Tim Sweeney (Univ Maryland) reaction to Saudi Arabia having China enter Gaza, West Bank and building them up and evicting illegal Jew settlers

64 views
Skip to first unread message

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Feb 6, 2025, 9:34:26 PM2/6/25
to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP asks X's Tim Sweeney (University Maryland) for his opinion on Saudi Arabia switching from buying 600 billion worth of Arms from USA and buying from China instead and then having Chinese Army enter Gaza, West Bank and the Middle East oil rich countries paying China to build up Palestine evict all Jew illegal settlers and even build a barb wire fence to keep out Jew trouble makers.

Cheers, Hooray, a TWO STATE Solution and the world looking forward to lasting Peace in the Middle East
Peace in the Middle East
Peace in the Middle East


X (symbol) X X-TimSweeneyEpic 4likes, 4 years ago Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? 9:56 PM- Oct 22, 2019   



Univ. Maryland physics dept Derek Boyd, Dieter Brill, Alessandra Buonanno, Chia-Cheh Chang, Chung-Yun Chang, Thomas Cohen, Douglas Currie, Sankar Das Sarma, Alan DeSilva, Jay Dorfman, William Dorland, Alex Dragt, James Drake, Howard Drew, Theodore L Einstein, Sarah Eno, Victor Galitski, George Gloeckler, Jordan Goodman, Oscar Greenberg, Richard Greene, Nicholas Hadley, Douglas Hamilton, Kara Hoffman, Theodore Kirkpatrick, Glenn Mason, John Mather, Edward Ott, Johnpierre Paglione, Jogesh Pati, William Philips, Edward Redish, Steven Rolston, Philip Roos, Peter Shawhan, Philip Sprangle, Edo Waks, Stephen Wallace, John Weeks, Frederick Wellstood, Ellen Williams, James Yorke


Tim Sweeney (Univ Maryland) reaction to Saudi Arabia having China enter Gaza, West Bank and building them up and evicting illegal Jew settlers.


Tim, I know you have a loud dumb mouth on science and math, how about politics????????

Google search of Archimedes Plutonium reveals Tim Sweeney hate-sheet as 5th hit when the 5th hit should be AP's newsgroup of 


https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe      



Tim Sweeney on University Maryland failing in all facets of science--- failures in science-- so stupid they cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.


1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.

2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.

3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.

4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.


5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2. 

6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction. Read AP's textbook-- 

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors// Teaching True Logic series, book 1


by Archimedes Plutonium


This is AP's 5th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        


Preface:

First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.


The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.


My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.



7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle" 

8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron. 


9) Never took logic, or not enough, to understand Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids black holes.

10) Too stupid in mind to understand for the Atomic Theory to be a law of science requires the Universe itself be a Atom.


11) Far far too stupid to insist the Polynomial is the only valid function in all of math, thus reducing Calculus to a mere add or subtract 1 from exponent and making Calculus ----Super super easy


12) So stupid in physics that they never took a course in Logic in College to be able to think straight and clear and thus able to understand that physics has no Black Holes nor does it have a Big Bang for both violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle. duh duh duh


13) Hopelessly stupid in science when they see Accelerated Polar Ice Cap melt and run to their dumbarse computer modeling with CO2 greenhouse gas, when it is the Sun gone Red Giant because Sun and stars shine from Faraday law, not fusion. As every proton in the Sun is having muons thrust through the proton torus producing electrical energy.


14) So stupid in science and logic, that they will not even do Water Electrolysis and actually weigh the mass of oxygen compare to hydrogen. No, these logically impaired so-called scientists stop the experiment by eyeballing the volume, and then run to the lounge for cake coffee and donuts. Please be sure-- dan christensen, kibo parry and jan burse to concoct a hate sheet that appears 2nd or 3rd in a Google search of AP.


15) Is there any university in the entire world that requires its scientists to have 2 years of Logic study-- the AP corrected Logic not the crazy error filled Boole logic, so they can at least try to think straight, think clearly--- Answer is---  no.


Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Feb 12, 2025, 2:12:35 AM2/12/25
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Yes, looks like Trump instead of Nobel Peace prize will end up like Netanyahu as a war criminal with his latest stupidity of seizing Gaza in ethnic cleansing. Donald, what will you do then??? Have your son Eric fly around the world to do your business???

The best bet for Gaza, West Bank, East Jerusalem is have Saudi Arabia and oil rich states hire China to rebuild simultaneously have the Chinese military to insure Israel trouble makers stay out and away.

America USA lost its moral compass in the past 75 years, always honking and hooting the Two State Solution but rather end up doing the exact opposite--- genocide ethnic cleansing --- hideous Occupation and let Israel steal steal the land slowly but surely.

Donald, by sanctioning the ICJ for listing Netanyahu as war criminal, is a terrible thing to do, for it shows you lost your marbles altogether.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages