Dear all,
I am trying to study free energy profiles for base flipping in a DNA+Protein system via
umbrella sampling calculations on Gromacs 2016.3 patched with PLUMED 2.4.1.
On visualizing the GRO file which comes after equilibriation (and which is used to make
the initial TPR that each window uses), I saw that part of the DNA molecule has moved out
of the PBC box. The atoms in the DNA concerning my collective variable are also coming out
of the PBC box (my system is huge, and the water box is not too big) (PFA the screenshot).
Simulations run using TPR generated from this GRO file have resulted in profiles that are
most likely, incorrect (scatter data from production runs is far from the minima obtained
in the PMF).
Q1) To make sure that the PLUMED calculations start with the entire system inside the PBC
box, should I apply the trjconv command to the equilibriation GRO file, and use `-pbc mol`
and `-pbc nojump` in succession to bring the part of the DNA that went outside the box
back inside it. This file will then be used to generate the initial tpr.
Q2) In the PLUMED config file where I apply my restraints, I use the command
`WHOLEMOLECULE ENTITY0:<range of all dna+protein atoms>`, which as per my understanding,
handles PBC for PLUMED calculations of the CVs. Does this conflict with the PBC treatment
that GROMACS uses?
My CVs are angular in nature (bias applied over 2 dihedrals). The protocol for umbrella
sampling was as follows:
- equilibriate system well (total 5ns of nvt + npt runs)
- use the gro file generated above to make initial tpr, which is used by each umbrella
sampling window
- restraints/bias is defined in plumed data files passed to mdrun with -plumed flag
- run wham on plumed generated colvars to build pmf