Problems data analysis Warp PLS-SEM

[Lonneke Oosterbaan]

Hello everyone,

I have to use PLS-SEM to analyze the data for my master thesis, but I am experiencing some problems. First of all, I have two conditions that I
want to compare. When I drew my conceptual model in Warp, it showed that there was a significant relationship between the variable condition and the variable presence.However, because I have two conditions I didn't know which condition of the two was significant.

That is why I decided to do two separate analyses, one for each condition. By doing this, I wasn't able to choose the latent variable ‘condition' anymore to include in my conceptual model (I think because all values were the same, because I only included people that were in this condition). So then I drew my statistical model without the condition variable but the problem with that is that I want to compare different methodologies to measure one of 
my variables (information processing). I want to know if people have applied a heuristic or systematic processing mode after the experiment, 
and I measured this using a thought listing technique, with self-reported measures and with Mousetracker software. What I want to investigate is if people in condition 1 engaged more in heuristic processing than people in condition 2, and if people in condition 2 engaged more in systematic processing.

What seems to be the problem for me is that I cannot include the Mousetracker data as an indicator in both the systematic and heuristic 
processing variable, so I do not know how I can find out if the MouseTracker data significantly correlates with the thought listing 
technique and/or with the self-reported measures.

Hopefully someone will be able to help me, and if you need more information please do not hesitate to ask.

Best regards,
Lonneke

[Ned Kock]

Did you use a dummy variable, as in the post linked below?

http://warppls.blogspot.com/2010/02/how-do-i-control-for-effects-of-one-or.html

On Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 12:28:06 PM UTC-6 l.h.c.oo...@tilburguniversity.edu wrote:

Hello everyone,

I have to use PLS-SEM to analyze the data for my master thesis, but I am experiencing some problems. First of all, I have two conditions that I
want to compare. When I drew my conceptual model in Warp, it showed that there was a significant relationship between the variable condition and the variable presence.However, because I have two conditions I didn't know which condition of the two was significant.

[...]

[Lonneke Oosterbaan]

Dear Mr. Kock,

I did but can I see anywhere which group or condition in my case is responsible for the significant effect?

Best regards,

Lonneke

Op 5 jan. 2021 om 23:22 heeft Ned Kock <ned...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:

Did you use a dummy variable, as in the post linked below?

--
Join us at the PLS Applications Symposium: http://plsas.net
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PLS-SEM" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pls-sem+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pls-sem/9a3f7652-c3fc-4b0f-b998-d411670af1a1n%40googlegroups.com.

[Ned Kock]

The interpretation should be based on the values assigned (e.g., 0 and 1) and the path coefficients involving the variable.

The link below should be helpful in connection with this:

https://www.scriptwarp.com/warppls/pubs/Kock_2013_IJeC_OneGroupOneCondition.pdf

For more on this and other PLS-SEM-related topics, please visit:

https://warppls.com

 

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:47 AM 'Lonneke Oosterbaan' via PLS-SEM <pls...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Kock,

I did but can I see anywhere which group or condition in my case is responsible for the significant effect?

Best regards,

Lonneke

[...]