Big news today as Stardust released its proprietary information - at least some of their information - regarding the nature of the particles that they are testing.
According to the New York Times article linked to below the response from people like David Keith seems to be fairly positive so far. If I remember correctly he was extremely skeptical and critical that Stardust would be able to come up with particles that would be as advantageous as the particles that are now being considered for use in SAI. It appears that he may have been premature in reaching that conclusion.
My own view as I’ve expressed before Is that Stardust is performing an absolutely essential role in shaking up a sector that has been dominated by the very conservative cautious and much too slow culture of universities.
Ideally it would be a number of national governments that would be aggressively taking the lead with universities and similar institutions playing an essential research role in support of national governments.
In the absence of any national government being aggressive as necessary, despite all the grumbling from the research and Civic NGO Community Stardust appears to be just the spark and the catalyst to substantially accelerate action.
Any analysis of the particles from our scientists would be really useful to hear.
Herb
Herb Simmens
Author of A Climate Vocabulary of the Future
HerbSimmens.com