In this broader discussion of our many
differences, it's a no-brainer that we need to put ourselves in the other guys
shoes ... toe in, toe out ... to see if the water is as chilling as it's touted
to be. Here, on the Left, we are accused of being too soft, too tepid, too
undisciplined, not tough enough on all the ills of the world. Pushovers, as it
were. The Hawks are screaming today, lead by wee Lindsey Graham (whom Bill Maher
gleefully references as John McCain's bitch) calling for more aggression and
leadership ... wah wah wah ... and that water is waaay too
hot.
Indeed, today I listened to just about every Sunday pundit from the
moderate to Right-leaning, talk about how Obama is asleep at the switch and how
America is virtually leaderless. If you suck up the Kool-aid on this level,
you'll agree with those who believe it's un-American not to keep the rest of the
world on a choker-chain, obedient to our might (makes right? Not!)
And yet, if you examine the numbers on most
progressive issues, you'll find that the populous at large wants less war, more
safety nets and government regulation, more dialogue and -- most definitely --
solutions to the many problems we suffer ... answers to which, should Obama lead
on them, will not be tolerated nor supported from the Right.
They want
more military solutions but won't fund military expansion. They want more
boarder control and answers to the dilemma that's put hundreds of thousands of
children in our care, but they won't fund immigrations needs. No matter what the
need, always the fault of this black president, it won't be funded so they can
continue to bitch, non-stop, about lack of leadership. It's just freekin'
tiresome!
This is a post containing two letters to those who will not
flex, about why they should -- and a MoveOn petition asking Hillary to flex on
GMO's. That last is especially worthwhile considering the recent decision by the
House Agriculture Committee that the American public is just too damned dumb to
understand the science (and necessity) behind modified foods.
John, I consider you a friend of mine. We've known one another for well
over 50 years. Our parents knew each other, were friends and neighbors in
Reading. Our family businesses were directly across the street from each other
for over 70 years. But John, what the hell are you doing?
You've got
nothing more pressing to do than sue a president who was elected twice by the
majority of voting Americans?
You say "the majority of Americans are
frustrated." I agree, but not with this president. They're frustrated with the
childishness of those purporting to serve all the American people.
The
majority of Republicans are frustrated. Sure, I get that. But everything
shouldn't come to a halt because you don't control the White House. By the way,
you better get used to that too. You won't get that back by appealing to Old
White Guys.
John, whatever time you've got left in Washington, roll-up
your sleeves and get Washington moving in the correct direction. Not this "we
block everything you want" and "you block everything we want"
mentality.
Now, how about a round of golf at Sharon Woods on Sunday? On
me. I'll need 2 a side.
Your pal, Mooch
Jerry Mouch, Wyoming
++
This Jew Can’t Support Israel
Ellen Davidson,
www.indypendent.org via
popularresistance.org
July 18th, 2014
http://www.popularresistance.org/this-jew-cant-support-israel/
Growing up in my Jewish family, it was a given that Jews supported
civil rights, opposed the Vietnam War and believed in education, science and
progress. This didn’t make it easy to be a teenager in a small working-class
town in central Pennsylvania, an area not known for either diversity or liberal
views at the time. Israel was a distant place where survivors of the brutal
European Holocaust struggled to live in peace, occasionally beset by terrorists
and attacking armies from the surrounding countries.
When I went to
college, naturally, I became active in the late-1970s campus movement for
divestment from South Africa. Somewhere along the line, I realized that Israel
was the only country in the world that violated the international arms embargo
on the apartheid state, and that Israel was on the wrong side of all the
struggles for freedom and national liberation I supported, that it backed
dictatorships in Guatemala, Chile, Brazil and elsewhere.
The more I
learned about Israel, the more I realized that what I had been taught growing up
was a lie. But I also discovered that, even in the progressive movements in the
1980s, the issue was contentious. I spent my twenties working at the Guardian
radical newsweekly, a paper that staunchly supported Palestinian rights;
periodically we would lose a significant segment of our readership due to our
alleged “anti-Semitism,” and we would receive occasional bomb threats from the
Jewish Defense League, a nasty organization whose members would physically
attack participants in pro-Palestine demonstrations.
This kneejerk
labeling of critics of Israel as “anti-Semitic” (or in my case, a “self-hating
Jew”) made me even more firm in my conviction that it was the special obligation
of U.S. Jews to stand against racism in Israel. As more of us demanded equal
rights for all in Israel/Palestine, it became harder to smear supporters of
Palestine as “anti-Semitic.” The needle on this debate has moved considerably
since the 1980s, when just to say the word “Palestinian” was considered
inflammatory, even in some left circles.
These days, as Israelis rampage
through the streets of Jerusalem calling for killing all Arabs and Gaza is once
again bombarded in a storm of collective punishment, the racist underpinnings of
the Jewish state become harder to ignore. This is drawing larger numbers of
people into pro-Palestinian protests on the streets of this
country.
Indeed, at a July 13 vigil I attended in Woodstock, New York,
there were many faces I had never seen before. But not everything has changed. A
hostile group of tourists walked by and began berating us for our stance. “You
should try talking to some Jews,” said one man. “We are Jews,” two of us
answered simultaneously. “Then you’re fucked up,” he snapped.
In the past
decade, I have made a point of traveling to Israel/Palestine, so that I can both
show my solidarity in person and bring back firsthand accounts of the conditions
in the occupied territories and within the formal borders of Israel. I have
never encountered anything but warm welcome from the Palestinians I
encountered.
When I return, every time I speak as a Jew of personally
seeing demolished Palestinian houses, military checkpoints, the concrete wall
separating communities from their farmland, the overcrowded refugee camps built
as temporary solutions 60 years ago, I like to think that it widens the crack
that has been opening up in the U.S. Jewish community, leaving just a little
more space for honest discussion of what is being done in our name.++
Hillary Clinton: It's time to dump Monsanto and support public
health, and regenerative, organic agriculture
Petition by Katherine
Paul, Organic Consumers Association
To be delivered to Hillary
Clinton
Petition Statement
Speaking at this
year's BIO International Convention, you reiterated your support for genetically
modified organisms (GMOs). You said the industry needs "a better vocabulary" to
change negative public perception about GMO agriculture. But mounting scientific
evidence says the public is right to be concerned about the impact of Monsanto's
GMO crops and food on the environment, public health and global warming. We
don't need a better vocabulary. We need leaders who will stand up to Monsanto.
As a mother, soon-to-be grandmother and potential future candidate for U.S.
president, I ask that you do what's right, not what the biotech industry
lobbyists want you to do.
There are currently 80,493 signatures. NEW
goal - We need 100,000 signatures!
Petition
Background
Hillary Clinton could be the next Democratic
presidential nominee. Do we really want someone in the White House who protects
Monsanto's profits at the expense of public health?
Scientists, medical
professionals and climate experts warn us that a food and agriculture system
built around poisons like Monsanto's Roundup and Dow's 2,4-D, a system that
promotes soy and corn monocultures instead of crop diversity, is unhealthy for
humans and the environment. Genetically engineered agriculture has failed. It
has created superweeds that require increasingly toxic poisons, and those
poisons are showing up in the blood, urine and breast milk of humans. The United
Nations last year issued a report entitled "Before It's Too Late," stating that
not only will genetically engineered crops not feed the world, as the biotech
industry claims, but they are a huge contributor to global warming.
Polls show that 93% of Americans want GMO labeling laws. Yet politicians
like Hillary Clinton, whose ties to the biotech industry run deep, continue to
pander to Monsanto. Even Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who claims that he is
pro-states' rights, has said he would not defend states' rights to label
GMOs.
The next leader of the U.S. needs to take a stand against huge
corporations that are devastating the environment and human health. If Hillary
Clinton is not that leader, consumers will look to candidates like Sen. Bernie
Sanders (I-VT), who has a proven track record of supporting states' rights to
label GMOs, and the transition to organic, sustainable, regenerative
agriculture.
Sign the petition here:
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/hillary-clinton-its-time
++
“I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have
the final word in reality. That is why right, temporarily defeated, is stronger
than evil triumphant.”
~ The Reverend Martin Luther King
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes.