DeBroglie's Pilot Wave theory takes over Quantum Mechanics & Copenhagen-QM fails for the true electron of Atoms is muon// Physics Experiments by Archimedes Plutonium This is AP's 317th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-

99 views

Skip to first unread message

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Aug 27, 2024, 4:30:53 AM8/27/24

to Plutonium Atom Universe

DeBroglie's Pilot Wave theory takes over Quantum Mechanics & Copenhagen-QM fails for the true electron of Atoms is muon// Physics Experiments

by Archimedes Plutonium

This is AP's 317th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: I started this book with the intent of exploring and answering questions on whether Photographic Memory is real science and how it works. But as I went deeper and deeper into research I ended up over-throwing the Copenhagen view of Quantum Mechanics and setting a new foundation of Quantum Mechanics. This book is written as a history book of my discoveries and would be difficult reading for anyone not a trained physicist. It requires a lot of Logic ability. I do not go into details of my discovery, because from this book will come several books especially the future book of "Biology all reduced to electricity & magnetism". As for explaining photographic memory-- yes it exists and it is as simple as magnetic tape in a tape recorder, where neutrons of the plant or animal body become a tape recorder.

I must say, of all the books I have written on science, this one is magnificent and a stand out of one of my finest books.

I leave this book in a date-time notebook which allows the reader some glimpse into how great research in science is conducted.

And I must say, in the past 3 years at least, that many of my discoveries in science is coming from projects I start, and in the middle of that specific project, I veer off into something far bigger and more important. Some scientists believe that great discovery comes from being around other people who share the same interests. But in my past 3 years, great discovery seems better if no-one is around to distract you, and you plow deeper and stay more focused.

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of "Cloud computing hardware". For it is Cloud Computing that is the most modern update proof that DeBroglie's Pilot Wave theory is true and the Copenhagen view of Quantum Mechanics is false.

---------------------------------------

Table of Contents

---------------------------------------

1) My history behind this book.

2) How does signaling in animal bodies work?

3) Tackling 4 concepts, signal, language, memory, knowledge.

4) The properties of Light Waves (electricity).

5) Is calcium in plants and animals more for electrical conductivity than protection?

6) Where in the AP-EM equations is there an antenna?

7) If successful, I reduce all of biology to electricity and magnetism.

8) Signal is electricity & Light Waves and DNA is language.

9) Laser light sparking superconductivity news.

10) Most of biology's memory and knowledge comes from individual neutrons.

11) How does a signal get broken-up then reassembled?

12) DeBroglie's pilot wave is the true quantum mechanics, and the Copenhagen QM is false.

13) Summary.

-----------------------

Text

-----------------------

1) My history behind this book.

Honestly, I do not understand why Prince Louis DeBroglie was not given more fame, and it was DeBroglie who created CERN laboratory. Personally, I myself, AP, the King of Science when after 1990 discovered the Plutonium Atom Totality, the first two scientists that helped my further research into the Atom Totality was none other than DeBroglie and Dirac. DeBroglie for his thermodynamics inside a single atom. And Dirac for his nonconservation of a Universe that is growing by multiplying-up of atoms. Later on Bell would contribute heavily to the Atom Totality with his Superdeterminism. And superdeterminism is just another name for DeBroglie's famous "pilot wave theory". I am indebted heavily by these three great scientists DeBroglie, Dirac, and Bell.

I suspect the reason that DeBroglie was not given his share of respect by others, is that he was viewed as smarter than Bohr, Pauli, Heisenberg, Schrodinger and others of the quantum physics. For obviously the Pilot Wave solution-- took all the strangeness out of quantum mechanics. But then, what exactly is the "pilot" in the pilot wave?

In April of 2024, I read a science magazine article that mentioned photographic memory, and questioning whether it really existed. And I thought to myself, that is somewhat silly doubting. I mean if someone can stand in front of you and recite a book, word for word, a complete book, stands to reason it is a real phenomenon. So I endeavored to devote a book to the phenomenon, for I have been fascinated by the idea other people have superior memory over me. I often have a hard time remembering the name of a person I just met.

Archimedes Plutonium Apr 29, 2024, 4:31:01 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

AP's 317th book of science in science queue line-- Photographic Memory-- its mechanism in the brain and how it works.

I am attempting to explain how Photographic Memory actually works. And also, I hope to use this mechanism to prove other areas of physics-- such as Light Wave = Perfect DNA.

Archimedes Plutonium May 1, 2024, 10:46:11 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

This topic is fascinating for me. And using my Logical mind, I believe I can contribute in a major way. If true-- photographic memory such as the example listed below of Von Neumann implies the Human Brain must itself be a photo-camera. This means the brain can be configured into a camera. I never heard of the word "Eidetic" before. --- quoting Wikipedia on photographic memory --- Eidetic memory 36 languages Article Talk Read Edit View history Tools From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the precise recall of memories. For other uses, see Perfect recall. For the video game developer, see Eidetic, Inc. For the 2011 documentary, see Photographic Memory (film). For Sri Lankan action thriller short film, see EIDETIC (2016 film). For the method in phenomenology, see Eidetic reduction. Eidetic memory (/aɪˈdɛtɪk/ eye-DET-ik), also known as photographic memory and total recall, is the ability to recall an image from memory with high precision—at least for a brief period of time—after seeing it only once and without using a mnemonic device. Although the terms eidetic memory and photographic memory are popularly used interchangeably, they are also distinguished, with eidetic memory referring to the ability to see an object for a few minutes after it is no longer present and photographic memory referring to the ability to recall pages of text or numbers, or similar, in great detail. When the concepts are distinguished, eidetic memory is reported to occur in a small number of children and is generally not found in adults, while true photographic memory has never been demonstrated to exist. The word eidetic comes from the Greek word εἶδος (pronounced [êːdos], eidos) "visible form". Eidetic vs. photographic The terms eidetic memory and photographic memory are commonly used interchangeably, but they are also distinguishable. Scholar Annette Kujawski Taylor stated, "In eidetic memory, a person has an almost faithful mental image snapshot or photograph of an event in their memory. However, eidetic memory is not limited to visual aspects of memory and includes auditory memories as well as various sensory aspects across a range of stimuli associated with a visual image." Author Andrew Hudmon commented: "Examples of people with a photographic-like memory are rare. Eidetic imagery is the ability to remember an image in so much detail, clarity, and accuracy that it is as though the image were still being perceived. It is not perfect, as it is subject to distortions and additions (like episodic memory), and vocalization interferes with the memory." "Eidetikers", as those who possess this ability are called, report a vivid afterimage that lingers in the visual field with their eyes appearing to scan across the image as it is described. Contrary to ordinary mental imagery, eidetic images are externally projected, experienced as "out there" rather than in the mind. Vividness and stability of the image begin to fade within minutes after the removal of the visual stimulus. Lilienfeld et al. stated, "People with eidetic memory can supposedly hold a visual image in their mind with such clarity that they can describe it perfectly or almost perfectly ..., just as we can describe the details of a painting immediately in front of us with near perfect accuracy." By contrast, photographic memory may be defined as the ability to recall pages of text, numbers, or similar, in great detail, without the visualization that comes with eidetic memory. It may be described as the ability to briefly look at a page of information and then recite it perfectly from memory. This type of ability has never been proven to exist. Prevalence Eidetic memory is typically found only in young children, as it is virtually nonexistent in adults. Hudmon stated, "Children possess far more capacity for eidetic imagery than adults, suggesting that a developmental change (such as acquiring language skills) may disrupt the potential for eidetic imagery." Eidetic memory has been found in 2 to 10 percent of children aged 6 to 12. It has been hypothesized that language acquisition and verbal skills allow older children to think more abstractly and thus rely less on visual memory systems. Extensive research has failed to demonstrate consistent correlations between the presence of eidetic imagery and any cognitive, intellectual, neurological, or emotional measure. A few adults have had phenomenal memories (not necessarily of images), but their abilities are also unconnected with their intelligence levels and tend to be highly specialized. In extreme cases, like those of Solomon Shereshevsky and Kim Peek, memory skills can reportedly hinder social skills. Shereshevsky was a trained mnemonist, not an eidetic memoriser, and there are no studies that confirm whether Kim Peek had true eidetic memory. According to Herman Goldstine, the mathematician John von Neumann was able to recall from memory every book he had ever read. Skepticism Skepticism about the existence of eidetic memory was fueled around 1970 by Charles Stromeyer, who studied his future wife, Elizabeth, who claimed that she could recall poetry written in a foreign language that she did not understand years after she had first seen the poem. She also could seemingly recall random dot patterns with such fidelity as to combine two patterns from memory into a stereoscopic image. She remains the only person documented to have passed such a test. However, the methods used in the testing procedures could be considered questionable (especially given the extraordinary nature of the claims being made), as is the fact that the researcher married his subject. Additionally, the fact that the tests have never been repeated (Elizabeth has consistently refused to repeat them) raises further concerns for journalist Joshua Foer who pursued the case in a 2006 article in Slate magazine concentrating on cases of unconscious plagiarism, expanding the discussion in Moonwalking with Einstein to assert that, of the people rigorously scientifically tested, no one claiming to have long-term eidetic memory had this ability proven. American cognitive scientist Marvin Minsky, in his book The Society of Mind (1988), considered reports of photographic memory to be an "unfounded myth", and that there is no scientific consensus regarding the nature, the proper definition, or even the very existence of eidetic imagery, even in children. Lilienfeld et al. stated: "Some psychologists believe that eidetic memory reflects an unusually long persistence of the iconic image in some lucky people". They added: "More recent evidence raises questions about whether any memories are truly photographic (Rothen, Meier & Ward, 2012). Eidetikers' memories are clearly remarkable, but they are rarely perfect. Their memories often contain minor errors, including information that was not present in the original visual stimulus. So even eidetic memory often appears to be reconstructive" (referring to the theory of memory recall known as reconstructive memory). Scientific skeptic author Brian Dunning reviewed the literature on the subject of both eidetic and photographic memory in 2016 and concluded that there is "a lack of compelling evidence that eidetic memory exists at all among healthy adults, and no evidence that photographic memory exists. But there's a common theme running through many of these research papers, and that's that the difference between ordinary memory and exceptional memory appears to be one of degree." Trained mnemonists To constitute photographic or eidetic memory, the visual recall must persist without the use of mnemonics, expert talent, or other cognitive strategies. Various cases have been reported that rely on such skills and are erroneously attributed to photographic memory. An example of extraordinary memory abilities being ascribed to eidetic memory comes from the popular interpretations of Adriaan de Groot's classic experiments into the ability of chess grandmasters to memorize complex positions of chess pieces on a chessboard. Initially, it was found that these experts could recall surprising amounts of information, far more than nonexperts, suggesting eidetic skills. However, when the experts were presented with arrangements of chess pieces that could never occur in a game, their recall was no better than that of the nonexperts, suggesting that they had developed an ability to organize certain types of information, rather than possessing innate eidetic ability. Individuals identified as having a condition known as hyperthymesia are able to remember very intricate details of their own personal lives, but the ability seems not to extend to other, non-autobiographical information. They may have vivid recollections such as who they were with, what they were wearing, and how they were feeling on a specific date many years in the past. Patients under study, such as Jill Price, show brain scans that resemble those with obsessive–compulsive disorder. In fact, Price's unusual autobiographical memory has been attributed as a byproduct of compulsively making journal and diary entries. Hyperthymestic patients may additionally have depression stemming from the inability to forget unpleasant memories and experiences from the past. It is a misconception that hyperthymesia suggests any eidetic ability. Each year at the World Memory Championships, the world's best memorizers compete for prizes. None of the world's best competitive memorizers in these competitions has claimed to have a photographic memory. Notable claims Main article: List of people claimed to possess an eidetic memory There are a number of individuals whose extraordinary memory has been labeled "eidetic", but it is not established conclusively whether they use mnemonics and other, non-eidetic memory-enhancement. 'Nadia', who began drawing realistically at the age of three, is autistic and has been closely studied. During her childhood she produced highly precocious, repetitive drawings from memory, remarkable for being in perspective (which children tend not to achieve until at least adolescence) at the age of three, which showed different perspectives on an image she was looking at. For example, when at the age of three she was obsessed with horses after seeing a horse in a story book she generated numbers of images of what a horse should look like in any posture. She could draw other animals, objects, and parts of human bodies accurately, but represented human faces as jumbled forms. Others have not been thoroughly tested, though savant Stephen Wiltshire can look at a subject once and then produce, often before an audience, an accurate and detailed drawing of it, and has drawn entire cities from memory, based on single, brief helicopter rides; his six-metre drawing of 305 square miles of New York City is based on a single twenty-minute helicopter ride. Another less thoroughly investigated instance is the art of Winnie Bamara, an Australian indigenous artist of the 1950s.

--- end quoting Wikipedia on photographic memory ---

Archimedes Plutonium May 1, 2024, 11:37:42 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So I am going to make some bold claims here. I suspect it is a real phenomenon, for people like Von Neumann are not prone to liar or exaggerate. And with my Logical Mind, I hypothesize that the human brain and many other animals have a photographic memory if configured properly. And this configuration requires that brain to be a "camera itself". So that when Von Neumann sees a page of a book or a picture, he can tell his brain to take a snap shot picture, same as a camera, and that picture is storaged in his brain in some electrical format. And all he needs to do to recall that picture is send some messenger wave to recall the picture in his archive storage. Now I have to review all the ways of "being a camera". Not just the traditional camera, and Polaroid, but even with a recent experience of placing chicken quarters in a plastic bag wrap and freeze them for cat food. That the print on the plastic bag transferred to the frozen chicken leg would be a camera photo of some type. Not saying the brain has a freezer compartment, but saying there are many ways in which we can simulate a camera.

So I wrote my 314th book of science on helping bats fight-off white nose fungus in July and August 2024, and found a troubling "signaling mechanism for bats" to fight the fungus. And looking at my list of future books, I decided to make my 317th on photographic memory, and maybe this troubling "signaling mechanism" maybe uncovered.

2) How does signaling in animal bodies work?

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 7, 2024, 2:14:38 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Now this is a hugely important book for me and biology, physiology, medical science, because of the notion of "signaling" in the animal body, even plants. And it is super important for my theory of Reincarnation. One of the largest holes and gaps in biology, is how does a signal from the brain reach the arm or leg to do something. How does a visual sight processed by the brain and send a electrical signal to the cells of the hand or leg to behave in what the signal tells them to behave. When my brain tells me to wiggle my toes, how does the electrical signal that goes down my brain into my toes and cause them to wiggle. I believe the answer is all contained in electricity being Light Waves of information. And where Photographic Memory is also Light Waves that is kept in near permanent storage. And in the act of recall, is summing those Light Waves to divulge their stored memory. And I believe where I crack this puzzle, this mystery is focus on three modern day phenomenon-- the old vinyl record I grew up with as a youngster that scratchings on a vinyl disc remembers the sound played, and the laser phonograph disc that remembers both sound and visual, and the tape recorder. The tape recorder is especially useful as analogy for it is more difficult to relate to a needle scratching into vinyl to produce the record. A tape head that moves magnetic strips into a position to recall, is far easier. So in this book, I am going to argue that Photographic Memory is like a laser disc that has both visual and sound and that is stored in Light Waves that are permanent storage in brain (or liver).

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 7, 2024, 1:05:58 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Carbon in the form of graphite is an excellent conductor of electricity. While calcium is a poorer conductor of electricity than copper or aluminum by volume, it is a better conductor by mass than both due to its very low density. (source Wikipedia) Carbon and calcium are essential to all life. Now this morning while still in bed in slumber, I was calculating in my head, whether I could match the Speed of Electricity through a human body, by the wiggle of my Right index finger then a wiggle of my Left index finger, then down to my Left toe wiggling, then over to my Right toe wiggling then back up to my Right index finger again wiggling and on and on in this same route of wiggling. Measure the distance from brain to index fingers to toes as a full loop distance. Wiggle all simultaneously. Wiggle each separately and in a pattern. Could I ever get close to the speed of Light in these biology measures??? No. But close to the speed of Sound.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 9, 2024, 4:07:38 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So in this book I need to clarify or begin to clarify several concepts in biology. 1) Signal 2) Communicate 3) Memory 4) Language 5) Knowledge & Understanding I need to explain those using only physics Light Waves and biology's DNA.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 11, 2024, 1:14:17 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

I feel a huge massive weight is upon me in solving this, this problem of how a plant or animal body communicates and signals throughout the body. And in that communication exists an exquisite apparatus of photographic memory in animals. I departed my 314th book of science, a book on helping bats recover health from white nose fungus with this question. 4) The signaling by hormones or vitamin D, what exactly is signaling? We can easily understand signaling when the eyes sees something in the environment and the brain processes the signal, telling the body to move or run away. But how does signaling of a hormone tell cells of the body to start to run? Does this imply that each cell has a sort of "brain" to process what a hormone is signaling that cell? So in medical science we really have no clear explanation of hormone or vitamin D signaling. For me to understand how photographic memory works, obviously I need to understand several broad functions of bodies on how they signal, how they communicate from body to cells, how memory is formed, if they have a language from body to cells, a how is knowledge and understanding formed in body and cells. A daunting task and challenge, but AP was never scared of any challenge. Besides, I have Logic on my side.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 11, 2024, 2:44:16 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

And to loosen that massive weight of solving this problem, let me impose a Occam's type of Razor argument. Let me say each cell has a brain in the form of the DNA contained in that cell. So the human or animal brain is communicating or signaling to an individual cell of its DNA as brain. For plants, they have Meristem in roots, which I would denote as the brains of plants, land plants.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 11, 2024, 3:25:29 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Certainly one of the most difficult projects I ever started. For I am going to try to unify and assemble the five concepts below into some meaningful link up. So I am sitting in a medical doctor's clinic and he asks me to wiggle my toes to the right on my right foot. So I hear his language, and my brain goes to work in understanding, and my brain receives the sound communication of the language. And some memory goes to work in the brain which then sends a signal to my right foot and moves the toes to the right. And immediately we have to ask, do we need to know all of this to understand Photographic Memory? And sadly we do need to know all of these 5 concepts to know how Photographic Memory works. Fortunately though all is simplified because Light Waves exist and DNA exists and according to my books written decades back. That Light Waves are "perfect DNA". And we can immediately sense that DNA when split in half from its spiral staircase helix forms two waves. Two waves that carry information. So my task in making sense of the five concepts is actually reduced to making sense of how Light Waves can be a signal, be a communication, be a memory, be a language and be a knowledge and understanding. And my task is made easier with the invention of the phonograph, TV, tape recorder and computer.

3) Tackling 4 concepts, signal, language, memory, knowledge.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 11, 2024, 5:40:19 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

I cannot tell you how massive of a project I have undertaken to solve, certainly one of the most massive projects I have embarked upon, but not as massive as "Reincarnation". I am about to solve the relationship of five concepts-- signal, communication, memory, language, and knowledge with understanding. But I have an awesome weapon or tool, the tool of Logic. I am gifted in logic. And as the old saying goes "Those of you who are gifted, much is expected". I do not know where the saying comes from, probably the Bible. Ah, yes, looking it up "to whom much is given, much will be required" Luke 12:48. By logic, I know the Light Wave is the ultimate carrier of information. I know the DNA molecule is a model or replica of a Light Wave. It is from that parcel of information that I plan to conquer those 5 concepts and to unify them into one clear package.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 12, 2024, 12:09:29 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Alright, on 11Aug2024, was one of the coolest nights this summer, and I had a moth that was in the house caught in a jar that I was going to release, the next day. I put a watermelon peel in the glass jar in case she needed nourishment. I found her dead but next to her body were two cocoons. Probably her next generation. And during the day I keep an eye out on frogs in my stock tanks. Around August many frogs are attracted to stock tanks. One of them had over 10 frogs, and then a snake found its way into the stock tank and had to drain out the water, frogs and snake and all. But today on 11Aug, no tank had any frog. They must have an internal thermometer that tells the frogs to dig into the ground to hibernate over winter. So all of this behavior means signals, signaling.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 12, 2024, 10:08:57 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe Seems like a long way to get at Photographic Memory, but that is the situation at hand. AP is no ordinary scientist. An ordinary scientist has excellent memory but only a few marbles of logical intelligence. This book started in my recent "bat book" my 314th book of science, where I ended that book in the below quoted paragraph. So I ended that 314th book of science on bats with that question of how exactly does life signal its parts body to cell and perhaps even intercellular to body whole?? How is signalling accomplished? And so with that question on mind and knowing I had started a book on photographic memory, I decided to include signaling and several other concepts into this book. And today is 12Aug2024, and happy to say I have made huge progress. Helping BATS survive white-nose-fungus // biology by Archimedes Plutonium This is AP's 314th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Preface: Seeing a SCIENCE magazine in July 2024 of a dying "little brown bat" from fungus, made me upset, and I said to myself, I have to try to help. And then in August 2024, National Geographic had a feature article on bats and pages 40-41 shows a researcher feeding a fruit bat some mango juice just before the bat is set to fly. Which warms my heart. So I just cannot help but try to offer a solution that saves millions of bats. Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of the little brown bat with white nose fungus next to the fruit bat sipping mango juice. (snipped to the last paragraph) 4) The signaling by hormones or vitamin D, what exactly is signaling? We can easily understand signaling when the eyes sees something in the environment and the brain processes the signal, telling the body to move or run away. But how does signaling of a hormone tell cells of the body to start to run? Does this imply that each cell has a sort of "brain" to process what a hormone is signaling that cell? So in medical science we really have no clear explanation of hormone or vitamin D signaling.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 12, 2024, 10:42:48 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

This will be a key pivotal book for me, as I write to unify key concepts of biology. 1) Signal 2) Communicate 3) Memory 4) Language 5) Knowledge & Understanding Very very daunting task is before me, to unify all of those above 5 concepts into one clear meaningful biology apparatus and process. So I really start with an idea I carry around with me in many of my books, the axiom principle over all of science. Axiom Principle of Science-- all science--- and is this: All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Now here are some rough numbers but they get the message across. The human body, my human body has 10^27 atoms. An elephant would be say less than a 100 of me and thus at most 10^29 atoms, and a whale would be 1000 of me and thus 10^30 atoms. The Force of electricity is 10^40 that of gravity. Gravity as you know is mass and weight. If the world, the Cosmos had only gravity, it would not have Life, for the most essential aspect of life is movement. So in this book, I likely, although not guaranteed to have a newer definition of "What is Life" once finished. So I am composed of 10^27 atoms and Electrical Force is 10^40 more than is gravity--weight-mass. This allows me to predict how much electricity is in the body of AP. For 10^40/10^27 = 10^13. How many cells are in the body of Archimedes Plutonium? And, sure enough there are about 10^13 cells in AP's body. How many base pairs of DNA and of mitochondrial DNA and RNA are there in AP's body? Sure enough, there are approximately 10^13 base pairs of DNA, RNA in AP's body. Alright, so, where is this heading for and leading into???? This is heading for the idea that a Living Organism body is all electrical, and that the mass weight of the body is merely the tangible substance, but the Thinking, the signaling the communication the memory, the knowledge and comprehension understanding is all in the Electrical Part of the body under study. What makes up AP as a substance is 10^27 atom particles. But what makes up the mind and life of AP is 10^13 units of electricity. If I obtained a rock with the same number of atoms (no doubt more massive than me for life uses the lighter elements) a rock of 10^27 atoms. Then that rock is not alive as biology is alive because there is not a 10^13 units of electricity connecting up with every 10^27 atoms of that rock. Now let us do a rough calculation on bats and other flying animals, for their mass has to be far smaller than AP in order to fly. A bat typically is 1/100 of AP mass, and about 10^25 atoms. And this leaves bats with the ability to have 10^13 to 10^15 amount of electricity for their body. This then leads to the question of physics, how does electricity equal Light Waves, how do they interact with one another, for essentially those 5 concepts are interactions of Light Waves.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 12, 2024, 11:41:51 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Now DNA has its own "memory mechanism" as it forms a copy form, a 1/2 strand. But in Light Waves we have a mechanism of Birefringence, a very very strange phenomenon. And we can easily see it being the Wisdom or Knowledge & Understanding. This is where an idea of one mind teaches the idea to a different mind.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 12, 2024, 11:58:59 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Now let us go in the exact opposite direction, by asking how many atoms are contained by Earth? And the answer is about 10^50. Now our Forces of Physics has mass being gravity at 1 unit and Electricity being 10^40. So this tells us that a mass the size of Earth, that it is impossible for Earth itself to be a living creature for there is no way of getting electricity to control 10^50 individual atoms. But in the body of AP there are only 10^27 atoms and so 10^13 units of electricity can control the entire body of AP. So what size of a astro body could actually be what we would call "alive"??? We would need a astro body of a very small sized meteor or asteroid to have a chance of being alive.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 12, 2024, 12:59:52 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

What I am doing here is making all of biology be electricity and magnetism over a collection of atoms. The five concepts of 1) Signal 2) Communicate 3) Memory 4) Language 5) Knowledge & Understanding arise from electricity that is in constant communication with a collection of cells. These concepts are what we consider the "Mind" versus the body. Which reminds me of a joke I heard in Australia when I was a teacher there, teaching math. A Indian was teaching at the same school and told me the joke of Descartes and some philosopher. Philosopher: Mind-- no matter. Descartes: Matter-- never mind. Anyway, the speed at which the brain signals the toes to move, or to react to some situation, means that Mind of an animal body is linked to all parts of the body to react in a split second. And that can only come about if the Mind is Electricity that is in constant circuit throughout all the cells of the body.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 12, 2024, 7:41:43 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Science is truly truly marvelous, so there I was doing a book on bats, wanting to save them, by suggesting the solution is give them water with vinegar to drink, for vinegar solves my toe-nail fungus. And perhaps that is the direction we are going with hotter years, making more alkali -salt environment. And the fungus cannot stand acidic environment. So the bats and other animals are missing acid in their diets. But the marvelous thing about this "suggested solution for bats" is something totally unexpected by me. A research into Signaling, how the body actual signals its parts to move and behave. Which leads to a research in five major biological processes-- signaling, communication, memory, language, and knowledge & understanding. Who would have guessed that research into bats leads directly to the bare essentials of biology-- electricity & Light Waves. So in doing science-- the saying is so so true--- Expect the Unexpected.

4) The properties of Light Waves (electricity).

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 13, 2024, 3:42:46 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

What are some of the properties of Light Waves (electricity)? 1) reflection 2) refraction 3) diffraction 4) interference 5) dispersion 6) polarisation 7) scattering 8) birefringence 9) transverse and longitudinal with compression and rarefactions 10) cycloid wave I am looking for Light Wave properties that explains each of these biology concepts the best. 1' signaling 2' Communicate 3' Memory 4' Language 5' Knowledge & Understanding I have to be true to form of the Primal Axiom over all of Science-- All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but electricity & magnetism.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 14, 2024, 2:16:05 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Alright, I listed 10 properties or behavior of Light Waves (electricity). And I listed 5 concepts that I want to show are properties of Light Waves. In other words, for both plant and animal, they can be reduced down to electricity body and the rest of the body is nothing more than holding up the electrical part of the body. Plants have a worse time of an architecture of body frame for electricity because of height of trees for wood is not alive but the outer cambium layer. Vulnerable to girdling. And in a sense killing of the organism because the electrical flow was no longer there. But now I want to list as many senses of the body that taps into the electrical flow. SENSES of the animal human body (1) Vision (2) Hearing (3) Smell (4) Taste (5) Touch (6) Voice-box Sound That is all I can think of at the moment. And what I want to do, since everything in science reduces down to electricity and magnetism, is to reduce those Senses to the 10 properties of Light Waves (electricity). Vision is one of the most important senses, if not the most important and involves Reflection and Birefringence of Light Waves.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 14, 2024, 3:51:04 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So now memory and photographic memory would be one of the easiest, very easiest to cast into a Property of Light Waves, and thus indicate to us that photographic memory surely exists. For it is the physics example of either the Vinyl groove of music albums like the Rolling Stones of the 1960s or the tape deck of magnetic tape of the Rolling Stones of the 1960s. The vinyl groove would be a Electric field as compared to the magnetic tape of the Magnetic field. Only in modern times of 2024, I need visual plus sound as in the Vinyl Laser disc player. So the Mind, the brain of a human has the capacity to make a Laser disc of electricity that goes round and round in some capacitor of a neutron in an atom in the brain. And whenever the information stored in that neutron is desired, all it takes is a signal to that neutron to release the full information. Now there may involve several neutrons of a Atom, say a iron atom or carbon atom in the brain, a single atom and all its neutrons of that atom act like a Laser disc storage that can release the entire photographic memory of a book or series of books such as what John von Neumann had photographic memory. But AP does not have that ability, only normal memory, chopped up and pieces of this and that. So my memory is etched in many neutrons in the brain atoms and as I recall something in memory, a signal is sent to that atom and its neutron and it releases the electrical information, such as a tape deck releasing a Rolling Stones rock and roll song like "Street Fighting Man".

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 14, 2024, 5:04:57 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Alright, I have a new one for Light Wave properties as outlined in Science News, 10 August 2024 "Light may spark superconductivity: A magnetic experiment strengthens the controversial claim" Here they shone a laser light beam on copper molecules and found that it expels the magnetic field much in the same way that superconductivity expels all magnetic field, leaving superconduction. And this is much in what AP has been saying for decades now, that Ohm's law needs to include both magnetic and electric fields to be not Old Ohm's law = V = iR but be New Ohm's law of V = i (B*E). So, well, does the Human body have laser light??? Probably not. But I would guess that the human body simply does not need laser light and that normal light can cause this same effect in cells of the Human body, especially nerve and muscle cells. I bet that this superconduction goes on in plenty of nerve and muscle cells of animals. As for plants, they constantly need Sunlight bathing in radiant sun, and here they probably have superconduction in many plants.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 15, 2024, 12:42:33 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So this is a big discovery in Physics, for it implies biology has superconductivity. --- quoting Science News 10Aug2024 --- Scientists knew that light could disrupt superconductivity, but the idea that light could also birth it was unexpected and controversial. --- end quote --- Strangely enough, the picture shown in Science News on page 6 shows Cuprate molecules hit by a red laser light and shows the magnetic field in blue being expelled by the laser light, and the configuration geometry shape of the expelled magnetic field is almost the same geometry shape of biology Vaults in cells as written in my 307th book of science. So is there a connection between Vaults and superconductivity inside of cells?

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 15, 2024, 2:45:49 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Sorry I have not been a good movie watcher in the past 40 years, sometimes not watching a movie for 2 decades at a stretch. But I bet there has been a movie producer who created human images as bodies with no substance but just a flow of electric current. Maybe a science fiction movie. Maybe even a old Star Trek episode which shows beings as electric flow and no substance. Well that is the direction this book is heading for-- a human who essentially is nothing but electricity and magnetism, in order to explain those 5 concepts. Now I was looking up whether Calcium, the calcium in bones is a good conductor of electricity, and would you not know it-- it is an excellent conductor of electricity. --- quoting Chemistry Dictionary dot org --- Calcium is a good conductor of electricity because it has metallic bonding which allows the delocalized electrons (those from the outer shell) to flow freely from atom to atom, conducting electricity. --- end quoting --- Well this is New Physics and when they say "electrons" they really mean Dirac magnetic monopoles. And that raises an interesting question of whether any animal has sensory organs not near some calcium skeleton? Can we have a animal with fingers but no calcium bones in those fingers and function as a sensory finger? So in this recent report of superconductivity of cuprate molecules by shining a laser light on the material. What if we shine light on calcium bone matrix; and will we get superconductivity? But better yet, since there really is no difference between Light Wave and electricity, that we have electric current itself causing superconductivity.

5) Is calcium in plants and animals more for electrical conductivity than protection?

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 15, 2024, 3:39:09 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So now the question starts to emerge as to the calcium bone skull of animals, and whether that is more for electricity conduction rather than a "protection cover" of the brain. In other words, the skull is more of the Mind, than the brain contained within. So here we ask the simple question, how much of an injury can a skull withstand and still be alive?? Once on the tv show Doc Martin, he drills a hole into the skull and the patient is still alive. How much of a fracture of the skull and the patient is still alive?? I seem to remember vaguely that a hairline fracture can cause death, quick death.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 16, 2024, 4:02:47 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

No, reading up on skull fractures are not as dangerous as thought. The Basilar Skull Fracture seems to be the worst. Apparently young children often get skull fractures and self-mend.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 16, 2024, 5:15:07 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

1) Signal 2) Communicate 3) Memory 4) Language 5) Knowledge & Understanding Alright, just before I go to bed, I want to sleep on this idea. I am going to replace each of the 5 concepts above by some action and reaction of electricity & light waves. And the recent Science News report of superconductivity by shining a laser light beam on copper (in my case calcium of bones) yields the expelling of the magnetic field is going to be one of those 5 concepts, perhaps several of them. Well, memory is the easiest to turn into electricity and magnetism for all we need there is the Magnetic Tape in a tape recorder. And that gives us memory, even photographic memory. We can consider the neutrons in the body-- the head can hold electric current and where the magnetism of the current is like a Tape Recorder. With Knowledge, I replace that with the concept of "focus". When we know and understand something, we have reached some focal point. And this is common trait of Light Waves-- we focus them. Now language, in the English language we have 26 letters and some 5 vowels and 21 consonants. Now for language we can take the DNA molecule of its base pairs and replace language. Communicate, on second thought is signal. So I need a Light Wave analog of signal. And I am going to take the Superconductivity research as the signal. Mostly because I am too tired. And I am sure to change things as I think further on this.

6) Where in the AP-EM equations is there an antenna?

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 16, 2024, 5:41:23 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So here I need to ask some questions. Where in the AP-EM equations is there an antenna?

The 6 AP-Electromagnetic Equations and the 7 Laws of Physics and all sciences

0) domain law as Atomic Theory

1) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2

2) V = C*B*E New Ohm's law, law of electricity

3) V' = (C*B*E)' Capacitor-Transformer law

4) (V/C*E)' = B' Ampere-Maxwell law

5) (V/(B*E))' = C' Faraday law

6) (V/(C*B))' = E' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 16, 2024, 7:27:34 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Actually, what I am doing here, at least attempting to do is turn all of biology into merely electricity and magnetism. Where we view lifeforms as complete electrical circuits and magnetic tape memory and electricity as driving force. I started out with 5 concepts and reduced that to 4. 1) Signal 2) Communicate 3) Memory 4) Language 5) Knowledge & Understanding I am going to replace each of the 5 concepts above by some action and reaction of electricity & light waves. And the recent Science News report of superconductivity by shining a laser light beam on copper (in my case calcium of bones) yields the expelling of the magnetic field is going to be one of those 5 concepts, perhaps several of them. Well, memory is the easiest to turn into electricity and magnetism for all we need there is the Magnetic Tape in a tape recorder. And that gives us memory, even photographic memory. We can consider the neutrons in the body-- the head can hold electric current and where the magnetism of the current is like a Tape Recorder. With Knowledge, I replace that with the concept of "focus". When we know and understand something, we have reached some focal point. And this is common trait of Light Waves-- we focus them. Now language, in the English language we have 26 letters and some 5 vowels and 21 consonants. Now for language we can take the DNA molecule of its base pairs and replace language. Communicate, on second thought is signal. So I need a Light Wave analog of signal. And I am going to take the Superconductivity research as the signal. And I am sure to change things as I think further on this. AP writes today, 16Aug2024. Well, I unified the 4 forces of physics being (1) EM (2) gravity (3) radioactivity as all three being a form of EM. Since all the forces in the Cosmos make-up just 3, then to turn all of biology into electricity and magnetism implies that only 3 forms of force-interaction need be found. 1) Signal 2) Memory 3) Language 4) Knowledge & Understanding Notice that signal is to memory as what language is to knowledge. Now we can look at other animals to help solve these problems. The domestic cat has a rich language suited for their lifestyle. And it amazes me how they learn and understand the language without having school lessons.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 17, 2024, 2:40:15 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

If successful, one of my most important science books of all time. For if successful, I reduce biology to electricity and magnetism. And the only real surprise for me, is where it started from. It started in the last pages of my book on helping to save bats from fungus.

--- quoting my 314th book of science Helping BATS survive white-nose-fungus // biology--- 4) The signaling by hormones or vitamin D, what exactly is signaling? We can easily understand signaling when the eyes sees something in the environment and the brain processes the signal, telling the body to move or run away. But how does signaling of a hormone tell cells of the body to start to run? Does this imply that each cell has a sort of "brain" to process what a hormone is signaling that cell? So in medical science we really have no clear explanation of hormone or vitamin D signaling.

--- end quote ---

Now I do need to talk about how chemical hormones facilitate actions and reactions. But at the moment I am more concerned with the pure physics of electricity and magnetism. For it is not the hormones that cause action and reaction, but rather, facilitates the electric and magnetic fields in living bodies that causes action and reaction. Hormones are facilitators, not causes. So in the listed 6 equations.

The 6 AP-Electromagnetic Equations and the 7 Laws of Physics and all sciences

0) domain law as Atomic Theory

1) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2

2) V = C*B*E New Ohm's law, law of electricity

3) V' = (C*B*E)' Capacitor-Transformer law

4) (V/C*E)' = B' Ampere-Maxwell law

5) (V/(B*E))' = C' Faraday law

6) (V/(C*B))' = E' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force

Notice how we can make quantum duality laws-- for the Faraday law is reverse of Ampere law in that one creates electric current from cutting the Lines of Force of magnetic field of thrusting magnet in copper wire coil. While Ampere law is re-creating Lines of Magnetic Field by running electric current in copper wire. So this leaves open the question of Coulomb law E' = (V/(C*B))' what is its reverse?? And it could only be V' = (C*B*E)' the Capacitor-Transformer law. And this is a surprise for one is all multiplication while the other is division. Is there some justification for this? I suppose we can say the rate of change of Electric Field is directly related to the rate of change of voltage. Now I apply those two dualities the (1) Faraday law dual to Ampere law and (2) Voltage law dual to Coulomb law. And I overlay the 4 concepts of (1) signal (2) memory (3) language (4) knowledge & understanding. What is the Faraday to Ampere duality here? To me it looks like Memory to Knowledge is Faraday versus Ampere laws. And what is Voltage law dual to Coulomb law duality here? Here it looks to be knowledge as Voltage and signal as Coulomb law.

7) If successful, I reduce all of biology to electricity and magnetism.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 17, 2024, 3:12:35 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

On Saturday, August 17, 2024 at 2:40:15 AM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: If successful, one of my most important science books of all time. For if successful, I reduce biology to electricity and magnetism. If successful, I must immediately follow up this book with a book titled: Reducing all of Biology to electricity & magnetism. And it would undoubtedly be one of my greatest science books. To think, every living organism reduced to a entity of electricity and magnetism. And the only real surprise for me, is where it started from. It started in the last pages of my book on helping to save bats from fungus. --- quoting my 314th book of science Helping BATS survive white-nose-fungus // biology--- 4) The signaling by hormones or vitamin D, what exactly is signaling? We can easily understand signaling when the eyes sees something in the environment and the brain processes the signal, telling the body to move or run away. But how does signaling of a hormone tell cells of the body to start to run? Does this imply that each cell has a sort of "brain" to process what a hormone is signaling that cell? So in medical science we really have no clear explanation of hormone or vitamin D signaling. --- end quote --- Now I do need to talk about how chemical hormones facilitate actions and reactions. But at the moment I am more concerned with the pure physics of electricity and magnetism. So here, already, I can tell hormone communication in animal bodies is secondary, and not the underlying cause. For it is not the hormones that cause action and reaction but facilitates the electric and magnetic fields in living bodies that causes action and reaction. So in the listed 6 equations.

The 6 AP-Electromagnetic Equations and the 7 Laws of Physics and all sciences

0) domain law as Atomic Theory

1) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2

2) V = C*B*E New Ohm's law, law of electricity

3) V' = (C*B*E)' Capacitor-Transformer law

4) (V/C*E)' = B' Ampere-Maxwell law

5) (V/(B*E))' = C' Faraday law

6) (V/(C*B))' = E' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 17, 2024, 3:19:06 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Now modern day movie producers can make a sci-fi movie depicting the Human as a electricity magnetism body, where the skeleton system is the hard wiring of calcium, just as if it were copper. And where we see a human as "aglow in light" as electric current and Light Waves flow round and round in circuits. The actual rest of the human body is there just to support this circuit flow of Light and Electricity. This has probably already been done in some sci-fi movies. You see electricity as the body of the alien.

8) Signal is electricity & Light Waves and DNA is language.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 17, 2024, 3:35:22 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Alright, so I have the duality of V' is to E' (Coulomb law). And C' (Faraday law) is dual to B' (Ampere law). 0) domain law as Atomic Theory 1) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2 2) V = C*B*E New Ohm's law, law of electricity 3) V' = (C*B*E)' Capacitor-Transformer law 4) (V/C*E)' = B' Ampere-Maxwell law 5) (V/(B*E))' = C' Faraday law 6) (V/(C*B))' = E' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force Then I have memory is dual to knowledge and understanding. And I have signal is dual to language. Now let me switch-out the concept of language for what it is in physics. For it is the DNA, RNA and mitochondrial DNA. And the signal is Light Waves and electricity. A "signal" involves a receiver (antenna) and a transmitter (TV station). So I have Signal dual to DNA (language) and I have Memory dual to Knowledge.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 18, 2024, 12:41:27 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

On Saturday, August 17, 2024 at 3:35:22 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Alright, so I have the duality of V' is to E' (Coulomb law). Now I may have that one wrong, that quantum duality. It maybe the case that V, not V' is the dual of E' (Coulomb law). For we can picture V as volume instead of voltage. And we can envision E' as a rate of change of say length, while we have a length of area through space to compose volume. And C' (Faraday law) is dual to B' (Ampere law). Now this one is very interesting for Faraday law can be described geometrically as the peeling off of Magnetic Lines of Force of the thrusting bar magnet converted into electric current in the copper coil. And the Ampere law as the reverse, where electric lines of force are peeled off to compose a Magnetic Field of Magnetic Lines of Force. This is especially interesting to review and research, for it could be the easiest way of proving that Light Waves (Electric current) is a Cycloid Wave, a longitudinal cycloid wave, much like Sound is a longitudinal wave. And here I have to stop for a moment and ask the deeper question of logic, is it possible the World has two different types of waves of transverse and longitudinal that Light Waves are not longitudinal??? I think the answer is no. That Light Waves are both transverse and longitudinal. 0) domain law as Atomic Theory 1) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2 2) V = C*B*E New Ohm's law, law of electricity 3) V' = (C*B*E)' Capacitor-Transformer law 4) (V/C*E)' = B' Ampere-Maxwell law 5) (V/(B*E))' = C' Faraday law 6) (V/(C*B))' = E' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force. Then I have memory is dual to knowledge and understanding. And I have signal is dual to language. Now let me switch-out the concept of language for what it is in physics. For it is the DNA, RNA and mitochondrial DNA. And the signal is Light Waves and electricity. A "signal" involves a receiver (antenna) and a transmitter (TV station). So I have Signal dual to DNA (language) and I have Memory dual to Knowledge. So it is easy to see that you have no knowledge if you have no memory. And you have some memory if you have some knowledge. We liken the memory to the tape deck magnetic strips being coded and we liken the knowledge to reading-off the magnetic strips. Now the signal is electric current or Light Waves, and how is that Light Wave translated into action, into meaning? By the DNA of the body as language. The DNA of a dog when Light Waves or electricity pass through the DNA yields dog behavior responses. The electricity or Light Waves that pass over a plant's DNA gives a plant's response. So we see in the New Scientist article of 10Aug2024 "Light may spark superconductivity" where the laser impulse upon cuprate molecules expels the magnetic field and forms a geometrical figure shape of Vaults of biology. The expulsion of the magnetic field leaving only a current of superconductivity constitutes a signal from DNA. Now I need to connect to electricity numbers figures. It is known how much electricity that big corporations like Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft use to keep their networks up and running. Take for example all the posts in this newsgroup of AP. PAU newsgroup is this. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium.

How much electricity is used by Google to keep PAU active? Storing all the posts (I assume on some magnetic tape disc or electric field Flash drive storage.) And so when a user comes to PAU, Google uses a quantity of electricity to keep PAU what we can call "electronically alive". So how much electricity is involved with AP's PAU of 5,000 threads? Now we go back to the human body of AP and ask how much electricity is running through AP's body to keep his memory, his knowledge alive?? And which is the greater amount of electricity involved?? Perhaps both are nearly the same.

9) Laser light sparking superconductivity news.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 18, 2024, 1:24:39 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 12:41:27 AM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: So we see in the New Scientist article of 10Aug2024 "Light may spark superconductivity" where the laser impulse upon cuprate molecules expels the magnetic field and forms a geometrical figure shape of Vaults of biology. The expulsion of the magnetic field leaving only a current of superconductivity constitutes a signal from DNA. In science, in physics, one thing leads to another, provided you have a Logical Mind able to proceed. If you have no logical mind, forget it, science is not for you. We know from logic that Quantum Physics is a duality of electricity to magnetism. That means in the Superconductivity, the complete expulsion of the magnetic field-- the Meissner Effect. Now we deduce because of duality, there must exist a physics phenomenon that is the complete expulsion of the electric field, leaving only magnetism in that Space. And so, what is this phenomenon??? Is it ferromagnetism??? Or perhaps the recent newly discovered alter-magnetism? My 278th published book of science. Correcting & Chronicling famous Science Experiments-- Magnetism// Experiments of science by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Preface: Before Google shut-down its sci.physics and sci.math newsgroups on 22Feb2024, I was steadfast in posting how slipshod many experiments of science were. Such as Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden gold leaf using alpha rays to conclude atoms had nuclei, when in truth, the experiments do not permit that deduction. And where Water Electrolysis experiments were so slipshod, that they stopped by checking water volume of hydrogen compared to oxygen, when they should have weighed the mass of hydrogen to oxygen and prove the formula of water is H4O not H2O. And when one with a logical mind examines so many of the past physics and chemistry and biology experiments, finds error after more errors, and the conclusions not supported from the data of the experiments. So I thought a series of books looking intensely at the logic of famous experiments is vitally needed, not just to clear up the past mess, but to make experiments of the future be conducted more logically. The first book of this series is about magnetism and the recent discovery of the new form of "altermagnetism". Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search on recent discovery of "altermagnetism" and comparing it to ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 18, 2024, 4:22:41 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Seems as if this book is relying on two recent new research discoveries. The altermagnets and the Laser light having a superconductivity effect. So what form of magnetism is the reverse of the Meissner effect? Ferromagnetism is still conductive magnetism and so it does not exclude the electric field. But is Altermagnetism the exclusion of the electric field? Is Altermagnetism a reverse Meissner effect? It appears to be the case.

10) Most of biology's memory and knowledge comes from individual neutrons.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 18, 2024, 8:04:38 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

I am pretty sure that most of biology's memory and knowledge comes from neutrons of the animal body. And a nice way of finding out is the question of how much electrical energy is required of Google to have AP's 9th edition of Atom Totality book floating around in the "cloud". That book is 556KB. How much electrical energy does Google have to spend to keep that book in the cloud for 24 hours?? Is it two AA batteries worth of electrical energy? Is it the amount of electrical energy in a car battery?? Recently I heard complaints by environmental groups that Silicon Valley's "in the cloud" is taking up the entire energy of a nuclear powered electric facility can produce. Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 by Archimedes Plutonium This is AP's 148th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Preface: Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom. In this edition, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet inside a proton torus, which is 840MeV in the geometry shape of 840 windings of a coil torus and is a closed loop coil doing the Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation and then the growth of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe. For the Universe grows from Faraday law, not from an explosion. Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory. Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus. A different visualization of the proton is 840 windings of 1MeV each. In the ring-visualization each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 18, 2024, 10:23:25 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 8:04:38 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: I am pretty sure that most of biology's memory and knowledge comes from neutrons of the animal body. And a nice way of finding out is the question of how much electrical energy is required of Google to have AP's 9th edition of Atom Totality book floating around in the "cloud". That book is 556KB. How much electrical energy does Google have to spend to keep that book in the cloud for 24 hours?? Is it two AA batteries worth of electrical energy? Is it the amount of electrical energy in a car battery?? Recently I heard complaints by environmental groups that Silicon Valley's "in the cloud" is taking up the entire energy of a nuclear powered electric facility can produce. I was way off, for Greenpeace has it pegged at 30 power stations producing the electricity to make the Cloud possible. --- quoting a Google search on electricity used to power the Cloud --- That's almost a full electricity consumption an entire households in a year's time! No that's not a typo. In a single year the power consumption of a single cloud user can be anywhere between 60Kwh and 1600Kwh. That's the equivalent of running 8 extra fridges running in your home. How much energy does it cost to store data online - ToffeeShare ToffeeShare https://toffeeshare.com › blog › How-much-energy-doe... About featured snippets • Feedback People also ask How much electricity does the cloud consume? Is the cloud environmentally friendly? How much energy does iCloud use? Is cloud more energy efficient? Feedback How much electricity does the cloud use? Green America https://www.greenamerica.org › faq › how-much-electri... In 2012, analysts at the New York Times estimated that cloud computing consumed 30 billion watts of power per year, or as much as can be produced by 30 nuclear ... The Staggering Ecological Impacts of Computation and ... The MIT Press Reader https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu › the-staggering-ecolo... Feb 14, 2022 — A single data center can consume the equivalent electricity of 50,000 homes. At 200 terawatt hours (TWh) annually, data centers collectively ... Cloud Computing's Coming Energy Crisis IEEE Spectrum https://spectrum.ieee.org › cloud-computings-coming-e... Jul 21, 2021 — All that computing rakes in a lot of dollars, of course, but it also consumes a lot of watts: Bloomberg recently estimated that about 1 percent ... How much energy does it take to store 1 Terabyte of data in ... Sustainable Living Stack Exchange https://sustainability.stackexchange.com › questions › h... Dec 12, 2018 — According to a 2016 blog post by Backblaze, a (particular) 1.5TB HDD uses 3.4W when idle and 5.9W when operating. Cost of Living the Cloud Life: Fossil fuel consumption as a ... Cloudforecast https://www.cloudforecast.io › AWS May 24, 2023 — The average energy consumption of an EC2 instance is 0.14 kWh. Given these figures, we can make the following projections about your EC2 bill:. Discussions and forums How much electricity do U.S. data centers consume? Quora · 1 answer · 6mo ago How much energy does it take to run a server in a data center? How about ... Quora · 2 answers · 1y ago Are datacenters that use more than 1 GW of power actually going to be ... Reddit · r/datacenter · 50+ comments · 6mo ago See more Carbon and the Cloud STANFORD magazine https://stanfordmag.org › contents › carbon-and-the-clo... A Carnegie Mellon University study concluded that the energy cost of data transfer and storage is about 7 kWh per gigabyte. An assessment at a conference of the ... Energy‐efficiency and sustainability in new generation ... Wiley Online Library https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › spe by R Buyya · 2024 · Cited by 13 — Globally, by 2025, they are projected to consume 20% of global electricity and emit up to 5.5% of the world's carbon emissions. In addition, a ... ‎Abstract · ‎INTRODUCTION · ‎SIGNIFICANCE AND... · ‎RESEARCH ISSUES AND... How much energy do data centers consume? TechTarget https://www.techtarget.com › searchdatacenter › tip › H... Apr 25, 2022 — Based on current trend estimates, U.S. data centers are projected to consume approximately 73 billion kWh in 2020. A more recent analysis of ... --- end quote ---

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 18, 2024, 10:56:44 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

--- quoting google hits for 1GB of data use in energy amount --- around 3 to 7 kWh It has been estimated that storing 1 gigabyte of data costs around 3 to 7 kWh of energy (see sources below). To put this into perspective, a modern fridge uses around 200 KWh of energy per year. How much energy does it cost to store data online - ToffeeShare ToffeeShare https://toffeeshare.com › blog › How-much-energy-doe... About featured snippets • Feedback People also ask Does the internet use a lot of electricity? Does storing data cost energy? What is the carbon footprint of 1 GB of data? Does data storage use electricity? Feedback Calculating the Pollution Effect of Data CMSWire.com https://www.cmswire.com › digital-experience › calcula... Mar 16, 2020 — A monthly data usage of 140 GB per US citizen comes to 2.1 kWh or about 0.59 kg of pollution. The population of the US is 327 million. So, every ... Five ways to clean up your data 'junk' and save energy KONICA MINOLTA Business Solutions Europe GmbH https://www.konicaminolta.eu › eu-en › sustainability Jan 22, 2024 — For example, storing 1GB of data consumes 0.015 of kWh of electricity, and 0.28kg of CO₂ emissions. To put that more vividly: the electricity ... Carbon and the Cloud STANFORD magazine https://stanfordmag.org › contents › carbon-and-the-clo... A Carnegie Mellon University study concluded that the energy cost of data transfer and storage is about 7 kWh per gigabyte. An assessment at a conference of ... How much energy does it take to store 1 Terabyte of data in ... Sustainable Living Stack Exchange https://sustainability.stackexchange.com › questions › h... Dec 12, 2018 — 17.1 kWh/TB per year for HDD; 31.6 kWh/TB per year for SSD. Note that this doesn't include the energy to transfer the data from the main storage ... 5 answers · 6 votes: According to a 2016 blog post by Backblaze, a (particular) 1.5TB HDD uses 3.4W when idle ... Internet energy usage: How the life-changing network has ... Interesting Engineering https://interestingengineering.com › News › Innovation Jan 18, 2023 — However, it takes around 0.2 to 0.5 kWh of energy to download 1GB of data. It's important to note that this estimate is based on the energy ... How much electricity does it take to transfer 1GB of data ... Quora https://www.quora.com › How-much-electricity-does-it-... For a LAN switch with gigabyte Ethernet port, the power consumption is about 30 watt. For a SDH/MSTP equipment(2.5Gbps) with 4 2.5Gbps ports and ... 5 answers · Top answer: In another answer you mentioned you were interested in learning about the subject, so here ... Note that transfer of 1GB of data produces 3kg of CO2. ... Hacker News https://news.ycombinator.com › item 1000 J is roughly equal to 0.0003 kWh 1 kWh electrical power generation produces about 200-500g CO2 depending upon the electrical grid. So that would work out ... Cost of 1GB of data : r/telecom Reddit · r/telecom 10+ comments · 1 month ago Electricity cost is the only cost which you can think of which is contributing to per gb cost and that too it's not that straightforward. To ... Going from Data-Center to Desktop American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy https://www.aceee.org › files › data › papers PDF by D Costenaro · Cited by 45 — Assuming an average electricity cost of $0.10-US per kWh (EIA 2012), this equates to a system energy cost of data at $0.51 per GB. --- end quote --- Now I look up how much electricity used in a human body.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 18, 2024, 11:07:18 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:56:44 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Now I look up how much electricity used in a human body. Human body is about 2,500 calories per day with comes to 2.5 KiloWattHours.

11) How does a signal get broken-up then reassembled?

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 19, 2024, 2:02 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Now I am looking for how a EM signal tracks down a EM closed loop wave and adds onto to that wave. What do I mean? For example here in Google newsgroup of PAU, I am sending massive text messages, some 500 pages long, a few over a 1,000 pages long. And as I send them, they do not go as one closed loop package. No, they are broken up into smaller closed loops EM waves. So there must be a means in which one closed loop finds the other closed loop and adjoins or adds onto the other. This finding and joining up is the concept of Signal of my 4 concepts--- signal, language, memory, knowledge. In essence, this finding and joining up is the concept of Signal. So, how is that possible. And the essence of memory, is the magnetic tape, where you fix the magnetic tape and then play it back for what memory it contains.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 19, 2024, 2:21 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

--- quoting Cloudflare --- How does the Internet work? When data gets sent over the Internet, it is first broken-up into smaller packets, which are then translated into bits. The packets get routed to their destination by various networking devises such as routers and switches. --- end quote --- So here I am trying to understand how one EM closed loop wave is broken-up then later the broken loops joined back together to make the original. This would be the "signal concept".

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 19, 2024, 2:32 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

--- quoting skill-lync dot com--- These messages are broken into smaller pieces of data called packets. Each packet contains information about where it came from and where it needs to go. These packets are then sent through a series of interconnected networks, called routers until they reach their destination. --- end quote --- Examples: So I see danger up ahead and want to send a message, EM message to my legs to run away. In this case, the message is not broken up, but still, how does the closed loop wave signal the leg muscles to run. Another example: I am doing a problem of math, and so I take one direction of thought, but later take a different direction of thought, then back to the first direction of thought. Here I have packets of information and I have signals on those packets.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 19, 2024, 5:24 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So if that is how light-waves work in signaling-- they have tags on them which direct where they go. Then I have to ask if Light Waves have tags on them? This reminds me of DeBroglie's need of a "pilot wave". But I lost my memory of why DeBroglie needed the pilot-wave. But let us say the Pilot Wave of DeBroglie is this tag on a photon (Light Wave) that tells it where it is to go, and in case the wave is split up that each packet has a tag should they need to get back together again. But now, all of this brings up a fascinating idea. The idea that Light Waves are combinations of transverse waves and of longitudinal and cycloid waves. At the moment let us say that is 3 types of different waves. 1) Transverse ^v^v^v^ 2) longitudinal of plates with rarefaction and compression 3) cycloid wave where it is like transverse but snipped ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ So what I am thinking here, is that because Light Waves can be of 3 different forms, that perhaps the tag on a Light Wave is a different form for a snippet of the Light wave. Where it is mostly transverse closed loop, and where a tiny section is a label or tag that is cycloid, or longitudinal. I need to look up why DeBroglie needed a pilot wave.

12) DeBroglie's pilot wave is the true quantum mechanics, and the Copenhagen QM is false.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 19, 2024, 1:26 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

On Monday, August 19, 2024 at 5:24:02 AM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: So what I am thinking here, is that because Light Waves can be of 3 different forms, that perhaps the tag on a Light Wave is a different form for a snippet of the Light wave. Where it is mostly transverse closed loop, and where a tiny section is a label or tag that is cycloid, or longitudinal. I need to look up why DeBroglie needed a pilot wave. Looking up DeBroglie's pilot wave is the star show of this book. For it now destroys the Quantum Mechanics of the Copenhagen view of Bohr, Heisenberg, Pauli, Schrodinger. What their grave mistake was-- they thought the 0.5MeV particle was the Atom's electron. Which it was not. And that mistake cost them the idea that Physics is rooted in Probability, when it is not. The true electron of Atoms is the muon and stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus, doing the Faraday law. This eliminates all of the Probability out of Physics. The only problem DeBroglie had was, he never had a beautiful example of why his Pilot Wave theory is the correct theory. He had the recent oil drop experiments. But that experiment was really not enough. What he needed was to have the modern day Internet, where computers get "whole messages from the Cloud, by the reassembling of broken messages each tagged in the Cloud and then put back together as they enter my desktop computer far away from where those messages were sent". Cloud messaging is the Experimental Proof that the DeBroglie Pilot Wave Theory is the true theory. And the best website on the Internet that discusses the Pilot Wave theory is this website.

--- quoting science alert --- Could an Overlooked Quantum Theory Help The Universe Make Sense Again? EXPLAINER By SCIENCEALERT STAFF (kertlis/iStock/Getty Plus) Back in the 1920s, when the field of quantum physics was still in its infancy, a French scientist named Louis de Broglie had an intriguing idea. In response to confusion over whether light and matter were fundamentally particles or waves, he suggested an alternative: what if both were true? What if the paths taken by quantum objects were guided by something that rose and fell like an ocean swell? His hypothesis was the foundation of what would later become pilot wave theory, but it wasn't without its problems. So, like any beautiful idea that falters in the face of experiment, it swiftly became a relic of scientific history. Today, the majority of physicists subscribe to what's referred to as the 'Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics', which, generally speaking, doesn't give precise locations and momentums to particles until they're measured, and therefore observed. Pilot wave theory, on the other hand, suggests that particles do have precise positions at all times, but in order for this to be the case, the world must also be strange in other ways – which led to many physicists dismissing the idea. Yet something about De Broglie's surfing particles makes it impossible to leave alone, and over the past century, the idea continues to increasingly pop up in modern physics. For some, it's a concept that could finally help the Universe make sense – from the tiniest quantum particles to the largest galaxies. What is a pilot wave? To better understand what a pilot wave is, it helps to first understand what it is not. By the 1920s, physicists were baffled by highly accurate experiments on light and subatomic particles, and why their behavior seemed more like that of a wave than a particle. The results were best explained by a new field of mathematics, one that incorporated probability theory with the mechanics of wave behavior. To theoretical physicists like Danish theorist Niels Bohr and his German colleague Werner Heisenberg, who set the foundations of the Copenhagen interpretation, the most economical explanation was to treat probability as a fundamental part of nature. What behaved like a wave was an inherent uncertainty at work. This isn't merely the kind of uncertainty a lack of knowledge brings. According to Bohr, it was as if the Universe was yet to make up its mind on where to put a particle, what direction it should be twisting, and what kind of momentum it might have. These properties, he maintained, can only be said to exist once an observation has been made. Just what any of this means on an intuitive level is hard to say. Prior to quantum physics, the mathematics of probability were tools for predicting the roll of a dice, or the turning of a wheel. We can picture a stack of playing cards sitting upside down on a table, its hidden sequence locked in place. Mathematics merely puts our ignorance in order while reality exists with 100 percent certainty in the background. Now, physicists were proposing a flavor of probability that wasn't about our naivety. And that isn't as easy to imagine. De Broglie's idea of a hypothetical wave was meant to return some kind of physicality to the notion of probability. The scattered patterns of lines and dots observed in experiments are just as they seem – consequences of waves rising and falling through a medium, little different to a ripple on a pond. And somewhere on that wave is an actual particle. It has an actual position, but its destiny is in the hands of changes in the flow of the fluid that guides it. On one level, this idea feels right. It's a metaphor we can relate to far more easily than one of a dithering Universe. But experimentally, the time wasn't right for de Broglie's simple idea. "Although de Broglie's view seems more reasonable, some of its initial problems led the scientific community to adopt Bohr's ideas," Paulo Castro, a science philosopher at the University of Lisbon in Portugal, told ScienceAlert. Eminent Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli, one of the pioneers of quantum physics, pointed out at the time that de Broglie's model didn't explain observations being made on particle scattering, for example. It also didn't adequately explain why particles that have interacted with one another in the past will have correlating characteristics when observed later, a phenomenon referred to as entanglement. When was pilot wave theory established? For around a quarter of a century, de Broglie's notion of particles riding waves of possibilities remained in the shadows of Bohr's and Heisenberg's fundamental uncertainty. Then in 1952, the American theoretical physicist David Bohm returned to the concept with his version, which he called a pilot wave. Similar to de Broglie's suggestion, Bohm's pilot wave hypothesis combined particles and waves as a partnership that existed regardless of who was watching. Interfere with the wave, though, and its characteristics shift. Unlike de Broglie's idea, this new proposal could account for the entangled fates of multiple particles separated by time and distance by invoking the presence of a quantum 'potential', which acted as a channel for information to be swapped between particles. Now commonly referred to as the de Broglie-Bohm theory, pilot waves have come a long way in the decades since. "The new main hypothesis is that the quantum wave encodes physical information, acting as a natural computation device involving possible states," says Castro. "So, one can have whatever superposition of states encoded as physical information in the tridimensional wave. The particle changes its state to another by reading the proper information from the wave." Why isn't pilot wave theory widely accepted? Philosophically speaking, a theory is only as good as the experimental results it can explain and the observations it can predict. No matter how appealing an idea feels, if it can't tell a more accurate story than its competitors, it's unlikely to win over many fans. Pilot waves fall frustratingly short of contributing to a robust model of nature, explaining just enough about quantum physics in an intuitive way to continue to attract attention, but not quite enough to flip the script. What evidence is there for pilot wave theory? For example, in 2005 French researchers noticed oil droplets hopped in an odd fashion across a vibrating oil bath, interacting with the medium in a feedback loop that was rather reminiscent of de Broglie's wave-surfing particles. Critical to their observations was a certain quantization of the particle's movements, not unlike the strict measurements limiting the movements of electrons around an atom's nucleus. The similarities between these macro scale waves and quantum ones were intriguing enough to hint at some kind of unifying mechanics that demanded further investigation. Physicists at the Niels Bohr Institute in the University of Copenhagen later tested one of the quantum-like findings made on the oil drop analogy based on their interference patterns through a classic double slit experiment, and failed to replicate their results. However, they did detect an 'interesting' interference effect in the altered movements of the waves that could tell us more about waves of a quantum variety. In a remarkable act of serendipity, Bohr's own grandson – a fluid physicist named Tomas Bohr – also weighed in on the debate, proposing a thought experiment that effectively rules out pilot waves. While null results and thought experiments hardly disprove the basic tenets of today's version of de Broglie-Bohm's pilot waves, they reinforce the challenges advocates face in elevating their models to a true theory status. "The wave quantum memory is a powerful concept, but of course, there is still a lot of work to be done," says Castro. Could pilot wave theory be the future of quantum physics? It's clear there's an aching void at the heart of physics, a gap begging for an intuitive explanation for why reality rides wave-like patterns of randomness. It's possible the duality of waves and particles has no analogy in our daily experience. But the idea of a wave-like medium that acts as some kind of computational device for physics is just too tempting to leave alone. For pilot wave theory to triumph, though, physicists will need to find a way to pluck a surfer from its quantum wave and show the two can exist independently. Experimentally, this could be achieved by emitting two particles and separating one from its ride by measuring it. "Then we make this empty quantum wave interfere with the wave of the other particle, altering the second particle's behavior," says Castro. "We have presented this at the first International Conference on Advances in Pilot Wave Theory." Practically speaking, the devices required to detect such an event would need to be extremely sensitive. This isn't outside of the bounds of feasibility, but it is a task patiently waiting for an opportunity. Empty pilot waves might even hold the key for solving practical problems in quantum computation by making the waves less prone to surrounding noise. Future physicists could eventually land on observations that open us to a Universe that makes sense right down to its roots. Should experiments detect something, it'll be a solid indication that far from empty, the heart of physics beats with a pulse. Even when nobody's watching. --- end quoting science alert ---

I need to go through that history , line by line and point out why the Copenhagen Atomic View is all wrong--- for their electron was actually Dirac's magnetic monopole, makes the Copenhagen quantum mechanics all wrong. What survives as true is DeBroglie's pilot wave with John Bell's Superdeterminism. The fault that the Pilot Wave theory had, was Physics during the Copenhagen View was just not advanced enough in electronics to where we have a Internet Cloud in which messages are broken up and reassembled by tags of the Pilot Wave and then reassembled. This is Bell's quantum entanglement made into a obvious Experiment that the entire world calls Internet.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 19, 2024, 3:56 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So, I have 4 concepts to clarify. Signal and Language which is DNA, language = DNA. And I have memory and knowledge. Memory is like a tape in a tape recorder-- magnetic strips full of memory. And knowledge is a Memory Bank of these magnetic strips. Signal is a tag on a Light Wave, what is called the DeBroglie pilot wave. Signals are in Language = DNA, and signals are in Memory and signals are in Knowledge. This implies that Routers used to make the Internet are Memory Banks = Knowledge. And looking up what routers actually look like, well, they look like a antenna. An antenna stores (very briefly) memories. To some degree, we can say a router is a TV box. AP

#317 AP Book-- DeBroglie's Pilot Wave theory takes over Quantum Mechanics & Copenhagen QM fails for the true electron of Atoms is muon// Physics Experiments by Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 19, 2024, 4:54 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

My 317 book of science started out as a book on solving photographic memory-- what it is and how it works. It quickly expanded into solving how Biology works as "nothing but electricity and magnetism", and I thought that such would be the maximum expansion of this book, for I had unified all of Biology to be just electricity and magnetism. But no, in solving "signal" I find myself throwing out all of the Bohr-Heisenberg-Pauli-Schrodinger Quantum Mechanics, and replacing that with DeBroglie-Bell-AP Quantum Mechanics. The only thing missing for DeBroglie Pilot Wave theory is a magnificent physics experiment in its favor. And that magnificent experiment is what we know of as the "Cloud Internet". It is the DeBroglie Pilot Wave that makes the Internet possible. The Error, mistake and phony Copenhagen QM rests on the fact that they did not have the correct electron of Atoms for they thought the Thomson 1897 particle the 0.5MeV particle was the electron of atoms. No, that particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. The true electron of atoms is the muon discovered in 1936 and the muon is stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton and is the reason Stars and Sun shine, not fusion. So, throw out the window and into the dumpster, throw Old Physics Quantum Mechanics based on probabilities. For you needed probabilities when you stupidly think the electron of atoms is the 0.5MeV particle. When you have the true correct electron of atoms--- the Muon. Then the Quantum Mechanics becomes the DeBroglie Pilot Wave. And the Experimental Proof is all around us, every day, as we send and receive messages on the Internet, we use DeBroglie's Pilot Wave to send and receive. So I need to change the title of this book to its most magnificent teaching. #317 AP Book-- DeBroglie's Pilot Wave theory takes over Quantum Mechanics & Copenhagen QM fails for the true electron of Atoms is muon// Physics Experiments by Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 21, 2024, 12:38 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

On Tuesday, August 20, 2024 at 6:57:49 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: So let me go through this brilliant website discussing DeBroglie's pilot wave and interjecting my thoughts and comments On Monday, August 19, 2024 at 1:26:22 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: And the best website on the Internet that discusses the Pilot Wave theory is this website.

AP writes: Such a beautiful name for a theory-- Pilot Wave, as to guide and instruct a particle on where it needs to go. And in 2024, my message sent to the Internet Cloud, piloted on where it has to go.

>became a relic of scientific history. Today, the majority of physicists subscribe to what's referred to as the 'Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics', which, generally speaking, doesn't give precise locations and momentums to particles until they're measured, and therefore observed.

AP writes: The Copenhagen view of Quantum Mechanics, such a stretch-- probabilities here there and everywhere-- sort of anti-science in its theme. But can such a view tie together two messages broken apart by the Cloud Internet, snip them back together and get to where they need to go??? With all that probability this and that and therefore???

>Pilot wave theory, on the other hand, suggests that particles do have precise positions at all times, but in order for this to be the case, the world must also be strange in other ways – which led to many physicists dismissing the idea. Yet something about De Broglie's surfing particles makes it impossible to leave alone, and over the past century, the idea continues to increasingly pop up in modern physics.

AP writes: Yes indeed, pop up such as in Bell's Inequality Quantum theory that demands Quantum Entanglement found by Alain Aspect and his team. Even NOVA does a whole TV show on quantum-entanglement. AP calls quantum entanglement as simply superdeterminism. No probability that messages find one another after being broken up on the Cloud Internet, but determined to find one another.

>For some, it's a concept that could finally help the Universe make sense – from the tiniest quantum particles to the largest galaxies. What is a pilot wave? To better understand what a pilot wave is, it helps to first understand what it is not. By the 1920s, physicists were baffled by highly accurate experiments on light and subatomic particles, and why their behavior seemed more like that of a wave than a particle. The results were best explained by a new field of mathematics, one that incorporated probability theory with the mechanics of wave behavior. To theoretical physicists like Danish theorist Niels Bohr and his German colleague Werner Heisenberg, who set the foundations of the Copenhagen interpretation, the most economical explanation was to treat probability as a fundamental part of nature.

AP writes: Unless, of course, Bohr and Heisenberg were fooled along with every one else in physics, that the 0.5MeV particle that Thomson found in 1897, was not the Atom's electron but instead was electricity itself as the Dirac magnetic monopole. And that it takes until 1936 for the true electron of atoms to be found -- the muon, but takes until 2016-2017 for AP to tell physicists, they messed up, they have the 0.5MeV particle is really the magnetic monopole, the electricity in Nature, and thus, therefore their physics needed the kook foundation of probability theory. When the true foundation was DeBroglie's Pilot Wave.

>What behaved like a wave was an inherent uncertainty at work. This isn't merely the kind of uncertainty a lack of knowledge brings. According to Bohr, it was as if the Universe was yet to make up its mind on where to put a particle, what direction it should be twisting, and what kind of momentum it might have. These properties, he maintained, can only be said to exist once an observation has been made. Just what any of this means on an intuitive level is hard to say. Prior to quantum physics, the mathematics of probability were tools for predicting the roll of a dice, or the turning of a wheel. We can picture a stack of playing cards sitting upside down on a table, its hidden sequence locked in place. Mathematics merely puts our ignorance in order while reality exists with 100 percent certainty in the background. Now, physicists were proposing a flavor of probability that wasn't about our naivety. And that isn't as easy to imagine.

AP writes: The Copenhagen view was wastrel nonsense with its probability foundation. The probability had to be brought in because every measure of the __atom based on 0.5MeV as electron___ was pseudo physics. If I were to mistake and hallucinate that a dog is a beautiful woman, I too will get into trouble and have to have some __probability nonsense to right-the-ship___.

>De Broglie's idea of a hypothetical wave was meant to return some kind of physicality to the notion of probability. The scattered patterns of lines and dots observed in experiments are just as they seem – consequences of waves rising and falling through a medium, little different to a ripple on a pond. And somewhere on that wave is an actual particle. It has an actual position, but its destiny is in the hands of changes in the flow of the fluid that guides it. On one level, this idea feels right. It's a metaphor we can relate to far more easily than one of a dithering Universe. But experimentally, the time wasn't right for de Broglie's simple idea. "Although de Broglie's view seems more reasonable, some of its initial problems led the scientific community to adopt Bohr's ideas," Paulo Castro, a science philosopher at the University of Lisbon in Portugal, told ScienceAlert.

AP writes: You can say that again-- "the time was not right -- experimentally". I do not know when the first messages broadcast on the Internet were broken up and then reconnected as those messages reached there final destination. Those broken up messages were "Pilot Waved to join back up and delivered in full". My guess is the Internet broke up messages and then recombined them in early 1990s. So that by 1990, DeBroglie's Pilot Wave theory is easily proven true and the Copenhagen view is seen as false. False, because the Copenhagen view of quantum mechanics is based on electron of atoms is the 0.5MeV particle, which it is not. And so the Copenhagen view needed the dumb probabilities to cover up its huge errors.

>Eminent Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli, one of the pioneers of quantum physics, pointed out at the time that de Broglie's model didn't explain observations being made on particle scattering, for example. It also didn't adequately explain why particles that have interacted with one another in the past will have correlating characteristics when observed later, a phenomenon referred to as entanglement. When was pilot wave theory established? For around a quarter of a century, de Broglie's notion of particles riding waves of possibilities remained in the shadows of Bohr's and Heisenberg's fundamental uncertainty.

AP writes: I do not know, was Pauli abrasive and bully like? For it seems that DeBroglie shyed away from his Pilot Wave theory. But of course, you need that fantastic experiment result of the Internet Cloud to throw the Copenhagen view into the trash can and lift the Pilot Wave theory into prominence.

>Then in 1952, the American theoretical physicist David Bohm returned to the concept with his version, which he called a pilot wave. Similar to de Broglie's suggestion, Bohm's pilot wave hypothesis combined particles and waves as a partnership that existed regardless of who was watching. Interfere with the wave, though, and its characteristics shift. Unlike de Broglie's idea, this new proposal could account for the entangled fates of multiple particles separated by time and distance by invoking the presence of a quantum 'potential', which acted as a channel for information to be swapped between particles. Now commonly referred to as the de Broglie-Bohm theory, pilot waves have come a long way in the decades since. "The new main hypothesis is that the quantum wave encodes physical information, acting as a natural computation device involving possible states," says Castro. "So, one can have whatever superposition of states encoded as physical information in the tridimensional wave. The particle changes its state to another by reading the proper information from the wave." Why isn't pilot wave theory widely accepted? Philosophically speaking, a theory is only as good as the experimental results it can explain and the observations it can predict. No matter how appealing an idea feels, if it can't tell a more accurate story than its competitors, it's unlikely to win over many fans. Pilot waves fall frustratingly short of contributing to a robust model of nature, explaining just enough about quantum physics in an intuitive way to continue to attract attention, but not quite enough to flip the script.

AP writes: Well, even worse than having the Copenhagen probability based quantum mechanics, that having the wrong electron of atoms being 0.5MeV particle when in truth it is the muon, caused an even greater turmoil in physics and astronomy, than quantum mechanics. Because with the muon being the true electron of atoms means the proton is only 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law. And this is how stars and our Sun shine, not from fusion but from Faraday law. So, before straightening out quantum mechanics of the error filled Copenhagen view, humanity needs to, more importantly straighten out how stars and Sun shine.

>What evidence is there for pilot wave theory? For example, in 2005 French researchers noticed oil droplets hopped in an odd fashion across a vibrating oil bath, interacting with the medium in a feedback loop that was rather reminiscent of de Broglie's wave-surfing particles. Critical to their observations was a certain quantization of the particle's movements, not unlike the strict measurements limiting the movements of electrons around an atom's nucleus. The similarities between these macro scale waves and quantum ones were intriguing enough to hint at some kind of unifying mechanics that demanded further investigation. Physicists at the Niels Bohr Institute in the University of Copenhagen later tested one of the quantum-like findings made on the oil drop analogy based on their interference patterns through a classic double slit experiment, and failed to replicate their results. However, they did detect an 'interesting' interference effect in the altered movements of the waves that could tell us more about waves of a quantum variety. In a remarkable act of serendipity, Bohr's own grandson – a fluid physicist named Tomas Bohr – also weighed in on the debate, proposing a thought experiment that effectively rules out pilot waves. While null results and thought experiments hardly disprove the basic tenets of today's version of de Broglie-Bohm's pilot waves, they reinforce the challenges advocates face in elevating their models to a true theory status. "The wave quantum memory is a powerful concept, but of course, there is still a lot of work to be done," says Castro.

AP writes: Yes, it takes until 2024, to get the Deciding Experiment for the Pilot Wave of DeBroglie-- that the Internet Cloud cannot work with a Copenhagen view of quantum mechanics. The Internet Cloud works splendidly on DeBroglie's Pilot Wave.

>Could pilot wave theory be the future of quantum physics? It's clear there's an aching void at the heart of physics, a gap begging for an intuitive explanation for why reality rides wave-like patterns of randomness. It's possible the duality of waves and particles has no analogy in our daily experience. But the idea of a wave-like medium that acts as some kind of computational device for physics is just too tempting to leave alone. For pilot wave theory to triumph, though, physicists will need to find a way to pluck a surfer from its quantum wave and show the two can exist independently. Experimentally, this could be achieved by emitting two particles and separating one from its ride by measuring it. "Then we make this empty quantum wave interfere with the wave of the other particle, altering the second particle's behavior," says Castro. "We have presented this at the first International Conference on Advances in Pilot Wave Theory." Practically speaking, the devices required to detect such an event would need to be extremely sensitive. This isn't outside of the bounds of feasibility, but it is a task patiently waiting for an opportunity. Empty pilot waves might even hold the key for solving practical problems in quantum computation by making the waves less prone to surrounding noise. Future physicists could eventually land on observations that open us to a Universe that makes sense right down to its roots. Should experiments detect something, it'll be a solid indication that far from empty, the heart of physics beats with a pulse. Even when nobody's watching. --- end quoting science alert ---

AP writes: When you mix up the true electron of Atoms as muon with a 0.5MeV particle what then happens is, your quantum mechanics becomes stupid silly through and through with probability theory. All because you screwed up on the true electron. The DeBroglie Pilot Wave explains how you can have a Internet Cloud exist because pilot waves break apart messages and pilot waves mend messages back together to get messages in full from point A to point B.

13) Summary.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 21, 2024, 7:30:28 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Looks like I need a Summary chapter. When you mistake the true electron of Atoms, mistake the 0.5MeV particle from the true electron is the muon as 105MeV. The 0.5MeV particle is not the electron of atoms but the Dirac magnetic monopole, the unit of electricity. So no wonder that the Copenhagen view of quantum mechanics is all wrong. All wrong because it is based on a huge mistake-- the true electron of atoms is the muon, not the 0.5MeV particle. No wonder you need Probability theory to flood quantum mechanics. Because when you start with a huge mistake-- 0.5MeV as atom's electron, then you need silly and stupid Probability theory all over the place. On the other hand, when you have the true electron of Atoms as the muon, stuck inside a proton torus, you no longer need probability theory. For you have the DeBroglie Pilot Wave that determines parameters of proton, electron and particles. The only trouble with DeBroglie Pilot Wave from 1924 to 2024, was that no-one had a Experiment that proves the Pilot Wave. But now in 2024 we can look back to the 1990s and see the growth of the Internet Cloud system of computers which breaks-up messages and the Pilot Wave mends them back together. We would not have the Internet Cloud if we did not have DeBroglie's Pilot Wave.

But also, around 1964, the Irish physicist John Bell came out with the Bell Inequality that develops into the concept of "superdeterminism" where we live in a world that has no free-will. Everything that happens is forced to happen. And so one can easily see that a Pilot Wave is needed to force everything that happens. But few physicists or even philosophers could understand or grapple with these new ideas. Superdeterminism is often called "quantum entanglement". And quantum entanglement is incompatible with Copenhagen view of quantum mechanics.

Archimedes Plutonium Aug 21, 2024, 9:27:52 PM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

The only thing missing for the Pilot Wave theory of DeBroglie to be seen as true, is a lively experiment that is overwhelming. What physicists sometimes call a "deciding experiment", a major experiment. That experiment is in, and in fact existed in the 1990s, and John Bell died in 1990. And sadly, DeBroglie died in 1987. I wonder if DeBroglie ever contacted John Bell and discussed superdeterminism?

The Internet Cloud is the deciding experiment for Pilot Waves. We would not have the Internet Cloud system if not for Pilot Waves.

The existence of the Internet is not possible under a Copenhagen view of Quantum Mechanics. Only the DeBroglie Pilot Wave can break up Light and EM spectrum signals and then mend them back together. Because the Pilot Wave has a tag on the two broken signals. A tag that allows them to reach the same destination and mended back together. The Copenhagen view has only Probability. And the reason it only has probability, is because those knuckleheads thought the 0.5MeV particle was the Atom's electron. No, the 0.5MeV particle is a electric or Light Wave particle and you need probability to say where the Light Wave is at. You do not need probability to tell you where the muon is-- it is inside a proton torus doing the Faraday law.

zzzzzzzzzz

plutonium dot archimedes at gmail dot com. Looking for a College or University press to hardcover publish all 317+ AP books of science, likely to become 500-600 maybe even 700 books by the time I die. E-books are too prone to unbalanced-unhinged censor-editors, who can easily make your books vanish by pulling a switch. Science should never have gatekeepers, who thwart access to true science.

| /

|/______ hardcover or paperback

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Apr 15, 2026, 10:00:02 PMApr 15

to Plutonium Atom Universe

I better review this book as I am a bit uneasy about it, now.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Apr 16, 2026, 3:39:15 PMApr 16

to Plutonium Atom Universe

I need a far better title for this book. Perhaps this will do--- "Modern day Internet Cloud proves the truth and existence of the DeBroglie Pilot Wave". At the moment I need to finish my 4 Logic textbooks and then, I revise this book and #322, for I was totally unaware of the huge implications found in the 1887 Hertz famous Experiment.

I need to revise both my #322 and #317 books with the recent revelation of the 1887 Hertz Experiment that explains how messaging in the Universe occurs. When I wrote #322 and #317 I was not aware of the magnificent depth of the Hertz Experiment, where EM-waves hold huge amounts of information and the basis for Radio and TV.

The DeBroglie-Pilot-Wave then becomes easily proven true as the Experiment of a matter-of-fact, the existence of Internet- CLOUD where we add onto a existing message. A tagged message finding another tagged message. Tagged messages is the DeBroglie Pilot Wave in action.