Here are my responses to the Lesson 3 questions. I'm not really sure
about my answer to question 3. What bothers me the most is that the
success criteria for each of the intermediates steps (e.g., securing a
location, securing food, etc.) are not defined clearly. But, I'm not
sure if that information belongs in the scope statement. Your
thoughts?
1. Will you need a more detailed description before you can decompose
the project work?
• Initial project organization is not defined; members of the project
team, as well as other stakeholders should be identified and the
organization of the project should be documented.
• Known risks are not defined. For example, what happens if they could
not secure a location in time for the event?
• Schedule milestones are not defined. This is especially important
because of the inherent dependencies between tasks. For example,
securing food services without having secured a location is not of any
value.
• Project configuration management requirements are not specified. It
is not clear how changes will be controlled.
2. Is the project objective measurable and contain all the appropriate
measures?
• While the objective is specific, measurable, tangible, accurate and
time bound, it is not clear if it is realistic. Is it possible to
identify 500 corporate and individual donors that can donate $1000
each in the next 60 days?
3. Are the deliverables clearly described and appropriate for this
project?
• Deliverables, as stated, allow for the measureable outcomes of the
event. They are specific and verifiable (raise $500,000 in 60 days).
However, there’s no mention of ancillary results and supplementary
outcomes such as documentation or project management reports. What
report or document will the project team use to verify that $500,000
was raised net of all costs/expenses?