Hypothesis: Liver is the mind of the organism and the brain is accessory to the liver // Medical Science by Archimedes Plutonium This is AP's 153rd published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this.
Archimedes Plutonium
Hypothesis: Liver is the mind of the organism and the brain is accessory to the liver // Medical Science
by Archimedes Plutonium
This is AP's 153rd published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,
PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Preface: This is AP's 153rd book of science, and asks many questions about the liver "Is the Liver the first brain of the body and the brain itself is a secondary accessory brain organ"? Upon hearing or reading this, most everyone will laugh. But one of history's most famous medical scientist-- Galen was never laughing about the idea that the liver is the first brain, and the brain in the head was some accessory helper organ of the liver. So this book of AP on the liver is to further explore what the Ancient Greek scientist Galen started-- the liver is the brain and the mind of body. Which makes sense, common sense if you think of a brain and mind as being photons or neutrinos shot from a Atom Totality Control Center in the Cosmos into our liver as a antenna and then that message encoded in the photon or neutrino is for the liver, and brain in skull to decipher, and to act upon.
Cover Picture: This is my liver from a CT scan. You can see the Hamartoma of the Liver as all the darkness are cysts. My entire liver is covered in cysts. Little protrusions, and some large protrusions of cysts on my liver. Almost all livers are smooth tissue, but mine is coated in these cysts. Mine is covered in cysts. If I were to replace my liver with a electrical picture, I would chose several TV antennae with many protrusions, that resemble the liver as a antenna organ. For the title is about the liver being the first brain and the way that is accomplished is the liver is the antenna to the Atom Totality Control Central that shoots photons or neutrinos into our liver and makes us behave and react and think thoughts of whatever that photon or neutrino has encoded. In quantum mechanics this is called superdeterminism or some call it quantum entanglement.
----------------------------
Table of Contents
----------------------------
Part 1
1) History of this book on my hypothesis that the Liver is the organ of 1st brain and the brain in head is accessory to the liver.
2) Galen of Ancient Greeks does remarkable research into human anatomy and physiology.
3) Did Feynman have Hamartoma of the Liver?
4) Comparing the volume of the liver to the rest of the body, to the volume of the iphone antenna to the rest of the iphone.
5) Actual known functions of the Liver.
6) Do the metrics line up of Liver volume to body volume; iphone antenna volume or surface area of antenna to volume of entire iphone?
Part 2
7) What is a hypothesis versus a theory of science?
8) What is adult-hamartoma of the liver?
9) What is life like, living with adult-hamartoma?
10) My history of my adult-hamartoma of the liver.
11) Five years on after liposarcoma surgery, and still cancer free. Thank God!
12) Probability that Feynman and AP physics acumen is directly related to the condition of hamartoma of the liver.
13) What is the Mechanism of a hamartoma liver in causing superior achievement in science?
14) What would elevate hamartoma liver hypothesis to a theory of science?
----------
Text
----------
Part 1
1) History of this book on my hypothesis that the Liver is the organ of 1st brain and the brain in head is accessory to the liver.
This is a short book for it is not a theory of science but a hypothesis. A hypothesis is where the evidence is skimpy and not strong enough to be a science theory. And I have written this short book from my science notebook on the topic of liver as first brain. So do not mind seeing dates of my notebook.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 5, 2021, 8:30:50 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
153rd book of AP// Is the Liver the first brain of the body and the brain itself is a accessory organ?
So, if I can get a link up of the fact that both AP and Feynman had liposarcoma, and both were advanced physics achievers, and if Feynman had Hamartoma of the liver, would force me into the idea that the Liver is actually the main brain of a animal body.
Now, do all animals have livers?
Do plants have a similar organ to the liver?
Why is the liver shaped like a radio receiver triangular and flat. As if the liver is a huge antennae.
Why is the liver the only organ able to regenerate itself? As if to say, it is so important in function that it needs to be able to regenerate. Not even the actual brain has that capability.
So in several of my books I discuss the brain locus theory where all thoughts and actions committed were photons or neutrinos shot from the Atom Totality Control Central that once those shot photons are transcribed, force us to do what we end up doing.
So maybe the Liver is the antennae of the Brain Locus Theory. And maybe the liver dominates even over the brain.
Sounds logical, because if the liver supplies the brain with food and nourishment, seems reasonable to think the Liver is dominant control over the Brain itself. For in first beginnings, you cannot have a brain if you have no liver, but you can have a liver and have no brain.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 6, 2021, 11:10:37 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I am pretty sure no-one in medicine has ever researched the strange geometry configuration that is the Liver. Its shape of triangular and its very large surface area when it never needed to be that, considering its function as the chemical plant of the body.
Now bacteria do not have a liver but they must have some structure that functions as the liver does, and same question goes for plants.
And if we ask the question, which organ must have come first before the other, whether liver or brain. In that question we realize the Logical Order has to be liver comes first to nourish a brain that comes later. And so, in that logical answer we again must realize that the liver has some "thinking capabilities independent of the brain organ".
Thus, we must conclude that the Liver is our "first brain" and our other brain is an accessory organ.
Now I am aware that the Ancient Greeks thought the seat of thinking was the Liver. But I have no idea as to how they arrived at such a conclusion. Maybe in Ancient Greek times they had such primitive medicine and saw so much war and their experiments on cadavers with no social bounds placed on research, that they stumbled onto some feature of the liver that gave them this idea that Liver played a role in thinking. I have to explore that more.
For here, it is obvious that the shape of the Liver needs a answer. And whether that shape is all coming from electricity and magnetism as a antennae receiver. I suspect in our iphones antennae is shaped like a liver as shaped in the human body. So if the human body were a iphone, then the liver is the antennae of that iphone human body.
I know the liver is a organ saturated with blood, much like the prostate gland and whether we can say the liver is the top in blood saturation. Far more blood in the liver than the brain organ. And if that is the case, is more supporting evidence that the "seat of thought" is not the brain itself but is the Liver. And the liver needs a accessory organ to execute the thoughts that actually came in the Liver first, and the brain is a accessory organ that "executes the thoughts coming from the Liver".
So here I need research studies of those people with failing livers. Is there a correlation of "loss of thinking" as they lose their liver? Before they lose their liver they could do math calculus or physics equations, but as they lose their liver, they lose those abilities also.
2) Galen of Ancient Greeks does remarkable research into human anatomy and physiology.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 6, 2021, 1:19:08 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
--- quoting Univ of Calgary website on Galen ---
In terms of proponents for the liver as the principal organ in the human body, Galen was by far its biggest supporter. He based this theory on several findings. He observed that it was the first organ to form in the human fetus, concluding it must therefore be the most important (Findlen 1998). The importance of humours in Galen’s time also supported his case for its superiority. Humourism was a theory to explain the workings of the human body based on a balance between the four humours: blood, black bile, yellow bile and...
--- end quoting ---
The interests that AP has in whether the Liver is the 1st brain and the usual brain is a accessory organ to the Liver-as-brain, is because AP has this rare rare, phenomenally rare medical condition of adult Hamartoma. Every square centimeter of my Liver is covered in cyst like protrusions, tubules or lesions. Every square centimeter of my liver is covered in these protrusions. Where a normal liver is sleek and smooth, AP's liver is like a grass lawn with grass as these cysts, as a metaphor analogy.
Not only is the liver the biggest organ (besides the skin) but the bloodiest, the first to emerge in a fetus, the only organ of triangular shape and huge surface area, but the only organ able to Regenerate itself.
The most important organ of the animal body needs to regenerate itself.
But I have special interests in the Liver as the prime thinking organ-- my Brain Locus Theory where all thoughts are shot from the Plutonium Atom Totality Control Central shot into all living creatures that instructs them on what to think, what to do and what the next action is going to be.
So, well, I have looked at many of Radio Wave Antenna Receivers and the best of these antennae have huge surface area (like a liver) and have protruding metal perpendicular to surface. The best have protrusions (like cysts on a liver).
AP had Liposarcoma, so did Feynman. AP has Hamartoma of the Liver. Did Feynman have Hamartoma of the Liver? I do not know and I hope the Medical Community has saved the CT scans administered to Dr. Feynman. If CT scanners were around when Feynman was hospitalized. Because if Dr. Feynman also had hamartoma of the liver, would be a direct link to Advanced Science Achievement and supporting evidence in favor of the liver as a mind, 1st brain.
It would also indicate that the liposarcoma of Feynman, just like the liposarcoma of AP, was caused not by the atomic bomb development that Feynman helped engineer, but was caused by the stress and strain of doing Advanced Physics. The stress and strain of physics on internal organs and the right rear peritoneal.
Question to engineers and physicists: is the liver coated in cysts, is that the best Antennae of the human body able to be created?
Question to the current medical community: can we retrieve the CT scans of Dr. Feynman, if memory serves me correctly, died in 1988. Can we place those CT scans into the public domain and find out for sure whether Dr. Feynman had hamartoma of the liver.
This is important research for if it be known that Feynman also had hamartoma of the liver, signifies that the greatest advancements in science comes from scientists with hamartoma of the liver.
3) Did Feynman have Hamartoma of the Liver?
If I can get a link up of the fact that both AP and Feynman had liposarcoma, and both were advanced physics achievers, and if Feynman had hamartoma of the liver? For surely, AP has adult hamartoma of the liver. Could that be the reason AP has superior logic, math and science skills? When we have medical issues, such as my liposarcoma cancer of 2016, we always want to know how it was caused? But we likely will never find out. Same thing with the phenomenal science output of AP, writing 161 science books in 3 years, covering every hard science. Here again, we want answers as to how is that caused? Is it a physical explanation, a physiology explanation? Is it adult hamartoma of the liver?
Those questions launched me into a search for whether the Liver is the true brain and the brain in the human skull is just an accessory organ of the Liver as first brain.
Many will laugh, laugh laugh laugh when they hear or read this. But one of the early premier physicians Galen never was laughing when he discovered the miracles of the liver-- it is the only organ to regenerate itself. Because the organ that thinks, has to have that ability. And the liver is what Galen thought was the first brain, because the brain itself in the head is dependent on the liver to provide it what it needs. The brain is dependent on the liver. The liver is independent of the brain. That tells us all we really need to know, logic wise. It means the liver came first, and later the brain.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 7, 2021, 12:09:01 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now if it turns out that Feynman also had Hamartoma of the Liver, then I am going to respectfully request that some Feynman DNA samples be recovered for a genome of Feynman compared to the genome of AP, and to locate where this Hamartoma cysts of the Liver is located in DNA.
If Feynman did not have hamartoma liver, it would still be instructive to obtain a full genome of Feynman and compare with the AP genome.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 7, 2021, 12:57:19 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I know that James Clerk Maxwell died of stomach cancer. I do not know if that is accurate medical description. Could it have been a liposarcoma cancer just as Feynman's or AP's and passed off as being "stomach cancer". The question I am asking here is how accurate of a medical description of the 1860s conforms to the accuracy of medical diagnosis of 2020s. Would the medical diagnosis of 1860s categorized all cancers in the region of the abdomen as being "stomach cancer".
Certainly Maxwell was a titan of physics, more so than Feynman. So did Maxwell have liposarcoma and not stomach cancer as we know of stomach cancer today.
And if so, did Maxwell have Hamartoma of the Liver. Have what AP has, as every square centimeter of my liver is lined with cysts and tubules.
If true, if somehow we can verify that AP, that Feynman, that Maxwell all had liposarcoma, all had Hamartoma of the Liver, we have a direct physiology linkup of Advanced Science Achievement linked to a body physiology of medicine.
In other words, you are going to be a great scientist if you have Hamartoma Liver.
Explanation: All thoughts and ideas and reasoning are shot from the Plutonium Atom Totality Control Central into a human's body. And that message is a photon or neutrino message that is collected and unraveled in the Liver. The liver is the body's gigantic radio receiver, and hence its shape and size. But the most effective radio receivers have perpendicular protrusions, hence the hamartoma of liver. But that equipment of a liver acting as radio receiver involves a lot of energy transformations and easily cause cancer to near lying body cells such as the fat cells of right rear peritoneal and cause liposarcoma.
Keep in mind, the enhanced antennae as the liver with hamartoma causes so much ease and abilities to do Science properly, but also this large energy interaction causes nearby cells to melt into a cancer.
Now I suspect that Maxwell was buried in a well placed tomb and suspect we can go and have his bones dug up and retrieve DNA, for a full genome DNA done on James Clerk Maxwell.
I believe if memory is correct, that Galileo's finger is preserved. We can have a full genome performed on Galileo.
And if Feynman had a Hamartoma Liver means that with a genome we can sort of figure out where a Hamartoma Liver involves the A,T, C,G coding on DNA. And then compare that with Maxwell and Galileo.
I doubt that all four of these men Galileo, Maxwell, Feynman, AP, all four had a Hamartoma Liver. But we will never know unless we look.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 7, 2021, 7:19:25 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Let us exhume the bones of Darwin, although not in physics, his systematic ordering of biology warrants a look to see if he had Hamartoma of the Liver. I was looking for information on Darwin's death and especially if stomach cancer was involved. A website with a medical doctor of Cohen examined the historical record and added a new diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori a bacterium linked with peptic ulcers and stomach cancer.
But it is going to be instructive if we get enough famous scientists of their genome of DNA to compare one against the other.
Now a big one would be Isaac Newton, did he have Hamartoma Liver and did he die of abdominal disease. Here the record shows almost nothing as to how or why he died. So if the DNA of a exhumed Newton were gathered for a genome of Newton, that would be immensely valuable for comparison.
The death of Dirac is unclear. Did he die of cancer to the abdomen. Did Dirac have Hamartoma of the Liver. He was buried in Florida. Dirac was so important to physics, that he should be exhumed and collect DNA samples and his full genome should be exposed and compared with other great scientists. Not just to see about Hamartoma, but to compare with other great Advanced Achievers of Science.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 8, 2021, 3:44:49 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I am baffled at this moment how the Ancient Greeks in their mythology of Prometheus pinned to a rock and a vulture eating up his liver every day, only to regrow at night, for the next day's session.
How on Earth did the Ancient Greeks know that the liver was the only organ that regenerates itself.
The only educated guess I can make is that they thought other organs like the heart or maybe the brain and lungs also regenerate. So if they thought all four regenerate, and only got the Liver correctly. That would explain it. But if the Ancient Greeks thought only the liver can grow back, seems like too astounding of a feat of a guess. For they certainly did not practice modern medicine in the myth making of Prometheus to know the liver regenerates itself.
So, anyone expert in Greek Mythology, please explain how on Earth could they have guessed the Liver correctly?
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 27, 2021, 1:40:18 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 1:19:08 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
--- quoting Univ of Calgary website on Galen ---
In terms of proponents for the liver as the principal organ in the human body, Galen was by far its biggest supporter. He based this theory on several findings. He observed that it was the first organ to form in the human fetus, concluding it must therefore be the most important (Findlen 1998). The importance of humours in Galen’s time also supported his case for its superiority. Humourism was a theory to explain the workings of the human body based on a balance between the four humours: blood, black bile, yellow bile and...
--- end quoting ---
Now modern embryology has come a long ways since the time of Galen 129- 210 AD, Rome medical doctor. And we can investigate Galen's claim that the Liver is the first organ to appear in the human embryo. This is very important because if the liver appears before the brain circuitry, further implies the Liver is indeed the "Seat of the Mind", what I call the 1st brain of animals.
--- Quoting Wikipedia---
The liver is found in all vertebrates and is typically the largest internal organ. Its form varies considerably in different species, and is largely determined by the shape and arrangement of the surrounding organs. Nonetheless, in most species it is divided into right and left lobes; exceptions to this general rule include snakes, where the shape of the body necessitates a simple cigar-like form. The internal structure of the liver is broadly similar in all vertebrates.
An organ sometimes referred to as a liver is found associated with the digestive tract of the primitive chordate Amphioxus. Although it performs many functions of a liver, it is not considered a true liver but a homolog of the vertebrate liver. The amphioxus hepatic caecum produces the liver-specific proteins vitellogenin, antithrombin, plasminogen, alanine aminotransferase, and insulin/Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)
--- end quoting ---
So, does modern day embryology further support the Galen observations of the Liver being the very first cells to differentiate in embryo?
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 27, 2021, 2:18:14 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 1:42:20 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.physics:
Alright, the suggestion was made that the brain circuitry of the human embryo comes first, before the liver. I really doubt that suggestion; and is logically feeble. For you need as first structure, the structure that would feed the structure and other structures to develop later. That means the blood supply. That implies the liver has to come before brain and brain circuits.
Searching the web I see dot gov. website:
--- quoting dot gov ---
During foetal life, the liver plays the important roles of connection and transient hematopoietic function. Foetal liver cells develop in an environment called a hematopoietic stem cell niche composed of several cell types, where stem cells can proliferate and give rise to mature blood cells. Embryologically, at about the third week of gestation, the liver appears, and it grows rapidly from the fifth to 10th week under WNT/β-Catenin signaling pathway stimulation, which induces hepatic progenitor cells proliferation and differentiation into hepatocytes.
--- end quote ---
AP writes: I see no way around it, that in the development of any animal, food comes before "thinking" and this would mean the liver has to develop before the brain and brain wiring. What is the point of forming the brain if it cannot be nourished.
So here I am in support of Galen's idea that the Liver is the seat of the Mind, and not the Brain. So that we can see the Brain as a extension of the Liver, where the brain is bells and whistles of the Liver, liver as the first organ of the Mind.
And the liver being the largest organ makes me think its main role in "thinking" is as of a Radar antenna picking up the signals of the Atom Totality Control Central, and those signals transfered to the Brain for action, become our every thought.
Now years and years ago I kept posting how a animal species in the ocean waters "eats its brain" once it has secured itself on a fixed rock in water. That it ate its brain since it was not going to ever move again. Suggesting that the brain of animals is an accessory organ to navigate motion. But, now, I am almost certain that the species that eats its brain, certainly does not eat its liver. Implying that the brain is a secondary organ of the Liver and expendable. This tells me that the liver, once again is the Seat of the Mind in all animals.
Now I was watching this new PBS series of Mental Illness and they showed a picture of a person who had happened to have a iron bar shot through his skull by accident. And he lived. This again, suggests the brain is a extension of the liver.
Now do plants have something similar to what a liver does in animals?
AP compares the volume of the liver to the volume of the antenna in iphone, looking to prove the Liver is the first brain while the brain itself is secondary and accessory to the liver. If the math numbers come in showing that iphone efficiency and quality require 7% of volume by antenna, would then elevate this Hypothesis to the status of theory.
4) Comparing the volume of the liver to the rest of the body, to the volume of the iphone antenna to the rest of the iphone.
Archimedes Plutonium
Oct 23, 2021, 4:07 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
It is not a theory yet for it lacks enough supporting factual data. Not to say it does not exist. For, only now has anyone seriously; really explored the issue.
AP is going on this set of data so far:
1) Galen noticed that the liver was the first organ to form in a growing fetus. And first organ to Galen meant first importance.
AP is a highly logical scientist, and what Galen found, that the liver is the first to form and the liver has the ability no other organ has-- regeneration. That Galen's observations were not given due diligence by modern science. This book gives Galen his due diligence.
2) The brain requires the liver to feed the brain. So the brain is second importance, not first importance.
3) Several animal species eat their brain once anchored to rock in oceans. They never eat their liver.
4) You can live in comatose as brain dead, but the moment your liver fails, you are dead for sure.
5) The liver shape and size are very strange, strange indeed, for the shape and size to a physicist who mastered electricity magnetism theory would say the liver is a Antennae of the body due to its shape and size. By size I mean volume.
6) The volume of the liver with respect to entire body is approximately 5-7% of the entire human body, compared to the Antenna volume required for a quality efficient iphone by Apple is 7% of the entire iphone volume.
7) AP is trying to get that mathematical data of iphone antennae volume compared to human liver body volume as precise as possible.
8) The nerves and blood vessels from liver to rest of body, even the brain is the most used passage in the entire body.
9) In Atom Totality theory, the mind comes from Superdeterminism of photons and neutrinos shot through the organisms body to force that organism to do what it ends up doing, hence a Antennae is the main major item of "thinking".
10) Does the antenna of a animal need to be a distance away from the processing organ-- the brain? Does the antenna work better if it is of a distance from the electrical nerves processing accessory organ-- the brain?
11) Notice that the eyes and ears, the seeing and hearing is always located near the mouth for eating.
12) Every food goes through the liver first, before the body utilizes the food.
13) Liver is protected by rib cage as being the most necessary organ to live.
14) Do plants have a liver type organ similar to that of animals?
So these above are some questions and answers looked for in this book. The main concern is that the liver is a Antennae and thus the first brain the mind of the animal.
And although we feel or have the sensation that "thinking and thought" are being churned out from the brain in the skull, that feeling is likely to be a consequence only of the fact that the eyes and ears are located near the brain and not the liver.
Here again we can validate the AP hypothesis if we see that the optimal placement of iphone antennae matches the placement of the Liver in the human body. So far that placement is 5-7% of total volume is the liver, and that matches the volume required for a good iphone antenna. If the iphone were to scrimp on antenna volume, Apple would likely receive irate calls of disappointment that their iphone reception does not properly work. I think this is what happened to Apple and why they are giving 7% volume to the 5G iphone, 7% volume with a new antennae.
Archimedes Plutonium
Oct 23, 2021, 9:11 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I am not used to this calendar of CE, Galen born 129 CE for I remember it as AD. Galen died around 216 AD.
So what was Galen's logical reasoning that the Liver was the prime center of "thinking and wisdom"?
Of course, most everyone in modern society would be totally adverse to this idea that the Liver is the prime organ of wisdom and thinking, except for AP. AP is willing to give Galen's logical reasoning a complete and thorough review.
For what Galen discovered was that the human fetus develops first the liver, of all the organs, first comes the liver. So Galen is correct in logical thinking that if liver comes first and then supplies all the other organs of food nutrients, then the Liver must be the organ that commands and does the thinking of supplying the food. For if the brain is created long after the liver, the brain could not possible instruct the liver on what to do, for the brain is not even in existence.
And Galen further realized that since the Liver is created first among all organs it must do the thinking and instructing and guiding all the organs after the liver is created.
Now by "thinking and wisdom" what I mean by that in an Atom Totality Universe is there is a Control Center in the Atom Totality that sends out photons and neutrinos that course through the entire universe and when some of these waves enter into the body of the Liver, the liver intercepts these waves as a antenna intercepts TV or radio waves and thus the Liver is instructed on what to do next.
The brain with its eyes and ears nearby in the skull of humans is a secondary organ to the Liver, for the instructions in the Liver antenna are sent to the brain to perform what those instructions are.
This is all sound logical reasoning, first started by Galen in approx 200 AD, and only now in 2021 is AP positioned to further Galen's hypothesis.
The extremely odd and strange shape of the liver, is what a physicist or electrical engineer would say, a biological antenna. One of the pictures of the Liver shows it sectioned into 8 parts.
And the Liver is more Surface Area than is Volume. It is an organ that wants to spread out as a antenna for more surface area, than a organ wanting compact geometry.
Archimedes Plutonium
Oct 23, 2021, 11:40 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
So now, this begs the question of what drives thoughts turned into action before the liver is formed? Well, then we have to go to the DNA structure and say there is a liver component in DNA itself. A antenna inside of an antenna. If the Liver is a large antennae that guides and instructs the organism with thoughts, with photons and neutrinos shot from Atom Totality Control Center into the liver and received by the liver and interpreted by the liver. Then what is the receiver before the Liver is formed? So here we must have genes in the DNA that we can call Liver genes and these genes instruct and guide the DNA and surrounding cell functions in what to do and actions taken. This reminds me of electricity and magnetism of where one has a radio station that broadcasts EM waves from the station, by making electricity flow inside of antennae and thus creating EM radio waves and where households with a radio tune in and the EM waves catch these waves with their antenna in their radio and translate back to the sounds at the radio station. So the liver is a radio receiver antenna, and the DNA has genes which are radio receiver antenna. Antenna inside of antenna. And to think, that the mind and brain are nothing more than a "antenna" and translating the EM waves shot from the Atom Totality Control Station.
Now I do not know how advanced are biologists in mapping out animal DNA for the genes specific to the Liver. And whether they can spot what genes govern liver development and liver functions of producing chemicals that the body needs. Are we advanced or primitive on genes that are liver genes? It could well be that a majority of the genes are specific to the liver.
P.S. much of these ideas are very useful to my Reincarnation theory, where reincarnation is defined as a few photons here of that individual, a few from another individual shot into the mind of AP to force him to act and behave as per that prescribed photons. So that reincarnation is not one whole individual of the past making up a new individual of the future. Rather bits and pieces of various individuals composing a person now alive. And it need not be all human photons, it could be other animals, such as dogs, cats, pigs that strike our Liver antenna and force us to behave as per that instruction.
5) Actual known functions of the Liver.
Archimedes Plutonium
Oct 24, 2021, 12:06 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
An interesting read was The New York Times on the liver.
--- quoting NYT in part ---
Scientists have also discovered that hepatocytes, the metabolically active cells that constitute 80 percent of the liver, possess traits not seen in any other normal cells of the body. For example, whereas most cells have two sets of chromosomes — two sets of genetic instructions on how a cell should behave — hepatocytes can enfold and deftly manipulate up to eight sets of chromosomes, and all without falling apart or turning cancerous.
That sort of composed chromosomal excess, ..., is “superunique,” and most likely helps account for the liver’s regenerative prowess.
--- end quoting The New York Times ---
And in that same article, they discuss recent research that the Liver is able to tell time, and involved in circadian rhythms. And if I am not mistaken, the brain itself has no circadian rhythms. So this is another plus for supporting evidence that the Liver is the organ of thinking and the brain is just a accessory or "helper out of the liver as mind".
Archimedes Plutonium
Oct 24, 2021, 1:28 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
What does the liver actually do? What is its function that is known functions? For in this book I give the liver a function not recognized by other scientists. So what is recognized by scientists of the liver functions.
This is a excellent website that lists some of the major functions.
--- quoting from a website rnceus.com---
The liver is a metabolically active organ responsible for many vital life functions. The primary functions of the liver are:
Bile production and excretion
Excretion of bilirubin, cholesterol, hormones, and drugs
Metabolism of fats, proteins, and carbohydrates
Enzyme activation
Storage of glycogen, vitamins, and minerals
Synthesis of plasma proteins, such as albumin, and clotting factors
Blood detoxification and purification
--- end quoting
6) Do the metrics line up of Liver volume to body volume; iphone antenna volume or surface area of antenna to volume of entire iphone?
Archimedes Plutonium
Oct 24, 2021, 1:56 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now these volumetrics of the liver compared to the iphone antenna and iphone itself.
So a average male liver, consider AP average, is about 1700 grams.
And the volume of 1700 grams if it were all water is about a jug of milk in a 2 liter jug of milk.
This 2 liters would be the volume of my Liver, and a average male liver volume.
Now the average volume of a male human, AP is average, come be reckoned from the data that of about 62kg which is 62,000 grams and a 2 liter volume milk jug is 1700 grams. So dividing 62,000 by 1700 is 36.5 such milk jugs is a average human being. So the percentage of my body that is the liver is 2/36.5 is roughly 5.5% of my body is the liver.
Now the iphone antenna volume as seen on Internet is unknown. No-one has ever bothered to research the volume of the iphone antennae as a percent of total volume of the iphone. Is it 5.5%?
And the question is, what if we put a smaller volume antennae into a iphone? Would it make for poor reception? Conversely, what if we increased the iphone antennae volume to 7%? Would it make that iphone superior in reception?
Can we ask Apple or some university physics department to research and give us this much needed data?
Now I was looking at Apple's newest and latest iphones and some of the antennae are molded into the plastic cover and running as bands in the plastic cover. So I may have to readdress the question and factor in Surface Area rather than volume ratios. A concordance, we might say in a ratio of surface area rather than volume, but volume plays a huge part in this. For the liver is the largest organ.
And we have to ask whether the rib cage is part of the liver as a antenna? Or is the rib cage a protection of lung, heart, liver? And if protection, then is the vital organ the liver itself? Here we must ask if the liver is in a protected spot in all animals with a liver?
And earlier, I asked why would the liver have to be distant from the brain, the second brain in the skull? And one answer seems to be that we want our antennae a distance away from the box we receive the TV picture or radio box. That too close of box with antenna seem to interference one another.
Now in a Wikipedia page on Liver they show the liver in a picture called the Couinaud segments, of 8 segments. And this reminds me of the proton is a torus of 8 rings, each ring is 105MeV, the same as the electron of atoms the muon is 105MeV. And the muon is stuck inside this proton torus thrusting through the 8 rings constantly and almost at the speed of light, doing the Faraday law in producing magnetic monopoles. So I then question if the Liver is a "at large proton torus of 8 rings".
Hopefully someone can give us an answer as to the iphone surface area (or volume) percentage ratio to the total iphone. If that turns out to be true, the liver percentage matching the iphone antenna percentage, then this magnificent hypothesis becomes a theory of medical science. And will have proven Galen, way back in Ancient history, proven Galen was on the correct path of science truth.
Part 2
7) What is a hypothesis versus a theory of science?
Most people not in science itself need to understand the difference between a hypothesis, some call it a conjecture and a actual theory of science. A hypothesis is a clue that some idea maybe a theory, but just does not have strong supporting evidence. A hypothesis has little evidence and somewhat scattered evidence. Once a hypothesis gains a larger number of evidence and has elements of strong supporting evidence, then the hypothesis graduates into becoming a actual theory of science. A theory has vast supporting evidence and also has laws within the theory, laws of science connected to the strong supporting evidence.
Example of what can elevate AP's hamartoma hypothesis to that of a theory of science. If it is found that DNA molecule responds to electromagnetic energy in such a way that changes the sequential order of the liver metabolism and which the DNA is seen as being a antenna in focusing electromagnetic energy, with such evidence, AP's hamartoma hypothesis is elevated into the status of a theory of science.
8) What is adult-hamartoma of the liver?
As described in reference sources, hamartoma of liver is where the cells forming the liver disfigure in form. Something appears to be going wrong in cell formation and cells tangle and leave protrusions, cysts and lesions. It is as if a cell trying to complete itself stops forming and leaves behind a empty cell of a protrusion. These protrusions remind one of the director part in a TV antenna.
A normal liver has a smooth surface. A adult hamartoma of liver, as I saw it of my CT scan in 2016 looks like a shag carpet, not a smooth surface.
A second hypothesis is given to the first hypothesis.
Hypothesis: adult-hamartoma of liver renders its owner with superior intelligence // Medical Science
AP's 153rd book of science: The King of Science has a rare medical condition-- Adult Hamartoma of the Liver. Does the liver help make you think scientifically and logically? Well, AP has adult hamartoma, and did Feynman have adult hamartoma? AP had liposarcoma, right rear peritoneal. Feynman had liposarcoma. Did Feynman have adult hamartoma? These were the questions running in my mind after writing 153 books of science in just 3 years, 2019-2021. How is it possible for any human to cover all the sciences, write 153 books on science, revolutionizing physics a textbook series replacing Feynman Lectures on Physics, logic overhauling all of logic and pointing out the glaring mistakes in Old Logic, mathematics a complete overhaul, biology correcting many of its mistakes, chemistry with a book 1150 pages long? How is that feat possible? And AP wanted some answers. At first AP thought it was his 1/2 eunuch for AP has only 1 testicle after the 2016 surgery on Liposarcoma. So I thought it was driven by the reduced sex-thinking since I was now a 1/2 eunuch. But slowly and slowly from 2016 onwards, my suspicions fell on the fact of a adult hamartoma of the liver.
Sorry, sketches will have to do until I can take my own photographs of the CT scan of my adult-hamartoma liver. These are my own sketches of what I saw in my CT scan of 2016 of my adult hamartoma liver. I am going to try to get a actual photograph of my liver hamartoma, and when I do, will replace this hand drawing sketches. Here I sketch a normal liver and then a adult-hamartoma liver with those myriad of protrusions, those cysts of deformed cells. Reminding me of the protrusions on a TV antenna to get better reception.
__
.-' `-.
.' `.
/ \
; ;
| |
; ;
\ /
`. .'
`-.___.-'
normal liver with smooth surface
,dP""Yb,
,d"uu898"b
d'88 _999`Y,
8UU8UUU`b
`bUU,aP88P
U""""WW d'
PPPPPP,P"
a,UUUaP"
`"""''
adult-hamartoma liver with protrusions all over the surface
How rare is adult hamartoma of the liver? I read one report where the researcher said he has known of only 120 cases in all of medical history of adult hamartoma. Just 120 cases, means not just 120 for 7.5 billion humans on Earth now, but 120 cases in the entirety of human history. If that is true, then that really defines rarity in medical history. For 120 cases in the total of 10 billion humans that ever lived on Earth. Such rarity, I believe, deserves a list of those 120 known cases of adult hamartoma of the liver, a list and a short history of that person, to see if their hamartoma made them excel in something in life, not just AP's excelling in science. For I suspect several of those 120 hamartoma cases were Olympic athletes. Because I know in my life, that I was hyper active, high metabolism and a almost Olympic runner in 10K races for I could do the 10K in my prime at just under 30 minutes. Of course now, I read that the men's world record is 26:24 by Rhonex Kipruto and for women the world record by 2021 is 29:43 by Joyciline Jepkosgei. So in my prime I would have beaten the women in 10K Olympic races. The point being that hamartoma of the liver is an advantage in running. But did any Olympic racer have hamartoma of the liver? Of the 120 known cases of adult hamartoma, were any of them Olympic athletes?
A person who is exceptional in science, we want to always look for any physiological explanation. And in this book I offer a physiological explanation for why I am the King of Science, due to my adult-hamartoma-of-the-liver.
No average physicist could ever write the Feynman Lectures on Physics. So is there a physiological explanation to Feynman's physics abilities also? Both Feynman and AP had liposarcoma; did Feynman have hamartoma of the liver?
The record on AP is quite clear, 153 published science books to date. Overhauling mathematics in its entirety. And replacing the Feynman Lectures on Physics textbooks with AP's textbooks, especially 151st book of TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College by Archimedes Plutonium.
So in this short book I wish to offer a hypothesis, a conjecture on a physiological explanation for the superior science abilities of Feynman and AP. And as the title suggests, adult hamartoma of the liver as the cause.
In my previous book, book 153rd published as titled: Liver is the mind of the organism and the brain is accessory to the liver // Medical series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium.
This 154th book is the add-on continuation of the idea the Liver is the first brain and mind and the brain itself is a secondary accessory helper to what the "liver thinks".
Many will laugh, laugh laugh laugh when they hear or read this. But one of the early premier physicians Galen never was laughing when he discovered the miracles of the liver-- it is the only organ to regenerate itself. For Galen observed in his research that the liver is the first organ to form in a fetus, not the heart or brain or lungs or anything else, no, the liver is the first organ to form. Because every other organ has to be nourished with food and thus the liver comes first. And to nourish all the other organs, Galen would have thought the liver has to think, has to have that ability. And the liver is what Galen thought was the first brain, because the brain itself in the head is dependent on the liver to provide it what it needs. The brain is dependent on the liver. The liver is independent of the brain. That tells us all we really need to know, logic wise. It means the liver came first, and later the brain.
And how would the liver be a brain? Easy, it is a radio antenna to the Atom Totality Control Central, where photons or neutrinos are shot into the liver, and instructing the liver on what to next do. These liver instructions are then sent to the brain and the brain like some huge muscle nerve station executes on those liver instructions. And here is where the hamartoma comes in use. If you ever look at high quality antennae, you will see small metal add on structures to the main structure. These add on structures increase reception of EM waves. Increase reception of EM waves means clarity and logic power to science thinking.
9) What is life like, living with adult-hamartoma liver?
This is a recount and recall of snapshots of AP's life, as living with adult-hamartoma liver. Of course I never knew I had adult hamartoma liver until my liposarcoma cancer surgery of 2015-2016. Never knew I had a special type of liver. And only found out I had myriad cysts and lesions on my liver until late 2015 with a CT scan of my abdomen for the large cancer tumor near my liver.
So what is life like for a person with adult-hamartoma liver? I would summarize it in one word-- "speedy". Everything has to be in a speed mode that is higher than normal. Running is a activity conducive to hamartoma liver as you need high metabolism to feed the energy stores to the muscles. As long as I can remember starting as infant, I was running all over the place. Seems like I needed to burn energy. As I mention in several books, in my prime I could run a 10k just under 30 minutes, which is not quite Olympic grade, but the next tier below of quality running. This running ability is what got me out of the hospital after the cancer surgery age 66, as I started to run the hallways, carrying a urine tube, and almost a doctor in a group of doctors was not watching carefully enough, where he was going and almost collided with him, as he thanked his colleagues from pulling him back into the group.
I myself never really noticed my fast pace, too fast a pace until I started dating in college and the girlfriend kept pulling my back, because my walking pace was too fast for that date. My internal clock is racing so much faster than normal. She finally ordered me to stay behind her, holding hands and never walk in front of her. But the lesson was forgotten when I had a new date, and she also complained.
Then there is the obvious speedy pace in the fact that AP publishes 161 books of science, this the 153rd in three years time, on all the hard core sciences. One book is 1150 pages, a chemistry book. That is a pace of approximately 1 book of science per week. I am certain no scientist of the past had a pace like that for publishing science.
But another aspect that is noticeable with adult-hamartoma of liver is the youthful appearance I had throughout life so far. I am 71 years old and still, a few months back at a store, the clerk wanted id to make sure I was not under-age in buying a pack of beers I was giving a friend. But I always in my life looked about 10 or even 20 years younger than actual age. Does high metabolism keep a youthful look on a person? I would have thought the opposite, that a high metabolism so to speak-- burns up the body and ages much faster. But to the contrary, my youthful appearance stuck with me.
And on the matter of high metabolism with hamartoma, not until I was 50 years old did I start to gain weight for eating too much. Up until age 50, I could eat as much as I wanted, and never gain a single gram. I stuck to around 63 kilograms from High School to age 50. Then I started to gain and from 50 to age 67 was 67 kilograms and just recently was 68 kilograms. My high metabolism is not burning the calories as I was used to. But I still eat as much as I want.
Psychologically living with hamartoma, I am so much looking into the future and seldom can be in the present. I am super restless. And cannot stand being in a conversation of chit chat. On the telephone, I cannot bare talking if there is nothing of future action. Most people to me, talk too much with nothing to say. This is probably because of hamartoma.
Weather to hamartoma is one of I like cold more than hot. I could not live in the tropics, and failed living there as it slows me down too much. I was like the German Shepherd dog some Canadians had brought to the Caribbean Island I tried living on, but that dog was suffering terribly, and so was I. I need cool cold climate to best function. In fact this climate of cold extends into my sleep habits. I cannot bear to have my feet get hot. So I usually have my feet sticking out of the blankets. And while in the hospital for cancer surgery 2016. I asked the nurse to pull the blankets out so that my feet could stick out and not overheat. And what a surprised face that nurse made.
Does hamartoma bestow longevity to life? I would guess yes, because of the still youthful appearance I have, even though I am 71 years old, and look like I am 50. I believe in part of the theory of aging as a accumulation of mistakes in the body and once you reach a threshold of mistakes you die. So that high metabolism must have a means of getting rid of mistakes or decreasing mistakes.
Foods, I like-- fruit, cereal, and chocolate, and for main course meals I like spaghetti most and a well prepared steak or hamburger, and love potato salad, well cooked potatoes with mayo, mustard, celery, boiled eggs, onion, and touch of fresh lemon juice. Yes I love potatoes and sauerkraut. I like Mexican food and cheese and especially yoghurt. Of course I am eating all organic foods since my cancer. I eat only organic, religiously only organic.
I never smoked tobacco in my life, nor had a alcohol desire. I simply was not interested in them, nor did they ever give me any pleasure. I did like the champagne, but I never have that now since none is organic.
10) My history of my adult hamartoma of the liver.
This story starts when I was in the Yankton, South Dakota medical clinic to meet my oncologist doctor for I had recently in late 2015 take a CT of my abdomen and found a huge tumor of Liposarcoma. And my oncologist doctor informed me of my condition and was going to recommend me to surgery to remove the tumor. And as he reviewed my CT images, he was probably more fascinated with my liver than the cancer tumor, for I have that rare condition of adult-hamartoma of the liver. A liver is supposed to have a smooth surface but mine is like a shag carpet of cysts and lesions, tubular protrusions, not just one spot, but the entire liver.
I was looking at the scan, and of course the only thing really on my mind was the cancer tumor, not the liver, for I needed to get rid of the cancer and not worry about a organ that was fine although different.
And the doctor pointed out some cysts, yet I was carefree of the liver for I was focused on the cancer tumor that had pressed up against all the organs in that region.
And the doctor pointed out a cyst, and I said one, and he said no, the entire liver is coated in these cysts. For me, it was "oh well, I need to get rid of the cancer". The following Spring, March and April 2016 the liposarcoma tumor had been removed. And I thought from late 2015 to Spring of 2016, that my science thinking abilities had taken a huge hit to the downside and that my thoughts of science were now drastically on the wane. To my delight and surprise, my science abilities in seeing clear and straight and logic abilities had increased 10 fold. After Spring of 2016, I could conquer science problems in 1/10 the time before the cancer surgery.
So I thought, then, since one of my testicles was gone, that the decrease in testosterone was the reason for this upwelling increase in doing science so easily. But in questioning the doctors, my testosterone levels were really all about the same before the cancer surgery and after the tumor was removed even though I was 1/2 eunuch.
And so gradually, I entered into a different hypothesis, that the 1/2 eunuch was not the factor, but rather instead, this rare condition of hamartoma of the liver.
11) Five years on after liposarcoma surgery, and still cancer free. Thank God!
So I was under medical surveillance for 5 years from 2016 onwards, for they say that if after 5 years the cancer does not re-emerge means you are free of that cancer. And I was free of the cancer in my 2021 CT scan. But, however, I am still under surveillance, and probably the cysts of hamartoma on my liver is probably a major factor.
Since my liposarcoma of 2015 and thereafter, I have changed my living lifestyle in drastic measure. Before I ate only a fraction of my food as organic. After 2015 I am a total organic food and drink eater. Before 2016 I was using wood stoves as part of the heating of the house, now I use only electric, as the cleanest heating. You would be surprised to find that a wood stove, no matter how clean you think it is, leaves your clothing smelly of smoke and gets into your lungs, no matter how clean you think your fireplace or wood stove is. With fire, there is always smoke. Then I reviewed all chemicals passing through my body from such as cooking utensils, or drinking containers, not knowing what chemicals pass into my body. And by 2021, am even replacing petroleum jelly hand lotion and nylon in tooth brushing. Not only for cancer, but maybe they cause Alzheimer's as a accumulation of plastics in the body as a arthritis type reaction that is Alzheimers. So from beginning of 2016, my lifestyle was altered very drastically due to cancer. And it payed off because here I am in 2021, 5 years later as cancer free.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 3, 2021, 9:34:54 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's 154th book of science: The King of Science has a rare medical condition-- Adult Hamartoma of the Liver. Does the liver help make you think scientifically and logically?
When I met my doctor for this round of cancer surveillance, my 5th year remittance of Liposarcoma, my first question on the CT scan was "How is my liver"? I had known them as "cysts" but the doctor called them hamartoma. Which was brand new information for me. For I asked him to spell it please, for me, for I had never heard of the term, and known them only as cysts.
So this was new news to me on June 2, 2021.
Just tonight I look up Hamartoma and find them common, the most commonly found cysts on youngsters, but, extremely rare on adults. One website said there are only 120 known cases of adult hamartoma in the entire world. That is extremely rare. Only 120 cases in all of medical literature and observation.
So, the immediate question for me, anyway, is, does this condition help my brain-mind to think. To think better than most people. To think clear and logical and think scientifically?
So, I have to now delve into research of what connection does the mind-brain have with the liver. The liver is an extremely important organ, so it must be wired up to the mind-brain to a large extent.
Can we say metaphorically that the liver is the motor of the body? Or what is a good metaphor for the liver?
So, I devote this book to a small research of my Hamartoma Liver. See what I can find out. And just yesterday I was thinking my increase in science abilities was due to a 1/2 Eunuch slowing of the testosterone hormone flow. But today, I must now consider if it is my liver that is increasing my science abilities.
Question about Hamartoma-- do they make you able to run better? Does any great runner have Liver Hamartoma. Any Olympic athlete runners have Liver Hamartoma?
Of course most young people never have a CT scan until older and by happenstance notice the liver hamartomas.
And a larger question-- does any great scientist have Liver Hamartoma? Of course we can only account for scientists of recent history who had CT scans. Now Dr. Feynman, one of my heroes had a liposarcoma, as did AP and of comparable size-- both had a small watermelon size liposarcoma. And probably there are CT scans of Dr. Feynman especially his liver still in existence. And obviously when the doctors operated on Feynman to remove his tumor would have noticed liver hamartoma if present. So, did Dr. Feynman, as well as AP, have Liver Hamartoma?
If he did, then there must be a connection, a link with liver and advanced science achievement.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 4, 2021, 10:21:55 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, so, I was looking up the metaphor analogy of the liver and its function for the body. I first thought that motor of the body was apt, but it appears to be more of a "brain, but unlike the brain, the liver supplies food and nourishment to all the other organs including the brain". So as I can see from the below list the description of a General in a Army is apt.
Now it is interesting that the liver is the only organ in the body able to regenerate itself.
--- Quoting in parts from a web site of metamia.com ---
Liver ... is like a processing plant. Carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals all to the liver where they are broken down and stored. Later they are remade into whatever the body needs...
Liver... like a chemical factory, which performs over 500 different chemical reactions at any given moment.. Largest organ of our digestive system
Liver... an army's general.. The liver imparts to us the capacity to plan our life smoothly and wisely. In disease, a liver disharmony can manifest with an inability to plan our life and a lack of direction.
Liver... a salamander tail "But the liver is like a salamander's tail. A transplanted liver completely regenerates to fill the cavity the old liver left behind... That's a mechanism no one quite understands." says surgeon Drazen.
--- end quoting in parts from website ---
I never realized how special the liver is, until now.
12) Probability that Feynman and AP physics acumen is directly related to the condition of hamartoma of the liver.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 5, 2021, 6:01:14 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
So now I hope that the medical records of Dr. Feynman are kept in a safe place and has access to by the general public. I need to know if Dr. Feynman had cysts on his liver, the condition called Hamartoma or some spell it Hamaratoma. Both Feynman and AP had Liposarcoma and if Feynman had Hamartoma, then that is more than coincidence of two persons with advanced science achievement, considering adult-hamartoma is exceedingly rare.
What laws of probability theory are in here?
13) What is the Mechanism of a hamartoma liver in causing superior achievement in science?
The mechanism would be that the liver as antenna to the Atom Totality Control Center of shooting photons or neutrinos into the bodies of animals to make them do what they end up doing, would be obvious mechanism. In that protrusions from the liver would make that liver a better antenna in reception of EM waves. Much like a big antenna is better than a small antenna. More surface area of a antenna means better reception.
I remember in old days that people would wrap aluminum foil around their indoor TV antenna and get better reception. So the hamartoma liver is like wrapping aluminum foil.
The parts of the antenna are.
1) Directors
2) Reflector
3) Dipole
The directors increase the gain of the signal. The hamartoma cysts and lesions and protrusions are like directors of an antenna.
The reflector focuses the signal.
The Dipole receives the signal.
14) What would elevate hamartoma liver hypothesis to a theory of science?
What would go a long way in elevating hamartoma liver from hypothesis to theory of science would be if Feynman had hamartoma liver, much like AP, both excelling in physics and science. Both having a ultra rare condition, of only 120 known cases among approximately 10 billion humans. So these rare numbers matching in Feynman and AP, leads to a conclusion that hamartoma liver causes a mind conducive to science such as physics. This would elevate AP's hypothesis to that of theory.
What would elevate this theory even more, is if, or when, scientists find that DNA molecule has a sequence in coding of 4 base pairs and sugar phosphate backbone that is a Antenna of physics, and this DNA antenna is associated as the genes of the liver. So here, if we discover that the genetic code of DNA has a antenna and is the genetic code of the liver, then we have a scientific proof that hamartoma liver correlates with clarity, easy and excelling in several activities such as doing physics.
AP
zzzzzzzzzz
plutonium dot archimedes at gmail dot com. Looking for a College or University press to hardcover publish all 318+ AP books of science, likely to become 500-600 maybe even 700 books by the time I die. E-books are too prone to unbalanced-unhinged censor-editors, who can easily make your books vanish by pulling a switch. Science should never have gatekeepers, who thwart access to true science.
| /
| /
|/______ hardcover or paperback
PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
----------
Onto the pigeon news and this is more important for the Liver as a antennae for receiving messages from the Control Center of the Atom Totality. This is quantum entanglement--- Superdeterminism where all thoughts and actions derive from the Atom Totality forcing us to do, whatever we end up doing.
The protein ferritin can be magnetoreception in "superparamagnetic cells" which are concentrated in the liver. This links up to my idea that the Liver is the Antenna of the body and passes the information onto the brain. The brain is wired, mostly to act with action upon messages of the Liver. Think of the Mind as thoughts coming from out of the body, from the Atom Totality shooting photons into our body. The liver is the largest antenna in the body and passes the information onto the brain. The brain then responds to the information.
So the next question would be, in humans, is the liver the most highly concentrated superparamagnetic cells, as it is in the pigeon????? If so, well, AP's Superdeterminism theory of how the Mind works has gotten a great bid boost forward in supporting evidence.
AP, King of Science