Serial Number For Video Pad Video Editor
Cherrie Patete
Is there a way to jump directly to another line number in code editing (not in execution), the same way that I would use Ctrl+G in Notepad? This MSDN answer suggests that it's not possible, but I'm hoping that someone has found a way to do this kind of editor navigation.
I know that it's possible to just click on a procedure name in the dropdown, but unfortunately I'm working with some procedures that are several hundred lines long and until I get them refactored, it would be great to be able to include a line number in my bug tracker and jump to that line when I'm resolving the issue.
This procedure will prompt you for a line number and then (kind of) take you to that line for whatever procedure you're already in. Two things: There's no error checking in it, so it needs some work there; If you put in a number that's larger than the total lines, it just takes you to the next procedure. But if you enter, say 30, it will take you to the 30th line of the current procedure rather than just the 30th line of the Module.
The upside is that if you refactor or change anything in your code, the reference will remain valid, whilst if you simply use the line number, any modification will invalidate the reference.
Quick and dirty indeed. ;)
You want to allow negative / positive numbers and floating point numbers so you have to allow "0123456789+-,." And at this point, you have to parse the string. And even then, a good input field would only allow inputs, that are valid, signs (+/-) only as the first characters etc.
My allegro.cfg file has PART_NUMBER=YES in it at the top. However, the footprint/refdes combos in PCB Editor do not have any part number associated with the. This is a problem when I go to create my pick and place file. Is there some setting that I am missing?
However, I do not believe that this is the problem. I have a height property associated with each part number. When the component is inserted in the design in Capture (from the CIS database), it includes this property. I edited the allegro.cfg file to include this:
You are looking in the wrong place to turn pin numbers on and off. You want the symbol properties, not the pin properties. Using the same buzzer, here it is as shipped:
2020-10-08 10_59_08-Window1097556 22.5 KB
Note the setting that I have my pointer over in the screenshot. Turn this off (and then close the properties window) and you get this:
2020-10-08 10_59_41-Window1097556 22.3 KB
(I re-opened the properties window for the screenshot.)
A simple number editor or spinner that acts like those in After Effects and similar software. You can click and drag to slide the value, or double-click to enter a new value. You can use up/down while editing to increment and decrement the value. Holding command/control will step by smaller values, and holding shift will step by larger values.
I am currently working on implementing a mind map and aiming to utilize ProseMirror to enable rich-text editing for each node. However, this approach would result in the existence of thousands of editor instances simultaneously. EditorState seems to be a lightweight class, but I am unsure about the potential performance implications of having such a large number of instances. Are there any known limitations or best practices for handling a high number of editor instances within ProseMirror?
Was following a tutorial on objects, animations, geometry nodes etc. And within the Geometry Nodes section I have a value node in which I've used the function #frame on a mesh. Following the tutorial when he presses spacebar/start the mesh begins to move in-sync with the model that has actual keyframes. However when I do it nothing happens. Then I noticed if I click and drag the numerical field in the value node the number resets to whatever frame it was at and I get the error "Can't edit driven number value, see graph edtor for the driver setup". I can manually enter the frame number and hit enter but it still doesn't do anything when I hit play/spacebar.
Good day. I get the error "Can't edit driven number value, see graph editor for the driver setup." I have a leg that I will bend. To make it look good, I decided to follow this video ( =PLRNEtMVoxM681OU2OEl5FDH-6O8CLlP8X). But after I follow it step by step and install the driver, my value is reset to zero, the transformation is not applied, and this error also appears. If I uncheck "Does F-Curve contribute to result" in the drivers editor, then the transformation is applied, but the error keeps coming out and the shape keys do not work correctly. I created a new file from scratch, and used a regular cylinder, but the error appears anyway. Rotation of the model in Video happens to be set to X and in my model also rotation is set to X. What am I doing wrong?
Since there are Vim bindings, I assume there are enough people who wanted this feature such that it was considered important enough. Then I can only imagine that the majority of these users would also very much welcome support for line numbers.
Ah, Thanks. I seem to have misunderstood the discussion earlier and thought that the implementation of line numbers itself added complexity to the code. Now, I understand that this is more about limiting options to configure so that remains simple. I can get why this can be an issue.
I miss having line numbers a lot in Joplin and have to edit in external editor (vim) a lot, which is a painful friction. Will wait for the possibility of either Laurent coming around to accepting this feature or enabling a plugin system where we could do it ourselves
Thanks for the new plugin system, Laurent. If possible, could you or someone else please help to create a plugin for turning on the line numbers? I'm afraid I don't know much of JS and I tried using the code from your earlier commit above but that didn't seem to do anything.
You must verify your business before you can edit information about it. The changes can include the name, category, address, hours, phone number, and website. After verification of the business and approval of the edits, these changes can be published on Google Search and Maps.
Okay this sounds like a question a six year old would ask, (and I hope there is an empirical answer) so here's my inner child: In programming numbers start from from zero but why do line numbers in text editors (for programming) also start from one?
Looking at a coffee mug on your table, you would not answer the question of how many mugs there are by saying: "Zero" - because that would imply no mug at all is on your table. Thus with line numbers, and almost every other countable thing there is, you'd start with 1 for logic reasons.
Kontur is correct. But I would also like the add that Arrays in programming start at 0 for a very specific reason. This is not because the number in an array is supposed to 'count' the amount of elements, but instead it is considered an offset value, and thus array[0] merely means that the specific entry is 0 memory positions away from the start of the array in memory and array[1] is 1 position along. They are not used for counting purposes but as an offset meaning it is perfectly logical that programming lists start at 0.
Early languages like FORTRAN had the first element of an array starting with 1, and it was weird when C came along to use 0. That's only natural to you youngsters. FORTRAN started with 1 because it was natural to number things in a list starting with 1. C started with 0 because it was a language deliberately written to be close to the hardware, whereas FORTRAN was abstracting the mathematical concepts with no idea as to how the computer would implement it. Of course we had to be able to know in some cases how the code was implemented in machine language, but in general C is much closer to the hardware.
It is purely historical / traditional / cultural. In many ways one can argue that line numbers should start at zero. But text editors have always labeled the first line as line one, and any editor that labeled it as zero would be outcast.
We (programmers) don't actually count from zero, I think that's a misunderstanding. The first element in an array is at index (or offset) zero (but it's still the first element, i.e. element number one).
Hi Pete,
I saw this thread and I have similar (not entirely the same) question as the above. I have a serial ID column field in my data set that has text and number ID numbers that goes something like "123.600S" or "123.6005". When I load it into power BI and change it into text format the decimal numbers will convert into something crazy like "123.60050000000001". Is there a way to prvent it from doing this? I need the ID to stay as "123.6005" in order to merge query via the column field.
Thanks!
2) As above, converting to text in PQ isn't going to help you once the values have been evaluated as number types. The trailing zero doesn't exist any more so can't be automagically displayed when changing the data type.
OK, here are the complete instructions for turning on line numbering for the linux version of TexStudio:Options > Configure TexStudio (then tick Show Advanced Options box in lower left corner of window. At that point a new entry will appear Adv. Editor. Select that. On the third line down in the new window will be an option to turn on line numbering.
Hi
Been using Arduino IDE for years, but now trying the Web Editor. But after a few days I started getting the message "Sorry, you have reached the maximum number of compilations per day", even at start of day with the first attempt.
What is this limit, and how do I get round this problem?
There are two limits related to the sketchbook. One is space (which you seem to be nowhere near exceeding), but the other is number of sketches. The maximum number of sketches allowed is 100 so you could be hitting that limit. However, you should get a different error message if you exceeded the maximum sketch count.
aa06259810