Dear,
I performed a well-tempered metadynamics calculation with two CVs, whose plumed.dat content is described below.
__________________________________________________
WHOLEMOLECULES ENTITY0=1-16000 ENTITY1=38054-38062
lig_1: COM NOPBC ATOMS=38054-38062
d1: ZANGLES ATOMS1=38054,38059 MEAN
cos_theta: MATHEVAL ARG=d1.mean FUNC=cos(x) PERIODIC=NO
mem: COM NOPBC ATOMS=11-15886:125
CV1: DISTANCE ATOMS=lig_1,mem SCALED_COMPONENTS
m: METAD ...
ARG=CV1.c,cos_theta
SIGMA=0.05,0.1
HEIGHT=0.28
BIASFACTOR=10
PACE=500
TEMP=310
GRID_MIN=-0.5,-1.0
GRID_MAX=+0.5,+1.0
GRID_BIN=200,200
CALC_RCT
RCT_USTRIDE=125
... m:
PRINT ARG=CV1.c,cos_theta,d1.mean,m.bias,m.rbias STRIDE=500 FILE=COLVAR
__________________________________________________
I carried out a reweighting considering only CV1 and obtained a 1D FES plot. The content of reweight.dat is shown below:
__________________________________________________
CV1: READ FILE=COLVAR IGNORE_TIME VALUES=CV1.c IGNORE_FORCES
m: READ FILE=COLVAR IGNORE_TIME VALUES=m.rbias IGNORE_FORCES
weights: REWEIGHT_METAD TEMP=310 ARG=m.rbias
hhcv1: HISTOGRAM ARG=CV1.c STRIDE=50 GRID_MIN=-0.5 GRID_MAX=+0.5 GRID_BIN=200 BANDWIDTH=0.005 LOGWEIGHTS=weights
ffcv: CONVERT_TO_FES GRID=hhcv1
DUMPGRID GRID=ffcv FILE=ffcv1.dat
PRINT ARG=CV1.c,weights STRIDE=1 FILE=COLVAR_reweight
__________________________________________________
Does this procedure of reweighting with respect to only one CV make sense, even though the metadynamics was run using two CVs?
Best regards,
Mariana Yoshinaga