Steve Huffman (Univ Virginia) reaction to Saudi Arabia having China enter Gaza, West Bank and building them up and evicting illegal Jew settlers
Archimedes Plutonium
Google search of Archimedes Plutonium reveals Steve Huffman as 2nd hit when the 2nd hit should be AP's newsgroup of
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Steve Huffman lists science lunatics:
Reddit (symbol) r/math, 3 years ago Genius meets Lunatic: 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium
I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane: and it is 1 (color everything
Steve Huffman on math lunatics Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao,
Steve Huffman University of Virginia, Alexis Ohanian
Reddit (symbol) An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers Reddit · r/badmathematics 10+ comments · 6 years ago An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers ... In Grid Systems, you are exact only to the Grid, and forget about the beyond. "The ...
Univ Virginia math dept: Peter Abramenko, Julie Bergner, Mikhail Ershov, Jeffrey Holt, John Imbrie, Thomas Koberda, Slava Krushkal, Thomas Mark, Jennifer Morse, Ken Ono, Andrei Rapinchuk, Christian Reidys, Jim Rolf, Charles Dunki, Ira Herbst, James Howland, Craig Huneke, Thomas Kriete, Nicholas Kuhn, Irena Lasiecka, Barbara MacCluer, Kevin McCrimmon, Karen Parshall, Loren Pitt, Donald Ramirez, James Rovnyak, Leonard Scott, Lawrence Thomas, Roberto Triggiani, Harold Ward
Steve Huffman lists science lunatics:
Reddit (symbol) r/math, 3 years ago Genius meets Lunatic: 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium
I remember Archimedes Plutonium and sci.math. He calculated the chromatic number of the plane: and it is 1 (color everything
An other Archimedes Plutonium rant about irrational numbers Reddit · r/badmathematics 10+ comments · 6 years ago He claimed that numbers beyond the borderline were irrational and infinite. Also, 0 was irrational. 1994 discussion between Terry Tao and Ludwig Plutonium Apr 26, 2021 I know what is going on with Archimedes Plutonium, I think. : r ... May 24, 2023 What conspiracy theory do you believe in and why? - Reddit Apr 9, 2018 Math Conspiracy : r/math - Reddit Dec 24, 2013 More results from www.reddit.com
Reddit's Steve Huffman on Univ Virginia failing in all facets of science--- failures in science-- so stupid they cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.
1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction. Read AP's textbook--
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors// Teaching True Logic series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium
This is AP's 5th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,
PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
9) Never took logic, or not enough, to understand Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids black holes.
10) Too stupid in mind to understand for the Atomic Theory to be a law of science requires the Universe itself be a Atom.
11) Far far too stupid to insist the Polynomial is the only valid function in all of math, thus reducing Calculus to a mere add or subtract 1 from exponent and making Calculus ----Super super easy
12) So stupid in physics that they never took a course in Logic in College to be able to think straight and clear and thus able to understand that physics has no Black Holes nor does it have a Big Bang for both violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle. duh duh duh
13) Hopelessly stupid in science when they see Accelerated Polar Ice Cap melt and run to their dumbarse computer modeling with CO2 greenhouse gas, when it is the Sun gone Red Giant because Sun and stars shine from Faraday law, not fusion. As every proton in the Sun is having muons thrust through the proton torus producing electrical energy.
14) So stupid in science and logic, that they will not even do Water Electrolysis and actually weigh the mass of oxygen compare to hydrogen. No, these logically impaired so-called scientists stop the experiment by eyeballing the volume, and then run to the lounge for cake coffee and donuts. Please be sure-- dan christensen, kibo parry and jan burse to concoct a hate sheet that appears 2nd or 3rd in a Google search of AP.
15) Is there any university in the entire world that requires its scientists to have 2 years of Logic study-- the AP corrected Logic not the crazy error filled Boole logic, so they can at least try to think straight, think clearly--- Answer is--- no.
Archimedes Plutonium
Google search of Archimedes Plutonium reveals Mark Barton hate-sheet as 3rd hit when the 3rd hit should be AP's newsgroup of
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on Univ Glasgow Mark Barton. Quora (symbol logo) Mark Barton PhD physicist with University of Glasgow Author has 16.9K answers and 21.5M answer views10y None at all - he was a raving nutter. 1.9K viewsView upvotes...
