jet thru the air. That maximum speed is about 300 to
350 mph.
The aerodynamic limitations of the Boeing 767-200 aircraft are such
that it would be unwise to exceed an indicated airspeed of 460 mph at
any altitude. These airspeeds at sea level is well above the maximum
operating speed of the Boeing 767-200 and therefore the pilots would
run the risk of either total structural failure or localized
structural failures, namely wing fairings breaking off, engine
cowlings breaking off, control surfaces breaking off or becoming
inoperative and handling difficulties. It appears from analysis of the
video photos just prior to UA 175 crashing into the south tower, that
someone has used video fakery.
There had to be more than one person or group responsible for the
forgery and / or manipulation of video tapes of flight UA175 moving at
Impossible Speeds.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology- 503 mph
British Royal Air Force- 575 mph
Federal Aviation Administration- 586 mph
National Institute of Standards and Tech.- 546 mph
Federal Emergency Management Agency- 590 mph
Why would people do this? Maybe it was to make it appear as if the
force of the jets (the momentum) was far more than it really was.
http://612ua.0catch.com/
Radar data that was released by the NTSB from flights AA 11 and
UA175,Boeing 767-200 jets that hit the Twin Towers is false. NTSB
radar data show that flight AA 11 flew into the WTC at 430 knots (495
mph) and flight UA 175 at 510 knots (587 mph ) both at very low
altitude where air is very dense.
Boeing Aircraft Corporation states the maximum speed of a 767-200 at
low altitudes (say 1,000 feet above sea level is 360 knots (414
mph).Why do they state this?It is because they have tested the design
of 767s and at test speeds of around 500 plus mph, the wings would be
torn off. Furthermore, the 767 jet engines are not powerful enough to
the airplane going 495 or 587 mph.
Therefore, we know radar data of the speed of AA 11 and UA 175 given
by NTSB is false.
People just do not understand how much training and experience it
takes to fly a 767 or 757. Experienced 767 and 757 pilots stated that
they could not hit the Twin Towers with the 9 mph cross wind blowing
that day or the Pentagon and at these NTSB claimed speeds. Some also
tried to do this in a flight simulation and could not do it.
Therefore, it was humanly impossible to fly these jets and hit those
buildings.
For more detail see:
http://vimeo.com/6679633
As a result of a FOIA request The NTSB provided, the raw data from
they claim was from American Airlines flight 77's Flight Data Recorder
(FDR). It is on a spread sheet similar to a Microsoft Excel document.
The first problem with this FDR information is that the NTSB did not
include the serial number of the FDR or the cockpit voice recorder.
They stated the no audio was recoverable from the cockpit voice
recorder. The FBI has refused to release these FDR serial numbers and
the serial number of all the four crashed airplane parts.
Dennis Cimino stated; “…two data fields being zeroed out. Without
those, there can... never be any linkage of the FDR to an 'N' (serial)
number in the F.A.A. registry, not because the 'N' number is in the AC
ID field, but the AC ID FIELD number is directly traceable to an N-
Number in the F.A.A. registry, and the FLEET ID shows which carrier
(airlines) it went to. “ All FDR serial numbers are recorded with the
FAA, on installation into an airplane.
Nobody flies with black boxes with that data zeroed out or missing.
Without this data in the CPM [Crash Protected Memory], in the
preamble, there can be no linkage to an aircraft N-Number.
I saw that on the first look.... the test person who extracted that
data should have seen the NO ACFT ID and NO FLEET ID and said; "oh,
this is such bullshit" and then asked his supervisor ….”
When a FDR is put into an airplane, the serial number of the aircraft
is loaded into the FDR. By the NTSB refusing to provide the serial
number of the FDR, there is no way to prove the flight data parameter
information actually came from AA flight 77. Of all major NTSB
investigation reports during the past 20 years, 9/11 was virtually the
only time NTSB did not disclose the serial numbers of the black boxes
(flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders).
Dennis Cimino analyzed the FDR material and found it suspicious. He is
a systems engineer who has worked for 33 years with flight data
recorders, flight management computers, aircraft electronic, SPH-2
RAVIR,video processing , radar, radar recorders, radar signal
propagation, and IFF ( friendly vs. foe= the ID code number that comes
up on the radar scope at the FAA aircraft control center).He is also
is a commercial pilot with some 2,000 hours of flight time.
Cimino states that FDRs are able to record data up till 0.3 to 0.5
seconds in a plane crash. Meaning the FDR is recording data till it is
ripped away from the wires collecting data and wires supplying
electric power to it. So it is possible data may have been recorded by
the FRD even as the 757 was smashing into the building, given that the
FDR is located in the rear of the jet.
The Excel spread sheet that NTSB disclosed noted that some of the data
parameters were unconfirmed of not working. This is not possible
because all parameters are stored in the solid state Crash Protective
Memory Module. If there were gaps in data, there would be missing data
for a give time period, not just a specified parameter or few
parameters.
NTSB is therefore, covering up flight data or they screwed up in print
up the Excel spread sheet. NTSB refused to answer question about this
missing data. It should be noted here that the Crash Protective Memory
Module and the Excel spread sheet and all other evidence that the NTSB
analyzed, was given to the FBI via a chain of custody procedure.
Given that it is impossible for only a few parameters to be missing,
the FBI needs to look into who tampered with the data.
It appears that some UNANIMOUS DISINFORMATION people have been saying
that FDRs have been known to have not recorded the last two to six
seconds prior to an airplane crash. THIS IS TOTAL BS used to explain
why the NTSB did not provide all the data in answer to the FOIA
request and deliberately deleted the data for those last seconds of AA
77 alleged crash into the Pentagon.
Crash Protective Memory Module are tested to withstand fires of 1,100
F. for hours and physical damage. They are virtually indestructible.
The whole FDR maybe damaged but the data is still recoverable from the
Crash Protective Memory Module.
Cimino also noted in his analysis of the FDR that it lost power and
then re-initialized itself (like starting up a computer after it was
shut down).This is a highly unusual thing for a FDR to do and this was
occurring thru out the flight. When this happens a warning tone goes
off to tell the pilot. The warning is also transmitted via radio to
airline maintenance people on the ground so that they immediately
replace this FDR and put in a new one before the jet is allowed to fly
again.
This happened 35 times during the flight of AA 77 (a gross
malfunction) and therefore, Cimino suspect someone faked all the data
on the Excel spreadsheet.“The data is not real,” he says.
These power failure in or to the FDR should also have been noted on
the CSB file (L-3 file), therefore there would have been all kinds of
jumps in the data so that an animation recreation would have been
impossible. Yet, the NTSB provided an animated re-creation of the
flight. In other words, any REAL animation based on the FDR data
should have shown great jumps in altitude, an animated jet flying
straight ahead and then it jumps sideways as in a turn, etc., etc. the
animated movements of the airplane.
The other major problem with the flight data has to do with the light
poles that were allegedly knocked down by the jet. Those moments the
wings hit the light poles would have been recorded on the Excel spread
sheet as changes in flight data.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2052484937239620900#
Another problem with the flight data recorder data is that the data
about the radio altimeter reading shows the aircraft flying at 460 to
480 knots (over 530 mph).This is impossible at sea level where the air
is dense. At these speeds the wings would have been torn off before
the 757 hits the Pentagon. Additionally, at these speeds the radio
altimeter is not capable of working, so its data on the Excel
spreadsheet is false or should be missing. The tracking capability of
the radio altimeter is 330 feet per second, or a little under 200
knots. It is used in landing the aircraft.
The FDR shows that flight AA 77 was flown by a very experienced 757
pilot. This can be easily observed by the FDR data. There is also the
question of why the alleged hijacker just did not fly the 757 into the
section of the Pentagon's accounting department which could not
account for $2.2 trillion, instead of just aiming for the center of
the Pentagon or right into the White House.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Making iron from Iron ore and charcoal and burning the charcoal in a
furnace by forcing air into the fire to get a hot fire of 900 degrees.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8AtgArVZfI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcLhCJfpO3M&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zwgI-pQ6kE&feature=related
to melt steel 1,500 C
heating a slab of steel for 3 hours at 1,200 C.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea_7Rnd8BTM&feature=related
coal is cooked at 1,100 degree into coke.
Mixed with iron ore limestone and heated with igniting the coke and
forcing air heated to about 1,250 C
Pure oxygen is blown into the vat of pig iron to make steel. And
heated 1,600 C
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&v=CfkppiIxztg&NR=1
Learn about the Bronze age. It lasted for about 1,000 yearsended in
800 BC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcLhCJfpO3M&feature=related
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages