Lunatic Steve Huffman & lunatic Terry Tao still failing in calculus with their sado-masochistic calculus as torture chambers, vomiting and nervous breakdowns. Both too stupid and ignorant of math to understand Polynomials as the only valid function
Archimedes Plutonium
Lunatic Steve Huffman,Terence Tao cannot admit the truth of math; none at UCLA can admit slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse. And none can admit polynomial is the only valid function reducing calculus to add or subtract 1 from exponent and thus calculus supereasy. But worst of all, none can admit 9 x muon rest mass equals neutron rest mass within sigma error raising the question that the true electron of atoms is the muon, not the Dirac magnetic monopole = 0.5MeV.
--- quoting Wikipedia---
.jpg)
Born
17 July 1975 (age 49)
Citizenship
- Australia
- United States[3]
Alma mater
Known for
Partial Differential Equations, Analytic Number Theory, Random matrices, Compressed Sensing, Combinatorics, Dynamical Systems
Spouse
Laura Tao
Children
2
Awards
Fields Medal (2006)
Scientific career
Fields
Harmonic analysis
Institutions
University of California, Los Angeles
Thesis
Three Regularity Results in Harmonic Analysis[3] (1996)
Doctoral advisor
Elias M. Stein
Doctoral students
Monica Vișan
--- end quoting Wikipedia---
UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner
Willard Libby (chem), Julian Schwinger (physics), Paul Boyer (chem), Andrea Ghez, James Fraser Stoddart (chem), Louis Ignarro (physio-medic)
My 3rd published book of science.
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
#12-2, My 11th published book
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
My 283rd published book of science.
Psychopathology of why math professors refuse to make Calculus super-easy and stop torturing students// psychology in math
by Archimedes Plutonium
Preface: AP is sick and tired of Old Math and Old Math professors who refuse to correct and revise what math they teach. Calculus as taught today is a torture chamber, of vomiting during exams, and nervous breakdowns all because math professors do not switch to the super-easy calculus, where the only valid function of mathematics is the polynomial, making calculus super, super easy. And AP can teach calculus in Junior High School, so easy as it is. Old Math teaches fake calculus, that is tough and incomprehensible to students with a mindless limit analysis, expecting students to accept a rectangle with 0 width having interior area for integral, and their derivative as tangent to the function graph at a point when it should be predicting the next point of the function graph. Mistake after mistake after mistake, when instead of 1,000 page calculus textbooks, AP can teach calculus with only 100 pages and where students love calculus, love math, and find math the easiest of all the sciences.
This book is more of a psychology book asking and analyzing why Old Math professors delight in punishing students rather than teach calculus in the easiest way possible.
Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of some of my TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks sold on Amazon's Kindle. The world's first math textbooks that take a student from 5 years old through graduate school written by one author alone. Focus on the far right top as the textbook that teaches ages 5 to 18. TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2. TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks is written by one author who carries the student through all their math needs from age 5 to age 26. When one author does all math textbooks, there is coherence and logical flow in math education, not a disruption and discontinuity and oddball stuff that does not fit together. And especially those students who move from one school to another.
Univ Virginia math dept: Peter Abramenko, Julie Bergner, Mikhail Ershov, Jeffrey Holt, John Imbrie, Thomas Koberda, Slava Krushkal, Thomas Mark, Jennifer Morse, Ken Ono, Andrei Rapinchuk, Christian Reidys, Jim Rolf, Charles Dunki, Ira Herbst, James Howland, Craig Huneke, Thomas Kriete, Nicholas Kuhn, Irena Lasiecka, Barbara MacCluer, Kevin McCrimmon, Karen Parshall, Loren Pitt, Donald Ramirez, James Rovnyak, Leonard Scott, Lawrence Thomas, Roberto Triggiani, Harold Ward
Reddit (symbol) r/math, 3 years ago Genius meets Lunatic: 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium
I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane: and it is 1 (color everything
An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers Reddit · r/badmathematics 10+ comments · 6 years ago He claimed that numbers beyond the borderline were irrational and infinite. Also, 0 was irrational. 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium Apr 26, 2021 I know what is going on with Archimedes Plutonium, I think. : r ... May 24, 2023 What conspiracy theory do you believe in and why? - Reddit Apr 9, 2018 Math Conspiracy : r/math - Reddit Dec 24, 2013 More results from www.reddit.com
Archimedes Plutonium
Huffman's Lunatics Univ Virginia math dept: Harold Ward, Roberto Triggiani,Lawrence Thomas,Peter Abramenko, Julie Bergner, Mikhail Ershov, Jeffrey Holt, John Imbrie, Thomas Koberda, Slava Krushkal, Thomas Mark, Jennifer Morse, Ken Ono, Andrei Rapinchuk, Christian Reidys, Jim Rolf, Charles Dunki, Ira Herbst, James Howland, Craig Huneke, Thomas Kriete, Nicholas Kuhn, Irena Lasiecka, Barbara MacCluer, Kevin McCrimmon, Karen Parshall, Loren Pitt, Donald Ramirez, James Rovnyak, Leonard Scott
Steve Huffman do they fail geometry because they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse or is it because they are too dumb to make the polynomial the only valid function in math and thus reduce all of calculus to add or subtract 1 from exponent?? How stupid can that be???
AP's 228th published book
Brief History of *True Calculus*--including new integration methods / math focus
by Archimedes Plutonium
This is AP's 228th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,
PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Preface: AP as a teenager had a wish at University in 1969-- to make all of calculus as easy as the Power Rules over polynomial functions. And by 2015, AP's wish came true. For calculus really is easy math, as easy as add, subtract, multiply and divide. But only when people see the light of day about calculus. And where math professors stop chasing fame and fortune in publishing nonsense and spend more time teaching better in classrooms and making calculus be easy.
The history of True Calculus is far different from that which is written in math history books. True Calculus requires a true valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which none was ever given until 2015. Once a geometry proof of FTC arrived, can we write a true history of calculus. The Old Math history of calculus is filled with error and fake science such as the "limit concept", the concept of "continuity". And where Old Math never even had a proper well defined "function" concept. No wonder Old Math history of calculus is trash. AP provides a brief history of True Calculus. But while studying this subject, AP has new insights into the right-circular-cone. And a new method of integration of varying sized circles over a distance length.
Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Wikipedia entry of Cavalieri quadrature formula (area formula) that was so critical in Calculus history for it is the formula of integrals under the function graph curve for polynomial functions. Cavalieri's discovery of the Power Rule for integrals marks the beginning of modern day calculus.
College Professors that fail calculus MOVIE
directors Steve Huffman Univ of Virginia+Lunatics Terry Tao UCLA; Davide Cavion-Trinity College Dublin, Univ Glasgow Mark Barton; ETH Zurich Jan Burse ; X Elon Musk + Tim Sweeney
Steve Huffman lists science lunatics:
Reddit (symbol) r/math, 3 years ago Genius meets Lunatic: 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium
I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane: and it is 1 (color everything
Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on Univ Glasgow Mark Barton. Quora (symbol logo) Mark Barton PhD physicist with University of Glasgow Author has 16.9K answers and 21.5M answer views10y None at all - he was a raving nutter. 1.9K viewsView upvotes...
Jan Burse near ETH Switzerland-- 30 year attack ads---
Google Groups (logo) Google Groups --- ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM BANNED--- Google Groups https://groups.google.com › comp.lang.prolog One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls ...
Davide Cavion hate-spew foul mouthed stalker
narkive (symbol logo) narkive How the Archimedes Plutonium Idiocy began. narkive https://sci.math.narkive.com › how-the-archimedes-plut... Being ignorant of and incompetent at math, it amused him to send out emails containing his meaningless math rambles to all and sundry....When one does not break any laws, one is fearless. In your lingo what this means is: I piss ... How the Archimedes Plutonium Idiocy began. narkive https://sci.math.narkive.com › how-the-archimedes-plut... When one does not break any laws, one is fearless. In your lingo what this means is: I piss on shit on the filthy, disgusting cunt that spewed YOU out. Do you ...
X (symbol) X X-TimSweeneyEpic 4likes, 4 years ago Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? 9:56 PM- Oct 22, 2019
Archimedes Plutonium
John Baez UC Riverside:
On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 3:28:35 AM UTC-5, noTthaTguY wrote:
> ellipses are ovals, but not all ovals are elipses, of course;
> just grab a dictionary, asshole
>
UC Riverside Math Dept, provost: Cynthia Larive- chemist,
Mark Alber, John Baez, Mei-Chu Chang, Vyjayanthi Chari, Kevin Costello, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz, Jacob Greenstein, Jose Gonzalez, Zhuang-dan Guan, Jim Kelliher, Sara Lapan, Michel Lapidus, Carl Mautner, Amir Moradifam, Yat Sun Poon, Ziv Ran, David Rush, Reinhard Schultz, Stefano Vidussi, David Weisbart, Fred Wilhelm, Bun Wong, Yulong Xing, Feng Xu, Qi Zhang
Mathstodon (Mathstodon logo)
John Carlos Baez: "My paper has finally appeared..."
Jul 2, 2024---... Plutonium's "the universe is a plutonium atom... Archimedes was better than the Beethoven and changed his name to Archimedes Plutonium.
Lunatic Steve Huffman,Terence Tao cannot admit the truth of math; none at UCLA can admit slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse. And none can admit polynomial is the only valid function reducing calculus to add or subtract 1 from exponent and thus calculus supereasy. But worst of all, none can admit 9 x muon rest mass equals neutron rest mass within sigma error raising the question that the true electron of atoms is the muon, not the Dirac magnetic monopole = 0.5MeV.
