Poison Double Dose Ultimate Hits Rar

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Tommye Hope

unread,
Jul 11, 2024, 10:06:36 AM7/11/24
to pofodolcorp

Poison - Double Dose: Ultimate Hits is a double disc greatest hits compilation album released May 3, 2011 by the hard rock band Poison to celebrate the band's 25th anniversary. The career-spanning collection features thirty-five of the multi-platinum band's top hits and fan favorites. The album charted at #23 on the Billboard Top Hard Rock Albums chart[1] and #17 in Canada.[2]

Poison Double Dose Ultimate Hits Rar


Download File https://urlin.us/2yXMEg



I take an action to apply one dose to my sword, and then another action to apply a second dose. Then I hit a monster with my sword. Does the effect accumulate, with each poison causing an additional 1d4 damage (for a total of 2d4 on top of the normal weapon's damage)?

If there's no official answer, I'd appreciate any reasoning to help me make a ruling as a DM. I have a player whose character recently acquired an Alchemy Jug (which can make Basic Poison), and has asked me how multiple doses at once would work. I'm not sure whether poison ought to be something that is either there or not (and multiple doses wouldn't change anything other than maybe extending the duration) or whether applying more poison ought to be more harmful than applying less. Both interpretations seem reasonable to me.

The closest you can come to this is perhaps a double-bladed weapon and Extra AttackLet's suppose your aim is to get 2d4 instead of just 1d4 of that poison damage on a single turn, with a single weapon, and without reapplying the poison once the combat has started.

However, does the player have a double-bladed weapon, and Extra Attack? Then she could coat both blades right before jumping into the fray, and potentially get the 1d4 poison on both attacks (if they hit), because they no longer happen "at the same time."

As far as my group and i understand, if you put multiple doses of poison on something they would all hit at the same time and make that one instance much more potent. I both wanted to make sure that this is correct and how/if i should deal with this.

1: Assume that a PC has been exposed to 4 doses of poison in one round. This would increase the DC +6. Assume that the PC has a miracle fort save and saves. Next round, the PC is exposed to another 4 doses. Does the DC stay at +6, having reset at the end of the round, or is the DC now +14, including the 4 doses from the previous round.

2: Assume that the PC failed his +6 increased DC save and is now poisoned. Before he gets his next save, he's exposed to another 4 doses of the poison. Now that he is already poisoned, do the new doses of the poison increase his save, or do they have no affect since he is already poisoned?

-Success You resist the new dose and carry on as if it never happened (this success does not count toward the requisite "consecutive saves" for curing any poison that is already in your system)
-Failure The DC for all subsequent checks are increased by 2 and the duration of the poison is increased by half of the listed value. (eg if you are poisoned with a poison with a DC 11, being exposed again forces you to make a save at DC 13. If you fail this, all your future checks to cure the poison, avoid damage, or resist being poisoned again are at DC 13 - and the duration is increased by half. If you are exposed for a third time, you would need to save at DC 15 against the new dose, etc)Here is the example in the bookCore Rulebook wrote:For example, a character is bit three times in the same round by a trio of Medium monstrous spiders, injecting him with three doses of Medium spider venom. The unfortunate character must make a DC 18 Fortitude save for the next 8 rounds. Fortunately, just one successful save cures the character of all three doses of the poison.Under the rules explanation you posted, the DC to resist a poison only increases if you are exposed to multiple doses while already poisoned. Therefore, the character in the example would have to make 3 saves. The 1st would be at a DC 14. If he fails, then he makes another with a DC 16 and if he fails, he makes another at a DC 18. But if he succeeds on the 1st save, he makes another save at a DC 14 and if he succeeds again, he makes another save at a DC 14. But that seems to contradict the example from the Core Rulebook and I have never seen anyone apply the rules that way. B: It doesn't really answer my 1st question. If a character receives multiple doses of poison in a round and resists them all, does the increased DC persist to the next round, or does it reset?

Now lets say I am a baller and make all those saves. Keep in mind that if you make the initial save against a poison, you don't get poisoned at all.So the first bolt hits you, and you have to make a DC 13 fort save. If you make it, then you're not poisoned and the second bolt's poison DC is still 13. It's only if you fail and actually get poisoned that the next dose is at an increased DC.

now my understanding is also that once I am poisoned, I must make all subsequent saves at the DC at which I am poisoned.Also be aware (can't tell if you are from your posts) that no matter how many doses you manage to get coursing through your veins, you still only make one save at each interval frequency. So if you failed your save against (say) five of the drow's bolts, you'll have five doses of poison active, but only make one save per round (at a heightened DC, and for an increased duration).Is that helpful at all?

Is That Correct? No sir. You make the save upon being poisoned, and you make the saves again at the start of you initiative.Official Poison FAQ Blog wrote:

2. The saving throw DC is increased by +2 for every active dose currently affecting the character. Poisons that were cured, have run through their entire frequency, or were negated with a successful initial saving throw do not increase the DC.That is why I said earlier that once you make the save the poison is gone, assuming it is a one save poison AUC.register('auc_MessageboardPostRowDisplay'); AjaxBusy.register('masked', 'busy', 'auc_MessageboardPostRowDisplay', null, null) Elamdri Sep 13, 2012, 06:08 pm Ok, I think I understand, the problem is that the way we have always done it is how the book describes: Every time you take a dose of poison, the DC increases by +2.

Bob takes a dose of poison (DC 15 save) and saves.
Bob takes another dose of poison (DC 17) and saves.
Bob takes a third dose of poison (DC 19) and fails, taking a round of poison damage.
Bob gets another save next round (DC 19) and fails, taking another round of poison damage. Meanwhile Bob is bitten again (DC 21) and saves, so the DC stays the same.
Bob gets another save next round (DC 19) and fails, taking another round of poison damage. Meanwhile Bob is bitten again (DC 21) and fails, so the DC goes up to 21.
Bob gets another save next round and saves (DC 21) and cures himself of the poison.
Next round Bob gets bitten again (DC 15) and saves.

Bob takes a dose of poison (DC 15 save) and saves.
Bob takes another dose of poison (DC 15) and saves.
Bob takes a third dose of poison (DC 15) and fails, taking a round of poison damage.
Bob gets another save next round (DC 15) and fails, taking another round of poison damage. Meanwhile Bob is bitten again (DC 17) and saves, so the DC stays the same.
Bob gets another save next round (DC 15) and fails, taking another round of poison damage. Meanwhile Bob is bitten again (DC 17) and fails, so the DC goes up to 17.
Bob gets another save next round and saves (DC 17) and cures himself of the poison.
Next round Bob gets bitten again (DC 15) and saves.

Is that correct? And if so, why does the book describe a different scenario in the poison section of the glossary? Because my understand was that the point of poison was that the DC stacks so that if you take enough doses, failure is inevitable.

If you suspect a child has been exposed to a poison, or given the wrong medicine or the wrong dose of medicine, do not wait for symptoms to occur. Call the Poisons Information CentreExternal Link (Tel. 13 11 26) immediately for advice.

This article is for information only. DO NOT use it to treat or manage an actual overdose. If you or someone you are with overdoses, call the local emergency number (such as 911), or the local poison center can be reached directly by calling the national toll-free Poison Help hotline (1-800-222-1222) from anywhere in the United States.

@rwallace8665DMG Poisons: If you crit with a poison coated weapon, do you double poison dice because crit, or not because saving throw? The intent is no. The saving throw, not the attack, determines whether the poison takes effect after a hit.

Because kids are smaller, it takes less nicotine to poison them (or pets, for the same reason). There's enough in a cigarette butt to harm your little one if they decide to eat one off the floor, for example. An older child experimenting with chewing tobacco can also overdose.

If someone has overdosed and has serious symptoms such as passing out or trouble breathing, call 911. Otherwise, call a poison control center right away. US residents can call their local poison control center at 1-800-222-1222. Alberta residents can call PADIS (Poison and Drug Information Service) 24 hours a day at 1-800-332-1414. Canada residents can call a provincial poison control center. Symptoms of overdose may include: bloody/black/tarry stools, pink/dark urine, unusual/prolonged bleeding.

Methods: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of scorpion antivenom in critically ill children; open-label clinical trials of antivenom in children and in adults; an open-label treatment protocol study; one video education study; one pharmacoeconomic study; and one historical controls study. Endpoints included syndrome resolution by 4 h after treatment, cumulative midazolam dose, plasma venom levels, and overall cost of care.

Nor does the background presence of Andrew Neil, Britain's archetypal yuppy, give much cause for encouragement. No good tidings - except in terms of circulation - come from that quarter. What we are in danger of getting is not the revival of a newspaper which represented English conservatism at its nicest - as the Daily Telegraph was when Bill Deedes served as its editor rather than its fig leaf - but rather a cloned new version of the Daily Mail which represents English conservatism at its very nastiest. A double dose of the Daily Mail poison, could the English body politic really survive that?

aa06259810
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages