Cavion and Strang, is Mark Rutte a scaredy cat couch potato with NATO armies because as Gilbert Strang says--- ignorant and incompetent of math????
Mullenweg & Myers on Spherical Bullshit that is Univ Houston, Klaus Kaiser, Christopher Murray, Vern Paulsen, Charles Peters, David Wagner, Clifton Whyburn, Jennifer May, Nicholas Leger.
2--
No one there passes Mullenweg & Myers TEST, slant cut of cone is not ellipse but oval, and so Univ Houston is nothing but Spherical Bullshit.PZ Myers wearing the shithead+cap of Matt Mullenweg at the Spherical Bullshit Univ Minnesota +Univ Houston, Rebecca Cunningham, Paul Crowell, Kevin Bassler, Maurice Brookhart, Chu Ching-wuMullenweg & Myers TEST that makes all science degrees Null & Void if you fail.AP writes:: funny, how Mullenweg & Myers both failed the test, and their degrees in science null and void.Univ Houston Matt Mullenweg & U.Minnesota PZ Myers Universal TEST of PhD's being null and void.----------------------------------------------------------------------------And Matt Mullenweg, PZ Myers with their cheap low class Wordpress smear platform highlights the fact that Matt and PZ Myers are totally ignorant of Physics, Logic and how to put together a idea of science. And that Mullenweg Wordpress & Myers pharyngula blog present a --- universal methodology of null and voiding all scientists of their degree in science on a TEST.
Matt Wallenweg & PZ Myers Spherical Bullshit with their Test of PhD science professors
Univ Houston physics dept Ed Hungerford, Alex Ignatiev, Joseph McCauley, Mark A Meier, Shuheng Pan, Lawrence Pinsky, Audrius Brazdeikis, Rabi Ebrahim, Rebecca Forrest, Sladjana Maric, Israel Portillo
math dept Giles Auchmuty, John Hardy, Gordon Johnson, Johnny Johnson, Klaus Kaiser, Christopher Murray, Vern Paulsen, Charles Peters, David Wagner, Clifton Whyburn, Jennifer May, Nicholas Leger
2--
WordPress.com Archimedes Plutonium | Spherical Bullshit - Word Press dot com Feb 6, 2013-- Plutonium simply thinks superdeterminism is the only way quantum theory can make sense. And given his horrific understanding of the spherical harmonics of an....
2--
Pseudoscientists PZ Myers and Matt Mullenweg failed math and logic for their small minds cannot even see that a slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse for you need the symmetry of a cylinder to obtain a ellipse slant cut which points out the fact that Myers and Mullenweg have no native science intelligence but all of which is memorized from book reading for they have no logical marbles in their brain cap to reason the truth of anything in the world. And it is a shame that kooks of science like Myers and Mullenweg have teaching roles when they fail science outright.No wonder no-one at University Minnesota could ever do a proper logical Water Electrolysis by not stopping at looking at volume of hydrogen and compare to oxygen but actually getting out the weighing scale. No, when you have kook science brains like Myers and Mullenweg, you hop skip and jump to the coffee lounge once you look at volume, too stupid to weigh.I do not know, does University Minnesota, even have a quartz microbalance scale, and would PZ Myers ever know how to do Water Electrolysis, for it appears to me all that PZ Myers can do is --- if you place a lens in each of his ears-- makes a fine telescope.Matt Mullenweg's Univ.Houston science and math-- says nothing but spherical bullshit-- Ed Hungerford, Alex Ignatiev, Joseph McCauley, Mark A Meier, Shuheng Pan, Lawrence Pinsky, Audrius Brazdeikis, Rabi Ebrahim, Rebecca Forrest, Sladjana Maric,
Why Matt?? Is it because no-one at UH can admit slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse. And none can admit polynomial is the only valid function reducing calculus to add or subtract 1 from exponent and thus calculus supereasy. But worst of all, none can admit 9 x muon rest mass equals neutron rest mass within sigma error raising the question that the true electron of atoms is the muon, not the Dirac magnetic monopole = 0.5MeV.
Matt Mullenweg
Spherical Bullshit Wordpress.com (symbol) Spherical Bullshit Feb 6, 2013 -- The central thesis... is the "atom totality" theory. This states that the structure of... via PZ Myers....
Univ Houston physics dept Ed Hungerford, Alex Ignatiev, Joseph McCauley, Mark A Meier, Shuheng Pan, Lawrence Pinsky, Audrius Brazdeikis, Rabi Ebrahim, Rebecca Forrest, Sladjana Maric, Israel Portillo
math dept Giles Auchmuty, John Hardy, Gordon Johnson, Johnny Johnson, Klaus Kaiser, Christopher Murray, Vern Paulsen, Charles Peters, David Wagner, Clifton Whyburn, Jennifer May, Nicholas Leger
--- quoting Wikipedia ---Matt Mullenweg asks Caltech why they are so dumb in physics as to bypass the question of which is the atom's true electron??? That 0.5MeV particle or the muon which makes a lot more sense that the muon is the Atom's true electron!!!!Matthew Charles Mullenweg
January 11, 1984 (age 40)Houston, Texas, U.S.
Education
University of Houston
Occupation(s)
Entrepreneur, Founder & CEO,[1] Automattic
Principal, Audrey Capital[2]
Lead Developer, WordPress Foundation
Organization
Automattic
Known for
Developing WordPress.com---end quoting Wikipedia ---Matt Mullenweg on bullshit physics of University of Houston David Wagner, Clifton Whyburn, Jennifer Maywith their inability to understand any of these modern day issues::::Matt Mullenweg
Spherical Bullshit Wordpress.com (symbol) Spherical Bullshit Feb 6, 2013 -- The central thesis... is the "atom totality" theory. This states that the structure of...
Archimedes Plutonium | Spherical Bullshit - WordPress.com Spherical Bullshit https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com › 2013/02/06 Feb 6, 2013 — Plutonium simply thinks superdeterminism is the only way quantum theory can make sense. And given his horrific understanding of the spherical harmonics of an ... via PZ Myers....AP writes: It was great that the Internet opened up Science to the entire world. Only trouble is, most people who think they know science will come to find out, all they know is their childish memorizations and their empty head of logical marbles.Archimedes Plutonium | Spherical Bullshit - WordPress.com Spherical Bullshit https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com › 2013/02/06 Feb 6, 2013 — Plutonium simply thinks superdeterminism is the only way quantum theory can make sense. And given his horrific understanding of the spherical harmonics of an ... via PZ MyersAP writes: It was great that the Internet opened up Science to the entire world. Only trouble is, most people who think they know science will come to find out, all they know is their childish memorizations and their empty head of logical marbles.PZ Myers, is it not super stupid to talk about physics when you are only a biologist, or even get involved with a physics conversation?????????? Super stupidPZ MyersPZ Myers in London in 2006
BornPaul Zachary Myers
March 9, 1957 (age 68)Kent, Washington, U.S.
Education
University of Washington (BS)
University of Oregon (PhD)
Known for
Pharyngula blog
Scientific career
Fields
Evolutionary developmental biology
Institutions
University of Minnesota Morris--- end quoting Wikipedia on PZ MyersAP: Why is not Adam wearing his glued on walrus tusks for his picture taking?Just like David Attenborough saber toothed tiger Smilodon??Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on Univ Glasgow Mark BartonQuora (symbol logo) Quora Quora https://www.quora.com › What-effect-did-Archimedes-... Aug 26, 2013 — Plutonium is significant because its isotope, plutonium-239, is a slow nuclear fuel. A slow nuclear fuel will likely undergo nuclear fission if ... 4 answers · Top answer: Everyone was trying to figure out this new medium, the internet, what it was for.
> > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan ; University of Glasgow
> > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
Mark Barton University Glasgow and Univ. Queensland: Not at all, he was a raving nutter.
Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on Univ Glasgow Mark Barton
Quora (symbol logo) Quora Quora https://www.quora.com› What-effect-did-Archimedes-... Aug 26, 2013 — Plutonium is significant because its isotope, plutonium-239, is a slow nuclear fuel. A slow nuclear fuel will likely undergo nuclear fission if ... 4 answers · Top answer: Everyone was trying to figure out this new medium, the internet, what it was for.
> > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views> > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
Adam D'Angelo Caltech, Charlie Cheever-Harvard on Univ Glasgow Mark Barton. Quora (symbol logo) Mark Barton PhD physicist with University of Glasgow Author has 16.9K answers and 21.5M answer views10y None at all - he was a raving nutter. 1.9K viewsView upvotes... Robert J. Kolker "The man spouts total nonsense and balderdash..."
Mark Barton on Katherine Grainger, Paul Soler, Andy Blue, Sheila Rowan, James Hough, Graham Woan, Martin Hendry, Giles Hammond, Ik Siong Heng, Harry Ward, Iain Martin, Sonja Franke-Arnold, Miles Padgett, Richard Bowman, Graham Gibson, Sara Restuccia, Simon Peter Mekhail, Chris Bouchard, Christoph Englert, Judd Harrison, David Miller, Sophie Renner, Declan Diver, Lyndsay Fletcher, Norman Gray, Iain Hannah...Peter Bussey, Michael Campbell, David Crooks, who cannot tell apart a oval from a ellipse, with their slant cut of Cone as ellipse which is impossible for the cone has but one axis of symmetry.
Mark Barton, Univ.Glasgow on Raving Nutters + Robert J. Kolker's Berkeley balderdash science Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita, Sheldon Glashow
Volney failures..Berkeley,Dr.Eric Betzig (chem), Dr.George Smoot,Dr.Barry Barish,Dr.David Wineland,Dr.John Mather, Dr.Alan Heeger (chem), Dr.Robert Laughlin
Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney 30 year nonstop stalker in sci.math, sci.physics-- kibo was the first crackpot we met in sci.math especially with his 938 is 12% short of 945, yet Rensselaer Polytechnic graduates him as a engineer).On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:37:32 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"goonclod failure of logic"
Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. Is it that they are stupid silly thinking volume and mass are the same. For AP needs to prove decisively, if Water is really H4O or H2O. And of course, this experiment would destroy the Standard Model-- that post-diction theory of physics that never gave a single prediction in all of its tenure.
Surely they knew the Quartz Crystal Microbalance had been around since 1960s to weigh hydrogen versus oxygen in water electrolysis. Or is that tougher of a science for Berkeley than nucleosynthesis of plutonium and curium???
Or is it because they cannot admit the truth of math geometry that slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse for you need the symmetry of slant cut of cylinder to yield a ellipse.UC Berkeley, the place where plutonium was discovered by Seaborg et al, deserves a separate listing, as a top of tops school in science.
Berkeley physics & chemistryUC Berkeley,Dr.Steven Chu,Dr.Gilbert N. Lewis,Dr.Harold Urey,Dr.William F.Giauque,Dr.Glenn T. Seaborg,Dr.Willard Libby,Dr.Melvin Calvin,Dr. Jennifer Doudna,Dr.Reinhard Genzel,Dr.Yuan T. Lee,Dr.Saul Perlmutter,Dr.Randy Schekman (physiology)
Berkeley physics & chemistry
UC Berkeley,
Dr.Eric Betzig (chem), Dr.George Smoot,Dr.Barry Barish,Dr.David Wineland,Dr.John Mather, Dr.Alan Heeger (chem), Dr.Robert Laughlin, Dr.Steven Chu,Dr.Gilbert N. Lewis,Dr.Harold Urey,Dr.William F.Giauque,Dr.Glenn T. Seaborg,Dr.Willard Libby,Dr.Melvin Calvin,Dr. Jennifer Doudna,Dr.Reinhard Genzel,Dr.Yuan T. Lee,Dr.Saul Perlmutter,Dr.Randy Schekman (physiology)
Dr.John Clarke, Dr.Marvin Cohen, Dr.Michael Crommie, Dr.Joel Fajans, Dr. Roger Falcone, Dr.Mary Gaillard, Dr.Gabriel Gann, Dr.Naomi Ginsberg, Dr.Heather Gray, Dr.Hartmut Haeffner, Dr.Lawrence Hall, Dr.Oskar Hallatschek, Dr.Wick Haxton, Dr.Frances Hellman, Dr.Petr Horava, Dr.Barbara Jacak, Dr.Bob Jacobsen, Dr.Steven Kahn, Dr.Dan Kasen, Dr.Edgar Knobloch, Dr.Shimon Kolkowitz, Dr.Yury Kolomensky, Dr.Alessandra Lanzara, Dr.Stephen Leone, Dr.Eric Ma,... the physics faculty reads almost as long as a army of soldiers, please forgive any names that AP left out, please forgive...
Mark Barton is everyone at UC Berkeley raving nutters for they still preach slant cut of cone is ellipse when in truth it is a Oval. No wonder no-one at Berkeley, least of all Kolker or Muller have the logical marbles to weigh the mass of oxygen versus hydrogen in water electrolysis, no, they skip and hop back to the lounge for coffee and donuts after looking at volume, never able to weigh the mass, like a complete-scientist.
Robert J. Kolker and Richard A. Muller Berkeley failing in all facets of science--- failures in science-- so stupid they cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.
1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction. Read AP's textbook--
Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors// Teaching True Logic series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium
This is AP's 5th published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
9) Never took logic, or not enough, to understand Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids black holes.
10) Too stupid in mind to understand for the Atomic Theory to be a law of science requires the Universe itself be a Atom.
11) Far far too stupid to insist the Polynomial is the only valid function in all of math, thus reducing Calculus to a mere add or subtract 1 from exponent and making Calculus ----Super super easy
12) So stupid in physics that they never took a course in Logic in College to be able to think straight and clear and thus able to understand that physics has no Black Holes nor does it have a Big Bang for both violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle. duh duh duh
13) Hopelessly stupid in science when they see Accelerated Polar Ice Cap melt and run to their dumbarse computer modeling with CO2 greenhouse gas, when it is the Sun gone Red Giant because Sun and stars shine from Faraday law, not fusion. As every proton in the Sun is having muons thrust through the proton torus producing electrical energy.
14) So stupid in science and logic, that they will not even do Water Electrolysis and actually weigh the mass of oxygen compare to hydrogen. No, these logically impaired so-called scientists stop the experiment by eyeballing the volume, and then run to the lounge for cake coffee and donuts. Please be sure-- dan christensen, kibo parry and jan burse to concoct a hate sheet that appears 2nd or 3rd in a Google search of AP.
15) Is there any university in the entire world that requires its scientists to have 2 years of Logic study-- the AP corrected Logic not the crazy error filled Boole logic, so they can at least try to think straight, think clearly--- Answer is--- no.
Pseudoscientists PZ Myers and Matt Mullenweg failed math and logic for their small minds cannot even see that a slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse for you need the symmetry of a cylinder to obtain a ellipse slant cut which points out the fact that Myers and Mullenweg have no native science intelligence but all of which is memorized from book reading for they have no logical marbles in their brain cap to reason the truth of anything in the world. And it is a shame that kooks of science like Myers and Mullenweg have teaching roles when they fail science outright.No wonder no-one at University Minnesota Morris UMM could ever do a proper logical Water Electrolysis by not stopping at looking at volume of hydrogen and compare to oxygen but actually getting out the weighing scale. No, when you have kook science brains like Myers and Mullenweg, you hop skip and jump to the coffee lounge once you look at volume, too stupid to weigh.I do not know, does University Minnesota Morris UMM, even have a quartz microbalance scale, and would PZ Myers ever know how to do Water Electrolysis, for it appears to me all that PZ Myers can do is --- if you place a lens in each of his ears-- makes a fine telescope.Matt Mullenweg's Univ.Houston science and math-- says nothing but spherical bullshit-- Ed Hungerford, Alex Ignatiev, Joseph McCauley, Mark A Meier, Shuheng Pan, Lawrence Pinsky, Audrius Brazdeikis, Rabi Ebrahim, Rebecca Forrest, Sladjana Maric,Why Matt?? Is it because no-one at UH can admit slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse. And none can admit polynomial is the only valid function reducing calculus to add or subtract 1 from exponent and thus calculus supereasy. But worst of all, none can admit 9 x muon rest mass equals neutron rest mass within sigma error raising the question that the true electron of atoms is the muon, not the Dirac magnetic monopole = 0.5MeV.
Matt Mullenweg
Spherical Bullshit Wordpress.com (symbol) Spherical Bullshit Feb 6, 2013 -- The central thesis... is the "atom totality" theory. This states that the structure of...
Univ Houston physics dept Ed Hungerford, Alex Ignatiev, Joseph McCauley, Mark A Meier, Shuheng Pan, Lawrence Pinsky, Audrius Brazdeikis, Rabi Ebrahim, Rebecca Forrest, Sladjana Maric, Israel Portillo
math dept Giles Auchmuty, John Hardy, Gordon Johnson, Johnny Johnson, Klaus Kaiser, Christopher Murray, Vern Paulsen, Charles Peters, David Wagner, Clifton Whyburn, Jennifer May, Nicholas Leger
--- quoting Wikipedia ---Matt Mullenweg asks Caltech why they are so dumb in physics as to bypass the question of which is the atom's true electron??? That 0.5MeV particle or the muon which makes a lot more sense that the muon is the Atom's true electron!!!!Matt MullenwegMullenweg in 2019
BornMatthew Charles Mullenweg
January 11, 1984 (age 40)Houston, Texas, U.S.
Education
University of Houston
Occupation(s)
Entrepreneur, Founder & CEO,[1] Automattic
Principal, Audrey Capital[2]
Lead Developer, WordPress Foundation
Organization
Automattic
Known for
Developing WordPress.com---end quoting Wikipedia ---Matt Mullenweg on bullshit physics of University of Houston David Wagner, Clifton Whyburn, Jennifer Maywith their inability to understand any of these modern day issues::
2-Cannot understand slant cut of cylinder is truly ellipse but in cone it is oval? Do they have cataracts in their eyes or are they simpleton fools failures of math like you, Mark Barton a sci.math math failure???2--- quoting Wikipedia---2--- end quoting Wikipedia---2-Mark Barton broadcast on math raving nutters starting with Terry Tao UCLA, unable to admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse for it appears everything Terry does in math is a memorization of a Wikipedia page.
2--- end quoting Wikipedia on Conic Section---2-Mark Barton, can even one math professor or physics professor at Univ Glasgow be honest and admit, slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse? Apparently no-one at Oxford Univ is honest enough to admit the truth on conics, and to think they want to name a building after Wiles--- perhaps they can engrave this along with it--- He that knoweth not what is slant cut of cone and thinks he proved FLT, when he was blind to even Euler's mistake in exp 3 for Euler forget to prove when A, B, C are even in A^3 + B^3 = C^3. Build a monument to Andrew Wiles--- the grievious failure of math.pppMark Barton, Univ.Glasgow- Raving Nutters + Berkeley balderdash Robert J. Kolker & Richard A. Muller UC Berkeley on failures of science Dr.Eric Betzig (chem), Dr.George Smoot,Dr.Barry Barish,Dr.David Wineland,Dr.John Mather, Dr.Alan Heeger (chem)ppp
Yes Univ Virginia Steve Huffman Lunatics.. did Putin telephone Trump to invade Venezuela to sideline USA while Russia takes over all of Ukraine, while Dondolt Trump starts bombing Nigeria, then invading Iran??Please, Denmark, hand the USA a 600 billion euro yearly rental fee for Greenland and bases throughout Europe as Dondolt Trump loves Russia more than he likes Europe or even the USA.In addition, pass a indictment on Trump for making these threats on Greenland, and the next time Trump steps foot on European soil, handcuff him and throw him in a European jail awaiting trial. Even a majority of USA citizens will cheer and clap hands, hoping we can be rid of the narcissist idiot and have a new president in the USA.Go for it, Denmark........pp---quoting BBC---Danish PM tells Trump to stop 'threats' against GreenlandMette Frederiksen said the "US has no right to annex any of the three nations in the Danish kingdom".6 hrs ago | Europe--- end quoting BBC---ppp