#370 science book of AP -- Intermediate LOGIC // Teaching True Logic textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium This is AP's #370 published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe, PAU newsgroup is this. https://groups.google

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Intermediate LOGIC // Teaching True Logic textbook series

by Archimedes Plutonium


This is AP's #370 published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,
PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe



Preface: This textbook is an expansion and detailing of my 366 textbook of Logic--- Elementary Logic. Here I want to expand and detail some ideas of Elementary Logic. Not much concern over Truth Tables but a focus on the laws of logic.

I have prescribed that all science students seeking a degree in science be required to take two years mandatory logic in college or university. The Elementary and Intermediate Logic textbooks fulfills that requirement. But some, who found these two textbooks enjoyable, I recommend they take Advanced Logic where I make case studies of famous scientists and how Logic would have spared them that embarrassment of messing-up and screwing-up.

Cover picture: Pragmatism as the best philosophy system of all since its mechanism is the 'scientific method'. Meaning is future actions. Knowledge is in the "doing". Ideas for a pragmatist are weapons for purposeful action. My photograph picture of colonizing Europa.

---------------------------------
Table of Contents
---------------------------------

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Cover picture: Pragmatism as the best philosophy system of all since its mechanism is the 'scientific method'. Meaning is future actions. Knowledge is in the "doing". Ideas for a pragmatist are weapons for purposeful action. My photograph picture of a new type of Rubik's Cube illustrating all of knowledge.

---------------------------------
Table of Contents
---------------------------------

Part 1. What is Knowledge and where does Logic fit in?



----------
Text
----------

Part 1. What is Knowledge and where does Logic fit in?


In "Elementary Logic" textbook, I often stated that truth of ideas comes from the best available science on the topic. And we can make a list such as this of all knowledge evaluated by science


                                        Physics
                                       /
                                   Chemistry
                                    /
                                  Astronomy, Geology
                                  /
                                Biology which includes Sociology and language, medicine, political science,
                                              history
                                /
                              Logic = statements + images
                             /
                           Mathematics = numbers + geometry figures


But the trouble with a diagram like that--- it does not show relationships such as math is connected directly to physics. The diagram should not be linear but rather circular where one science influences other sciences.

A sphere would be nice to show this interconnectedness, but a modified Rubik's Cube would be even better.

A Rubik's Cube has 9 small cubes per 6 faces equals 54 small cubes.  Now, if we give physics 9 small cubes then we have 54-9= 45 remaining small cubes. Now we give chemistry 4 small cubes and give biology 4 small cubes and so we have remaining 45-8 = 37. Now astronomy we give it 2 small cubes, geology 1 small cube, leaving us with 37-3= 34.

Now, surprisingly we need to give Logic 2 small cubes and give Mathematics 2 small cubes, for the reason that mathematics is split into two houses-- numbers and geometry figures. Logic is also split into two houses--- ideas and then images.

The images of the world, whether a eyesight image, a photograph a painting picture, is geometry, compared to say text of statements as algebra. Say, the difference of watching a movie of Noah's Ark and reading it in the Bible.

This geometrical-logic is the philosophy Pragmatism. And since pragmatism is the finest logic we can say that Logic = statements + images. Similar to Mathematics = numbers + geometry figures.

Now in the AP cube I wanted to give a sense of interconnectedness, where chemistry small cubes are near physics small cubes and where Logic and Math small cubes are near physics small cubes.

We can visualize other so called sciences like economics, political science, history as far away from the all physics face.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

So what I have in mind is all the blue colored small squares be Physics, 4 for chemistry, 4 for biology, until all sciences are represented by a small square. Logic would have 2 small squares and math would have 2 and be near the Physics squares. This is how I can best relate the idea of interconnectedness of science.

AP's opinion:: if such a cube were manufactured, it would be utterly simple to play, for the rule would be to just get all the blue physics onto 1 face. Question:: Is the AP cube the Most Simple of all Cubes, after you have a cube that is totally all one color, where you actually do not need to move anything at all???? Silly people are always looking to make things difficult, when we should look to make things easy. Such as AP's books on Calculus, reducing calculus to just add or subtract 1 from exponent of polynomial , because the only valid function in all of math is the Polynomial. But few math professors have a 1/2 or more marble logical brain to ever understand that.

pp

--- quoting Wikipedia---

free encyclopedia

Rubik's Cube

Other names
Magic Cube, Cube
Type
Combination puzzle
Invented by
Ernő Rubik
Company
Rubik's Brand Ltd (Spin Master)^[1]
Country
Hungary
Availability
1977: as Hungarian Magic Cube, first test batches released in Budapest
As Rubik's Cube, worldwide, 1980–present
Official websiteAn illustration of an unsolved Rubik's Cube

ppp

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Homework: take a real light colored Rubik's cube and mark all 54 faces with a light pencil to erase later and see if you can fit Physics, Chemistry, Biology, etc. If no cube available, make sketches of the 6 faces with the sciences in each of the 54 small squares.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, I am momentarily stuck here and need to resolve the issue before I continue with the textbook.

I have arrived at the idea where all of philosophy, be it pragmatism or any other philosophy is a branch of Logic where Logic is split into geometry and into algebra.

When I do the logic syllogism: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore Socrates is mortal. Is composed of 2 premisses and conclusion in statement form and is ____algebraic logic____

When I do logic by these pictures--- showing a slant cut in cylinder and showing a slant cut in cone--- concluding that the cylinder is ellipse slant cut and cone is oval slant cut. I am doing Geometry Logic as seen in pictures below.

However, this causes a huge problem of determining how much is a statement/s or premiss/s be that of algebra or that of geometry????

And one can say, that every algebra statement has a mix of algebra with geometry and every geometry statement has a mix of both.

For example: Statement: Jack ran up the hill until he reached the top. Jack walked down the hill, after he reached the top.

So, in that Logic Statement, we can see there is a algebraic component, but there is also a geometry component in or minds as we form pictures of the events that occurred.

You see, my big problem here is that Old Logic saw all of logic as just "algebraic statements". While New Logic sees statements of Logic can be totally geometrical and not at all algebraic.

For example: It is dark nighttime and you turn off the light, nearby the bed. You have a few steps to walk to get to the bed. You turned off the light, but your mind geometrically remembers you have to avoid a cord and avoid a table top. And all of that is possible because the mind has a geometry picture of those next events that take place.

So here I need to spend some time on furnishing New Logic with two branches--- an algebraic and symbolic branch and then a branch that can be fully pictures and geometry. 

These 2 pictures of slant cut in cylinder and cone is Geometry Logic, as well as the pictures of the proof of Pythagorean theorem.

AP, King of Science

--- quoting Wikipedia---

--- end quoting Wikipedia---

--- quoting Wikipedia on Pythagorean theorem proof---

Proofs using constructed squares

Rearrangement proof of the Pythagorean theorem.
(The area of the white space remains constant throughout the translation rearrangement of the triangles. At all moments in time, the area is always c². And likewise, at all moments in time, the area is always a² + b².)

Rearrangement proofs

In one rearrangement proof, two squares are used whose sides have a measure of  and which contain four right triangles whose sides are a, b and c, with the hypotenuse being c. In the square on the right side, the triangles are placed such that the corners of the square correspond to the corners of the right angle in the triangles, forming a square in the center whose sides are length c. Each outer square has an area of (a + b)² as well as 2ab + c², with 2ab representing the total area of the four triangles. Within the big square on the left side, the four triangles are moved to form two similar rectangles with sides of length a and b. These rectangles in their new position have now delineated two new squares, one having side length a is formed in the bottom-left corner, and another square of side length b formed in the top-right corner. In this new position, this left side now has a square of area (a + b)² as well as 2ab + a² + b². Since both squares have the area of (a + b)² it follows that the other measure of the square area also equal each other such that 2ab + c² = 2ab + a² + b². With the area of the four triangles removed from both side of the equation what remains is a² + b² = c².

--- end quoting Wikipedia---

What is often left-out in the discussion of the Pythagorean Theorem is the geometry that you Need a 90degree angle.

And the importance of this theorem, linking numbers to 90 degrees if you hand me lengths 3.5, 4, 5, that it cannot form a right-triangle. It forms a triangle, but not a right-triangle.

Physics uses the Pythagorean theorem everywhere for the laws of Electromagnetism depend on the perpendicular, such as Faraday Law, and even the Light Ray where the Electric field is perpendicular to the Magnetic field.

It looks as though the video above made it through.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, I was thinking this was going to take a long time, but no, a day or two.

THEORY OF THE MIND

-----------------------------------

A theory of the mind has to account for both memory and where new ideas come from.

In a Plutonium Atom Totality, new ideas come from the Atom Control Central as it shoots photons into our body and give us new thoughts.

But, where is Memory in a Atom Totality. Here the brain is the memory station and the brain is a large capacitor.

A capacitor is where photons are like electricity, just go round and round in the brain.

The photons of Light are pure DNA, and pure DNA is geometrical. The ATGC of DNA are geometry figures such as squares, triangles, circles etc

When we see something in life our eyes form a image of the sight and that is converted to photons-of-Light that is storaged in the brain as electric current going round and round.

When a new thought comes into our mind from the Atom Control Central it can link up with one of these photons going around and around in our brain, link up and where we relive the images.

How Much of an Idea is a algebra statement or a image statement?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since Memory is all stored images, means that all ideas from memory start out as Geometry.

AP, King of Science

[Archimedes Plutonium]

If this theory pans out as true, it will certainly be one of my finest science discoveries ever.

It will change all of psychology as a science.

It will give structure to the Brain-Mind and well define both.

So let me go slowly on explaining this.

A few days ago, I was starting to get into trouble about what Constitutes a Idea for Logic????

We are all familiar with Logic statements like this.

All men are mortal. Socrates is a man.

Therefore Socrates is mortal.

Plenty of ideas in those statements.

But then I ran into a difficulty.

Are IMAGES, or pictures statements of logic??

Seems reasonable that instead of just words as logic ideas, that a picture probably packs far more ideas in a single image or picture than a sentence or words.

So, then, I fell into this vast pit of wondering if Images and Pictures should be allowed as Ideas, as statements as pressisses even as conclusions.

And what I ended up saying, is that the Mind itself starts out all ideas as being Images, as pictures, that DNA is geometry and that Photo-Light is perfect DNA. That electricity is perfect DNA.

Hence, the Mind is a battery capacitor of electric signals all made up of perfect DNA, and that MEMORIES are these constant circuits of the brain of this electric signals. When we have a past memory, we simply turn on a switch that gives us some of those electric currents full of past pictures revealing themselves in our mind.

Of course, during the waking day-- our eyes capture images of the world and our eyes transform those images into electric currents that hold those pictures in our mind as a battery-capacitor.

Few of our IDEAS are sentences of words. Most of our IDEAS are images and pictures.

Like reading a magazine. Each sentence can be construed as a algebraic idea. But each sentence forms a picture in our mind as the idea.

Our Minds as Memories does not hold the algebraic sentence, no, it transforms the algebra of words and we hold in our mind-memory a picture.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

So there I was, several days back-ago. I had arrived upon this Logic idea, that a statement or premiss need not be a sentence, but be, actually a whole entire picture or image.

A sentence being a algebra of words.

A picture or image being a geometry.

And, come to think of it, whenever one reads or writes a sentence that forms a Statement or Premiss of Logic, it is extremely difficult to keep that sentence to not form a picture or imagine.

In other words, I had a fight on my hands a few days back-ago.

And the resolution of this--- is spectacular. It involves a complete revolution in the science of Psychology.

Our brains are the hardware of a Mind of Thoughts. And all thought is ---- Pictures and Imagines.

The bodies of plants and animals is composed of DNA. These are molecules constructed from ATCG which are geometric figures. The Photon-Light is actually perfect DNA and is electric current.

What this resolves into being is that the Brain is a organ that is a battery capacitor, in which it circulates electric current all composed of geometry figures. These figures were formed from the eyes seeing the world around us and making pictures that are transcribed into electric current. We can recall such a long past picture because we have that picture circulating around in our head as long as we live.

In other words images and pictures are turned into electric current that is kept circulating in our brain and is our MEMORY.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I need pictures of the brain and try to see if I can make out the image of a car battery as Parallel Plate Capacitor.

All those folds, can we say the folds are like parallel-plates?????

So that the electric currents that are constantly flowing around and around remain in the brain forming a Mind and Memory.

pp

--- quoting Wikipedia---

free encyclopedia 

Brain

Brain of a chimpanzee

Model of a human brain

Details
Part of
Nervous system
Identifiers
Latin
cerebrum
Greek
ἐγκέφαλος (enképhalos)
MeSH
D001921
NeuroNames
21
TA98
A14.1.03.001
TA2
5415
Anatomical terminology

[edit on Wikidata]

The brain is an organ that serves as the center of the nervous system in all vertebrate and most invertebrateanimals. It consists of nervous tissue and is typically located in the head (cephalization), usually near organs for special senses such as vision, hearing, and olfaction. Being the most specialized organ, it is responsible for receiving information from the sensory nervous system, processing that information (thought, cognition, and intelligence) and the coordination of motor control(muscle activity and endocrine system).

While invertebrate brains arise from paired segmental ganglia (each of which is only responsible for the respective body segment) of the ventral nerve cord, vertebrate brains develop axially from the midline dorsal nerve cord as a vesicular enlargement at the rostral end of the neural tube, with centralized control over all body segments. All vertebrate brains can be embryonically divided into three parts: the forebrain (prosencephalon, subdivided into telencephalon and diencephalon), midbrain (mesencephalon) and hindbrain(rhombencephalon, subdivided into metencephalon and myelencephalon). The spinal cord, which directly interacts with somatic functions below the head, can be considered a caudal extension of the myelencephalon enclosed inside the vertebral column. Together, the brain and spinal cord constitute the central nervous system in all vertebrates.

In humans, the cerebral cortex contains approximately 14–16 billion neurons,^[1] and the estimated number of neurons in the cerebellum is 55–70 billion.^[2] Each neuron is connected by synapses to several thousand other neurons, typically communicating with one another via cytoplasmic processes known as dendrites and axons. Axons are usually myelinated and carry trains of rapid micro-electric signal pulses called action potentialsto target specific recipient cells in other areas of the brain or distant parts of the body. The prefrontal cortex, which controls executive functions, is particularly well developed in humans.

--- end quoting Wikipedia---

ppp

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I have never really understood this physiological brain structure of neurons, axon, synapse.

Until now, for it is beginning to make sense, as the eyes are like a Photo-Camera and wants the picture to be converted into a electric current that stays trapped inside the brain, going around and around, like electricity in a car battery.

pp

--- quoting Wikipedia---

Cellular structure

Neurons generate electrical signalsthat travel along their axons. When an electrical impulse reaches a junction called a synapse, it causes a neurotransmitter to be released, which binds to receptors on other cells and thereby alters their electrical activity.

The brains of all species are composed primarily of two broad classes of brain cells: neurons and glial cells. Glial cells (also known as glia or neuroglia) come in several types, and perform a number of critical functions, including structural support, metabolic support, insulation, and guidance of development. Neurons, however, are usually considered the most important cells in the brain.^[8] In humans, the cerebral cortex contains approximately 14–16 billion neurons,^[1] and the estimated number of neurons in the cerebellum is 55–70 billion.^[2] Each neuron is connected by synapses to several thousand other neurons. The property that makes neurons unique is their ability to send signals to specific target cells, sometimes over long distances.^[8] They send these signals by means of an axon, which is a thin protoplasmic fiber that extends from the cell body and projects, usually with numerous branches, to other areas, sometimes nearby, sometimes in distant parts of the brain or body. The length of an axon can be extraordinary: for example, if a pyramidal cell (an excitatory neuron) of the cerebral cortex were magnified so that its cell body became the size of a human body, its axon, equally magnified, would become a cable a few centimeters in diameter, extending more than a kilometer.^[9] These axons transmit signals in the form of electrochemical pulses called action potentials, which last less than a thousandth of a second and travel along the axon at speeds of 1–100 meters per second. Some neurons emit action potentials constantly, at rates of 10–100 per second, usually in irregular patterns; other neurons are quiet most of the time, but occasionally emit a burst of action potentials.^[10]

ppp

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Intermediate LOGIC // Teaching True Logic textbook series

by Archimedes Plutonium

This is AP's #370 published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe 

Preface: This textbook is an expansion and detailing of my #366 textbook of Logic--- Elementary Logic. Here I want to expand and detail some ideas of Elementary Logic. I have not much of a concern over Truth Tables but a focus on the laws of logic.

I have prescribed that all science students seeking a degree in science be required to take two years mandatory logic in college or university. The Elementary and Intermediate Logic textbooks fulfills that requirement. But some, who found these two textbooks enjoyable, I recommend they take Advanced Logic where I make case studies of famous scientists and how Logic would have spared them that embarrassment of messing-up and screwing-up.

Cover picture: Pragmatism as the best philosophy system of all since its mechanism is the 'scientific method'. Meaning is future actions. Knowledge is in the "doing". Ideas for a pragmatist are weapons for purposeful action. My photograph picture of a new type of Rubik's Cube illustrating all of knowledge.

---------------------------------

Table of Contents

---------------------------------

1) What is Knowledge and where does Logic fit in?

----------

Text

----------

1) What is Knowledge and where does Logic fit in?

Archimedes Plutonium 3:11 AM, 11Mar2026 to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

In "Elementary Logic" textbook, I often stated that truth of ideas comes from the best available science on the topic. And we can make a list such as this of all knowledge evaluated by science

                                        Physics

                                       /

                                   Chemistry

                                    /

                                  Astronomy, Geology

                                  /

                                Biology which includes Sociology and language, medicine, political science, 

                                              history

                                /

                              Logic = statements + images

                             /

                           Mathematics = numbers + geometry figures

But the trouble with a diagram like that--- it does not show relationships such as math is connected directly to physics. The diagram should __not be linear__ but rather circular where one science influences other sciences.

A sphere would be nice to show this interconnectedness, but a modified Rubik's Cube would be even better.

A Rubik's Cube has 9 small cubes per 6 faces equals 54 small cubes.  Now, if we give physics 9 small cubes then we have 54-9= 45 remaining small cubes. Now we give chemistry 4 small cubes and give biology 4 small cubes and so we have remaining 45-8 = 37. Now astronomy we give it 2 small cubes, geology 1 small cube, leaving us with 37-3= 34.

Now, surprisingly we need to give Logic 2 small cubes and give Mathematics 2 small cubes, for the reason that mathematics is split into two houses-- numbers and geometry figures. Logic is also split into two houses--- ideas and then images.

The images of the world, whether a eyesight image, a photograph a painting picture, is geometry, compared to say text of statements as algebra. Say, the difference of watching a movie of Noah's Ark and reading it in the Bible.

This geometrical-logic is the philosophy Pragmatism. And since pragmatism is the finest logic we can say that Logic = statements + images. Similar to Mathematics = numbers + geometry figures.

Now in the AP cube I wanted to give a sense of interconnectedness, where chemistry small cubes are near physics small cubes and where Logic and Math small cubes are near physics small cubes. 

We can visualize other so called sciences like economics, political science, history as far away from the all physics face.

Archimedes Plutonium Mar 11, 2026, 3:25:02 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

So what I have in mind is all the blue colored small squares be Physics, 4 for chemistry, 4 for biology, until all sciences are represented by a small square. Logic would have 2 small squares and math would have 2 and be near the Physics squares. This is how I can best relate the idea of interconnectedness of science.

AP's opinion:: if such a cube were manufactured, it would be utterly simple to play, for the rule would be to just get all the blue physics onto 1 face. Question:: Is the AP cube the Most Simple of all Cubes, after you have a cube that is totally all one color, where you actually do not need to move anything at all???? Silly people are always looking to make things difficult, when we should look to make things easy. Such as AP's books on Calculus, reducing calculus to just add or subtract 1 from exponent of polynomial , because the only valid function in all of math is the Polynomial. But few math professors have a 1/2 or more marble logical brain to ever understand that.

--- quoting Wikipedia---

--- quoting Wikipedia---

free encyclopedia

Rubik's Cube

Other names
Magic Cube, Cube
Type
Combination puzzle
Invented by
Ernő Rubik
Company
Rubik's Brand Ltd (Spin Master)^[1]
Country
Hungary
Availability
1977: as Hungarian Magic Cube, first test batches released in Budapest
As Rubik's Cube, worldwide, 1980–present
Official websiteAn illustration of an unsolved Rubik's Cube

--- end quoting Wikipedia---

An illustration of an unsolved Rubik's Cube

Archimedes Plutonium Mar 11, 2026, 3:35:38 AM to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Homework: take a real light colored Rubik's cube and mark all 54 faces with a light pencil to erase later and see if you can fit Physics, Chemistry, Biology, etc. If no cube available, make sketches of the 6 faces with the sciences in each of the 54 small squares.

Archimedes Plutonium Mar2026, to Plutonium Atom Universe newsgroup.

Alright, I am momentarily stuck here and need to resolve the issue before I continue with the textbook.

I have arrived at the idea where all of philosophy, be it pragmatism or any other philosophy is a branch of Logic where Logic is split into geometry and into algebra.

When I do the logic syllogism: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore Socrates is mortal. Is composed of 2 premisses and conclusion in statement form and is ____algebraic logic____

When I do logic by these pictures--- showing a slant cut in cylinder and showing a slant cut in cone--- concluding that the cylinder is ellipse slant cut and cone is oval slant cut. I am doing Geometry Logic as seen in pictures below.

However, this causes a huge problem of determining how much is a statement/s or premiss/s be that of algebra or that of geometry????

And one can say, that every algebra statement has a mix of algebra with geometry and every geometry statement has a mix of both.

For example: Statement: Jack ran up the hill until he reached the top. Jack walked down the hill, after he reached the top.

So, in that Logic Statement, we can see there is a algebraic component, but there is also a geometry component in or minds as we form pictures of the events that occurred.

You see, my big problem here is that Old Logic saw all of logic as just "algebraic statements". While New Logic sees statements of Logic can be totally geometrical and not at all algebraic.

For example: It is dark nighttime and you turn off the light, nearby the bed. You have a few steps to walk to get to the bed. You turned off the light, but your mind geometrically remembers you have to avoid a cord and avoid a table top. And all of that is possible because the mind has a geometry picture of those next events that take place.

So here I need to spend some time on furnishing New Logic with two branches--- an algebraic and symbolic branch and then a branch that can be fully pictures and geometry. 

These 2 pictures of slant cut in cylinder and cone is Geometry Logic, as well as the pictures of the proof of Pythagorean theorem.

--- quoting Wikipedia---

--- quoting Wikipedia---

--- end quoting Wikipedia---

--- quoting Wikipedia on Pythagorean theorem proof---

--- quoting Wikipedia on Pythagorean theorem proof---

Proofs using constructed squares

Rearrangement proof of the Pythagorean theorem.
(The area of the white space remains constant throughout the translation rearrangement of the triangles. At all moments in time, the area is always c². And likewise, at all moments in time, the area is always a² + b².)

Rearrangement proofs

In one rearrangement proof, two squares are used whose sides have a measure of  and which contain four right triangles whose sides are a, b and c, with the hypotenuse being c. In the square on the right side, the triangles are placed such that the corners of the square correspond to the corners of the right angle in the triangles, forming a square in the center whose sides are length c. Each outer square has an area of (a + b)² as well as 2ab + c², with 2ab representing the total area of the four triangles. Within the big square on the left side, the four triangles are moved to form two similar rectangles with sides of length a and b. These rectangles in their new position have now delineated two new squares, one having side length a is formed in the bottom-left corner, and another square of side length b formed in the top-right corner. In this new position, this left side now has a square of area (a + b)² as well as 2ab + a² + b². Since both squares have the area of (a + b)² it follows that the other measure of the square area also equal each other such that 2ab + c² = 2ab + a² + b². With the area of the four triangles removed from both side of the equation what remains is a² + b² = c².

--- end quoting Wikipedia---

What is often left-out in the discussion of the Pythagorean Theorem is the geometry that you Need a 90degree angle.

And the importance of this theorem, linking numbers to 90 degrees if you hand me lengths 3.5, 4, 5, that it cannot form a right-triangle. It forms a triangle, but not a right-triangle.

Physics uses the Pythagorean theorem everywhere for the laws of Electromagnetism depend on the perpendicular, such as Faraday Law, and even the Light Ray where the Electric field is perpendicular to the Magnetic field.

It looks as though the video above made it through.

The idea in the above pictures-images is that many, probably most ideas come from pictures-images on paper and the visual world, but also inside our brains and minds. Our brains and mind seldom makes sentence statements of ideas.

A review of Pragmatism philosophy and where all philosophies become the geometry branch of Logic.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Reality for a Pragmatist-- facts and data, only material and eye witness facts and data. And here we have to go down to "reliable sources" if not a, on the scene seeing for oneself. Even then, there maybe a magician in the report. So a Pragmatist is very tough on what is fact and data of reality. One of the recent researches of mine is Sleep and hypnosis, and I find that no hypnosis exists, never has and never will. Because if I wanted to sleep using hypnosis, I cannot. Hence, hypnosis is not a science but a sham, a magician trick. 

(2)  Ideas and the Meaning of those Ideas, for pragmatist are tools, instruments, weapons for purposeful future action. We must include concepts and definitions as ideas and Meaning. So we have in the first two Tenets of Pragmatism, we have facts, data, definitions and concepts. Now we must put those four-- facts, data, definitions, concepts into motion, and the last two tenets of Pragmatism do just that.

(3) Wisdom, Knowledge and Education is in the _doing_ the hands on experience. For a Pragmatist, that boils down to just one word- experiment. 

(4) Truth is what  _works_ and works in the long run.  Truth for the Pragmatist is boiled down to be a "Law of Physics or Science". Because it is science laws that work in the long run. So when we speak about truth in the world, we are really talking about laws of science. 

So we can make some equations comparing mathematics to Logic.

Math = algebra numbers + geometry figures

Logic = ideas as sentence statements or symbols + ideas from pictures-images

The ideas from pictures-images is the realm of philosophy. All philosophies are subjects that are pictures-images.

Some would say that a philosophy, as Abraham Kaplan lists them-- Pragmatism, Analytic Philosophy, Existentialism, Freud and Modern Philosophy, Communism, Buddhism, Chinese Philosophy, Indian Philosophy, Zen. That after reading his book, "The New World of Philosophy", 1961 in my teenage years, I came away with the impression that philosophy was a "attitude of behavior" to living life.

Many of us know people with a "attitude" and some call it a "personality".

Some philosophies you can ascribe "tenets" to them like above of the 4 tenets of pragmatism.

But many of the philosophies listed above we cannot even ascribe tenets to them, and have to have the "feeling of the philosophy".

When we lack this ability of describing the philosophy in sentences and statements, and tenets we thus describe the philosophy in pictures and images. Such as the sitting position of meditation in Buddhism.

Many philosophies, many religions rely more on pictures-images to get ideas across rather than on sentences of words to get ideas across. "Do as I do, is the teaching".

In "Introduction to Logic" #366, I defined Logic as the science that makes ideas clear and straight and manipulates ideas to form new ideas. There I did not break down ideas into two classes--- the algebraic statement idea and now we have a second type of idea which comes from pictures-images.

So where Mathematics has this equation Math = algebra numbers + geometry figures. That Logic has this equation Logic = algebra statements + pictures-images.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Scientific Method from various sources on Internet
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Step 1-- Make observations and ask many questions.

Step 2-- Research the subject matter and Review the literature on the subject.

Step 3-- Formulate a Hypothesis of what you think is going on.

Step 4-- Conduct Experiments pertaining to your hypothesis.

Step 5-- Collect data from the experiment/s and analyze the data.

Step 6-- Draw conclusions.

Step 7-- Publish the results.

Homework: take each step and write two paragraphs for how much of that step is in algebra sentence ideas and how much is in picture-image ideas.

To help you get started, I have done Step 1-- Make observations and ask many questions.

(A) For sentence ideas in biology, I come up with few, as in the outdoors I am looking and observing and using eyesight which is pictures-images. Even a graph of biology is more geometry than word sentences. As for asking questions, then my ideas become word sentence questions.

(B) For picture-image ideas all my biology observations are picture-image, and only when I get into asking questions do word sentence ideas come forth starting with "I wonder... or What if..." If it were a different science say physics or chemistry or geology, I run into much the same.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On Sunday, March 15, 2026 at 3:05:01 AM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Intermediate LOGIC // Teaching True Logic textbook series

by Archimedes Plutonium

This is AP's #370 published book of science published on Internet, Plutonium-Atom-Universe,

PAU newsgroup is this.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe 

(snipped) 

Math = algebra numbers + geometry figures

Logic = ideas as sentence statements or symbols + ideas from pictures-images

The ideas from pictures-images is the realm of philosophy. All philosophies are subjects that are pictures-images.

Some would say that a philosophy, as Abraham Kaplan lists them-- Pragmatism, Analytic Philosophy, Existentialism, Freud and Modern Philosophy, Communism, Buddhism, Chinese Philosophy, Indian Philosophy, Zen. That after reading his book, "The New World of Philosophy", 1961 in my teenage years, I came away with the impression that philosophy was a "attitude of behavior" to living life.

Many of us know people with a "attitude" and some call it a "personality".

Some philosophies you can ascribe "tenets" to them like above of the 4 tenets of pragmatism.

4 tenets of pragmatism

-------------------------------------

(1) Reality for a Pragmatist-- facts and data, only material and eye witness facts and data. And here we have to go down to "reliable sources" if not a, on the scene seeing for oneself. Even then, there maybe a magician in the report. So a Pragmatist is very tough on what is fact and data of reality. One of the recent researches of mine is Sleep and hypnosis, and I find that no hypnosis exists, never has and never will. Because if I wanted to sleep using hypnosis, I cannot. Hence, hypnosis is not a science but a sham, a magician trick. 

(2)  Ideas and the Meaning of those Ideas, for pragmatist are tools, instruments, weapons for purposeful future action. We must include concepts and definitions as ideas and Meaning. So we have in the first two Tenets of Pragmatism, we have facts, data, definitions and concepts. Now we must put those four-- facts, data, definitions, concepts into motion, and the last two tenets of Pragmatism do just that.

(3) Wisdom, Knowledge and Education is in the _doing_ the hands on experience. For a Pragmatist, that boils down to just one word- experiment. 

(4) Truth is what  _works_ and works in the long run.  Truth for the Pragmatist is boiled down to be a "Law of Physics or Science". Because it is science laws that work in the long run. So when we speak about truth in the world, we are really talking about laws of science.  

But many of the philosophies listed above we cannot even ascribe tenets to them, and have to have the "feeling of the philosophy".

When we lack this ability of describing the philosophy in sentences and statements, and tenets we thus describe the philosophy in pictures and images. Such as the sitting position of meditation in Buddhism.

Many philosophies, many religions rely more on pictures-images to get ideas across rather than on sentences of words to get ideas across. "Do as I do, is the teaching".

In "Introduction to Logic" #366, I defined Logic as the science that makes ideas clear and straight and manipulates ideas to form new ideas. There I did not break down ideas into two classes--- the algebraic statement idea and now we have a second type of idea which comes from pictures-images.

Homework assignment:

-------------------------------------- 

Take a philosophy other than Pragmatism and read about it in various sources-- Kaplan's book "The New World of Philosophy" 1961, or Encyclopedia Britannica, other encyclopedias, or Wikipedia, or from books on philosophy and see if you can make a --- list of tenets---- on your chosen philosophy? Can you make a list of tenets of your chosen philosophy?? If not, make a list of picture-images of what your chosen philosophy represents.

In Kaplan's "The New World of Philosophy" he has these once pragmatism is removed.

Analytic Philosophy, Existentialism, Freud and Modern Philosophy, Communism, Buddhism, Chinese Philosophy, Indian Philosophy, Zen. 

Question: Can we do Christianity as a philosophy? No, it is too familar and Kaplan does not even list it as philosophy.

This homework assignment will require you to write up a 1 or 2 page paper on "tenets of your chosen philosophy, or of picture-images that embody your chosen philosophy", then require you to write another 1 or 2 page paper on relating your chosen philosophy to the "Scientific Method of 7 steps".

Scientific Method from various sources on Internet
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Step 1-- Make observations and ask many questions.

Step 2-- Research the subject matter and Review the literature on the subject.

Step 3-- Formulate a Hypothesis of what you think is going on.

Step 4-- Conduct Experiments pertaining to your hypothesis.

Step 5-- Collect data from the experiment/s and analyze the data.

Step 6-- Draw conclusions.

Step 7-- Publish the results.

I would estimate this assignment due after 2 weeks, but do not procrastinate for you have to do some reading of at least 50 pages for your chosen philosophy, then quite a bit of mental gymnastics in writing a 2 to no more than 4 page paper.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Summary on what is Logic

-----------------------------------

Logic is the science that is larger than mathematics and contains all of mathematics inside of Logic. But Logic is small compared to physics for logic is a subset of physics. Physics is the science of everything. While logic is the science that makes ideas clear, straight and manipulates ideas into making new ideas. The truth of ideas is determined not by logic but the best available science at the moment--- physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc etc. The ideas of Logic come in two forms--- they can be either word-sentence algebra form or be a picture-image geometry form and often the case is any idea is a mixture of word-sentence and picture-image.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

2) The Elements of Physics, Logic and Mathematics.

Since physics dominates the world of ideas and where Logic is a subset of physics and where mathematics in total is a subset of Logic, we should spend some time on exposing what the fundamental elements of physics, logic and mathematics are.

For Physics the base elements of that science are Atoms, and chemistry enshrines the elements in what it calls the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements.

This is a chart of the Atomic Theory, the greatest single science theory in all of human history.

Atoms are the base foundation elements of Physics.

My 5th edition, Chemistry: The Central Science, by Brown, LeMay, Bursten, goes up to element 105 Ha with 262 nucleons. But looking in Wikipedia, they go up to 118 Og with 294 nucleons.

The elements of Physics are the Atoms, one of 118 known chemical elements. The mistake and huge mistake most people make is that they see the world not composed of these 118 elements but rather see the world of atoms as swimming inside a ocean of subatomic particles such as Photon-Light-rays, protons, electrons, neutrons and many other subatomic particles. This viewpoint is a mistake.

These are all ______ subatomic particles______.

Photon-Light-rays

electrons as Muons of 105 MeV as stuck inside a hydrogen atom proton

Magnetic Monopoles of 0.5MeV

Protons as 840MeV proton toruses

Neutrons as 945MeV when fully grown

Alpha particles which are really helium atoms

Trouble with modern day physics, is few if any have logical brains or training in logic

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

When I was taking Logic in college-- 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati for my degree in mathematics, I took 2 years of Logic one taught from Introduction to Logic, Copi, and one taught from Introduction to Symbolic Logic, Thomason. I remember the thought in both classes, a lack of science in examples or even the comparison of science and math to that of logic. If I look in the index for subject matter for "physics" or for "mathematics" I find nothing in either Thomason or Copi.

But to Copi's credit on page 417, he describes how Pauli in 1930 gave a logical solution to the contradiction of the neutrino and the conservation of energy. Pauli, logically, declared a new particle.

All Old Logic textbooks are junk for the singular reason, alone, they do not recognize the role of Science as the truth giver of the basic elements of Logic---- IDEAS.

The basic Elements of Physics are the atoms, 1 of 118 known chemical atoms. And Atoms in the Atomic Theory---- All things are made up of Atoms or parts of atoms and compose the entire Universe, and the Universe itself is one of those 1 in 118 atoms--- specifically plutonium.

Now in Ancient Greek Atomic Theory though empty space makes up a vast part of the Universe, of dark empty space. But recently in my researches, we find that Microwave Photon rays make up 10^7 more than the rest-mass matter of the universe. This means, in a sense, the entire universe is a single big Plutonium Atom and the dark empty space we see, is occupied by Microwave Photon rays. In other words, every atom is full of either rest mass particles or photon radiation and _____ no dark empty space exists____.

The basic Elements of Mathematics are what?? Is there anyone in this classroom who knows the basic elements of Mathematics??? Probably not, because virtually 100% of math professors in all colleges and universities across the world do not know the basic Elements of Mathematics.

The basic elements of numbers in Math are the Decimal Grid Systems starting with 10 Grid, next 100 Grid, next 1000 Grid until we end up and reach 10^604 Grid where the infinity borderline lies.

Here are all the integer numbers of mathematics for the first 100 integers.

91, 92, 93, 94, 95 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10

00

This is the 10 Grid with a counting successor unit as .1 because you get the next number from any given number by adding .1.

9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9, 10.0 
8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9, 9.0
7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 8.0
6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7.0
5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 6.0
4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5.0
3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 4.0
2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.0
1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0

00

The 10 Grid if we ignore 0 has exactly 100 elements. How many elements would the next higher Grid, the 100 Grid have??

Homework: Write out the last 100 elements of the Decimal 100 Grid. Careful, your last number should be 100.00.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now Mathematics has two sets of Elements--- numbers for algebra and geometry figures for geometry. The two branches of elements are connected through Pythagorean Theorem and is the reason that theorem is so important in mathematics.

It is easy to list all the Number elements of math although time consuming as we list 10 Grid, 100 Grid, 1000 Grid on up to and including 10^604 Grid.

If you do not know it yet, Old Math with their Reals, rationals, irrationals, complex, imaginary and all manner of silly stupid numbers were fools and stupid idiots of mathematics. So dumb has the mathematics community become that in the year 1900, Max Planck in Germany showed the world that Physics, all of Physics obeys Quantum Mechanics. Quantum means "discrete". The Decimal Grid numbers are discrete. The Reals are of the continuum and are stupid insane numbers. The endless fools of Old Math never stood up and realized what Planck had discovered, instead, they doubled down into insanity with Cohen seeking continuums up the kazoo.

The geometry branch of Elements of Mathematics is difficult to list, for geometry figures are an enormous list of varying types. We can start off with Point, then line segment, then line out to infinity. But we have to be careful for in True Geometry because Space is Discrete, has ____ no curved line segment or line out to infinity____. A curved line is a string of small straight line segments strung together. The smaller the segments, the more the figure looks like a smooth curve.

Geometry Figure Elements

------------------------------------------

Point

Straight line segment

Straight line to infinity borderline

closed straight line figures triangle, square, rectangle, trapezoid

curved-straight line figures that are closed -- circle, ellipse, oval

many more, in fact so many more that a picture or image may contain 10^12 such geometry figures

So to my comment earlier, that while I was in college a teenager and reaching age 21-22, in logic classrooms, I noticed an absence of the sciences like physics or mathematics discussed in Logic. It is as if the subject of logic in academics had become a downtrodden feeble annoying subject that could only once in awhile open its mouth about physics and math and the other sciences.

What AP textbooks on Logic is beginning to show is that Logic dominates over math, all of math and that it is Logic, so powerful that it is tearing down vast swathes of Old Physics with their diseased nucleus of Atoms that never existed and their diseased coma of thinking Sun and stars shine from fusion, when in truth, they shine from Faraday Law.

AP logic textbooks puts Logic back in center stage of wherever science, whether it be physics on down to psychology.

No more is logic some shadow subject.... and I recommend 2 years mandatory course to get a science degree.

AP, King of Science

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Since mathematics has 2 Elements to construct it (1) numbers-algebra, (2) geometry figures, that it stands to reason that Logic, the superior set over mathematics must have 2 Elements that builds Logic and those would be (1) word-sentence-statement Ideas and (2) pictures-images as Ideas.

Then we would have to go back to Physics and ask if the Elements also come in a duality? We have in Physics the Atomic Theory where atoms are all the Elements. But, a noted earlier, atoms have subatomic particles and especially Electromagnetic Photons. These photons fill up the space all inside an atom and all the space outside of the atom/s. In other words the universe has ___ no empty space___. So the 2 Elements of Physics are (1) Atoms (2) Space which is subatomic particles such as photons that is the Space between atoms.

Now the Elements of Logic (1) word-sentence ideas (2) picture-images as ideas allows us to build a science of Psychology, plus a science of Mind-Brain, plus a science of Language. This is all possible when a science has Dualistic Elements.

Science of Psychology built from word sentence + picture-images

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All life has DNA. The geometry of DNA is a double helix. A Photon-Light is a closed circuit pencil ellipse. When we inspect a Photon it is also a double helix of E-field and B-field, which I have named "pure DNA".

|__|__]___[##]___\___/___|  one Photon segment can look like this of its E and B field

Another can look like this [__]___\___[____|_##]___|____|

These photons are composed of bits of geometry such as |__| is a bit of geometry such as a square or retangle. And one Ray of Photon-Light can inscribe an entire picture such as a photograph of you or a photograph of me.

More later....

[Archimedes Plutonium]

This is difficult, for it is self analysis.

I am looking for how much of my "thoughts-ideas" are in picture form and how much in text-word-sentence form.

Most of the night in sleep is that of Picture-image form and unable to find a single text-form. Perhaps this is the reason for the rapid-eye-motion.

I did notice that as I woke up, the first "thoughts-ideas" were the words "time?" What is the time. And apparently most science thoughts-ideas are in Question format of text. That means most of science is word-sentence-text and less so in picture-image format.

AP, King of Science

[Archimedes Plutonium]

How much of science is a enterprise of asking questions??? I would say considerable and asking questions is text-word-sentence format, not picture format.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z

26 letters alphabet with 5 vowels, 21 consonants

Safe to say that hearing and phonetics comes first before visual seeing to create text-word-sentence ideas.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On Monday, March 16, 2026 at 6:04:31 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

How much of science is a enterprise of asking questions??? I would say considerable and asking questions is text-word-sentence format, not picture format.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z

26 letters alphabet with 5 vowels, 21 consonants

Safe to say that hearing and phonetics comes first before visual seeing to create text-word-sentence ideas.

I am always curious. 

--- quoting the Internet---

Iron is pretty much a trace element in the human body (about 60 ppm); the heaviest element with a significant presence (in excess of 0.1%) is Calcium. Among elements that are at least 1 ppm and play a known biological role the heaviest is Zinc; the heaviest known to have a biological role is Iodine. 

--- end quoting the Internet---

Iron is element 26

Calcium is element 20

Zinc is element 30

Iodine is element 53

Looking up to see who has the least letters of a alphabet to form a language--- Papua New Guinea the Rotokas language gets by with only 12 letters.

I started the History of Logic textbook with the story of Neanderthals in UK some 400,000 years ago who made fire from striking flint with iron pyrite to make sparks.

By logical reasoning, they must have had a phonetic language to communicate--- Sun, fire, and thus these sparks. They must have had words for the flint rock and the iron pyrite rock. A word for striking the two upon one another.

When they spoke these words, thoughts-ideas came into the other members of the Neanderthal tribe.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, I promised that I would develop these ideas-theories.

1) the true subject of Psychology as science, a world's first

2) a theory of Mind-brain

3) theory of Memory

4) true science of Language 

5) the theory of Philosophy as a segment of Logic science

Now that looks to be a mess of various subjects and the reader probably questioning how or why on Earth would all five of those come up all at once. And the answer is, all 5 came up as I saw that pictures-images are Ideas in Logic, not just words-sentences-statements in Logic. The same as mathematics is split up into two segments of numbers-algebra and geometry figures. So too, must Logic have two compartments  --- words-sentences-statement ideas and also picture-images ideas. This duality in mathematics has a duality in Logic and ultimately the duality of quantum mechanics physics of electricity to magnetism.

So, only recently we come to realize the Logic duality of ideas as words-sentences-statement and now the picture-image idea.

When Ideas have a duality, then Old Psychology is in the weeds. When ideas have duality then Mind-brain theory can be formed. When Ideas have word to picture duality a theory of Language emerges. When the other half of Logic of pictures-images emerges then the field of Philosophy is seen as not a separate subject but as the picture image Ideas of Logic.

I have commented several times in my books that making a new theory is best served by projecting forward to an answer immediately. And then seeing if your guess fits the theory in details. It is the fastest way to develop a new theory--- guess the answer --- then research and experiment if your guess is correct.

But before I guess the above 5 new theories, let me list what I consistently know as the truth that relates to these 5 theories.

Confident Truths

--------------------------

1) Quantum Mechanics 

2) The EM Spectrum from radio to microwave to infrared to Visible to UV to X-ray to gamma ray.

3) Bell Inequality with Superdeterminism

4) Atom Totality and its control-center

5) Photon-Light are perfect DNA

6) DNA in biology is imperfect photon-light

7) All cells of biology have DNA

8) Electricity is motion, force while magnetism is space-geometry

9) The pilot-wave of DeBroglie

10) The major laws of EM theory-- New Ohm's law, Faraday law, Ampere law, Coulomb law, capacitor law

Now let me make an analogy based on observations. The Mind-brain can have at least 3 ideas simultaneously at any given moment. (1) brain controlling bodily functions on remote-pilot-automatic like breathing; (2) brain can see images of the environment via eyesight; (3) brain can be thinking abstractly, all three performed simultaneously.

Now let me build a Analogy of those 3 simultaneous ideas by saying the Mind brain is 3 TV sets simultaneously broadcasting. I live in a part of the USA where on a good day of weather I receive South Dakota PBS, Iowa PBS, and Nebraska PBS. Imagine the Mind-Brain as those 3 stations playing simultaneously.

Preliminary Guess of Psychology, Mind-brain, Memory, Language, Philosophy 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Psychology

------------------

Psychology is the science of the brain, and how it works is that the brain is a large number of cells each containing 

DNA. Thoughts-ideas enter the brain in two major ways-- through the senses such as eyes, ears, touch, smell and they are transformed into either pictures (especially eyes) or into word-sentence abstractions (especially sounds).

Axons and synapses are the transformation boxes in the brain that converts these EM signals into picture images or into word-sentence abstractions.

The brain has to storage these Ideas and it stores them in the myriad convolutions as EM rays that go round and round until called for by a EM pilot wave which triggers a memory.

But ideas can come completely from outside the body from the Plutonium Atom Totality Control Center. These EM rays enter the brain much as picking up a radio or a PBS TV station and once inside the brain can instruct every DNA inside every cell of the brain (superdeterminism). This out of body instruction can be both word-sentence or be picture-image.

Mind-brain

------------------

This is the theory that the mind-brain is a constant flow of word-sentence ideas plus picture-image ideas.

Memory

-------------

The geometry shape of the brain is such that it is a physics capacitor, much the same way that a car battery is a physics capacitor. And EM rays move round and round in this capacitor until called into use by a switching on of that memory ray.

Language

----------------

This requires two senses-- hearing phonetics and seeing eyesight. We build the alphabet from phonetics and then we memorize words that relate to an object. For example: Cat is memorized with a picture image of a house cat. The axons and synapse transform EM rays so that they are saturated full of the word "Cat" and full of picture images of cats that circulate constantly in the brain battery capacitor. When a new cat appears in our environment, a pilot wave seeks out the cat ray already in circulation. And axons and synapse then can create another photon ray to circulate with the cat ray.

The circulating rays in our brain battery have some special rays that are full of words, our own personal dictionary, mind-brain dictionary. What I am fascinated by is that when I was young I tried to learn words and their meanings in hope of using them. And only now, in old age, is it paying off in that those words seem to come forth in memory some 50 years later.

Philosophy

-----------------

It was thought that Philosophy is a separate subject from most other subjects, except perhaps religion. In Universities, philosophy is usually found in a department that has both religion and philosophy together. I contend that the picture-image Ideas of Logic (half of Logic) is philosophy itself. This is easily seen in Pragmatism being the Scientific Method-- and in turn the Scientific Method being a part of Logic as well as a part of physics.

AP, King of Science

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I do not recall the definition of death in a hospital? Is it when no more heart beat, or is it no more electrical activity of the brain? Of course the two are likely connected.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

So, now, when I get to writing my textbook on Psychology I should start out first with explaining Plutonium Atom Totality Universe and how superdeterminism causes events to take place and happen. This means all thought and ideas come from Out Of The Body that is shot into the brains of animals and forcing them to think what they think.

And the best analogy to this is the Crystal Radio set with its Faraday coil and its ferrite slide rod.

But with a radio, you get only sounds and words-sentence ideas.

To get pictures-images I need the most primitive TV set that turns Photons-Light from the broadcast station into pictures and sound on the TV.

So, I use Analogies to describe and explain Brain science, the analogy of crystal radio and of the TV set.

Looking at the Human brain and looking at a crystal radio or TV, can we say some brain parts are similar to the radio and TV. Yes, most definitely yes as the Brain is mostly these convoluted lobes shaped like the Faraday coil.

Now in the crystal radio there is a sliding ferrite rod inside the coil, and in human brain anatomy there is glial cells and neurons.

So, in forming True Psychology as a science requires me to say the brain is a TV set. The thoughts and ideas that come to the brain come mostly from outside the body from the Atom Totality Control Center. When these photons enter the brain or kidney and funnelled into the brain, they are processed for their information content and the brain has the ideas of a word-sentence or a picture-image.

AP