Lunatic Steve Huffman & lunatic Terry Tao still failing in calculus with their sado-masochistic calculus as torture chambers, vomiting and nervous breakdowns. Both too stupid and ignorant of math to understand Polynomials as the only valid function throughout mathematics and making calculus as supereasy-- just add, subtract 1 from exponent.Reddit's "Genius meets Lunatic" Steve Huffman meets Terence Tao
.jpg)
Born
1970 (age 54–55)[2]
Alma mater
University of Maryland[3]
Occupation(s)
Video game programmer and developer, businessman
Notable work
ZZT
Unreal Engine
Title
Founder and CEO of Epic Games
Awards
AIAS Hall of Fame Award (2012)[4]
GDC Lifetime Achievement Award (2017)[5]
Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on E.J.Corey water electrolysis as Mark Barton Univ Glasgow says "raving nutter". Dr. Walter Gilbert (chem), Dr.Dudley Herschbach (chem), Dr.Martin Karplus (chem). What, another that looks only on volume??--- quoting Wikipedia---E.J. CoreyCorey in 2007
BornElias James Corey
July 12, 1928 (age 96)Methuen, Massachusetts, U.S.
Alma mater
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (BS, PhD)
Known for
- Retrosynthetic analysis
- Synthon
- Corey–Bakshi–Shibata catalyst
- Corey–Chaykovsky reaction
- Corey–Fuchs reaction
- Corey–Gilman–Ganem oxidation
- Corey–House synthesis
- Corey–Itsuno reduction
- Corey–Kim oxidation
- Corey–Link reaction
- Corey–Nicolaou macrolactonization
- Corey–Peterson olefination
- Corey–Seebach reaction
- Corey–Suggs reagent
- Corey–Winter olefin synthesis
- LHASA
Awards
- ACS Award in Pure Chemistry(1960)
- Ernest Guenther Award (1968)
- Centenary Medal (1971)
- Linus Pauling Award (1973)
- George Ledlie Prize (1973)
- Arthur C. Cope Award (1976)
- William H. Nichols Medal (1977)
- Franklin Medal (1978)
- Chemical Pioneer Award (1981)
- Lewis S. Rosenstiel Award (1981)
- Paul Karrer Gold Medal (1982)
- Tetrahedron Prize (1983)
- Willard Gibbs Award (1984)
- Wolf Prize in Chemistry (1986)
- National Medal of Science (1988)
- Japan Prize (1989)[1]
- Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1990)
- ForMemRS (1998)[2]
- Priestley Medal (2004)
Scientific career
Fields
Organic chemistry
Institutions
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
Harvard University
Thesis
The synthesis of N,N-diacylamino acids and analogs of penicillin (1951)
Doctoral advisor
John C. Sheehan
Notable students
- Phil Baran
- Rajender Leleti
- Eric Block
- Dale L. Boger
- Weston T. Borden
- David E. Cane
- Rick L. Danheiser
- William L. Jorgensen
- John Katzenellenbogen
- Alan P. Kozikowski
- Bruce H. Lipshutz
- David Liu
- Gojko Lalic
- Albert Meyers
- K. C. Nicolaou
- Ryōji Noyori
- Gary H. Posner
- Bengt I. Samuelsson
- Dieter Seebach
- Vinod K. Singh
- Brian Stoltz
- Hisashi Yamamoto
- Ramakanth Sarabu
- Jin-Quan Yu
--- end quoting Wikipedia---
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
Google Groups
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
My first great science was 1990 of the Atom Totality theory-- the entire Universe is just one big atom of plutonium. My second great discovery was the real electron is the muon and 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
Google Groups
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
My first great science was 1990 of the Atom Totality theory-- the entire Universe is just one big atom of plutonium.My second great discovery was the real electron is the muon and 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
--- quoting Wikipedia---Adam D'AngeloD'Angelo in 2022
Born
August 14, 1984 (age 39)Redding, Connecticut, U.S.
Education
California Institute of Technology(BS)
Occupation
CEO of Quora
Known for
Former CTO of Facebook, co-founder of Quora
Board member of--- end quoting Wikipedia---AP: Why is not Adam wearing his glued on walrus tusks for his picture taking?
Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on Univ Glasgow Mark Barton
Quora (symbol logo) Quora Quora https://www.quora.com › What-effect-did-Archimedes-... Aug 26, 2013 — Plutonium is significant because its isotope, plutonium-239, is a slow nuclear fuel. A slow nuclear fuel will likely undergo nuclear fission if ... 4 answers · Top answer: Everyone was trying to figure out this new medium, the internet, what it was for.
> > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan ; University of Glasgow
> > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
David Attenborough:[ Big cat snarls ] ♪♪ A great cat with immense, saber-shaped teeth... ...Smilodon.
....
[ Low growling ] [ Sharp note plays ] ♪♪ [ Low growling ] You might think that Smilodon would have caught its prey as a lion often does, by chasing it, leaping on it at speed, and then throttling it, suffocating it with a bite to the neck.
♪♪ But Smilodon stalked its prey, creeping quietly across the plains, until it got really close.
♪♪ And then it pounced!
♪♪ ♪♪ Smilodon couldn't throttle its prey with those huge teeth, and they were too brittle to slash.
They would shatter if they struck bone.
♪♪ Instead, the animal would have first used its great weight to pin down its victim.
Then it would have used its sabers like blades to slice open the soft flesh of its victim's throat.
Mark Barton University Glasgow and Univ. Queensland: Not at all, he was a raving nutter.
Tim Sweeney University Maryland : Whatever happened to..
AP: Whatever happened to commonsense, you mean, Tim, that how a cat can go through life trying to dodge its senseless evolution of teeth that get in the way of everything the cat wants to do? Well a nice answer is that the saber teeth belong to a walrus and are walrus tusks that the cat preyed upon. For no fossil find of Smilodon has the actual teeth and jaw combined. No, these are glued and screwed on walrus tusks to cat jaws.
X (symbol) X X-TimSweeneyEpic 4likes, 4 years ago Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? 9:56 PM- Oct 22, 2019
Univ. Maryland physics dept Derek Boyd, Dieter Brill, Alessandra Buonanno, Chia-Cheh Chang, Chung-Yun Chang, Thomas Cohen, Douglas Currie, Sankar Das Sarma, Alan DeSilva, Jay Dorfman, William Dorland, Alex Dragt, James Drake, Howard Drew, Theodore L Einstein, Sarah Eno, Victor Galitski, George Gloeckler, Jordan Goodman, Oscar Greenberg, Richard Greene, Nicholas Hadley, Douglas Hamilton, Kara Hoffman, Theodore Kirkpatrick, Glenn Mason, John Mather, Edward Ott, Johnpierre Paglione, Jogesh Pati, William Philips, Edward Redish, Steven Rolston, Philip Roos, Peter Shawhan, Philip Sprangle, Edo Waks, Stephen Wallace, John Weeks, Frederick Wellstood, Ellen Williams, James Yorke
Maybe they should spend all their time on gluing Walrus tusks to cat jaws and make anti-science museum exhibits.Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin, Dr. Elias Corey (chem), Dr. Walter Gilbert (chem), Dr.Dudley Herschbach (chem), Dr.Martin Karplus (chem)
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
Google Groups
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
My first great science was 1990 of the Atom Totality theory-- the entire Universe is just one big atom of plutonium. My second great discovery was the real electron is the muon and 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
Google Groups
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
My first great science was 1990 of the Atom Totality theory-- the entire Universe is just one big atom of plutonium. My second great discovery was the real electron is the muon and 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
Google Groups
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
My first great science was 1990 of the Atom Totality theory-- the entire Universe is just one big atom of plutonium. My second great discovery was the real electron is the muon and 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
Google Groups
https://groups.google.com › plutonium-atom-universe
My first great science was 1990 of the Atom Totality theory-- the entire Universe is just one big atom of plutonium. My second great discovery was the real electron is the muon and 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
Tim Sweeney on Univ Maryland and Mark Barton on University of Glasgow failing in all facets of science--- failures in science-- so stupid they cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.
1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction. Read AP's textbook--
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors// Teaching True Logic series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium
This is AP's 5th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,
PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
9) Never took logic, or not enough, to understand Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids black holes.
10) Too stupid in mind to understand for the Atomic Theory to be a law of science requires the Universe itself be a Atom.
11) Far far too stupid to insist the Polynomial is the only valid function in all of math, thus reducing Calculus to a mere add or subtract 1 from exponent and making Calculus ----Super super easy
12) So stupid in physics that they never took a course in Logic in College to be able to think straight and clear and thus able to understand that physics has no Black Holes nor does it have a Big Bang for both violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle. duh duh duh
13) Hopelessly stupid in science when they see Accelerated Polar Ice Cap melt and run to their dumbarse computer modeling with CO2 greenhouse gas, when it is the Sun gone Red Giant because Sun and stars shine from Faraday law, not fusion. As every proton in the Sun is having muons thrust through the proton torus producing electrical energy.
14) So stupid in science and logic, that they will not even do Water Electrolysis and actually weigh the mass of oxygen compare to hydrogen. No, these logically impaired so-called scientists stop the experiment by eyeballing the volume, and then run to the lounge for cake coffee and donuts. Please be sure-- dan christensen, kibo parry and jan burse to concoct a hate sheet that appears 2nd or 3rd in a Google search of AP.