#466 book of science for AP---- My Logo Pictures over the years on Internet, especially with Wheeler, Aspect, Ghiorso on Atom Totality and my attempt of grafting different phylum for Reincarnation// Archimedes Plutonium

112 views
Skip to first unread message

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 2, 2026, 4:09:39 PMMar 2
to Plutonium Atom Universe
This book is under construction.

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 2, 2026, 4:38:18 PMMar 2
to Plutonium Atom Universe
My current logo picture, after coming off of Dr. Ghiorso of transuranium fame is Alain Aspect an experimental physicist in France. His reply to me after writing him in 1991 of the Plutonium Atom Universe is this reply.


institut d'optique theorique et appliquee


Orsay le 2 avril 1991


Ludwig van Ludvig

po box 851

Hanover NH 0355

USA


Dear Sir,


I am sorry to be unable to give a valuable opinion on your ideas. Your way of thinking seems to me very different from my usual way of doing science.


Sincerely yours, [signed Alain Aspect]


AP writes: my name in 1991 was still Ludwig van Ludvig before I legally changed it, to my current name.
I wished that John Bell were still alive in 1991, but he died a month earlier in October 1990 and the Plutonium Atom Totality was discovered by me in 7Nov1990. John Bell did his famous Bell Inequality which would eventually lead him to recognize the Universe is Superdeterministic, what some call quantum entanglement who only understand it half heartedly.

Alain Aspect et al did experiments to support the Bell Inequality.

I had wished that Bell had been alive because of all the scientists around at the birth of the Plutonium Atom Totality, the one that would get it the best and immediately would have been John Stewart Bell, who had a Logical Mind to understand that if you required Superdeterminism in physics is equivalent, is equal to the requirement that the Universe in total be a Single Big Atom, and plutonium fits all the important numbers of physics and math the best.

If Dirac had been alive in 1991, who I consider a giant of Logical Reasoning, he too, because his life was mostly devoted to this quest of Logic--- the Magnetic Monopole HAD to Exist. Dirac, if I had written him a letter would have returned a reply saying--- beautiful.

Of course, well Alain Aspect is deep into experimentation and poor in Logical thought, so poor that he just does not realize that Unless the Universe is a single big Atom of a chemical element in the periodic table, that the Atomic Theory is not a theory--- but a mere meager Rule of thumb--- correct sometimes but not always.

This is what kept Dirac to the grindstone that the Magnetic Monopole has to exist (which in fact is the 0.5MeV particle and the Muon is the true electron of Atoms), his Logical perception that physics cannot be asymmetrical.

I am sorry that Alain Aspect seems to be absent of Logical thought and likely wishes to carry on thinking it is okay for the Atomic Theory to Not be a theory but a Rule. This is why I say--- make 2 years of compulsory Logic classes to all prospective science students before they get a degree. To help them think straight, think clearly.

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 2, 2026, 4:41:39 PMMar 2
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Previously I wrote::

My current Logo picture as of 28Feb2026 is a letter to me from Dr. Albert Ghiorso
109 views
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 3:08:56 AM (3 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
My current logo picture is a letter from Dr. Albert Ghiorso of transuranium atom fame. He wrote to me in early 1990s saying this.

To Ludwig Plutonium with my sincere regards, Albert Ghiorso 1992

Your letter of 20 July, 1992 addressed to Dr. Barnett, Univ of Ca Berkeley, Berkeley Particle Data Group went by some round-about route to me. By the time that I received it there was no longer your enclosure of The Dartmouth 14/7/92 or the first ten pages of your book. At any rate the proper address is

Albert Ghiorso

Bldg 71 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

1 Cyclotron Road

Berkeley, CA 94720

As you will see from the enclosed reprint I am the co-discoverer of elements 95-106 and we are presently working to find element 110. AG
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 4:55:02 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I discovered the Plutonium Atom Totality theory in 7 November, 1990 and I can easily remember this date because plutonium element was discovered by Seaborg and others on 14 December, 1940, almost mathematically 50 years apart.

