> I am looking for peer review paper to support the
suggestion that multicollinearity test is not appropriate for reflective
measurement model.
Testing for multicollinearity among latent variables (LVs) is VERY important, whether the measurement approach used is reflective or formative.
Moreover, it is important to conduct a test that identifies both vertical and lateral collinearity among LVs.
In WarpPLS this is done through the calculation of full collinearity variance inflation factors (VIFs), which can also be used to identify common method bias.
Of course I am talking about multicollinearity among LVs, not among the indicators of a reflectively measured LV. The latter are in fact expected to be redundant if psychometrically sound measures are used.
I hope that the materials linked below can be of use in connection with this.
Kock, N., & Lynn, G.S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580.
http://www.scriptwarp.com/warppls/pubs/Kock_Lynn_2012.pdf
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B76EXfrQqs3hYlZhTWdWcXRockU/view
User Manual (link to specific page):
http://www.scriptwarp.com/warppls/UserManual_v_5_0.pdf#page=66
Solve Collinearity Problems in WarpPLS (video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avPWO324E0g
The links above, as well as other links that may be relevant in this context, are available from: