Psychopathology of Math Professors who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse//psychology-math by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle) This is my 285th published book of science.

113 views
Skip to first unread message

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 30, 2024, 4:19:44 PM3/30/24
to Plutonium Atom Universe

My 285th published book of science.



Psychopathology of Math Professors who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse//psychology-math


by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


This is my 285th published book of science.


Preface: This book examines why Math professors and even High School teachers refuse to admit slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse. By giving a psychology answer, more precisely, a psychopathology for why math teachers refuse to correct their mistake, subsequently students suffer in having to learn and be tested upon error laden math.


Cover Picture: A picture of a cone with a semi-sphere inside the right-circular cone and nearby a cylinder. I draw the two to your attention because cylinder and ellipse have 2 axes of symmetry, while the cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry.





Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CZ4MTMLB
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 25, 2024
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 573 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 46 pages

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Apr 6, 2024, 3:29:15 AM4/6/24
to Plutonium Atom Universe

Narkive's Davide Cavion solving Dan Christensen's problem of pissing on true math calculus and making calculus classrooms as torture chambers.


Narkive's Davide Cavion-- When one does not break any laws, one is fearless. In your lingo what this means is: I piss ... 


Re: ...,One pint short of an empty bladder // Harvard's Dr.Hau "slow light", and turning the laser off; I find very comprehensible 170 views Dan Christensen's profile photo Dan Christensen Jun 9, 2019, 1:53:00 PM


AP's 283rd published book of science.



Psychopathology of why math professors refuse to make Calculus super-easy and stop torturing students// psychology in math


by Archimedes Plutonium


Preface: AP is sick and tired of Old Math and Old Math professors who refuse to correct and revise what math they teach. Calculus as taught today is a torture chamber, of vomiting during exams, and nervous breakdowns all because math professors do not switch to the super-easy calculus, where the only valid function of mathematics is the polynomial, making calculus super, super easy. And AP can teach calculus in Junior High School, so easy as it is. Old Math teaches fake calculus, that is tough and incomprehensible to students with a mindless limit analysis, expecting students to accept a rectangle with 0 width having interior area for integral, and their derivative as tangent to the function graph at a point when it should be predicting the next point of the function graph. Mistake after mistake after mistake, when instead of 1,000 page calculus textbooks, AP can teach calculus with only 100 pages and where students love calculus, love math, and find math the easiest of all the sciences.


This book is more of a psychology book asking and analyzing why Old Math professors delight in punishing students rather than teach calculus in the easiest way possible.



Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of some of my TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks sold on Amazon's Kindle. The world's first math textbooks that take a student from 5 years old through graduate school written by one author alone. Focus on the far right top as the textbook that teaches ages 5 to 18. TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2. TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks is written by one author who carries the student through all their math needs from age 5 to age 26. When one author does all math textbooks, there is coherence and logical flow in math education, not a disruption and discontinuity and oddball stuff that does not fit together. And especially those students who move from one school to another.


Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CWYD54T3
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 19, 2024
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 411 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 46 pages



    Is Jan Burse banning slow light at ETH because of Harvard's Dr. Hau??


    Google Groups (logo) Google Groups (Jan Burse) --- ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM BANNED---  Google Groups https://groups.google.com › comp.lang.prolog  One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls ...     

    Jan Burse banning ETH, Kurt Wuthrich (chem), Dr.Joel Mesot,Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, 


    In sci.math others were concerned over Jan Burse bans on freedom of speech in doing science -- 


    Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??

    by Michael Moroney    Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM



    Re: ...,Useful as a chocolate teapot // Harvard's Dr.Hau "slow light", and turning the laser off; I find very comprehensible 260 views Dan Christensen's profile photo Dan Christensen Jun 7, 2019, 10:48:40 AM



    Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it

    by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM



    Volney  with Jan Burse selling ETH because they cannot do Water Electrolysis properly-- forgetting to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen compared to oxygen, and stop at observing volume. ETH science is so shoddy of logical reasoning.


    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:37:32 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote in sci.math or sci.physics:

    >"goonclod failure of logic" 


    Volney, who can weigh

    Kurt Wuthrich (chem), Dr.Joel Mesot,Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg 

    the hydrogen and oxygen in Water Electrolysis, for it is unusual that Caltech physics is so shoddy in logical thought as to think of stopping Water Electrolysis by observation of Volume and not weighing the masses.



    Davide Cavion of Narkive pissing on ETH calculus classrooms which bans Jan Burse outright.


    Discussions in sci.math became tense over the fact ETH refuses to make calculus education easy, instead of its torture chamber, and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.



    Re: entire STANFORD Univ. math dept fired// unable to acknowledge truth in math, and teaches that 2 OR 3 =5 when it is 2 AND 3= 5

    by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Nov 12, 2017, 2:23:06 PM



    Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o

    May 10, 2021

    by Michael Moroney



    Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it

    by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM


    On www, a Google search of AP reveals many disgruntled students who want to fix math professors and physics professors from teaching propaganda in classrooms and books for the slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse and that water electrolysis the true formula of water is H4O not H2O.  Even the Internet's Quora, Mark Barton, Univ. Glasgow got into the fray.     


    Quora (symbol logo) Quora Quora https://www.quora.com › What-effect-did-Archimedes-... Aug 26, 2013 — Plutonium is significant because its isotope, plutonium-239, is a slow nuclear fuel. A slow nuclear fuel will likely undergo nuclear fission if ... 4 answers   ·   Top answer:  Everyone was trying to figure out this new medium, the internet, what it was for.  Mark Barton PhD physicist with University of Glasgow Author has 16.9K answers and 21.5M answer views10y None at all - he was a raving nutter. 1.9K viewsView upvotes...   


    Google Groups (logo) Google Groups --- ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM BANNED---  Google Groups https://groups.google.com › comp.lang.prolog  One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls ...       



    narkive (symbol logo) narkive How the Archimedes Plutonium Idiocy began.  narkive https://sci.math.narkive.com › how-the-archimedes-plut...  When one does not break any laws, one is fearless. In your lingo what this means is: I piss ...     How the Archimedes Plutonium Idiocy began.  narkive https://sci.math.narkive.com › how-the-archimedes-plut... When one does not break any laws, one is fearless. In your lingo what this means is: I piss on shit on the filthy, disgusting cunt that spewed YOU out. Do you ...  Narkive's Davide Cavion reminds me of Univ. Leiden so famous in physics such as superconductivity but here we see Univ Leiden too stupid in physics to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen and compare to oxygen, unless, unless maybe Univ Leiden, Univ Groningen does not have a quartz crystal microbalance. Some of us, surely I miss Kamerlingh Onnes but I guess the fool Davide Cavion is taking over Europe science.  Such a shame, Univ Leiden, home of Rene Descartes, Christiaan Huygens, the home of the Leyden jar of physics, yet no-one at Univ Leiden can weigh the masses of hydrogen and oxygen in water electrolysis, and according to Davide Cavion, only piss on....   



    The Odyssey Online (symbol) The Odyssey Online Who Is The Mysterious Man Sponsoring This National TV ...  The Odyssey Online https://www.theodysseyonline.com › Entertainment  Apr 17, 2018 — That's right, Archimedes Plutonium is a man whose only internet presence is a minor mention on an extremely obscure Wikipedia page. The page, ...       AP writes:: What Odyssey is talking about obscure is when President Donald Trump showed up in sci.math and sci.physics to talk about how bad math education is in colleges and universities since math professors cannot even admit to mistakes in geometry,-- slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.     



    Re: -- König der Wissenschaft --AP-- King of Science---und Konig von Physik, Mathematik, Zoologie und der Goths, Visigoths und OstraGoths

    by Donald Trump   Mar 28, 2020, 2:39:48 PM


    Re: 科学之王 Kēxué zhī wáng --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4

    by Donald Trump       Apr 2, 2020, 9:17:54 AM



    Re: Rey de Reyes de la Ciencia --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4

    by Donald Trump   Apr 2, 2020, 12:36:08 AM



    Re: Roi des Rois de la Science --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4

    by Donald Trump  by Apr 2, 2020, 12:38:32 AM



    mirro.uncyc.org (symbol) mirro.uncyc.org Mar 2, 2017 -- Archimedes is at the same time the most brilliant .....   



    X (symbol) X X-TimSweeneyEpic 4likes, 4 years ago Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? 9:56 PM- Oct 22, 2019    



    narkive (symbol) narkive Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium.... his varied and eccentric contributions ....   EverybodyWiki (symbol) EverybodyWiki Archimedes Plutonium-- EverybodyWiki Bios & Wiki Mar 26, 2021... wrote extensively about science...   



    Spherical Bullshit (symbol) Spherical Bullshit Feb 6, 2013 -- The central thesis... is the "atom totality" theory. This states that the structure of...   



    Google Groups (symbol) Archimedes ...math test of a lifetime-generation test. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real...  



    Reddit (symbol) Reddit - r/ArchimedesConspiracy 1 comment - 10 months ago I know what is going on with Archimedes Plutonium, I think.: r/ArchimedesConspiracy   



    C2 wiki (symbol) C2 wiki ArchimedesPlutonium ... most relevant materials will soon be refactored from WikiVsUsenet.


    Reddit (symbol) Reddit - r/math 150+ comments - 2 years ago 

    1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium

    I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane, it is 1 (color everything black; no 2 points...


    Facebook (logo image)

    Facebook

    Archimedes Plutonium

    Archimedes Plutonium is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Archimedes Plutonium and others you may know.

    Facebook gives people the power to share...


    AP writes: actually when Facebook was formed as a company, apparently Mark Zuckerberg ordered his lieutenants to comb the telephone directory for names and to list them as joined members as in the case of AP, for AP never wanted to be on Facebook-- yet there it is-- a outright liaring, fraud, forgery that AP joined.


    Archimedes Plutonium

    unread,
    Apr 26, 2024, 7:44:14 PM4/26/24
    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Narkive's Davide Cavion on women in science, AMS Ruth Charney, Harvard's Lisa Randall, and Dr. Hau, Univ Toronto Rose Patten

    How the Archimedes Plutonium Idiocy began.  narkive https://sci.math.narkive.com › how-the-archimedes-plut... When one does not break any laws, one is fearless. In your lingo what this means is: I piss on shit on the filthy, disgusting cunt that spewed YOU out. Do you ...

    Davide Cavion archiving this sci.math post.

    Re: 2-Dan Christensen spanks Rose M. Patten,Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole

    by  Augǝl    Jan 2, 2023, 7:34 PM 


    Davide Cavion archiving this sci.math post.


    Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)

    By (Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney) Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views 


    Davide Cavion archiving this sci.math post.


    Re: Kibo on > I want to f..... > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

    May 13, 2023

    V's profile photo

    V


    Davide Cavion archiving this sci.math post.


    Re: Kibo Parry M sickfuck stalker along with his Dunning Kruger sickfuck psychologists who guide Kibo// Kibo claims that Ruth Charney, Dr. Panchanathan, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Sheldon Glashow never had a single truth in their entire life, says Kibo

    Dec 31, 2022, 8:51 PM

    by Herp Derpington

    Archimedes Plutonium

    unread,
    May 2, 2024, 6:21:47 PM5/2/24
    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Narkive's Davide Cavion on AMS Ruth Charney, Harvard's Lisa Randall, and Dr. Hau, Univ Toronto Rose Patten, and women on science

    Davide Cavion writes or edits Narkive to say this on women in science:::
    How the Archimedes Plutonium Idiocy began.  narkive https://sci.math.narkive.com › how-the-archimedes-plut... When one does not break any laws, one is fearless. In your lingo what this means is: I piss on shit on the filthy, disgusting cunt that spewed YOU out. Do you ...

    Davide Cavion's message infused sci.math and sci.physics discussion debate devoted to women.


    Re: 2-Dan Christensen spanks Rose M. Patten,Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole

    by  Augǝl    Jan 2, 2023, 7:34 PM 


    Davide Cavion archiving this sci.math post.


    Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)

    By (Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney) Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views 


    Davide Cavion archiving this sci.math post.


    Re: Kibo on > I want to f..... > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

    May 13, 2023

    V's profile photo

    V


    Davide Cavion archiving this sci.math post.


    Re: Kibo Parry M sickfuck stalker along with his Dunning Kruger sickfuck psychologists who guide Kibo// Kibo claims that Ruth Charney, Dr. Panchanathan, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Sheldon Glashow never had a single truth in their entire life, says Kibo

    Dec 31, 2022, 8:51 PM

    by Herp Derpington


    Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.

    by Dan Christensen Jun 28, 2021, 2:33 PM


    Then there was the time that Dan Christensen in Canada made this sexist remark of women in science, and at the time I was feeling that Dan had to be a tenured professor in Canada to get away with such verbal abuse nonsense, even of his bosses.


    Re: 2-Dan Christensen spanks Rose M. Patten,Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole

    by  Augǝl    Jan 2, 2023, 7:34 PM 


    Re: W.Mueckenheim,Susanne Schneider,Metin Tolan,Anja Karliczek is this what the Gottingen Univ statue of slant cut in Cone looks like?? It sure looks like a Oval, never ellipse to me. Courtesy of newsreporter photographer Angel in Germany.

    by 

    Augǝl     Jan 1, 2023, 6:54:05 AM 


    Wonderful how Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney math failure could not even do a proper percentage with his 938 is 12% short of 945, yet here is Kibo praising his favorite Mathopedia.


    Re: 81,045-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker

    by Frank Cassa    12Apr2021 7:00 AM 





    Re: 7,744-Student victims of Linda Hasenfratz Univ Western Ontario from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz President Alan Shepard

    11:53 AM 10Apr2021

    by Wayne Decarlo





    Weighing David Sainsbury Cambridge Uni, water electrolysis

    Dr.Didier Queloz (phy), Dr.Richard Henderson (chem), Dr.David Thouless (phy), Dr.Duncan Haldane (phy), Dr.John Kosterlitz (phy)



    Dr.Duncan Haldane (phy), Dr.John Kosterlitz (phy), Dr.Michael Levitt (chem) of Cambridge as dunce in Water Electrolysis, never weighing the hydrogen and oxygen as dunce as you Pete Olcott and Richard Damon with your Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction?


    Why? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. Is it that they are stupid silly thinking volume and mass are the same. For AP needs to prove decisively, if Water is really H4O or H2O. And of course, this experiment would destroy the Standard Model-- that post-diction theory of physics that never gave a single prediction in all of its tenure.



    Or is it because they cannot admit the truth of math geometry that slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse for you need the symmetry of slant cut of cylinder to yield a ellipse.


    David Sainsbury Cambridge chancellor

    Cambridge Physics Dept 

    Dr.Didier Queloz (phy), Dr.Richard Henderson (chem), Dr.David Thouless (phy), Dr.Duncan Haldane (phy), Dr.John Kosterlitz (phy), Dr.Michael Levitt (chem), Dr. Venkatraman Ramakrishnan (chem), Dr.Roger Tsien (chem), Dr.Richard Schrock (chem), Dr.Alan McDiarmid (chem), Dr.John Pople (chem),

    Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington. 

     

    Cambridge Math Dept 

    Alan Baker, Bela Bollobas, Darwin Smith, John Coates, Timothy Gowers, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain 

     

    Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry. 


    On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

    > Physics minnow 

    > WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS: 


    What warning is that Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney failure of science who cannot even do percentages-- warning that insane persons like Kibo Parry Moroney Volney spends their entire life in a hate-mill, never doing anything in science itself. 


    Kibo failure in science and math with his 938 is 12% short of 945.


    On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

     > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 

     > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 

    Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

    >  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 

     > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 


     

     ---quoting Wikipedia --- 

    > Controversy 

    > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis." 

    --- end quote --- 


    > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

    > Dr. Panchanathan , present day 

    > NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley 

    > France Anne Cordova 

    > Subra Suresh (bioengineer) 

    > Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering) 

    > Rita R. Colwell (microbiology) 

    > Neal Francis Lane 

    > John Howard Gibbons 1993 

    > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world 

    > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua 

    > Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne 



    News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in. 


    > Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20 PM 

    > to Plutonium Atom Universe 

    > News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in. 

    > I received a letter today of Experiment results on Water Electrolysis of weighing the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube and the result is 1/4 atomic mass units of Hydrogen compared to Oxygen. 

    > The researcher weighing 1600 micrograms of hydrogen, using a Eisco-Brownlee-Water-Electrolysis Apparatus. 

    > Using sulfuric acid as electrolyte on ultra pure water. Using low voltage DC of 1.5 volts, 1 amp. 

    > I am not surprised that news of the true formula of Water is H4O comes so quickly. For not much in science is more important than knowing the truth of Water. And this means the start of the complete downfall and throwing out the sick Standard Model of Physics, for it is such an insane theory that it cannot get passed the idea of its subatomic particles as stick and ball, with no job, no function, no task. The Standard Model of Physics, is crazy insane physics for it is all postdiction, never prediction. The idea that the hydrogen atom is H2 not H, is because of the prediction of Atom Totality Theory where a atom is a proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law and all atoms require at least 1 capacitor. That means the one proton in H2 serves as a neutron to the other proton, storaging the electricity produced by the other proton. 

    > The true Hydrogen Atom is H2 for all atoms need at least one capacitor, and one of the protons in H2 serves as a neutron. 

    > Sad that chemistry and physics throughout the 20th century were too stupid to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in electrolysis, no, the ignorant fools stopped at looking when they saw the volume of hydrogen was twice that of oxygen. A real scientist is not that shoddy and slipshod ignorant, the real scientist then proceeds with -- let us weigh the hydrogen test tube mass versus the oxygen test tube mass. 

    > Thanks for the news!!!!! 

    > AP 

    > News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in. 

     

    > There is another experiment that achieves the same result that Water is truly H4O and not H2O, but I suspect this second method is hugely fraught with difficulty. 

    > The prediction of H4O comes from the Physics idea that a Atom is composed, all atoms mind you, is composed of a proton torus with muon/s inside going round and round thrusting through the torus in the Faraday law and producing electricity. So that when you have Hydrogen without a neutron, there is no way to collect the electricity produced by the Faraday law. Think of it as a automobile engine, you cannot have a engine if there is no crank shaft to collect the energy from the thrusting piston inside the crankcase. 

    > Same thing with an Atom, it needs 3 parts-- muon as bar magnet, proton as torus of coils, and a capacitor to storage the produced electricity. If one of those parts is missing, the entity is a Subatomic particle and not a atom. 

    > So, when we have Hydrogen as a proton with muon inside, it is not a Atom, until it has a neutron, or, has another proton of hydrogen H2, then it is a Atom. 

    > So that H2 is not a molecule but a Atom. H alone is a subatomic particle. 

    > SECOND EXPERIMENT: 

    > Much harder than Water Electrolysis. 

    > We need to get two identical containers. 

    > We need to be able to make pure heavy-water with deuterium. Deuterium is proton + neutron as hydrogen. Proton + proton is H2 as hydrogen. 

    > So we have two identical containers and we fill one with pure heavy water, deuterium water. 

    > We have the second container and we fill it with pure (light) water. 

    > We now weigh both of them. 

    > If AP is correct, that water is really H4O and not H2O, then both containers should weigh almost the same. Only a tiny fraction difference because the neutron is known to be 940MeV versus proton in Old Physics as 938MeV a tiny difference of 2MeV, but we realize we have a huge number of water molecules in the two identical containers. 

    > If water is truly H4O, the weights should be almost the same. If water is H2O, then there is a **large difference** in weights. 

    > But the Water Electrolysis experiment is much easier to conduct and get results. 


    > And, there is the biological processes that apparently cannot distinguish between heavy water and that of regular normal water. 

    > Deuterium Water is the same in biology as is normal regular water. This means that water must be H4O, due to biology as proof. 

    > Deuterium Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the deuterium. 

    > Regular normal Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the 4 protons in H4O. 

    > Old Physics and Old Chemistry had regular water as H2O in atomic mass units of 16 oxygen and 2 hydrogen for 2 protons. 

    > If biology functions whether heavy water or normal water all the same, then water itself must be H4O. 

    > Now, there maybe some animal or plant that can separate out heavy water from H4O water??? 

    > Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins. 

    > Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O. 

    > H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses. 

    > Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV. 

    > So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference. 

    > EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O. 

    > So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time. 

    > EXPERIMENT #4 also plays on this minor difference of 4MeV. We devise a sort of squirt gun for D2O and a identical squirt gun for H4O (what we call H2O). We put pure D2O in one squirt gun and the H40 or light water in the other squirt gun. Both guns forcing the water a certain distance. 

    > If AP is correct that light water is really H4O and not H2O as we squirt both guns, where the water lands should be almost the same distance considering H4O is only 4MeV apart from D2O. 

    > If Old Physics and Old Chemistry is correct, then D2O water is 940 + 940 = 1880MeV apart from light water of H2O, and H4O is only 4MeV apart. 

    > So where the squirt gun lands the D2O is a very much shorter distance than a H2O land, but a H4 land distance is nearly the same as the D2O land. 

    > These two experiments are very exciting and would be a very nice confirming evidence to Water Electrolysis actual weighing the mass in atomic mass units. 

    > On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 5:07:13 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 

    > > Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins. 

    > > 

    > > Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O. 

    > > 

    > > H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses. 

    > > 

    > > Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV. 

    > > 

    > > So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference. 

    > > 

    > > EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O. 

    > > 

    > > So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time. 

    > > 

    > Apparently this Experiment is already done and called for-- There is Uniform Distribution of heavy water Deuterium Water in the Oceans, Lakes, Ponds, Streams and Rivers. Heavy Water is not layered in the oceans or lakes or ponds or streams or rivers. Uniformity means that the difference between D2O and H4O is so slight of a difference (only 4MeV, compared to 1880MeV for H2O, that Brownian motion keeps the D2O and H4O in a Uniform Distribution in all bodies of water. I was going through the research literature today and find that scientists discover Uniformity of Distribution of deuterium water. This thus closes the case on Water, for uniformity of distribution of D2O implies that Water is itself H4O and not H2O. 


    My 250th published book. 

    > TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry 

    > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle) 

    > Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational. 

    > Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen. 

    > Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms. 

    > Product details 

    > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG 

    > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023 

    > • Language ‏ : ‎ English 

    > • File size ‏ : ‎ 788 KB 

    > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled 

    > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported 

    > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled 

    > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled 

    > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled 

    > • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe 

    > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 168 pages 


    Archimedes Plutonium

    unread,
    May 3, 2024, 2:37:19 PM5/3/24
    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Narkive's Davide Cavion on Harvard's Lisa Randall, AMS Ruth Charney and Dr. Hau, Univ Toronto Rose Patten, and women on science

    Archimedes Plutonium

    unread,
    Oct 11, 2024, 5:25:29 AM10/11/24
    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Trinity College Dublin Cavion's Narkive on "ignorant & incompetents at math" Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Roger Penrose, Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on Univ Glasgow Mark Barton, Steve Huffman Univ Virginia, Peter Abramenko,Julie Bergner 76 views Subscribe  Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com> Oct 8, 2024, 8:44:02 PM (2 days ago)     to Plutonium Atom Universe  Oxford Univ Chris Patten meet Andrew Wiles, Steve Huffman meet lunatic Terence Tao, Adam D'Angelo Caltech meet lunatic Mark Barton Univ Glasgow --- quoting Wikipedia---  Sir Andrew Wiles KBE FRS   Wiles in 2005  Born Andrew John Wiles 11 April 1953 (age 71) Cambridge, England Nationality British Education King's College School, Cambridge The Leys School Alma mater University of Oxford (MA) University of Cambridge (PhD)  Known for Proving the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture for semistable elliptic curves, thereby proving Fermat's Last Theorem Proving the main conjecture of Iwasawa theory Awards Whitehead Prize (1988) Rolf Schock Prize (1995) Ostrowski Prize (1995) Fermat Prize (1995) Wolf Prize (1995/6) Royal Medal (1996) NAS Award in Mathematics (1996) Foreign Associate of the National Academy of Sciences (1996) Cole Prize (1997) MacArthur Fellowship (1997) Wolfskehl Prize (1997) IMU Silver Plaque (1998) King Faisal International Prize in Science (1998) Shaw Prize (2005) Abel Prize (2016) Copley Medal (2017)[1] De Morgan Medal (2019)  Scientific career Fields Mathematics Institutions University of Oxford Princeton University  Thesis Reciprocity Laws and the Conjecture of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer (1979) Doctoral advisor John Coates[2][3] Doctoral students Manjul Bhargava Brian Conrad Ehud de Shalit Fred Diamond Ritabrata Munshi Karl Rubin Christopher Skinner Richard Taylor[2] Vinayak Vatsal --- end quoting Wikipedia---  Steve Huffman lists science lunatics: Reddit (symbol) r/math, 3 years ago Genius meets Lunatic: 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane: and it is 1 (color everything  Davide Cavion hate-spew foul mouthed stalker narkive (symbol logo) narkive How the Archimedes Plutonium Idiocy began.  narkive https://sci.math.narkive.com › how-the-archimedes-plut...  Being ignorant of and incompetent at math, it amused him to send out emails     Mark Barton says "raving nutter" web Narkive Davide Cavion says "ignorant and incompetent at math" web Quora  AP asks them-- why is Roger too dumb to ask the simple question -- which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is Dirac's magnetic monopole. Mark Barton does the fact that Roger cannot tell apart a oval from ellipse blinding his intelligence??? --- quoting Wikipedia --- Sir Roger Penrose OM FRS HonFInstP  Penrose in 2011 Born8 August 1931 (age 93) Colchester, Essex, EnglandEducation University College London(BSc) St John's College, Cambridge (PhD) Known for show List of contributions  Spouses Joan Isabel Wedge ​ ​(m. 1959, divorced)​ Vanessa Thomas ​(m. 1988)​[1] Children4RelativesLionel Penrose (father), Roland Penrose (uncle), Jonathan Penrose (brother), Oliver Penrose (brother), Shirley Hodgson (sister), Antony Penrose (cousin)Awards show List of awards  Scientific careerFieldsMathematical physics, tessellationsInstitutions Cornell University Bedford College, London Princeton University Rice University Syracuse University King's College, London Birkbeck, University of London Wadham College, Oxford Polish Academy of Sciences ThesisTensor Methods in Algebraic Geometry (1958)Doctoral advisorJohn A. ToddOther academic advisorsW. V. D. HodgeDoctoral students Andrew Hodges Lane Hughston Richard Jozsa Claude LeBrun John McNamara Tristan Needham Tim Poston Asghar Qadir Richard S. Ward --- end quoting Wikipedia ---  Stupidity & Failure of Roger Penrose Oxford Uni recounted by Trinity College Dublin Davide Cavion, Uni Glasgow Mark Barton, where Roger too dumb to admit slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse, and too dumb to ask about muon-is it the true electron of Atoms  Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, 30 year stalker in sci.math Kibo wrote:I Pound His Male Rectum. Peter Higgs,Sheldon Glashow, Francois Englert, Saul Perlmutter ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.   On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:  >"mentally ill"  >Re: "imp of math"    On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:  >"mentally ill"   Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, the 30 year stalker On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 7:52:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:  >Village Idiot"  > defiles the pope and then tards:  > 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry Moroney Volney  > On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 10:10:38 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:  > >"little stinker"  > > fails at math and science:  > > "The Delicious Rump Man"  > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"  > > "Penis Could Mature Him"  > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"   > > > > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:  > > > > > > > > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,  > > > > > > > > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:  > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"  > > > > > > > > > can be re-arranged to spell  > > > > > > > > > "The Delicious Rump Man"  > > > > > > > > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"  > > > > > > > > > "Penis Could Mature Him"  > > > > > > > > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"  > > > > > > > > > and many other delightful phrases  > > On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 11:21:32 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:  > > > is leaving our NewsGroup? Great! That means that the average IQ here just jumped about 20 points! earle  > > Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney  > > > > > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:  > > > > > > > "little stinker"  > > Earle Jones and Kibo, why cannot they ask the simple question which is the true electron of atoms-- muon or 0.5MeV particle.    Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.  1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms. 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus. 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity. 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.  5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.  6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction  7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"  8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.   9) Never took logic, or not enough, to understand Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids black holes. 10) Too stupid in mind to understand for the Atomic Theory to be a law of science requires the Universe itself be a Atom.     > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,  > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish  > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita  > > Arthur B. McDonald  > > Francois Englert  > > Saul Perlmutter  > > Brian P. Schmidt  > > Adam G. Riess  > > Makoto Kobayashi  > > Toshihide Maskawa_  > > Yoichiro Nambu_  > > John C. Mather  > > George F. Smoot  > > Roy J. Glauber_  > > David J. Gross  > > Hugh David Politzer  > > Frank Wilczek  > > Raymond Davis Jr. _  > > Masatoshi Koshiba_  > > Riccardo Giacconi_  > > Gerardus 't Hooft  > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_  > > Jerome I. Friedman  > > Henry W. Kendall_  > > Richard E. Taylor_  > > Carlo Rubbia  > > Simon van der Meer_  > > William Alfred Fowler_  > > Kenneth G. Wilson_  > > James Watson Cronin_  > > Val Logsdon Fitch_  > > Sheldon Lee Glashow  > > Steven Weinberg_  > > .  > > .  > > little fishes  > > .  > > .  > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV  > >  > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass  > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu  > > more and more layers of error thinking physics  > > .  > > .  > > Edward Witten  > > John Baez  > > Brian Greene  > > Lisa Randall  > > Alan H. Guth  > > Michael E. Brown  > > Konstantin Batygin  > > Ben Bullock  > > Larry Harson  > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan ; University of Glasgow > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views  > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.  > > Richard A. Muller, Discover magazine, crank-crackpot at Berkeley  > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater  > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater  > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater  > >  > >  > > #2-1, 137th published book  > >  > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition  > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  > >  > >  > >  > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory  > >  > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.  > >  > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.  > >  > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.  > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.  > > Length: 64 pages  > >  > > Product details  > > • File Size : 790 KB  > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020  > > • Word Wise : Enabled  > > • Print Length : 64 pages  > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled  > > • Screen Reader : Supported  > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled  > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled  > > • Language: : English  > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY  > > • Lending : Enabled  > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)  > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory  > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)  > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads  > >  > > #2-2, 145th published book  > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2  > > Kindle Edition  > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.  > >  > > Product details  > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB  > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020  > > • Language: : English  > > • File size : 682 KB  > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled  > > • Screen Reader : Supported  > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled  > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled  > > • Word Wise : Enabled  > > • Print length : 78 pages  > > • Lending : Enabled  > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)  > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads  > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)  > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)  > >  > > #2-3, 146th published book  > >  > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3  > > Kindle Edition  > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  > >  > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.  > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.  > >  > > Product details  > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V  > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020  > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English  > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB  > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported  > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled  > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages  > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)  > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)  > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)  > >  > >  > > #2-4, 151st published book  > >  > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4  > > Kindle Edition  > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  > >  > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.  > >  > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.  > >  > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.  > >  > > Product details  > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM  > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021  > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English  > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB  > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported  > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled  > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages  > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)  > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory  > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)  > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)  > >  > >  > >  > > #2-5, 174th published book  > >  > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College  > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition  > >  > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).  > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.  > >  > > Product details  > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC  > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022  > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English  > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB  > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported  > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled  > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages  > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > >  > >  > >  > > #2-6, 177th published book  > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College  > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition  > >  > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.  > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.  > >  > > Product details  > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST  > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022  > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English  > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB  > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported  > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled  > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled  > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages  > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > >  > >  > >  > > #2-7, 178th published book  > >  > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College  > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)  > >  > >  > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.  > >  > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.  > >  > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.  > >  > > Product details  > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW  > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022  > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English  > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB  > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported  > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled  > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages  > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled  > >    Mark Barton Univ Glasgow, is Chairman Xi like V. Putin more than he likes his own Chinese people, for Xi is not getting back Outer Manchuria for Russia is occupied in Ukraine. Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on Univ Glasgow Mark Barton. Quora (symbol logo) Mark Barton PhD physicist with University of Glasgow Author has 16.9K answers and 21.5M answer views10y None at all - he was a raving nutter. 1.9K viewsView upvotes...     4 -Maybe we should send Netanyahu to China for he would know to recapture Outer Manchuria, and send Xi to Israel and have Peace in Middle East as Xi falls asleep all year long all decade .. Derek Boyd, Dieter Brill, Alessandra Buonanno whatever happened to teaching true calculus at Univ Maryland; let alone ask the question which is the Atom's true electron asked by computer burnt out brain Tim Sweeney  --- quoting Wikipedia---  Tim Sweeney   Sweeney at the Game Developers Choice Awards 2017  Born Timothy Dean Sweeney[1] 1970 (age 53–54)[2] Alma mater University of Maryland[3] Occupation(s) Video game programmer and developer, businessman Notable work ZZT  Unreal Engine Title Founder and CEO of Epic Games Awards AIAS Hall of Fame Award (2012)[4] GDC Lifetime Achievement Award (2017)[5] --- end quoting Wikipedia---  Tim Sweeney asks whatever happened to teaching true calculus at Univ Maryland, Darryll Pines; let alone ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle?? Is Sweeney's computer games making students mentally retarded?? Does the EU need to put Mental Health Warnings on Sweeney computer games???  X (symbol) X X-TimSweeneyEpic 4likes, 4 years ago Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? 9:56 PM- Oct 22, 2019        X (symbol) X X-TimSweeneyEpic 4likes, 4 years ago Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? 9:56 PM- Oct 22, 2019      Univ. Maryland physics dept Derek Boyd, Dieter Brill, Alessandra Buonanno, Chia-Cheh Chang, Chung-Yun Chang, Thomas Cohen, Douglas Currie, Sankar Das Sarma, Alan DeSilva, Jay Dorfman, William Dorland, Alex Dragt, James Drake, Howard Drew, Theodore L Einstein, Sarah Eno, Victor Galitski, George Gloeckler, Jordan Goodman, Oscar Greenberg, Richard Greene, Nicholas Hadley, Douglas Hamilton, Kara Hoffman, Theodore Kirkpatrick, Glenn Mason, John Mather, Edward Ott, Johnpierre Paglione, Jogesh Pati, William Philips, Edward Redish, Steven Rolston, Philip Roos, Peter Shawhan, Philip Sprangle, Edo Waks, Stephen Wallace, John Weeks, Frederick Wellstood, Ellen Williams, James Yorke           Univ. Maryland physics dept Derek Boyd, Dieter Brill, Alessandra Buonanno, Chia-Cheh Chang, Chung-Yun Chang, Thomas Cohen, Douglas Currie, Sankar Das Sarma, Alan DeSilva, Jay Dorfman, William Dorland, Alex Dragt, James Drake, Howard Drew, Theodore L Einstein, Sarah Eno, Victor Galitski, George Gloeckler, Jordan Goodman, Oscar Greenberg, Richard Greene, Nicholas Hadley, Douglas Hamilton, Kara Hoffman, Theodore Kirkpatrick, Glenn Mason, John Mather, Edward Ott, Johnpierre Paglione, Jogesh Pati, William Philips, Edward Redish, Steven Rolston, Philip Roos, Peter Shawhan, Philip Sprangle, Edo Waks, Stephen Wallace, John Weeks, Frederick Wellstood, Ellen Williams, James Yorke  Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.  1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms. 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus. 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity. 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.  5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.  6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction  7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"  8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.   9) Never took logic, or not enough, to understand Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids black holes. 10) Too stupid in mind to understand for the Atomic Theory to be a law of science requires the Universe itself be a Atom.  11) Far far too stupid to insist the Polynomial is the only valid function in all of math, thus reducing Calculus to a mere add or subtract 1 from exponent and making Calculus ----Super super easy  --- quoting my 283rd book of science--- Psychopathology of why math professors refuse to make Calculus super-easy and stop torturing students// psychology in math  by Archimedes Plutonium  This is AP's 283rd published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe      Preface: AP is tired of Old Math and Old Math professors who refuse to correct and revise what math they teach. Calculus as taught today is a torture chamber, of vomiting during exams, and nervous breakdowns all because math professors do not switch to the super-easy calculus, where the only valid function of mathematics is the polynomial, making calculus super, super easy. And AP can teach calculus in Junior High School, so easy as it is. Old Math teaches fake calculus, that is tough and incomprehensible to students with a mindless limit analysis, expecting students to accept a rectangle with 0 width having interior area for integral, and their derivative as tangent to the function graph at a point when it should be predicting the next point of the function graph. Mistake after mistake after mistake, when instead of 1,000 page calculus textbooks, AP can teach calculus with only 100 pages and where students love calculus, love math, and find math the easiest of all the sciences.  This book is more of a psychology book asking and analyzing why Old Math professors delight in punishing students rather than teach calculus in the easiest way possible.   Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of some of my TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks. The world's first math textbooks that take a student from 5 years old through graduate school written by one author alone. Focus on the far right top as the textbook that teaches ages 5 to 18. TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2. TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks is written by one author who carries the student through all their math needs from age 5 to age 26. When one author does all math textbooks, there is coherence and logical flow in math education, not a disruption and discontinuity and oddball stuff that does not fit together. And especially those students who move from one school to another.  ------------------------------------- Table of Contents -------------------------------------  1) My history on this topic.  2) The current scene of math education in Calculus by March 2024.  3) Further topics in this series in math psychology.  4) AP not the only one to notice math calculus classrooms as torture chambers.  5) Few scientists examine themselves through the lens of psychology.  6) There is a pretty link between physics unification of forces and math making calculus super-easy.  7) Physicists have their own demon of Psychopathology in their Standard Model, string, quarks.  8) Others in education and academia communities have taken up the alarm call of math calculus being degenerate psychopathology.  9) Math professors in Colleges & Universities have decided it is better to torture students, rather than 1/2 the math staff layed off since calculus is so easy.  10) Together, those of us who want only truth in science, will force out the psychopathology in math.  11) Summary. --- quoting my 283rd book of science---
    Reply all
    Reply to author
    Forward
    0 new messages