Ms Office 2010 Professional Plus Activation Batch File
Suanne Forte
With this all you need to find is the office install ID. Or you could find the uninstall path in the C drive and run that with the batch file.Again I know its not Powershell but it at least gets the job done. I hope this helps!
Can you please show me how to run a script that I can monitor the success rate for machines that uninstalls office 2010. Then I want to run a modified setup.exe with an attached .msp file from the kbox to each machine. Please?
This first line uninstall Office 2010 and the second install Office 2016, All in one package. Please note the manually assigned path for the XML file. You will have run the install once to find the download folder. (use a commented out batch file to start, don't include the Office 2016 install, unless you want to wait for a 1.6gb office install to download).
I have looked deep for a solution but I have yet to find an answer.
Following this blog post ( -microsfot-office2019-project-2019-or-visio-2019-via-sda-or-sma) I attempted to get Microsoft office pro plus 2019 installed as a post install task. Using the Clientdrop feature, I've pointed it to a zip file of the setup.exe, the configuration XML file, the downloaded office files, and a bat file with the following code:
You'll see that it fails at that particular task. When I open up Command Prompt and search for that task ID, it does find it listed in the dir but when I open that particular folder, there are no files in that directory.
Change MSP name by the one you create. Also important point is the name of the directory you have to create on the pc should by exactly the same of the directory from where you have launch your setup.exe /admin otherwise it's won't work.
I have a home laptop and an office desktop. Both Windows 7/32bit
Office and home are close-by and both computers can see each other through LAN (as well as shared cloud space for when the laptop travels).
My home laptop is powerful enough to model but far less-so to render. The office desktop computer is more powerful overall plus uses GPU for Cycles rendering.
So I want to remotely have my office-desktop computer batch-render, but I want to instruct it to do so from home.
Your best bet is to use a Remote Desktop-like application. You can transfer the files to the cloud, then set up work on the other end. This is apparently not an uncommon way of getting this job done even in professional circles.
I have done some drawing documentation for other office. When they publish single PDF then it print b&W with proper line weights as per CTB file but when they publish batch from the same file then prints in colour. On my computer it prints perfectly fine either way. Any one has seen this situation before?
I went to their office and looked through all the settings. Every thing is same as mine. She sent me pictures of their plot setting options they look exactly the same as mine. Could it be their acrobat settings?
Quick Refresh: PUBLISH only does what you tell it to do, it's PLOT command with the ability to do more than ne at a time, nothing more, nothing less.
But unlike PLOT command, you have to select the correct pagesetup to use. See arrows below, this PUBLISH is going to use only the settings predefined in each of the LAYOUTS, the same settings use to PLOT each of the same layouts. Both commands will give the same result because nothing is different between the two requests.
Checking the plot settings will not necessarily help you when you Batch (PUBLISH) plot. I suggest that you ask your user to setup a named PAGESETUP and make it available during the PUBLISH command. Once a PageSETUP is defined and you have verified that it works properly it can be saved in a template file or imported directly from another file into the current one even at the time of PUBLISH.
I'm having a similar issue. When I do single plots, my page setup works. When I go to batch, it says in the bottom left corner that it is overriding the page setup and does not give me the option to turn the override off. Thoughts?
When rendering individual scenes in Sketchup, it runs smoothly. Even when I ran individual (render is perfect), then batch (bug, camera zooms out), then individual (render is perfect again), then batch (bug, camera zooms out). So the problem seems to be attached to the batch function.
I have read several other threads complaining of the same bug, and the solutions provided there (install latest version of Sketchup, or preview version) still won't fix the issue for me. I have even installed Sketchup on a fresh new Windows PC, and the results ar the same.
Would love if this issue was addressed. . I am noticing the same issue using enscape with sketchup. It makes rendering views on a larger project incredibly time consuming and we question at our office if its worth using enscape at all.
In this case we advice disabling View Synchronization entirely and creating your scenes/views via Enscape itself. I'm aware that you will likely have existing SketchUp scenes that have been created using SketchUp while View Synchronization was enabled, but if it's possible for you to re-create them you'll also be able to use of batch renderings without any perspective shifts or such thereafter. You can continue to make use of SketchUp's scene selection in combination with Enscape's View Management (Hotkey: F), but it is also possible to just navigate between scenes/views (or create them) using Enscape alone.
Entirely optional: You can also make use of SketchUp viewport resizing plugin that can be acquired here. This allows you to for example set your SketchUp viewport to the aspect ratio and size of Full HD (1080p) while the same has been setup for Enscape (via Visual Settings -> Output) which can help with further aligning if required. You'll notice that the renderings will not overlap 100% over the scene output visible in SketchUp, but they should remain similar enough so that it doesn't cause any problems.
Keep in mind that you can also link any of your existing Visual Settings presets to each view if that is of desire before batch rendering, click here to read more about that in case you haven't already.
Is there any plan to address this issue? This seems like a very common problem and requires either tedious single image export or duplicate view management with manually applied presets in enscape.
Iʻm just starting with Enscape using Archicad. The native synced views support was a major plus for Enscape and now I realize I need to do so much more work to make it work.
Batch production is a method whereby a group of identical products are produced simultaneously (rather than one at a time). It is up to the manufacturer to decide how big the batch will be, and how often these batches will be made.
Each batch can be different, as manufacturers can decide to change the specifications from one group of products to the next. Perhaps it is necessary to change the colour or size of that particular group (depending on the preferences specified in a particular order).
There is slightly more room for error compared to larger-scale techniques. If a manufacturer needs to create a large quantity of a product, but they break this down into smaller batches, there will be less waste, if, for example, one of these batches were to possess defective items.
If there was to be a new trend in the industry, or if a wave of seasonal demand were to come into effect, batch production makes it possible to tweak items from one production cycle to the next (rather than having an unchanged item for a long period of time).
The only time the production would be interrupted would be for very rare occasions of maintenance (or if machinery needed replacing). An example of an organisation likely to use continuous production is a chemical plant, or a paper manufacturer.
A disadvantage of this technique is that it requires a large amount of initial investment to get all of the equipment set up. Continuous production can additionally generate a high volume of waste. If product demand were to suddenly drop, there would be far too much inventory for the business to handle.
Assembly line production is one of the most popular methods for mass producing goods. Separate parts of the product are added at each individual stage of production, thus assembling the product until it is complete.
An advantage of assembly line production is that it is arguably cheaper than some other methods. This is because the production cycle is broken down into simpler steps, meaning a lower-paid employee (or less sophisticated machine) can complete the individual steps.
This type of software solution unifies all of your business functions, ensuring data is accurate, consistent, and up to date. This data makes it possible to have full visibility around inventory, sales and finance.
With full synchronicity between operations, many processes surrounding the supply chain can be automated. Manufacturing Software has production planning functionality, meaning work can be scheduled, and employees can constantly monitor any ongoing activity.
By bringing the office floor and factory floor together, Manufacturing Software helps smaller businesses to grow. This growth may provide the resources and confidence needed to try something like batch production, which itself will only contribute to further expansion.
Uploading a batch of files is a real pain because of file name issues. Is there a way/program to pre-identify the files before starting the upload action and having a stoppage during the upload due to a file name problem
Did this post help you? If so, give it a Like below to let us know.
Need help with something else? Ask me a question!
Find Tips & Tricks Discover more ways to use Dropbox here!
Interested in Community Groups? Click here to join