Mark Barton on Katherine Grainger, Paul Soler, Andy Blue, Sheila Rowan, James Hough, Graham Woan who cannot tell apart a oval from a ellipse, with their slant cut of Cone as ellipse which is impossible for the cone has but one axis of symmetry.
CalTech math dept
Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
Caltech Physics Dept
Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer
President Larry Summers
President now Lawrence Bacow
Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin, Dr. Elias Corey (chem), Dr. Walter Gilbert (chem), Dr.Dudley Herschbach (chem), Dr.Martin Karplus (chem)
Harvard Math dept
Harvard Math dept Noam Elkies (FP),Dennis Gaitsgory (FP),Robin Gottlieb (PP),Benedict Gross (FP),Joseph Harris (FP),Heisuke Hironaka (EM),Michael Hopkins (FP),Arthur Jaffe (FP),David Kazhdan (EM),Mark Kisin (FP),Peter Kronheimer (FP),Jacob Lurie (FP),Eric Maskin (FP),Barry Mazur (FP),Curtis McMullen (FP),David Mumford (EM),Martin Nowak (FP),Gerald Sacks (EM),Wilfried Schmid (FP),Yum-Tong Siu (FP),Shlomo Sternberg (EM),John Tate (EM),Cliff Taubes (FP),Hugh Woodin (FP),Horng-Tzer Yau (FP),Shing-Tung Yau (FP)
Mark Barton on Univ Glasgow, Harvard, Caltech failing in all facets of science--- failures in science-- so stupid they cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
31k viewsSubscribe4:32 PM (4 hours ago)to Plutonium Atom UniverseRingggg....Trump: Hello, Vladimir, late at nightPutin: Hi Dodolt, you are to attack Iran on Saturday with marines going to shoreTrump: Yes sir, anything else???Putin: You are to do it in the morning for Xi will invade China on that same dayTrump: why Taiwan?Putin: I owe Xi a Lunar New Year gift and Taiwan is the perfect gift.Trump: Yes sir [saluting Putin]--- quoting BBC---Trump says world has 10 days to see if Iran deal reached3 hrs ago | World--- end quoting BBC---Tim Sweeney, I know no-one at Univ Maryland can tell the difference between a ellipse and a oval, but maybe they know what Pavlov Dog Brainwashing with Sex is all about.Tim Sweeney, does Mark Rutte need some Russian beauty queen sex, Pavlov dog style before he realizes Trump loves Russia and hates Europe, even hates USA????Myers & Mullenweg is Mark Rutte spherical bullshit scaredy-cat??MIT Gilbert Strang.. on NATO chief Mark Rutte as ignorant and incompetent (Narkive)
X (symbol) X X-TimSweeneyEpic 4likes, 4 years ago Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? Whatever happened to Archimedes Plutonium? 9:56 PM- Oct 22, 2019
Tim Sweeney on Univ Maryland failing in all facets of science--- failures in science-- so stupid they cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.
1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction. Read AP's textbook--
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors// Teaching True Logic series, book 1
7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
9) Never took logic, or not enough, to understand Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids black holes.
10) Too stupid in mind to understand for the Atomic Theory to be a law of science requires the Universe itself be a Atom.
11) Far far too stupid to insist the Polynomial is the only valid function in all of math, thus reducing Calculus to a mere add or subtract 1 from exponent and making Calculus ----Super super easy
12) So stupid in physics that they never took a course in Logic in College to be able to think straight and clear and thus able to understand that physics has no Black Holes nor does it have a Big Bang for both violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle. duh duh duh
13) Hopelessly stupid in science when they see Accelerated Polar Ice Cap melt and run to their dumbarse computer modeling with CO2 greenhouse gas, when it is the Sun gone Red Giant because Sun and stars shine from Faraday law, not fusion. As every proton in the Sun is having muons thrust through the proton torus producing electrical energy.
14) Is there any university in the entire world that requires its scientists to have 2 years of Logic study-- the AP corrected Logic not the crazy error filled Boole logic, so they can at least try to think straight, think clearly--- Answer is--- no.
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪ ♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪ ♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪ ♪♪♪♪♪
Univ. Maryland physics dept Derek Boyd, Dieter Brill, Alessandra Buonanno, Chia-Cheh Chang, Chung-Yun Chang, Thomas Cohen, Douglas Currie, Sankar Das Sarma, Alan DeSilva, Jay Dorfman, William Dorland, Alex Dragt, James Drake, Howard Drew, Theodore L Einstein, Sarah Eno, Victor Galitski, George Gloeckler, Jordan Goodman, Oscar Greenberg, Richard Greene, Nicholas Hadley, Douglas Hamilton, Kara Hoffman, Theodore Kirkpatrick, Glenn Mason, John Mather, Edward Ott, Johnpierre Paglione, Jogesh Pati, William Philips, Edward Redish, Steven Rolston, Philip Roos, Peter Shawhan, Philip Sprangle, Edo Waks, Stephen Wallace, John Weeks, Frederick Wellstood, Ellen Williams, James Yorke
Tim Sweeney-- whatever happened to warning labels on your mindless computer games that causes students to fail in school??????
Univ Maryland Tim Sweeney Whatever Happened.. to NATO army fighting in war in Ukraine as Russia everyday attacks Europe countries-- airports, Poland rails, Scandinavia tele and electric cables, airports throughout Europe, is Mark Rutte and NATO army47 viewsSubscribepppMyers & Mullenweg is Mark Rutte spherical bullshit scaredy-cat??MIT Gilbert Strang.. on NATO chief Mark Rutte as ignorant and incompetent (Narkive)Cavion and Strang, is Mark Rutte a scaredy cat couch potato with NATO armies because as Gilbert Strang says--- ignorant and incompetent of math????AP asks:: What in world is Rutte waiting for--- Russia destroys Poland rails, cuts telephone and electricity lines in North Sea, flies over European air space, flies drones on European airports. What is Rutte waiting for???????????????????????Univ Virginia Huffman, is Mark Rutte a crank for not having Finland, Germany, Poland NATO army contingent inside of Ukraine now fighting alongside Ukraine Army to repel the Russians? I mean well Russia is attacking all European countries with cutting undersea cables and even blowing up Poland rails and drones in airports throughout Europe. Huffman question:: is Univ Glasgow Mark Barton raving nutter not only failing in slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse but a failure like Trump who thinks Ukraine started the war.p
Tim Sweeney, does playing your computer games make you as Verruckten as Terry Tao and NATO's Mark Rutte who only goes to war once Europe is flattened by Russia??????pppppSteve Huffman..why.. everytime Trump says Peace in Ukraine, Putin laughs at Trump and bombs Ukraine worse than ever before--No-one expects that either Trump or Vance can tell apart a Oval from ellipse. But those two fools should tell apart that Ukraine and NATO are allies of the USA. But here in the West, everyone expects that Trump will save Ukraine from falling into the hands of Russia, everyone, even the lunatic on Huffman's list-- JD Vance and Terence Tao.2--- quoting Wikipedia------ end quoting Wikipedia---2-Huffman's broadcast on math lunatics starting with Terry Tao UCLA, unable to admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse for it appears everything Terry does in math is a memorization of a Wikipedia page.
2--- quoting Wikipedia on Conic Section, for Jimmy Wales with his fascist editors never allow the truth of science into any of their entries of science in Wikipedia, not even a simple geometry of slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse------ end quoting Wikipedia on Conic Section---2-Steve Huffman, why lunatics Kip Thorne, John Baez, Andrea Ghez cannot understand slant cut of cylinder is truly ellipse but in cone it is oval? Do they have cataracts in their eyes or are they simpleton fools failures of math like you, Steve Huffman???2--- quoting Wikipedia------ end quoting Wikipedia---Steve Huffman (Reddit) on math lunatics. Steve is John Baez a math lunatic for he refuses to admit the truth about slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse. And of course revealing how much a math failure John is, unable to recognize that if the polynomial is the only valid function in all of math, makes calculus super easy. But no-one can penetrate the dense shell of a math lunatic, not Baez, not Wiles not Tao.