Anyway, shortly after my discovery I wanted to contact the relevant and pertinent people in the world, to get their comment on the idea that the Universe itself had to be a single big atom of Plutonium. Naturally, Feynman would be tops on that list to contact. But, unfortunately, he was gone by then---. But, I must comment that it seems as though the cancer Liposarcoma seems extraordinarily rare, that two Kings of Science were inflicted with Liposarcoma--- Feynman and AP. I know Feynman was involved in the Atomic Bomb and could it be that he inhaled or ate something that had radioactive atoms that ended up in the Liver and thus caused his Liposarcoma?? Could AP have injested or imbibed a radioactive element that ended up in the Liver and caused my Liposarcoma of 2015-16????

John Stewart Bell, I missed the opportunity for he departed 1 October 1990, and 7 November 1990 I discovered Plutonium Atom Totality. Bell is the famous author of Superdeterminism, and Superdeterminism and Atom Totality are the same thing.

Albert Ghiorso, thankfully he was alive and I got a letter back from him.

Alain Aspect in France was still alive, who validated John Bell's Inequality that would prove Superdeterminism (most like to call it quantum entanglement).

I will post Alain Aspects letter, later.

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 5:10:23 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Saturday, February 28, 2026 at 4:55:02 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
I discovered the Plutonium Atom Totality theory in 7 November, 1990 and I can easily remember this date because plutonium element was discovered by Seaborg and others on 14 December, 1940, almost mathematically 50 years apart.

Anyway, shortly after my discovery I wanted to contact the relevant and pertinent people in the world, to get their comment on the idea that the Universe itself had to be a single big atom of Plutonium. Naturally, Feynman would be tops on that list to contact. But, unfortunately, he was gone by then---. But, I must comment that it seems as though the cancer Liposarcoma seems extraordinarily rare, that two Kings of Science were inflicted with Liposarcoma--- Feynman and AP. I know Feynman was involved in the Atomic Bomb and could it be that he inhaled or ate something that had radioactive atoms that ended up in the Liver and thus caused his Liposarcoma?? Could AP have injested or imbibed a radioactive element that ended up in the Liver and caused my Liposarcoma of 2015-16????

Another famous scientist died of cancer is James Clerk Maxwell. Wikipedia says he had difficulty in swallowing as the first signs of health trouble, and died of abdominal cancer at the age of 48.

The first alert to me of Liposarcoma was a persistent cough that would not go away.

I please ask if there can be a re-examination of James Clerk Maxwell, for he too, like Feynman on whether he died of Liposarcoma. Could Maxwell have come in contact with radioactive substances????
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 5:16:19 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Interesting, Albert Ghiorso at age 95 died at his home in California of heart failure. Interesting because the first element he co-discovered was element Americium the 95th element in the Periodic Table.

In a world of Superdeterminism, none of these things are coincidence, no, no coincidence, but all is Superdeterminism.

John Bell dying in October 1990 and AP discovering Plutonium Atom Totality in November 1990 is Superdeterminism.

On Saturday, February 28, 2026 at 4:55:02 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 5:21:00 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Saturday, February 28, 2026 at 5:16:19 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Interesting, Albert Ghiorso at age 95 died at his home in California of heart failure. Interesting because the first element he co-discovered was element Americium the 95th element in the Periodic Table.

In a world of Superdeterminism, none of these things are coincidence, no, no coincidence, but all is Superdeterminism.

John Bell dying in October 1990 and AP discovering Plutonium Atom Totality in November 1990 is Superdeterminism.

One can picture that scene of John Bell dying in October 1990 and his soul (photons) ascending into the Proton torus (heaven) and when he gets there, his soul looks back at Earth, and with his soul shoots photons back to Earth that penetrate into AP sleeping in bed to have the Plutonium Atom Totality theory of November 7, 1990.

Thank you Dr. John Bell, and rest in peace in Heaven.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 8:15:24 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I almost forgot, I have a letter from John Wheeler over the issue of the Plutonium Atom Totality. Forgot, probably because Wheeler was saturated with the absurdity of black holes and other exotica.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 8:24:59 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
But looking at Wheeler's resume on Wikipedia, it appears he came up with a idea of "one-electron universe".

And lately I have been asking myself the question of whether given any frequency of light, whether one can cut that frequency in half and have two light-photons of 1/2 original frequency.

Example: Violet light is 400 nm and say we had 10^10 photons of violet light, can we turn that into being 2*10^10 photons of Infrared at 800 nm.

Honestly I cannot think of an experiment that splits Light into half and has twice as many photons afterwards.

So maybe the Wheeler observation of positron always comes together with magnetic monopole 0.5MeV, for Wheeler was not sophisticated enough in his life to realize the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole and the muon is the actual electron of Atoms stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV in hydrogen.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 8:29:20 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Wheeler forces me to look up in sci.physics when I first posted the silliness and stupidity of physics professors believing in black holes when they had right there in front of them the Pauli Exclusion Principle that forbids such nonsense from ever taking place, for you cannot squeeze matter into itself.

This is why I say--- every scientist must take 2 years of College Logic to get a degree in science that hopefully makes them think straight and clear and prevents them from becoming a contradictory fool in science.

AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 8:45:50 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I came to Usenet in August of 1993 and posted this about the phony baloney that is "black holes".

Newsgroups: sci.physics
From: Ludwig.P...@dartmouth.edu  (Ludwig Plutonium)
Subject: Why didn't Dirac or Feynman stop black holes (or
neutron stars)?
Message-ID: (CBz0H...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 19:51:00 GMT
Lines: 27

Certainly these two heavyweights of physics had the influential power.
Feynman though did make a correct disparaging appraisal of string
theories.

Black holes violate the Pauli exclusion principle. And neutron stars
violate the uncertainty principle (they are not neutrons but nickel
cobalt stars). In every test case between relativity theory and
quantum theory, quantum theory won. Neutron stars are so intuitively
ridiculous. Would a biologist believe that a human could exist as a pure
slab of just DNA. So why didn't Dirac or Feynman stop the present day
gurus in the physics community from making themselves look like the
movies Revenge of the Physics Nerds? My only guess is that both Dirac
and Feynman knew what fools the present day gurus were heading into
but regrettably both did not have the character nor time to set things
right.

No black holes can ever exist because the observable universe is the
94th electron of 231Pu. No quantum principle is ever violated. Relativity
theory is just closet attic space in the house of atoms. The reason the
Coulomb force has the same mathematical form as the gravitational
force only many times stronger is because we are in an atom. An
electron is dots of the electron cloud, and 10 of those dots are the
solar system.

When physics professors (those intuitionless aspirants of physics) can
not create any new true physics then like a herd of wildebeests, they
are off violating quantum principles.

AP writes in 28Feb2026: My letter to Dr. Wheeler was in Jan1991 with a reply back in 28Feb1991. Coincidence??? No, superdeterminism.

All professors of physics, who have not studied Logic run the risk of making stupid conclusions that torpedoes their understanding of physics.

Such a simple idea-- you cannot have a world of Pauli Exclusion Principle concomitant with black holes, for the ignorant fools who think so, never understood what Contradiction means.

When a physics idiot is teaching black holes, would be the same fool as a mathematician teaching you can divide by 0 and get away with it.

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 10:16:13 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Saturday, February 28, 2026 at 8:24:59 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
But looking at Wheeler's resume on Wikipedia, it appears he came up with a idea of "one-electron universe".

And lately I have been asking myself the question of whether given any frequency of light, whether one can cut that frequency in half and have two light-photons of 1/2 original frequency.

Example: Violet light is 400 nm and say we had 10^10 photons of violet light, can we turn that into being 2*10^10 photons of Infrared at 800 nm.

Honestly I cannot think of an experiment that splits Light into half and has twice as many photons afterwards.

So maybe the Wheeler observation of positron always comes together with magnetic monopole 0.5MeV, for Wheeler was not sophisticated enough in his life to realize the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole and the muon is the actual electron of Atoms stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV in hydrogen.

So let me drill down more on this idea of the Ability of a Light Ray to become divided into 1/2 and doubling the number of Rays.

Obviously true for Pair Production of a 1 MeV gamma ray becoming 2 rays of 0.5MeV positron and 0.5MeV antipositron (dirac magnetic monopole).

How about X-rays of bones. Is this where a frequency of X-rays is split into half forming 2 rays of Visible light, and hence the reason X-rays allow us to see bones inside the body???

How about a violet colored Laser light splitting in half to form double the amount of Rays and which those rays are now Infrared and melting away a metal????

How about my Fan Forced Heater in which the coils produce Infrared Rays but, I can hear sound and music of radio waves??

What I am exploring is the idea that we can take a Individual Photon of Light, split into half that forms 2 rays now of 1/2 the original frequency.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 2, 2026, 5:29:44 PMMar 2
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now the express reason I am doing Wheeler, Aspect, Ghiorso as logo pictures is that a few weeks ago I was looking to see an answer to a question that popped up.

A beautifully simple strange question.

If we have a Photon of Light that is in visible region, can that Photon split into 2 rays of Infrared region??????

And going through Wheeler, Aspect, Ghiorso history on Wikipedia, that Wheeler may just have answered my hauntingly beautiful question--- can a photon split into 2 of lower frequency.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 4, 2026, 12:39:31 AMMar 4
to Plutonium Atom Universe
So for the life of me, I am looking to see if any experiment performed, switched the frequency of Light Rays into 2 rays with 1/2 the original frequency, and the only case known is when a gamma ray of about 1MeV converts to 2 rays of positron and antipositron each of 0.5MeV the unit of electricity.

Maybe the entire EM Spectrum can only do this splitting up at 1MeV and nowhere else. If true, I need so some of proof argument. Maybe the Speed of Light has a say in all of this, for the positron and antipositron have rest mass. A sort of bridge where only EM rays can split up.

But also I must consider the very reverse. where you have say a collection of infrared rays that join together and become Visible rays.

Why would I want or need this property, for all EM rays??? The idea that you can always split atoms, the Final Cut as the concept of Atomic theory.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 4, 2026, 1:31:18 AMMar 4
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I think I found my second split in half Light Ray--- Cherenkov Radiation. Ever since I first heard of the explanation of Cherenkov Radiation-- it sounded too dumb for me to accept-- when antipositrons travel through water faster than the phase velocity of light. Fools who think Light speed is maximum and then want to contradict themselves for the sake of an explanation (a phony explanation).

Instead, let us try the explanation that the 0.5MeV particles divided in half their frequency is blue-UV light.

There are ample anomalies in Cherenkov Radiation and my explanation may address them all.

Now there also is Bremsstrahlung Radiation reported to be a continuous EM radiation purportedly caused by antipositrons being slowed down by an electric field. Anomalies in this radiation are also numerous.

If we instead say the cause is purely that of the splitting up of high energy EM radiation into 2 smaller frequency rays such as X-rays. Going from 0.5 MeV radiation to X-ray radiation.

If I can make the case for Bremsstrahlung, then I make the case for all EM Spectrum.

Now I wonder if some observations already show that Radio Wave can be split in half of their frequency to form 2 new EM rays???

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 4, 2026, 5:24:13 AMMar 4
to Plutonium Atom Universe
My current logo picture is a letter sent to me from John Wheeler. In early 1990s, 1991 I was looking for the leading physicists of the time to write a letter introducing my theory of -- Plutonium Atom Universe. Sad to say, Dr. Feynman was gone in 1988 and John Bell was gone in 1990 just one month earlier than my discovery of 7Nov1990. Dirac had gone by 1984. I wonder if Feynman and John Bell paid tribute on the passing of Dr. Dirac???? Probably.

Anyway, these letters from Wheeler, Alain Aspect, Ghiorso are instructive to me in reviewing them and especially reviewing the ideas of Wheeler. 

Sorry to say, I sort of blocked Wheeler from my mind with all his black holes and other astronomy exotica that defies the Pauli Exclusion Principle. And the reason I require all scientists wanting a degree in science to spend 2 years of Logic in their curriculum in order to help them think straight and think clearly. If Dr. Wheeler had taken Logic he probably would have realized black holes were a contradiction to Pauli Exclusion Principle and not have pushed that nonsense and folly in physics.

But, however, recently in a Logic book of mine--- The History of Logic, I examine the Atomic theory of Ancient Greeks and realize the entire theory is based on division--- The Last Cut. And that sprang a alarm bell in my brain. That if Atoms are the Last Cut, and since atoms can be converted to pure energy and atoms can be divided in half (if even numbered), raise the question can All EM radiation of a specific frequency be cut in half and yield 2 Light rays where before there was just 1???

And looking through Dr. Wheeler's resume of achievements--- his ___One Electron Universe___ hypothesis (really should be Magnetic Monopole for the 0.5 MeV particle is a magnetic monopole and the true electron of Atoms is the Muon stuck inside a 840 MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton torus).

So, well reading Wheeler's hypothesis, gave me more confidence I was on the correct path to figuring out that all EM radiation can be split in half (if even numbered) and end up with 2 Light rays where before there was only 1. This happens with Gamma rays of 1MeV or higher ending up in Pair Production --- positron and antipositron.

Further question, in electricity-- is the circuit 1/2 of antipositrons and the other half positrons??? This offers a exciting experiment.

I am confident that all EM radiation  can be split in half if even numbered resulting in 2 Light rays where before there was just 1.

I see strong evidence that Cherenkov Radiation  is the division  in  1/2 of the 0.5 MeV magnetic monopole and that Bremsstrahlung Radiation is also a splitting in 1/2 of a former single Light ray. There are far far too many anomalies in both Cherenkov and Bremsstrahlung, and whenever a Physics topic has anomalies, is because the laws and ideas of Cherenkov and Bremsstrahlung is ---- false physics--- in dire need of repair.

Here is what Dr. Wheeler replied to my sending him my Plutonium Atom Universe manuscript. My name in 1991 was still Ludwig van Ludvig.

Department of Physics Princeton University
Dear Mr. Van Ludvig
This is to acknowledge with thanks the receipt of your letter of 31Jan forwarded (with some delay) from Texas. I used to manufacture plutonium (at Hanford) so enjoy all mention of Pu!
Best--[signature of John Wheeler]
John Archibald Wheeler
Jadwin Hall, box 708
Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
28Feb1991

AP writes: I wonder if Dr. Wheeler unfortunately died of his exposure to plutonium??? He died age 96, so he benefitted with a long life. I myself will probably not make it to 96.

Wikipedia says he died of pneumonia in New Jersey. Maybe if he had stayed in Texas, he may have lived to 100? But he is far more luck than most who were in proximity to plutonium and uranium.

Thanks John Wheeler for your One-Magnetic Monopole Universe. Wish you all the best in Plutonium Atom Universe Heaven, which is likely to be the Cosmic Neutrons.

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 5, 2026, 12:04:33 AM (13 days ago) Mar 5
to Plutonium Atom Universe
This is one of about 30 attempts to graft diverse plants in 2025. I want to prove Reincarnation is real. All of my 2025 attempts failed.

This year I continue, only this time I use pine, spruce as rootstock and a angiosperm as scion.

The current logo picture is a elm rootstock and raspberry scion. I believe dessication is my worst enemy. That is why I have a sponge surrounding the graft site, as to not dry out.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 5, 2026, 5:07:06 AM (13 days ago) Mar 5
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Honestly I do not have to be a success in grafting.

Do Keep Pond Clean Or Fish Get Sick
domain kingdom phylum class order family genus species.

I hate this silly modern revision of the stupid clade this clade that.

It has already been proven that you can graft different families and genus such as cactus.

What I am attempting is to graft a angiosperm (flowering plant) onto a gymnosperm (pine, spruce).

I will later justify why this is proof of Reincarnation. Some will say the graft scion was not dead, but still alive. I will have to argue that the messages shot from the Control Center of the Plutonium Atom Totality into the angiosperm is now the messages shot into the gymnosperm.

In an Atom Totality, death is only the material body, but the soul is always in the Cosmos and can be utilized into the future.

My newest logo picture are grafts attempted in 2025, but I used rootstock of angiosperms and scions of spruce. I had 100% failure last year. This year I reverse the order gymnosperm rootstock and angiosperm scion. If successful, I will be the first scientist on Earth to graft two different Phylums.

Cactus were successful because they are full of water. My grafts probably died out from dessication.

I had several spruce stems grafted to elm rootstock. They held up for sometime, 2 months but eventually died.

Now, there have been many Liver transplants into people. What I am looking for here in connection with Reincarnation, if a receiver ends up having a Character-Personality change that matches the donor?? It would be a indication of Reincarnation.

Wish me luck, for certainly I will need plenty of that.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 5, 2026, 5:46:45 AM (13 days ago) Mar 5
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Actually, I do not know why I did not write to Glenn T. Seaborg for he and others discovered plutonium in 1940.

Maybe I just could not find a mailing address in 1991. I certainly did not have anything against Seaborg's ideas. Maybe it was because element 106 was named seaborgium.

Yes, looking back at posts in sci.physics, I had issues with naming elements after people.

Rose Marie Holt replied to one of my posts in 5/17/94 saying she had met Seaborg, Ghiorso, Darlene Hoffman, saying "I don't think you will ever pry Seaborg's name off of Seaborgium".

So maybe I did have some aversion to writing to Seaborg for he lived to 1999. Did he die of cancer?? No of a stroke.

So who of the scientists died of Liposarcoma cancer-- Feynman, AP escaped death in 2016 of liposarcoma, Maxwell died of stomach cancer, but was it Liposarcoma??

Faraday probably died of mercury poison. His last experiment had him mix electric current with a bunsen burner that created an explosion. (source charleston dot edu)

Paul Dirac died from unspecified cause-- a long illness. Was it perhaps stomach cancer or liposarcoma. No-one has reported the true cause. But I do not know if Dirac ever was in contact with radioactive materials.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 5, 2026, 6:01:58 AM (13 days ago) Mar 5
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Thursday, March 5, 2026 at 4:46:45 AM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Actually, I do not know why I did not write to Glenn T. Seaborg for he and others discovered plutonium in 1940.

Maybe I just could not find a mailing address in 1991. I certainly did not have anything against Seaborg's ideas. Maybe it was because element 106 was named seaborgium.

Yes, looking back at posts in sci.physics, I had issues with naming elements after people.

Rose Marie Holt replied to one of my posts in 5/17/94 saying she had met Seaborg, Ghiorso, Darlene Hoffman, saying "I don't think you will ever pry Seaborg's name off of Seaborgium".

Looking up if Darleane Hoffman died of stomach cancer or liposarcoma?? She died age 98, and I probably will not make it myself to age 98, lucky if I make it to 90. My liposarcoma of 2015 will probably return to be lung cancer. This is why I devote these last two decades--- top priority to science writing books. I am near 467, but hope to reach at least 500. 

News to me, she discovered plutonium 244 in 1971 naturally in rock samples from California's Mountain Pass mine. Where before this, scientists thought uranium as the last occurring natural element.


 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages