I think that you are anticipating the nature of my solution almost
completely correctly. However, the IDE side of my template solution is
pretty well set, so I cannot match just anything like Django on the
first release. In the future it will be possible to add wider parsing
support to the IDE side of the template system.
Yes, Java code will be generated which can be inspected and a class
loader will be added in the future to skip the code generation step.
Razor looks interesting. The code generator of my template system will
allow for definable parser tokens. Razor makes me think that a
valuable set of tokens might be one that enters with a single
character like @ and ends with the end of line (or word) or a { and
reenters and closes with a }. That is a neat trick that really cuts
down on the extra control characters. However, it would take time to
add support to IDEs and supporting all IDEs is my primary goal.
Thanks,
McKinley
On Mar 10, 10:49 pm, Christian Jensen <
christ...@jensenbox.com> wrote:
> That is great news!
>
> If I may - my $0.02
>
> If you use the Django templating system, you can migrate Django users like
> me over much faster. I hate the speed of Python and that is what led me to
> Play!
>