Download Add- In Terbilang Word 2016

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Fajar Roux

unread,
Jul 22, 2024, 10:34:32 AM7/22/24
to plunitthochre

Biasanya fungsi terbilang ini ada untuk MS Excel tapi kali ini saya akan buat di word. Fungsi Terbilang di Excel memang cukup mudah penggunaanya dan sangat berbeda ketika digunakan di MS Word walaupun untuk Scriptnya sama saja tidak ada perbedaan.

download add- in terbilang word 2016


Download File ————— https://urllie.com/2zE986



Jika kita mengalami kesulitan dalam menjalankan Fungsi terbilang dimana kita harus menekan ALT + F8 setiap kita ingin menjalankan fungsi ini. Kita bisa membuat Sortcut atau Tombol Menu untuk memudahkan kita menggunakan fungsi terbilang ini. caranya

Bagaimana klo sekarang mengaplikasikan Add In terbilang (menterjemahkan angka menjadi kata-kata ) pada Microsoft Word. Yang sudah kebanyakan dalam fungsi ini kita aplikasikan pada Excel dan cagaimana kita mengaplikasikannya pada word? Tidaklah sulit serta hampir sama penempatannya seperti pada excel yang telah saya tulis sebelumnya.

I am trying to build a word fragment completion task (see image below) so that I can run it in OSWEB. I am using the multi character method sugested by @sebastiaan -input-form-for-use-with-jatos as text_input forms don't work in OSWEB. This works very well.

This method runs a loop (get_input_loop) to collect individual inputs. The loop breaks when you hit enter. I want to imbed this loop in a higher level loop (word_frag_loop) that contains 20 word fragments. The first trial works great. The word fragment appears and text input is accepted. However, when you press enter, it breaks the get_input_loop and the experiment ends. The word_frag_loop does not loop again.

The problem lies in the position of the init item. If you open this item, you will see that it resets the response variable to an empty string. Now if you open get_input_loop, you will see that it breaks as soon as response is a return (or enter). So what happens in your experiment is that once you press enter, get_input_loop will break all subsequent iterations. The solution will be to move init to the start of the word_fragment_sequence so that the response variable is reset every time. Does that make sense?

I think it make sense. With the init item in the original place, it would not reset the response on every sunsequent loop of the word_frag_loop. When you say "once you press enter, get_input_loop will break all subsequent iterations". Does this refer to subsequent iterations of the word_frag_loop?

Not really. It will break subsequent iterations of get_input_loop, because of the break-if statement ([response] = enter or [response] = return). But word_frag_loop doesn't do much else except run get_input_loop, and therefore it de facto also skips that loop.

With the init item in the original place (i.e. start of the "word frag Task"), the response variable is reset to " " (i.e. nothing). The experiment moves onto the word_frag_loop and runs the word_frag_sequence, which then runs the get_input_loop. The get_input_loop loops round and round while multicharacter response is being collected (i.e. one loop per character). When enter/return is hit, the get_input_loop brakes and response is now set to "enter/return". At this point, does the experiemnt run another word_frag_loop, but becasue response variable has not been reset and still has a value of enter/return then when the experiemnt gets to the get_input_loop it brakes straight away and runs another word_frag_loop which then runs get_input_loop which brakes straight away and runs another word_frag_loop which then runs get_input_loop etc etc.

If you need to record 10 responses, you have to call the word_frag_sequence ten times and log the response at the very end of each iteration. So basically, for each response you want your participants to make, you need to run the entire response collection loop once.

I am using the Word Fragment Task that @Skilli has put together. When using the task on OSWeb, a '0' appears when you start typing a word (see below). Is there a reason why this is happening? How would I get this from showing up when participants begin to type?

760c119bf3
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages