371st,#371 AP book of science-- Advanced True Logic// logic textbook by Archimedes Plutonium This is AP's 371st published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this. Please read this textbook for free on

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Advanced True Logic// logic textbook by Archimedes Plutonium

This is AP's 371st published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this. Please read this textbook for free on Internet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe 

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph picture of the Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden experiments of 1906-1913 for which AP would prove by Logic 2016-2017 that Atoms have _____no nucleus_____. A scientist with little logic is almost no scientist at all.

------------------------------

Table of Contents

-------------------------------

Introduction

1) Start with the first shining bright Logic used by humanity-- Neanderthals discovery that flint struck on iron pyrite produces fire.

2) Thales of Miletus (626 - 548 BC) -- static electricity and magnetism.

3) Leucippus (5th century BC) and Democritus (460-370 BC) greatest of all science theories, the Atomic Theory

Now we come to the greatest science theory and idea in all the world, the Atomic theory, and its extension which says the total Universe itself has to be a single big Atom, and plutonium fits all the important numbers of math and physics.

4) Apollonius of Perga (240-190 BC) and his geometry and conic sections.

5) Aristarchus of Samos 270BC-- systematized the experimental science of Astronomy

I need to include Eratosthenes 276-194 BC along with Aristarchus as astronomers, thousand years ahead of their time because they had great logical skills.

6) Kepler 1571-1630, Galileo 1564-1642, Newton 1643-1727, all they needed to do was argue the force of gravity is magnetism.

7) Newton 1643-1727, Leibniz 1646-1716, the Calculus, if only they had logically reasoned it was geometry.

8) Maxwell 1831-1879, Unification of Electricity with Magnetism but the equations are full of error and asymmetry.

9) Heinrich Hertz 1887 Experiment, a magnificent experiment into radio-pulses but no-one had enough logical brains to see its many vast insights into electricity and magnetism and the whole of the science of psychology.

10) Max Planck, 1900 announcement of physics is discrete--- the birth of quantum mechanics, contrasted by math professors moron response by digging deeper into continuity with Reals.

11) Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden-Bohr Experiment of 1906-1913, illogical interpretation for Atoms have ___no nucleus___.

12) Pierre Curie 1859-1906, Dirac 1902-1984 their steadfast logical minds won them victory of truth--- magnetic monopoles exist and are abundant.

13) John Bell 1928-1990, a giant of logical mind with his Bell inequality and Superdeterminism Principle. 

14) AP; it is logic that carried me to be the King of Science. That is how important Logic is. And, what is the point of a College or University education if at the end, you come out and cannot think straight, think clearly, think correctly? I would contend your education was squandered.

15) Summary.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Let us take a moment to review units of physics.

And then apply Logic to see if ____ all of physics is just a Dimension shift___.

This is as advanced as Advanced Logic can get.

Here are some of the most important units in physics.

linear momentum  = MLT^-1

Angular momentum = ML^2T^-1

Force = MLT^-2

Energy = ML^2T^-2

Pressure = ML^-1T^-2

Power = ML^2T^-3

Entropy = ML^2T^-2


Angular momentum L =  kg*m^2/s

Action = kg*m^2/s where angular momentum = action

Current = A  where the A represents Ampere

Quantity of Current = C = A*s where the C represents Coulomb

Magnetic Field B = kg/ A*s^2

Electric Field is E = kg*m/ A*s^3  and where E/B = velocity = m/s

Voltage = i*B*E  = kg*m^2 /A*s^3

Is Classical Physics, the physics of Newton all enclosed inside of 2nd Dimension??????

We have the Identity function Y--> x as a diagonal straight line that bisects the 1st Quadrant of mathematics, for in truth there exists 1st quadrant only in all of math when stupid people realize no negative numbers exist.

|

|/__

Take an object A as existing, then its Linear Momentum = mass(velocity) is kg(dy/dx) or MLT^-1 as shown above.

Take the integral of identity function which is 1/2(x^2) and the integral becomes Kinetic Energy 1/2(mv^2).

So in Second Dimension we have linear-momentum and kinetic energy in order of calculus for the identity function Y--> x.

But now, let us go to 3 Dimension and what mathematics do we need to find out the Momentum and Energy of an arbitrary object? We can no longer use the Calculus of math of 2D, for we are in 3D.

Linear Momentum is ___not conserved__ in 3D.

Angular Momentum is conserved in 3D.

Energy is conserved in 3D and comes in the formula of Energy = mass(speed of light)(speed of light), we write it as E = mcc.

Angular Momentum is ML^2T^-1 while energy is ML^2T^-2. The same for E = mcc. Voltage is in 3D and is V= i*B*E where i is current, B magnetic field and E electric field with * meaning a generalized multiplication that can be normal multiply or vector dot product or vector cross product depending on the circumstances.

In 2D we easily see that the math Calculus goes from linear momentum to that of energy as integral.

In 3D we have to inspect carefully and closely, does Angular-Momentum go into being Energy???? Here we ask how does the Mathematics of ML^2T^-1 go into being  ML^2T^-2 ????? The answer is simple, that if you multiply Angular Momentum by frequency of angular momentum T^-1 that you end up with transforming angular momentum directly into energy.

What is the meaning of this????

It means that all of Classical Physics, the physics of Newton is of 2nd Dimension. While, when quantum mechanics came around with Planck in 1900 with his blackbody radiation experiments introduces Discrete numbers into all of physics and the Quantization of Physics. This is physics of 3rd Dimension.

Newton's classical physics is all in 2nd Dimension. When Quantum Mechanics starts in year 1900, now, we have physics of not only 2nd dimension but of 3rd Dimension.

The difference between Classical physics and quantum mechanics is a step higher in dimension. Of course, well, we live in 3rd dimension universe, the last dimension in science. Our momentum in the Universe is always in a closed loop circuit and that linear momentum is nonexistent for linear momentum is where you have not observed the Object in motion from a far enough distance out. Classical physics is all approximate physics while Angular-Momentum and Voltage as energy is total physics.

AP, King of Science

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Not too long ago, I wrote a science book, drawing to the conclusion that the Faraday Law-structure was the derivative in 3rd dimension, as I sought for a Calculus in 3rd dimension. Of course, I revised the entire Maxwell Equations to be polynomials using New Ohm's law-structure as the basis for all the Electromagnetic law-structures.

The 6 AP-Electromagnetic Equations and the 7 law-structures of Physics and all sciences.

0) domain structure as Atomic Theory-- Periodic Table of Chemical Elements
1) B and E primal unit structures Magnetic Field  B = kg / (Ampere*second^2) and Electric field E = kg*m/(Ampere*second^3)
2) V = A*B*E       New Ohm's law-structure of electricity
3) V' = (A*B*E)'         Capacitor-Transformer law-structure
4) (V/A*E)'  = B'        Ampere-Maxwell law-structure
5) (V/(B*E))' = A'      Faraday law-structure
6) (V/(A*B))' = E'      the new structures of Coulomb force law-structure with EM gravity force and DeBroglie pilot-wave structure

V= voltage, A = ampere current, B = magnetic field, E = electric field.

Using the Quotient Rule, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/(gh)^2 

Faraday Law-structure, where angular momentum L = E electric field = action.

(V/B*L)' = A' =  (V'*B*L - V*B' *L - V*B*L') / (B*L)^2

Can we see whether 3D space integral is that of volume????

No, unless one takes Area-plates and sums them up to be a volume. This is routinely done in geometry class, where the volume of a rectanglular solid is length times width for area then times height for volume. Same can be said of volume of cylinder where we take the area of the circle then multiply by the height for volume. And much the same for other figures in 3D space where the volume of the object is an area times how many of those plate-areas in 3D.

So, can we say the Faraday Law-structure is a form of calculus in 3D space??? Yes, but it is the derivative in 3D space while the Integral in 3D space is the New Ohm's law-structure of V = A*B*E.

AP