#467 AP book of Science-- Every Atom can be split in 2 atoms, and so, every Light Ray can be split into two rays with half the frequency of a former 1 Ray by Archimedes Plutonium

[Archimedes Plutonium]

--- quoting what I wrote in another book of mine on Logo Pictures---

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 8:15:24 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I almost forgot, I have a letter from John Wheeler over the issue of the Plutonium Atom Totality. Forgot, probably because Wheeler was saturated with the absurdity of black holes and other exotica.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 8:24:59 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
But looking at Wheeler's resume on Wikipedia, it appears he came up with a idea of "one-electron universe".

And lately I have been asking myself the question of whether given any frequency of light, whether one can cut that frequency in half and have two light-photons of 1/2 original frequency.

Example: Violet light is 400 nm and say we had 10^10 photons of violet light, can we turn that into being 2*10^10 photons of Infrared at 800 nm.

Honestly I cannot think of an experiment that splits Light into half and has twice as many photons afterwards.

So maybe the Wheeler observation of positron always comes together with magnetic monopole 0.5MeV, for Wheeler was not sophisticated enough in his life to realize the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole and the muon is the actual electron of Atoms stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV in hydrogen.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 8:29:20 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Wheeler forces me to look up in sci.physics when I first posted the silliness and stupidity of physics professors believing in black holes when they had right there in front of them the Pauli Exclusion Principle that forbids such nonsense from ever taking place, for you cannot squeeze matter into itself.

This is why I say--- every scientist must take 2 years of College Logic to get a degree in science that hopefully makes them think straight and clear and prevents them from becoming a contradictory fool in science.

AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 8:45:50 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I came to Usenet in August of 1993 and posted this about the phony baloney that is "black holes".

Newsgroups: sci.physics
From: Ludwig.P...@dartmouth.edu  (Ludwig Plutonium)
Subject: Why didn't Dirac or Feynman stop black holes (or
neutron stars)?
Message-ID: (CBz0H...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 19:51:00 GMT
Lines: 27

Certainly these two heavyweights of physics had the influential power.
Feynman though did make a correct disparaging appraisal of string
theories.

Black holes violate the Pauli exclusion principle. And neutron stars
violate the uncertainty principle (they are not neutrons but nickel
cobalt stars). In every test case between relativity theory and
quantum theory, quantum theory won. Neutron stars are so intuitively
ridiculous. Would a biologist believe that a human could exist as a pure
slab of just DNA. So why didn't Dirac or Feynman stop the present day
gurus in the physics community from making themselves look like the
movies Revenge of the Physics Nerds? My only guess is that both Dirac
and Feynman knew what fools the present day gurus were heading into
but regrettably both did not have the character nor time to set things
right.

No black holes can ever exist because the observable universe is the
94th electron of 231Pu. No quantum principle is ever violated. Relativity
theory is just closet attic space in the house of atoms. The reason the
Coulomb force has the same mathematical form as the gravitational
force only many times stronger is because we are in an atom. An
electron is dots of the electron cloud, and 10 of those dots are the
solar system.

When physics professors (those intuitionless aspirants of physics) can
not create any new true physics then like a herd of wildebeests, they
are off violating quantum principles.

AP writes in 28Feb2026: My letter to Dr. Wheeler was in Jan1991 with a reply back in 28Feb1991. Coincidence??? No, superdeterminism.

All professors of physics, who have not studied Logic run the risk of making stupid conclusions that torpedoes their understanding of physics.

Such a simple idea-- you cannot have a world of Pauli Exclusion Principle concomitant with black holes, for the ignorant fools who think so, never understood what Contradiction means.

When a physics idiot is teaching black holes, would be the same fool as a mathematician teaching you can divide by 0 and get away with it.

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Feb 28, 2026, 10:16:13 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Saturday, February 28, 2026 at 8:24:59 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
But looking at Wheeler's resume on Wikipedia, it appears he came up with a idea of "one-electron universe".

And lately I have been asking myself the question of whether given any frequency of light, whether one can cut that frequency in half and have two light-photons of 1/2 original frequency.

Example: Violet light is 400 nm and say we had 10^10 photons of violet light, can we turn that into being 2*10^10 photons of Infrared at 800 nm.

Honestly I cannot think of an experiment that splits Light into half and has twice as many photons afterwards.

So maybe the Wheeler observation of positron always comes together with magnetic monopole 0.5MeV, for Wheeler was not sophisticated enough in his life to realize the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole and the muon is the actual electron of Atoms stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV in hydrogen.

So let me drill down more on this idea of the Ability of a Light Ray to become divided into 1/2 and doubling the number of Rays.

Obviously true for Pair Production of a 1 MeV gamma ray becoming 2 rays of 0.5MeV positron and 0.5MeV antipositron (dirac magnetic monopole).

How about X-rays of bones. Is this where a frequency of X-rays is split into half forming 2 rays of Visible light, and hence the reason X-rays allow us to see bones inside the body???

How about a violet colored Laser light splitting in half to form double the amount of Rays and which those rays are now Infrared and melting away a metal????

How about my Fan Forced Heater in which the coils produce Infrared Rays but, I can hear sound and music of radio waves??

What I am exploring is the idea that we can take a Individual Photon of Light, split into half that forms 2 rays now of 1/2 the original frequency.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 2, 2026, 4:29:44 PM (2 days ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now the express reason I am doing Wheeler, Aspect, Ghiorso as logo pictures is that a few weeks ago I was looking to see an answer to a question that popped up.

A beautifully simple strange question.

If we have a Photon of Light that is in visible region, can that Photon split into 2 rays of Infrared region??????

And going through Wheeler, Aspect, Ghiorso history on Wikipedia, that Wheeler may just have answered my hauntingly beautiful question--- can a photon split into 2 of lower frequency.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 3, 2026, 11:39:31 PM (5 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
So for the life of me, I am looking to see if any experiment performed, switched the frequency of Light Rays into 2 rays with 1/2 the original frequency, and the only case known is when a gamma ray of about 1MeV converts to 2 rays of positron and antipositron each of 0.5MeV the unit of electricity.

Maybe the entire EM Spectrum can only do this splitting up at 1MeV and nowhere else. If true, I need so some of proof argument. Maybe the Speed of Light has a say in all of this, for the positron and antipositron have rest mass. A sort of bridge where only EM rays can split up.

But also I must consider the very reverse. where you have say a collection of infrared rays that join together and become Visible rays.

Why would I want or need this property, for all EM rays??? The idea that you can always split atoms, the Final Cut as the concept of Atomic theory.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
12:31 AM (4 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I think I found my second split in half Light Ray--- Cherenkov Radiation. Ever since I first heard of the explanation of Cherenkov Radiation-- it sounded too dumb for me to accept-- when antipositrons travel through water faster than the phase velocity of light. Fools who think Light speed is maximum and then want to contradict themselves for the sake of an explanation (a phony explanation).

Instead, let us try the explanation that the 0.5MeV particles divided in half their frequency is blue-UV light.

There are ample anomalies in Cherenkov Radiation and my explanation may address them all.

Now there also is Bremsstrahlung Radiation reported to be a continuous EM radiation purportedly caused by antipositrons being slowed down by an electric field. Anomalies in this radiation are also numerous.

If we instead say the cause is purely that of the splitting up of high energy EM radiation into 2 smaller frequency rays such as X-rays. Going from 0.5 MeV radiation to X-ray radiation.

If I can make the case for Bremsstrahlung, then I make the case for all EM Spectrum.

Now I wonder if some observations already show that Radio Wave can be split in half of their frequency to form 2 new EM rays???

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
4:24 AM (now)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
My current logo picture is a letter sent to me from John Wheeler. In early 1990s, 1991 I was looking for the leading physicists of the time to write a letter introducing my theory of -- Plutonium Atom Universe. Sad to say, Dr. Feynman was gone in 1988 and John Bell was gone in 1990 just one month earlier than my discovery of 7Nov1990. Dirac had gone by 1984. I wonder if Feynman and John Bell paid tribute on the passing of Dr. Dirac???? Probably.

Anyway, these letters from Wheeler, Alain Aspect, Ghiorso are instructive to me in reviewing them and especially reviewing the ideas of Wheeler.

Sorry to say, I sort of blocked Wheeler from my mind with all his black holes and other astronomy exotica that defies the Pauli Exclusion Principle. And the reason I require all scientists wanting a degree in science to spend 2 years of Logic in their curriculum in order to help them think straight and think clearly. If Dr. Wheeler had taken Logic he probably would have realized black holes were a contradiction to Pauli Exclusion Principle and not have pushed that nonsense and folly in physics.

But, however, recently in a Logic book of mine--- The History of Logic, I examine the Atomic theory of Ancient Greeks and realize the entire theory is based on division--- The Last Cut. And that sprang a alarm bell in my brain. That if Atoms are the Last Cut, and since atoms can be converted to pure energy and atoms can be divided in half (if even numbered), raise the question can All EM radiation of a specific frequency be cut in half and yield 2 Light rays where before there was just 1???

And looking through Dr. Wheeler's resume of achievements--- his ___One Electron Universe___ hypothesis (really should be Magnetic Monopole for the 0.5 MeV particle is a magnetic monopole and the true electron of Atoms is the Muon stuck inside a 840 MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton torus).

So, well reading Wheeler's hypothesis, gave me more confidence I was on the correct path to figuring out that all EM radiation can be split in half (if even numbered) and end up with 2 Light rays where before there was only 1. This happens with Gamma rays of 1MeV or higher ending up in Pair Production --- positron and antipositron.

Further question, in electricity-- is the circuit 1/2 of antipositrons and the other half positrons??? This offers a exciting experiment.

I am confident that all EM radiation  can be split in half if even numbered resulting in 2 Light rays where before there was just 1.

I see strong evidence that Cherenkov Radiation  is the division  in  1/2 of the 0.5 MeV magnetic monopole and that Bremsstrahlung Radiation is also a splitting in 1/2 of a former single Light ray. There are far far too many anomalies in both Cherenkov and Bremsstrahlung, and whenever a Physics topic has anomalies, is because the laws and ideas of Cherenkov and Bremsstrahlung is ---- false physics--- in dire need of repair.

Here is what Dr. Wheeler replied to my sending him my Plutonium Atom Universe manuscript. My name in 1991 was still Ludwig van Ludvig.

Department of Physics Princeton University
Dear Mr. Van Ludvig
This is to acknowledge with thanks the receipt of your letter of 31Jan forwarded (with some delay) from Texas. I used to manufacture plutonium (at Hanford) so enjoy all mention of Pu!
Best--[signature of John Wheeler]
John Archibald Wheeler
Jadwin Hall, box 708
Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
28Feb1991

AP writes: I wonder if Dr. Wheeler unfortunately died of his exposure to plutonium??? He died age 96, so he benefitted with a long life. I myself will probably not make it to 96.

Wikipedia says he died of pneumonia in New Jersey. Maybe if he had stayed in Texas, he may have lived to 100? But he is far more luck than most who were in proximity to plutonium and uranium.

Thanks John Wheeler for your One-Magnetic Monopole Universe. Wish you all the best in Plutonium Atom Universe Heaven, which is likely to be the Cosmic Neutrons.

AP, King of Science

[Archimedes Plutonium]

That is every atom except Hydrogen.

What I am making a fuss about is the idea that there is a Atomic Theory--- all Matter is composed of atoms. I am saying we can convert Matter to Electromagnetic Energy.

And since all Atoms except hydrogen can be split into 2 atoms, that all Light Rays can be split into 2 Rays  of a lower frequency.

I am replacing rest mass Atomic Theory with a energy Light Ray Theory.

It is easily seen that Pair Production of 1 gamma ray of 1MeV goes into 2 rays of 0.5MeV of a positron and antipositron (magnetic monopoles).

Olbers Paradox has never been sufficiently explained. This is the paradox asking for why is the night sky dark when all these stars and galaxies are pouring out Light Rays. One would think with all that outpouring the night sky would be awash in a glow of Light Rays, much like a lighted up room in a house.

Some have evoked what is called "tired light" to explain the paradox. What I suggest is that light naturally travels a distance and automatically halves itself into Rays which are dark like the Microwave region of EM spectrum. A fact is stated (Introduction Cosmology, Ryden) that the number density of photons in the CMB is one billion times (10^9) the number density of matter in the universe.

AP writes:: This is like saying, well, the universe does ____not have any Empty Space___ at all, but that what we thought was "empty space" is just packed full of Light Rays in the Microwave and Radio wave region.

In this perspective the entire Universe is a Solid in which Rest Mass matter of Atoms coexist in a sea of Light Rays.

As soon as the Sun emits Light Rays into the Solar System, those rays are splitting in half in their journey until they become dark Microwave and Radio wave Rays.

AP writes: The number 10^9 is related to magnetic permeability and electric permittivity. Multiply permeability by fine structure constant and you have 10^-9. Multiply permittivity by inverse fine structure constant and you have 10^-9.

AP, King of Science

[Archimedes Plutonium]

AI overview in a search of microwaves conduct electricity

Microwave Wireless Power Transmission (MPT) is a technology that transfers electrical energy wirelessly over long distances using electromagnetic waves (typically 300 MHz to 300 GHz). It converts electricity into microwaves at a source, transmits them to a receiver, and converts them back to electricity using a special device called a rectenna. 

ScienceDirect.com +2

Key Aspects of MPT:

• Process: The system typically involves a transmitter (often a magnetron or solid-state generator) and a receiver (rectifying antenna, or "rectenna").
• Key Components: The transmitter converts DC/AC power to RF, and the rectenna converts the microwave energy back to DC, often using Schottky diodes.
• Applications: Key uses include powering drones, sensors, IoT devices, and satellite power systems, often in situations where cables are impractical.
• Advantages: Long-range, line-of-sight capability that can bypass the need for physical infrastructure.
• Challenges: Key challenges include improving efficiency, managing beamforming, and ensuring safety. 
  ScienceDirect.com +9

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I revised Feynman's EM Spectrum to include electricity.

Quoting Feynman, page 2-5, Volume 1 Lectures on Physics and adding where electricity fits in---  

The Electromagnetic Spectrum  
Frequency in oscillations     Name        Rough behavior  
per second  

10^2 Electrical disturbance                      Field  
5*10^5-10^6 Radio broadcast                Waves  
10^8 FM-TV                                           Waves  
10^10 Radar                                           Waves  
5*10^14 - 10^15 Visible Light                 Waves  
10^18 X-rays                                          Particle  
DC electricity 
AC electricity 
10^21 gamma-ray, nuclear                    Particle  
10^24 gamma-ray, artificial                    Particle  
10^27 gamma-ray, in cosmic rays          Particle  

--- end quoting Feynman Lectures on Physics, 1963---

Unlike Atoms dividing in half to make 2 new atoms, with frequency I am dealing with square root instead of dividing by half. The justification for square root can come later.

So I have a 1 gamma ray of 1MeV and square root of that is 2 rays of Visible Light. Now the square root of Visible Light is 2 Rays of Microwave.

So, starting with a 1MeV gamma Ray I get 2 rays of Visible Light then get 4 rays of Microwave.

Now if I wanted to assemble a positron or antipositron and starting with Microwaves, I would need 4 microwaves to build 2 rays of Visible Light then take those 2 rays of Visible Light to build 1 magnetic monopole of 0.5MeV along with the antipositron magnetic monopole.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I am trying to figure out how the Faraday law makes RECTENNA work. Still not getting it.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

So now, I soon will be writing the 10th edition of Plutonium Atom Totality Universe. And I will use the recent Scientific American March2026 report of "Cosmic Chain: Hundreds of galaxies form one of the largest spinning structures ever spotted". For this is a geometry trek around the Plutonium Atom Totality to see the Cosmic Protons, the Cosmic Muons, the Cosmic Neutrons.

Can we see the Protons as a torus of 94 x 840 of windings?? Can we see the Cosmic Muons as a chain of 94 x 105 windings inside the proton torus?? Can we see 137 x 945 windings of the Cosmic Neutrons as parallel plate capacitors??

If the energy contained in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation CMBR, is 10^9 times greater than all the energy contained in the observable universe matter suggests that Black Space must be the majority of the Cosmic Neutrons and Cosmic Protons.

Now looking at Wikipedia's entry of CMBR they write: "The CMB is the key experimental evidence of the Big Bang Theory for the origin of the universe."

Now, I wrote a book on the fact that the key evidence by physicists that Atoms have a nucleus is the Rutherford-Marsden-Geiger gold foil experiment where alpha particles are shot into the foil but some bounced back at 180 degrees with more speed coming out than going in.

In this case, the evidence for Atoms having a nucleus turns out to be exactly the experiment that puts the nuclear concept into the trash can.  The speed of ejection of Alpha particles being faster than going in, disproves the nuclear concept, as meaning that the alpha particles hit a chain of 79 muons inside the gold atom proton torus and bounced the alpha particles back.

So, well, the logic in the case of Atom's nucleus turns against the conclusions of a nuclear atom.

Can the logic, likewise, turn 180 degrees against the dumb Big Bang theory???? Because we have a CMBR, proves the Universe can not be a result of a Big Bang???? I believe that is the case again, just like Rutherford's conclusion of a nucleus is false, and so a CMBR proves the Universe could never have come from a Big Bang.

AP, King of Science

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On Thursday, March 5, 2026 at 3:09:50 AM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

I am trying to figure out how the Faraday law makes RECTENNA work. Still not getting it.

If I cannot figure this out, then my old idea, going back decades is wrong. That old idea was that all electric current produced has to be from Faraday law.

If you can make electric current from simply combining 4 rays of Microwaves to form a gamma ray, then no Faraday law was involved.

AP 

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Ah, yes, I can save myself here. If we consider the Photon Ray is itself a Faraday coil, and when another photon ray Travels inside the first Ray is the Faraday law with production of electric current. This conjures up the bizarre image that two light waves, one thrusting through another yet both having the speed of light.

Maybe the diodes in the Rectenna slow down one of the rays allowing the other ray inside the first thrust through producing electricity.

The 6 AP-Electromagnetic Equations and the 7 Structures (Laws) of Physics and all sciences

0) domain structure as Atomic Theory-- Periodic Table of Chemical Elements
1) B and E primal unit structures Magnetic Field  B = kg*m^2 /second and Electric field E = 1/(Ampere*second)

2) V = A*B*E       New Ohm's structure, structure of electricity
3) V' = (A*B*E)'         Capacitor-Transformer structure
4) (V/A*E)'  = B'        Ampere-Maxwell structure
5) (V/(B*E))' = A'      Faraday structure
6) (V/(A*B))' = E'      the new structure of Coulomb force with EM gravity force and DeBroglie pilot wave

In the  Faraday law, there are 3 terms solved for the solution of the differential equation. Perhaps one of those terms is the production of electric current of a photon ray thrusting through the interior of another photon ray. Let me hope so, for I hate to have to go back through all my books for a correction.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, I have to do some long hard thinking here, for it seems to tell me this ability for Light Rays to join together and to divide apart, that the Neutrons of Atoms are the dark empty space of atoms.

This is a collosal reversal of what humanity has thought before--- the vast empty dark space is actually dense Microwaves, carrying more energy 10^9 of what rest-mass matter contains.

In this viewpoint, Space is a solid of energy and most of that is Microwave Light Rays.

I pause to collect my thoughts, as I have always before this, thought of Space as mostly just empty and dark. Of course, microwaves are dark, but because they are so numerous they are 10^9 more than matter objects like galaxies, stars, planets.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

There are many images of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation CMBR, but all of them confusing except the University of Oregon image, in my estimation.

I say this because I hypothesize the Cosmic Proton Torus is a Faraday Coil as in the Faraday law and the galaxies, stars form this coil.  And here is the first picture I have seen that puts a pattern to the galaxies as well as the dark Space that is full of Microwaves.

pp

University of Oregon

CMBR

ppp

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now an old idea of mine that needs to be more inspected by me.

Is a Photon Light Ray a coil like a coil in the Faraday Law, and can a Light Ray have a different light Ray inside itself doing the Faraday law and producing a tiny electric current.

Of the Faraday and Ampere laws, they require essentially two structures, a wire and a magnet.

AP