The mistake made by Wells Fargo in 2024 is again--- due to the glitches and holes in Wells Fargo SOFTWARE. The glitch is that people with a bankcard with ___no pinnumber___. That forces the Receipt they get to all be Generic receipts, never reflecting the true nature of the Transaction that transpired.So when Wells Fargo has a hole a glitch in their Software, not only do customers lose money, but bank tellers make mistakes that results in a loss to the bank.I am going to write this mishap up in this book as a lesson in Logic. Because Wells Fargo branch in Vermillion SD is not helping to solve the problem but rather Obstructing the resolution. By saying there is no longer the video, and by saying there is no problem in nationwide Wells Fargo software, yet it still has Generic receipts that never reflect the true transaction.I lost $3,000. on 24Feb2025, while Wells Fargo lost $1,500. on 30May2024 all could have been avoided if Wells Fargo had Software that accurately reflects the transaction that took place--- withdrawal or deposit in Savings Account.Unless Wells Fargo fixes their software problem, others may fall victim.
(snipped)
If I had been the Branch Manager in Vermillion on 30May2024, I would have called AP, Archimedes Plutonium on 31May and said "Archie, our bank made a mistake in the slip and would you come in the bank and sign the slip". I am a honest person and gladly made the Wells Fargo branch "right her ship" for I was a US Navy officer and Navy Officers do not lie, cheat or steal. And we have a expression in the Navy--- when things go wrong--- Right the Ship.
So what State Laws have been broken here?Well, if the teller on 24Feb2025 had pocketed $3,000. is Grand Theft. If pocketed just $1,500 is still Grand Theft.But without the camera video's of this transaction would be difficult to prove. So here again I ask Wells Fargo, is the camera video stored in North Carolina for 5 years???Absent of camera video, such as destruction of the camera video I contend that is breaking the law of Obstruction of Justice.If the IRS check of $1500 is made visible, and here I filled out a form asking for a photocopy front and back from the IRS, may reveal some evidence that the check had not been cashed out. Although the simultaneous withdrawal of $1500 from my Savings Account looks preposterous, as I have never needed $3,000 in 100 dollar bills.Maybe a police interview with these tellers may reveal what happened.Might I have a charge of a broken State law for the May2024 loss to the bank of $1500? Although it was in my favor of getting that money and never subtracted from my bank account. Might there be a State Law about banking practices in which Wells Fargo makes out Generic receipts that deceive both teller and customer. Here I need no camera video for it is plain to see in my monthly statements that the 30May2024 was a loss to the bank in the amount of $1500. Is there a law in South Dakota on bad banking practices of "Cashed chk" when it should read "Withdrawal from Savings". I looked in South Dakota law under code 54 for some law of bad banking practices.Is there some law about covering up, so that when the police ask for the balance for the day 30May2024 and 24Feb2025 and told the balance was within a few pennies, when truly short by $1500 on 30May2024 and a surplus of $3,000 on 24Feb2025. Can liaring to the police about those facts break a law of South Dakota?As I said before, if I had been bank manager and on 30May2024 seen a $1500 shortfall in the balance, I would get on the telephone to Archie and said-- we messed up on the slip and would you come in and sign the slip so the bank is not short. It is my guess that when the bank was short $1500 that day, that the bank manager said, "I will cover that loss with my own money". And then when 24Feb2025 rolls around and there is AP, with a IRS check (sadly) in the same amount-- $1500. was the opportunity for the bank manager to get back not only $1500 but an additional $1500.Leaving open the question--- did the teller pocket $3000. or pocket $1500? Did the bank regain its $1500 loss of 30May2024, and did someone pocket the other $1500????For as I see it as of this writing 21Feb2026, AP loses $1500.Now, I want to talk about how I see banking, its very rough spots.
I remember once during covid 19 of using the outside machine to withdraw $1500. and a nice lady teller. And so I do the paper slip work and she sends me the $100 bills in that tube. Trouble was they were new bills sticking together. So I was counting them and came up with 14 of $100, one short of $1500 and I told the nice teller, I counted only 14, and I could hear her sighing inside. And I said, these are so new let me count them again. And on my second count I did find two sticking together to make $1500. She was relieved inside. And I thought to myself, gee, I sure do not want to be a bank teller, for all the sleazy people who liar and try to cheat the bank. Perhaps in that situation, the bank should have a policy that counting cash should be done inside where the cameras are and any sleazebag trying to rip off the bank can be easily exposed.
On Saturday, February 21, 2026 at 3:24:46 AM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:So what State Laws have been broken here?Well, if the teller on 24Feb2025 had pocketed $3,000. is Grand Theft. If pocketed just $1,500 is still Grand Theft.But without the camera video's of this transaction would be difficult to prove. So here again I ask Wells Fargo, is the camera video stored in North Carolina for 5 years???Absent of camera video, such as destruction of the camera video I contend that is breaking the law of Obstruction of Justice.If the IRS check of $1500 is made visible, and here I filled out a form asking for a photocopy front and back from the IRS, may reveal some evidence that the check had not been cashed out. Although the simultaneous withdrawal of $1500 from my Savings Account looks preposterous, as I have never needed $3,000 in 100 dollar bills.Maybe a police interview with these tellers may reveal what happened.
Might I have a charge of a broken State law for the May2024 loss to the bank of $1500? Although it was in my favor of getting that money and never subtracted from my bank account. Might there be a State Law about banking practices in which Wells Fargo makes out Generic receipts that deceive both teller and customer. Here I need no camera video for it is plain to see in my monthly statements that the 30May2024 was a loss to the bank in the amount of $1500. Is there a law in South Dakota on bad banking practices of "Cashed chk" when it should read "Withdrawal from Savings". I looked in South Dakota law under code 54 for some law of bad banking practices.Is there some law about covering up, so that when the police ask for the balance for the day 30May2024 and 24Feb2025 and told the balance was within a few pennies, when truly short by $1500 on 30May2024 and a surplus of $3,000 on 24Feb2025. Can liaring to the police about those facts break a law of South Dakota?
Messrs Steven Black & Charles Scharf of Wells Fargo Bank, if you spent more time on having True Receipts to customers rather than spending all your time trying to figure out how to raise the percent of credit card profits 3-5% on each purchase, you would have a better Bank than what you presently have.Here is where the branch manager of Vermillion South Dakota, hands me a receipt when I asked for a Withdrawal of $1500. cash in 100 dollar bills from my Savings account.
And then I started to notice these Wells Fargo receipts when I withdrew $1500. in cash from my Savings. I noticed they were ____not reflective of the transaction_____ that took place. Here is a case example of where the branch manager did the transaction.Wells Fargo BankTransaction ReceiptBranch #0004595 02 Cash ChkCheck Amount(s) $1,500.00Check(s) Total $1,500.00Fee Total $0.00Loose Currency$100 $1,500.00Sub total $1,500.00Cash Paid to Customer$1,500.00Transaction # 027 004003:00PM 06/11/21Thank you XXXXX
Messrs Steven Black & Charles Scharf of Wells Fargo Bank, when your branch managers at Wells Fargo never learned how to do that transaction to where the receipt says "Withdrawal from Savings" sets up a booby trap that either the teller or the customer get snared into and which I call fraudulent bank practices.No wonder your Bank would end up losing $1500. on this transaction because no-one at the branch knows how to make a proper transaction that says "withdrawal from savings", you do not teach them, and the manager of course does not know, she was never trained to make a proper receipt. And of course this teller makes a mistake for no-one at the branch was trained. He probably checked the wrong box in your "one slip fits all sizes-- deposit, withdrawal, maybe even sing a hymn in the bank".
Here is that 2024 Wells Fargo Bank loss that happened on May 30, 2024.
Wells Fargo BankTransaction ReceiptBranch #0004595 04 Cash ChkCheck Amount(s) $1,500.00Check(s) Total $1,500.00Fee Total $0.00Loose Currency$100 $1,500.00Sub total $1,500.00Cash Paid to Customer$1,500.00Transaction # 030 005002:43PM 05/30/24Thank you XXXXX
Then of course, Messrs Steven Black & Charles Scharf, when your bank has no-one who knows how to make a receipt reflecting what truly transpired "Withdrawal from Savings" and not the generic b.s. "Cash Chk". Then of course, your bank Wells Fargo has a booby trap on all customers, where AP loses $3,000 on this date in 24FEB2025, where I was depositing a IRS refund check in the amount of $1500. No-one at your bank is trained to handle deposits, or withdrawals with receipt that accurately reflects the transaction.
Wells Fargo BankTransaction Receipt
Branch #00045595 06 Cash Chk
Check Amount(s) $1,500.00Check(s) Total $1,500.00Fee Total $0.00Loose Currency$100 $1,500.00Sub total $1,500.00Cash Paid to Customer$1,500.00
Transaction # 025 003702:24PM 02/24/25Thank you XXXXX
No, Messrs Steven Black & Charles Scharf your Wells Fargo bank system is a booby trap, all because you spend more time on increasing profits from credit card purchases and no time on making such a simple thing as a Honest Receipt "Deposit to Savings", or "Withdrawal from Savings". Every receipt from your Vermillion branch for the past 20 years is "Cash Chk", a lousy booby trap that frustrates tellers into making mistakes and victimizes me with a $1500 loss.And instead of the branch manager wanting to "Right the Ship" ( I was a Navy officer), no, she wants to stonewall, and obstruct justice by not showing the camera video.Messrs Steven Black & Charles Scharf, spend more time on making your Bank-- above board honest and not all the time looking to increase the 5% profit on credit card purchases.AP, King of Science
Google search of Archimedes Plutonium reveals Steve Huffman as 2nd hit when the 2nd hit should be AP's newsgroup of
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Steve Huffman lists science lunatics:
Reddit (symbol) r/math, 3 years ago Genius meets Lunatic: 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium
I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane: and it is 1 (color everything
Steve Huffman on math lunatics Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao,
Steve Huffman University of Virginia, Alexis Ohanian
Reddit (symbol) An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers Reddit · r/badmathematics 10+ comments · 6 years ago An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers ... In Grid Systems, you are exact only to the Grid, and forget about the beyond. "The ...
Univ Virginia math dept: Peter Abramenko, Julie Bergner, Mikhail Ershov, Jeffrey Holt, John Imbrie, Thomas Koberda, Slava Krushkal, Thomas Mark, Jennifer Morse, Ken Ono, Andrei Rapinchuk, Christian Reidys, Jim Rolf, Charles Dunki, Ira Herbst, James Howland, Craig Huneke, Thomas Kriete, Nicholas Kuhn, Irena Lasiecka, Barbara MacCluer, Kevin McCrimmon, Karen Parshall, Loren Pitt, Donald Ramirez, James Rovnyak, Leonard Scott, Lawrence Thomas, Roberto Triggiani, Harold Ward
Steve Huffman lists science lunatics:
Reddit (symbol) r/math, 3 years ago Genius meets Lunatic: 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium
I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane: and it is 1 (color everything
An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers Reddit · r/badmathematics 10+ comments · 6 years ago He claimed that numbers beyond the borderline were irrational and infinite. Also, 0 was irrational. 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium Apr 26, 2021 I know what is going on with Archimedes Plutonium, I think. : r ... May 24, 2023 What conspiracy theory do you believe in and why? - Reddit Apr 9, 2018 Math Conspiracy : r/math - Reddit Dec 24, 2013 More results from
Reddit's Steve Huffman on Univ Virginia failing in all facets of science--- failures in science-- so stupid they cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.
1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction. Read AP's textbook--
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors// Teaching True Logic series, book 1
7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
9) Never took logic, or not enough, to understand Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids black holes.
10) Too stupid in mind to understand for the Atomic Theory to be a law of science requires the Universe itself be a Atom.
11) Far far too stupid to insist the Polynomial is the only valid function in all of math, thus reducing Calculus to a mere add or subtract 1 from exponent and making Calculus ----Super super easy
12) So stupid in physics that they never took a course in Logic in College to be able to think straight and clear and thus able to understand that physics has no Black Holes nor does it have a Big Bang for both violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle. duh duh duh
13) Hopelessly stupid in science when they see Accelerated Polar Ice Cap melt and run to their dumbarse computer modeling with CO2 greenhouse gas, when it is the Sun gone Red Giant because Sun and stars shine from Faraday law, not fusion. As every proton in the Sun is having muons thrust through the proton torus producing electrical energy.
14) So stupid in science and logic, that they will not even do Water Electrolysis and actually weigh the mass of oxygen compare to hydrogen. No, these logically impaired so-called scientists stop the experiment by eyeballing the volume, and then run to the lounge for cake coffee and donuts. Please be sure-- dan christensen, kibo parry and jan burse to concoct a hate sheet that appears 2nd or 3rd in a Google search of AP.
15) Is there any university in the entire world that requires its scientists to have 2 years of Logic study-- the AP corrected Logic not the crazy error filled Boole logic, so they can at least try to think straight, think clearly--- Answer is--- no.
Hooray-- Roberts Supreme Court to initiate Amendment 25 section 4 on a unhinged president, draftdodger 6 times bankrupt loser and complete Russophile Donald Trump. Watch carefully if Dondolt invades Iran, whether Putin ordered Dondolt to invade Iran so that gives Xi in China the signal to invade Taiwan while Dondolt is busy in Iran. Maybe the Roberts Supreme Court can find something in the Constitution that it is "illegal for Trump to telephone call Putin, in a world where 30 minutes Russia can turn the USA into a radioactive dump waste, and not let all of America hear on, on what Trump says to Putin" Please, Judge Roberts, make all telephone calls between Trump and Putin live to the American people in real time. A Russophile like Trump could be trading away America.We cannot expect the cabinet to put Trump in Longview mental hospital for many of them belong there with him holding hands. But 3 Cheers to the Supreme Court to recognize the world is in crisis with this unhinged Lunatic in office-- tariffing allies and letting US enemies Russia steal Ukraine, and as Dondolt invades Iran, China simultaneously invades Taiwan. What will Dondolt do as China invades Taiwan?? Dondolt does what he does best--- shit in his pants and opens his big dumb loud mouth.Steve Huffman, is Mark Rutte a scaredy cat couch potato with NATO armies because as Gilbert Strang says--- ignorant and incompetent of math????AP asks:: What in world is Rutte waiting for--- Russia destroys Poland rails, cuts telephone and electricity lines in North Sea, flies over European air space, flies drones on European airports. What is Rutte waiting for???????????????????????Univ Virginia Huffman, is Mark Rutte a crank for not having Finland, Germany, Poland NATO army contingent inside of Ukraine now fighting alongside Ukraine Army to repel the Russians? I mean well Russia is attacking all European countries with cutting undersea cables and even blowing up Poland rails and drones in airports throughout Europe. Huffman question:: is Univ Glasgow Mark Barton raving nutter not only failing in slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse but a failure like Trump who thinks Ukraine started the war.pppSteve Huffman..why.. everytime Trump says Peace in Ukraine, Putin laughs at Trump and bombs Ukraine worse than ever before--No-one expects that either Trump or Vance can tell apart a Oval from ellipse. But those two fools should tell apart that Ukraine and NATO are allies of the USA. But here in the West, everyone expects that Trump will save Ukraine from falling into the hands of Russia, everyone, even the lunatic on Huffman's list-- JD Vance and Terence Tao.2--- quoting Wikipedia---2-Huffman's broadcast on math lunatics starting with Terry Tao UCLA, unable to admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse for it appears everything Terry does in math is a memorization of a Wikipedia page.
2--- quoting Wikipedia on Conic Section, for Jimmy Wales with his fascist editors never allow the truth of science into any of their entries of science in Wikipedia, not even a simple geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse------ end quoting Wikipedia on Conic Section------ end quoting Wikipedia---
(snipped)
The Generic Receipt is to blame for the bank loss by Wells Fargo of 30May2024, where I got $1500 in cash withdrawn yet never any deduction of that amount in my monthly bank statements.
But then comes 24Feb2025 me telling the teller deposit this IRS check into my savings account and I end up with a generic receipt of "Cash chk" but a loss of $3,000, for the IRS check was never deposited and on top of that $1500 taken out of my savings account.
(snipped)
Today (26Feb2026) I did another experiment with Wells Fargo. I went in and said I would like a Withdrawal of $10 from my Savings Account. I wanted the Teller to give me a receipt that said "Withdrawal from Savings" not "Cash chk" for there is no check involved. This experiment is in the case I had ___only a Savings account___ with Wells Fargo and no Checking Account. Obviously with no checking account I would not have a credit card, nor a pin number for the credit card.
Alright, I hope you are following me so far.
So, I was experimenting to see if Wells Fargo would give me $10 by handing them the number of my Savings account, and handing over my drivers license for identification. The slip for me to sign and then delivery of $10 and what does the Receipt say?????????? You guessed it "Cash chk".
My goodness, I have no checking account, and I did not give the teller a check.
So no, all of Wells Fargo is a booby trap on deposits and withdrawals as long as the Receipts never reflect the actual transaction that took place. Thus, the teller loses $1500 for Wells Fargo on 30May2024, and I lose $3000. on 24Feb2025.