Re: Actually, Blizkost may be useful

[David Fetter]

This from one of the people who showed up at the SFPUG meeting last
night :)

Cheers,
David.

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:19:35AM -0700, yary wrote:
> HI David,
>
> I was thinking that Blizkost is not necessarily a "dead end" as a PL,
> even though it doesn't generate PIR or a pbc. Since it is the glue
> between Parrot and a perl5 interpreter, it could presumably also be
> the glue between Parrot and PL/Perl(U),, so any PL/Parrot could call
> to PL/Perl.
>
> At the moment Blizkost is limited, in fact the only thing that's
> working right now is calling p5:eval from parrot- there's no other
> data, subroutine sharing.
>
> Too busy to volunteer, just sharing a thought.
>
> -y

--
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david....@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

[Jonathan Leto]

Howdy,

Some good points, but Blizkost has been active lately and more than
eval is working now. Thoughts on making Blizkost and PL/Parrot talk to
each other?

Duke

--
Jonathan "Duke" Leto
jona...@leto.net
http://leto.net