Dan Christensen 20 yr attacks in sci.math Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed by Dan Christensen Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 =

101 views

Skip to first unread message

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 9, 2025, 12:41:22 PM3/9/25

to Plutonium Atom Universe

Almost every post by AP in sci.math was attacked and stalked by Canadian Dan Christian with his "Student Beware" as easily seen in Google's sci.math of February 2024 when Google exited Usenet.

Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed

by Dan Christensen

Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM

by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM

Not just Canada, but the entire world would benefit from reading True Math and True Logic books by AP.

#5-1, My 134th published book of science.

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 134th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

#5-2, My 45th published book.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 45th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

#5-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 55th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

#5-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4

This is my 56th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.

Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.

#5-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 72nd published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.

#5-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6

by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

This is my 75th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

#5-7, My 89th published book of science.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

This is my 89th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

#5-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

This is my 90th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.

#5-9, 221st published book

An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 221st published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#5-10, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic

by Archimedes Plutonium

This is my 160th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface:

A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

y z

| /

|/______ x

#10-1, My 5th published book of science.

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 5th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface:

First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

#10-2, My 27th published book.

Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 27th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface:

These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic

Equal+Not

T = T = T

T = ~F = T

F = ~T = T

F = F = T

If--> then

T --> T = T

T --> F = F

F --> T = U (unknown or uncertain)

F --> F = U (unknown or uncertain)

And

T & T = T

T & F = T

F & T = T

F & F = F

T or T = F

T or F = T

F or T = T

F or F = F

Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.

Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:

| | ~p

| |---

| | .

| | q

| | .

| | ~q

| p

Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.

#10-3, 143rd published book

DeMorgan's Laws are fantasies, not laws// Teaching True Logic series, book 3

By Archimedes Plutonium

This is my 143rd published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: The Logic community never had the correct truth table of the primitive 4 connectors of Logic, (1) Equal compounded with NOT, (2) AND, (3) OR, (4) IF->THEN. In 1800s, the founders of Logic messed up in terrible error all 4 of the primitive logic connectors. And since the 1990s, AP has wanted an explanation of why Old Logic got all 4 connectors in total error? What was the reason for the mess up? And in the past few years, I finally pinned the reason to starting Logic with DeMorgan's fake laws, from which Boole, a close friend of DeMorgan, was going to keep his friendship and accept the DeMorgan Laws. That meant that DeMorgan, Boole, Jevons accepted OR as being that of Either..Or..Or..Both, what is called the inclusive OR. But the inclusive OR is a contradiction in terms, for there never can exist a combo of OR with AND simultaneously. This book goes into detail why the DeMorgan laws are fake and fantasy.

Cover Picture: Looks a bit rough, but I want students and readers to see my own handwriting as if this were a lecture and the cover picture a blackboard where I write out DeMorgan's two (fake) laws of logic.

#10-4, 100th published book

Pragmatism, the only Philosophy I loved // Teaching True Logic series, book 4

By Archimedes Plutonium

This is my 100th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

I need to give credit to the philosophy of Pragmatism, the only philosophy that I know of that is based on science. Credit for my discovery of the Plutonium Atom Totality in 1990, came in part, partially due to a passage of the Pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce in Peirce's Cosmology:

Peirce's The Architecture of Theories...

...would be a Cosmogonic Philosophy. It would suppose that in the beginning - infinitely remote - there was a chaos of unpersonalized feeling, which being without connection or regularity would properly be without existence. This feeling, sporting here and there in pure arbitrariness, would have

started the germ of a generalizing tendency. Its other sportings would be evanescent, but this would have a growing virtue. Thus, the tendency to habit would be started; and from this, with the other principles of evolution, all the regularities of the universe would be evolved. At any time, however, an element of pure chance survives and will remain until the world becomes an absolutely perfect, rational, and symmetrical system, in which mind is at last crystallized in the infinitely distant future.

--- end quoting Peirce's Cosmology ---

But also I must give credit to Pragmatism for making it a philosophy one can actually live their lives by, for living a life of pragmatic solutions to everyday problems that occur in my life. A case in point example is now in March 2020, being the pragmatist that I am, and enduring the 2020 corona virus pandemic. No other philosophy that I know of is so keenly in tune with a person, the surrounding environment and how to live.

#10-6, 172nd published book

Occam's Razor Extended to be a part of Physics and Math// Logic science

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 172nd published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: Logic needs to have Occam's Razor fully incorporated into logic itself, and to amplify and extend Occam's Razor to be a actual part of Physics science. This book clarifies what Occam's Razor is, and where it is found in physics. AP uses Occam's Razor many times in his research. In a very real sense of common languages and philosophy and Logic, that Occam's Razor is to language what angular momentum is to physics.

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of New Scientist, Dec18-31, 2021 of the article "Razor sharp" explaining what Occam's Razor is.

#10-7, 169th published book

Mathematics Consistency// Logic science

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 169th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: I decided to place this book that talks all about mathematics into my logic section of books because Old Math was dumb and stupid about logic, where math professors for the most part never studied formal logic. They were arrogant to think they needed no training in logic. And it shows quite spectacularly in the mistakes made in Old Math, quite laughable even with their idea that the slant cut in single cone was a ellipse, yet a single cone has but one axis of symmetry, meaning by logic, it is impossible for the slant cut in single cone to be an ellipse, rather instead, it is a oval. This is just one example of where math professors are stupid in logic and then arrive at mistaken ideas. And in all my math education in college, not once did I hear a lecture on the logic of the mathematics studied. And the proofs of Old Math, not once did I see mathematicians arrange their proofs in a logical format, just off the cuff spiel of what they thought should be a proof.

It is even hard to tell if math professors know what Consistency means and how it is tested. For most have never taken formal logic, most have never read up on Logic. Is it arrogance? Is it stupidity? Probably a mix of the two.

So this book is a detailed attempt to teach the mathematics community what is Consistency and a look at the Consistency of Mathematics itself. This is AP's 169th published book of science and I deal with 4 major tests of Mathematics consistency (1) geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (2) polynomials as only valid functions (3) Oresme mess-up of Harmonic series (4) mess-up of dimensions.

Cover Picture: Sometimes a picture is so important that it needs to be the cover picture of several books. This cover picture is another iphone photograph of my handwritten proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, where the rectangle under the graph function is the integral and the hypotenuse of right-triangle when lifted up from its hinge forms the derivative. The Calculus geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is the topmost important test of Consistency of all of Mathematics.

#10-8, 188th published book

Practice in converting statements of Language into formulas and equations of science, math and logic// Logic science

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 188th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface:

My 188th book of science// Practice in turning statements of language into formulas and equations of math and logic.

This book is a potpourri of topics all under one umbrella of a Language translated into a math, logic or physics formula or equation. This is about the conversion of language to formulas or equations. An exercise we did in High School algebra where we read sentences of language and had to convert to math formulas or equations. Not an easy task but valuable for a clear logical mind. I would not see such homework until I took Logic in College, 2 years of logic and translating or converting sentences of language into formulas or equations of logic.

Cover Picture: After assembling the topics of discussion I wondered what particular topic was the stand out topic. And I finally decided the Gigantic Dragonflies of Devonian with its math table, which is the perfect best example to teach when teaching parametric equations in 1st year college. So I took a iphone photograph of my Dragonfly table of my 104th book of science (picture inset of my cover to that book). This is my 188th book of science.

#10-9, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 160th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface:

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

#10-10, 199th published book

The Pattern most-often found in the Counterintuitive Paradox-Riddle // Logic

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 199th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: There is a pattern to most paradoxes, an underlying pattern that makes the riddle counterintuitive. This book examines several paradoxes-- Monty Hall problem, Hotel problem, Special Relativity of Physics and why a fast speedy traveler ages slower. I also go into biology paradoxes and see that the pattern is there also. So this book examines various counterintuitive riddles, paradoxes and pinpoints the reason they are so counterintuitive, thereby, making them easier to understand.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search on the Monty Hall problem.

#10-11, 231st published book

All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 231st published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: The last time I worked on this idea was 2017, when I wrote it in my 8th edition of Atom Totality. And when I wrote it there, I was wanting to switch out the term "things" for a more scientific term such as "matter". For I was not comfortable with All things are made up of Atoms-- The Universe is a thing, therefore the Universe is an Atom. The upshot of switching "things" for "matter" made it better, but never eased my discomfort. I still felt there was room for improvement in the syllogism. Here on, 6 years later, I have finally found what makes me totally comfortable about the syllogism I have in 2023. It is not the switching of terms, but rather the inclusion of both quantifiers into the syllogism. Inclusion of the "Every or All" Universal quantifier along with the Existential quantifier that solves the logic. It ends up with "All Existence..." And the case can be made in life in general-- if stumped by a problem, best lay it aside and let the mind in subconscious find the best answer. I know in projects around the house, if I jump into them immediately I often have to "undo" that work. But if I rest and sleep on the problem for 3 weeks, I find the best way to tackle the work. In this case, I rested on the problem for 6 years, and now reaping the rewards.

When you combine All Existence.... or Everything that Exists.... combine that with All Matter is only one single atom of 1 of 118 possible chemical elements, then you end up with the Universe itself is one single atom of 1 of 118 single possible chemical elements. Plutonium atom fits all the special numbers of physics and math.

This book is about the Logic form of the Atomic Theory as a syllogism. And I dare say, my book would be a nice companion book to Titus Lucretius, poet and scientist with his magnificent De Rerum Natura poem on the Atomic Theory. If not for Lucretius, much of our history knowledge of the Ancient Greek Atomic Theory would have been lost and unknown.

A Logic Syllogism can be seen to some extent as verses of a poem, Titus Lucretius lovely poem to the Atomic Theory. And for which AP believes the calendar of the world was set as year 0000 as Lucretius writes the poem in year 0000, and now we are 2,023 years later from the poem on Atomic Theory.

Cover Picture: The cover picture is my iphone photograph of a old book of 1931, so old that the pages have "yellowed". It is the only book in which I have proof that the idea the entire Universe is one big atom, is stated. It is by a chemist who has excellent writing skills and writes of the history of the Atomic Theory. I took the photograph of page 4-- A SHORT HISTORY OF ATOMISM
by J. Gregory, Univ. Leeds, 1931, page 4-- and capturing the passage where Gregory talks of the Democritean Atom the size of the entire Universe. The only difference really between Democritus Atomic Theory in Ancient Greek times almost 3,000 years ago, and AP in 2023, is that if Democritus knew the chemical table of elements, he would be looking for what element is the Atom Totality.

#10-12, 300th published on Internet plutonium-atom-universe newsgroup book

Unification of Physics, Mathematics, Logic, Philosophy// Logic science

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is my 300th published book of science on Internet; Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: This book started out with me thinking about the question that speed in physics is distance / time and electric current in physics is voltage / resistance and so can we generalize to say voltage is a form of distance and time is a form of resistance? Soon, I was involved with Logic and then even Philosophy. Happily, this book ends with a unification of physics, math, logic and philosophy.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search on the "Scientific Method" which I demonstrate in this book is equivalent to the philosophy of Pragmatism.

zzzzzzzzzz

plutonium dot archimedes at gmail dot com. Looking for a College or University press to hardcover publish all 300 AP books of science, likely to become 500-600 books by the time I die. E-books are too prone to unbalanced-unhinged censor-editors, who can easily make your books vanish by pulling a switch. Science should never have gatekeepers, who thwart access to true science.

| /

|/______ hardcover or paperback

Archimedes Plutonium

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 9, 2025, 1:26:21 PM3/9/25

to Plutonium Atom Universe

Dan Christensen on Canadians struggling in physics--Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

--- quoting www Dan Christensen math---

Dan Christensen | Perimeter Institute

--- end quoting www Dan Christensen math---

Dan Christensen post in sci.math exposing struggles in Physics

Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =

by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM

by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM

Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of

May 10, 2021

by Professor Wordsmith

Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o

May 10, 2021

by Michael Moroney

Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle

by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept

Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

These AP textbooks can help struggling Canadians.

#1-1, My 148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1

by Archimedes Plutonium

This is AP's 148th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface:

Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet inside a proton torus, which is 840MeV in the geometry shape of 840 windings of 1MeV each, of a coil torus and is a closed loop coil doing the Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation and then the growth of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe. For the Universe grows from Faraday law, not from an explosion.

Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.

Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus. A different visualization of the proton is 840 windings of 1MeV each. In the ring-visualization each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.

#1-2, My 48th published book of science.

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 48th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

--------------------------

Table of Contents

--------------------------

1) A visual image of a Atom Totality

2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.

3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.

4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.

5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?

6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.

7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.

8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.

9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.

10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.

11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?

#1-3, 74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 74th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 840 windings and with the muon inside as bar magnet going round and round in a circle at nearly the speed of light doing the Faraday Law producing electricity of magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings, 840 windings with a muon of 1 ring, 105 windings, inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 105th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.

#1-5, My 112th published book of science.

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 112th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 135th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

#1-7, 138th published book

The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 138th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 1st published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.

Foreward:

I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.

So I published the 8th edition in 2019, but after I published the 8th edition, I was faced with the consideration of mistakes and errors in the 8th edition and whether to keep revising the 8th edition. A mistake was I thought the Electric Field was the same as Voltage and thus redundant, but in 2020, whilst doing gravity as EM force I realized Electric Field exists not as Voltage but is the equivalent of Angular Momentum. Instead of going through the 8th edition and changing things and correcting things, would only ruin its historical value. If I did that; keep revising would ruin the historic discovery made. And instead of going back and correcting those mistakes, I decided to write the 9th edition and leave as much as possible of the 8th edition intact, totally intact, mistakes and all, as is. Because I feel the historical significance of the 8th edition in that discovery of the real electron and thus the real proton of atoms, needs to be a "physics history book" rather than a physics textbook.

Another large mistake in 8th edition is the concept of "charge" for that is replaced by the magnetic monopole. Here again, if I go into the 8th edition and make corrections, I begin to lose the historical value of the book, a hugely important book as is for the history of physics and science. Thus, I keep the original text intact, mistakes and all.

So I decided to come back and discuss my writing of the 8th edition and that all important famous discovery of what the real electron and real proton were, for the value of pointing out how a great physics discovery was made. I still have 2016, 2017, and 2018 clear in my mind, of my thoughts and able to write this 8th edition as a history of physics book. But if I postpone this writing and do not write this history book now, at this moment in time, those recollections will go away. So I better write this physics history book now and for the teaching lessons of how to make a physics discovery, if possible.

The fully revised and up to date Atom Totality Universe theory can be seen in the 9th edition.

#1-9, 163rd published book

Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 163rd published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.

Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.

#1-10, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 161st published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface:

A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.

It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.

Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

y z

| /

|/______ x

#2-1, My 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 137th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.

And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 145th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 146th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.

Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

#2-4, My 151st published book of science.

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 151st published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

#2-5, My 174th published book of science.

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 174th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).

Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.

#2-6, 177th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 177th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.

Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.

#2-7, 178th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 178th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.

The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.

#2-8, My 202nd published book of science.

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Permanent Colony on Europa// graduate school college

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 202nd published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface: Crisis emergency times call for textbooks to reflect the times. The Sun gone Red Giant Initiation Phase as measured by NASA in the decade of 2010 to 2020 as showing a 0.005% Solar Radiation yearly increase threatens all life on Earth with extinction and oblivion. This crisis calls for "All Hands On Deck" to solve the problem. And to solve that problem we need all scientists in the work effort of getting Europa, the satellite of Jupiter to be our second home. I see no textbook for college graduate school as appropriate, unless it is a book addressing the crisis itself. Just the opposite of Nero was fiddling while Rome burned; we want All Hands on Deck, to save as much life on Earth as possible.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search for Europa with Webb telescope. These are exciting times in that the Webb telescope maybe able to pinpoint life on Europa.

#2-9, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is AP's 161st published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Preface:

It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 16, 2026, 4:16:15 AM (6 days ago) Jul 16

to Plutonium Atom Universe

Donald Trump on Univ Western Ontario math failure Dan Christensen, because Dan is too stupid to admit slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse, and force feeds his students with this nonsense. Dan is so bad in math, a complete flop that he never understood calculus is geometry, thence, it requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM

Re: Roi des Rois de la Science --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4
by Donald Trump by Apr 2, 2020, 12:38:32 AM

Dan Christensen tried to reconcile with Donald Trump in this post.

Re: Trump smarter in math than MIT & UC, Riverside Math departments, smarter in math than Terry Tao, Ed Witten, Appel & Hakken
by Dan Christensen Nov 10, 2016, 3:28:07 PM

But Donald Trump is far smarter than Dan Christensen as he continues to brainwash and propagandize Canadian students with his failed mind in mathematics.

Dan Christensen

Western University

https://jdc.math.uwo.ca

I am a Professor in the Department of Mathematics at The University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario, and am an Affiliate Member of the Perimeter Institute ...Read more

Dan Christensen

Google Scholar

https://scholar.google.com › citations

Professor of Mathematics, University of Western Ontario - ‪‪Cited by 1787‬‬ - ‪Algebraic Topology‬ - ‪Homotopy Type Theory‬ - ‪Representation Theory‬ ...

(John) Daniel Christensen

The Mathematics Genealogy Project

https://genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu › ...

(John) Daniel Christensen, MathSciNet, Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1997 UnitedStates, Dissertation: Ideals in triangulated categories.Read more

Videos

Dan Christensen, Sphere bundles and their invariants

YouTube HoTTEST

Apr 11, 2024

8 key moments in this video

Dan Christensen: "Reasoning in an ∞-topos with homotopy ...

YouTube Topos Institute

Apr 2, 2021

10 key moments in this video

The Hurewicz Theorem in Homotopy Type Theory - Dan ...

YouTube HoTT-UF 2020

Jul 7, 2020

10 key moments in this video

View all

User Dan Christensen

MathOverflow

https://mathoverflow.net › users › dan-christensen

I'm a professor in the Department of Mathematics at the University of Western Ontario, and am affiliated with the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics.

J. Daniel Christensen in nLab

nLab

https://ncatlab.org › nlab › show › J.+Daniel+Christensen

Jan 17, 2026 — Daniel Christensen is a mathematician at the University of Western Ontario. On model structures on chain complexes in homological algebra:

J. Daniel Christensen's articles on arXiv

arXiv

https://arxiv.org › christensen_j_1

Authors: J. Daniel Christensen, Subjects: Algebraic Topology (math.AT); Logic in Computer Science. Logic (math.LO) Subjects: Representation Theory (math.RT); ...

Dan Christensen @jdchristensen

Mathstodon

https://mathstodon.xyz › @jdchristensen

I'm a mathematician at the University of Western Ontario. I'm interested in homotopy theory, higher categories, homotopy type theory, and many other things.Read more

Dan Christensen's papers, preprints and talks

Western University

https://jdc.math.uwo.ca › papers

Dan Christensen's papers, preprints and talks. All of my papers are available from my author page at the arXiv. Citation information is available via my ...Read more

Dan Christensen

Perimeter Institute

https://perimeterinstitute.ca › people › dan-christensen

My research interests include algebraic topology (especially stable homotopy theory and model categories), derived categories, modular representation theory.Read more

ppp

Here is Dan Christensen-- perpetual stalker in sci.math, his last post to me before Google departed sci.math in 22Feb2024:

Dan Christensen, sci.math 2/22/24 says: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science.

AP writes:: You see Dan Christensen is scared of having to teach the real truth of mathematics--- slant cut of cone is a Oval, never ellipse, and Dan is a stupid lousy failure of math that he can never do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Many other people in sci.math realized he was a math failure such as the list below evinces.

Re: 81,045-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker
by Frank Cassa 12Apr2021 7:00 AM

Re: 7,744-Student victims of Linda Hasenfratz Univ Western Ontario from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz President Alan Shepard
11:53 AM 10Apr2021
by Wayne Decarlo

Re: 102,852-Student victims of Dominic Barton, Univ Waterloo from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Dominic Barton, President Feridun Hamdullahpur physics
by konyberg Apr 15, 2021, 3:09:41 PM

Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus... 0.5MeV electron when in truth it is the muon as the real electron
by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM

Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of
May 10, 2021
by Professor Wordsmith

Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 18, 2026, 6:55:58 PM (3 days ago) Jul 18

to Plutonium Atom Universe

AI overview of Dan Christensen on Terry Tao UCLA, Linda Hasenfratz, Michael Meighen, John Baez UC Riverside

AP writes: Nice to see Google and others referencing what the last human input was to each AI overview, so the correct people can be held accountable for demonization and dehumanization attacks. It is not enough for Google and others to say --- "AI responses may include mistakes" in a world where NO AI actually exists, because the minimum threshold of AI is self-awareness, and no machine ever built is self aware of itself, meaning these are AI-- artificial ignorance pretending to be intelligent, all for the sake of making a stock market bubble that crashes the market.

"Dan Christensen" is a notorious Usenet personality and internet crank known for his sprawling, non-standard theories in mathematics and physics. He is best recognized for the " Totality failure to admit truth that slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse" theory, which claims that Terry Tao UCLA, Linda Hasenfratz, Michael Meighen, John Baez UC Riverside. [1, 2]

For a look at the bizarre lore and discussions surrounding this eccentric internet figure:

30s

The Strangest Professor Ever?! 🥧

1.5K views · 4 months ago

YouTube · Elemon

ppp

Donald Trump on Univ Western Ontario math failure Dan Christensen, because Dan is too stupid to admit slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse, and force feeds his students with this nonsense. Dan is so bad in math, a complete flop that he never understood calculus is geometry, thence, it requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM

Re: Roi des Rois de la Science --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4
by Donald Trump by Apr 2, 2020, 12:38:32 AM

Dan Christensen tried to reconcile with Donald Trump in this post.

Re: Trump smarter in math than MIT & UC, Riverside Math departments, smarter in math than Terry Tao, Ed Witten, Appel & Hakken
by Dan Christensen Nov 10, 2016, 3:28:07 PM

But Donald Trump is far smarter than Dan Christensen as he continues to brainwash and propagandize Canadian students with his failed mind in mathematics.

On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM

John Baez UC Riverside:
On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 3:28:35 AM UTC-5, noTthaTguY wrote:
> ellipses are ovals, but not all ovals are elipses, of course;
> just grab a dictionary, asshole
>

UC Riverside Math Dept, provost: Cynthia Larive- chemist,
Mark Alber, John Baez, Mei-Chu Chang, Vyjayanthi Chari, Kevin Costello, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz, Jacob Greenstein, Jose Gonzalez, Zhuang-dan Guan, Jim Kelliher, Sara Lapan, Michel Lapidus, Carl Mautner, Amir Moradifam, Yat Sun Poon, Ziv Ran, David Rush, Reinhard Schultz, Stefano Vidussi, David Weisbart, Fred Wilhelm, Bun Wong, Yulong Xing, Feng Xu, Qi Zhang

Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM

Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon

Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard

Amit Chakma (chem engr)

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM

Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021

Re: Dan Christensen says close all math, physics, chemistry dept. in ALL Canadian Colleges with their fake electron (muon is real electron), fake geometry proof of calculus (Old Math sums up 0 width rectangles), fake Lewis 8 Structure (dissociation...
by Giant Radioactive Easter Bunnie Jan 21, 2021, 5:38:37 PM

Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed
by Dan Christensen

Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM

Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus... 0.5MeV electron when in truth it is the muon as the real electron
by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM

Re: 81,045-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker
by Frank Cassa 12Apr2021 7:00 AM

Re: 7,744-Student victims of Linda Hasenfratz Univ Western Ontario from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz President Alan Shepard
11:53 AM 10Apr2021
by Wayne Decarlo

Re: 102,852-Student victims of Dominic Barton, Univ Waterloo from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Dominic Barton, President Feridun Hamdullahpur physics
by konyberg Apr 15, 2021, 3:09:41 PM

Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus... 0.5MeV electron when in truth it is the muon as the real electron
by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM

Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of
May 10, 2021
by Professor Wordsmith

Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle

by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

1:31 AM (19 hours ago) 1:31 AM

to Plutonium Atom Universe

Dan Christensen of UWO on a firing campaign-- Steve Huffman, Julie Bergner, Mikhail Ershov, Jeffrey Holt, John Imbrie, Thomas Koberda, Slava Krushkal, Thomas Mark, Jennifer Morse, Ken Ono, Andrei Rapinchuk, Christian Reidys, Jim Rolf, Charles Dunki, Ira Herbst

In sci.math

Re: Dr.Terence Tao along with Dr. Gene D.Block fired from UCLA for teaching propaganda -- truth is slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, yet UCLA continues their propaganda of ellipse as slant cut.
by Dan Christensen Nov 26, 2022, 4:39:58 PM

Re: Fire WM & his spammers, Gottingen Uni's Metin Tolan, Germany's Anja Karliczek ministry of educ, and Jim Burns perpetual sci.math spammer, all for teaching slant cut of cone is ellipse when it never was -- it is a oval. Many of the WM spam brigade
by zelos...@gmail.com Nov 29, 2022, 2:40 AM

Re: forgyvme i sick i cry
by Bobby Spanò Nov 29, 2022, 12:42 PM

Steve Huffman lists science lunatics:

Reddit (symbol) r/math, 3 years ago Genius meets Lunatic: 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium

I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane: and it is 1 (color everything

..Is this crank perchance John Gabriel?

Univ Virginia math dept: Peter Abramenko, Julie Bergner, Mikhail Ershov, Jeffrey Holt, John Imbrie, Thomas Koberda, Slava Krushkal, Thomas Mark, Jennifer Morse, Ken Ono, Andrei Rapinchuk, Christian Reidys, Jim Rolf, Charles Dunki, Ira Herbst, James Howland, Craig Huneke, Thomas Kriete, Nicholas Kuhn, Irena Lasiecka, Barbara MacCluer, Kevin McCrimmon, Karen Parshall, Loren Pitt, Donald Ramirez, James Rovnyak, Leonard Scott, Lawrence Thomas, Roberto Triggiani, Harold Ward

Steve Huffman on math lunatics Terence Tao,

Steve Huffman University of Virginia,

Reddit (symbol) An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers Reddit · r/badmathematics 10+ comments · 6 years ago An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers ... In Grid Systems, you are exact only to the Grid, and forget about the beyond. "The ...

UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)

UCLA Physics dept

Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis

Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma

Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty

W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker

Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini

George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer

Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko

Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski

Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini

Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick

David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner

Willard Libby (chem), Julian Schwinger (physics), Paul Boyer (chem), Andrea Ghez, James Fraser Stoddart (chem), Louis Ignarro (physio-medic)

UCLA math dept.

Donald Babbitt, Kirby Baker, Andrea Bertozzi, Mario Bonk, Lennart Carleson, Tony F-C Chan, Shiu-Yuen Cheng, Robert Edwards, Gregory Eskin, Hector Fattorini, Thomas Ferguson, Theodore Gamelin, John Garnett, David Gillman, Mark Green, Nathaniel Grossman, Alfred Hales, Robert Jennrich, Paul Johnson, Alan Laub, Thomas Liggett, Donald Martin, Sidney Port, James Ralston, Paul Roberts, Bruce Rothschild, Murray Schacher, Roberto Schonmann, Masamichi Takesaki, Terence Tao, Veeravalli Varadarajan, James White, Donald Ylvisaker

AI Overview

University of Virginia is a well-known Usenet-era fringe math school. Known for posting unique theories on mathematics and physics, its most famous creation is the "slant cut of cone is ellipse when in truth it is a oval" theory, which posits that no-one at Univ Virginia or UCLA with Terry Tao have the brains to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. [1, 2]

For a quick look into how the Usenet community reacted to his eccentric and highly unconventional ideas:

The Strangest Professor Ever?! 🥧

2 sites

1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium - Reddit
Ludwig Plutonium's Character: Ludwig Plutonium (also known as Archimedes Plutonium) is a notable Usenet-era crank in mathematics, ...
Reddit