nikhil vatsa
unread,Apr 6, 2010, 5:22:15 PM4/6/10Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to placemen...@googlegroups.com
Well, I completely agree with Sarmaji on this one. We should not forget the electronics part of our branch and should resist from giving over-attention to the instrumentation part(which is not to say that we abandon it). What I am trying is to say that, we should channelize our efforts in bringing more semiconductor-based and electronics based companies in general. Lets not get too carried away with the short term prospects . Don't you think that the previous batches have got placed in to categories of companies ,ie, one which brackets instrumentation and the other communication. We seriously lack in focusing on core electronics companies which i think should have been more sought after. What I suggest is that, don't separate both branches ,rather keep them together while highlighting the differentiating syllabi of these two streams . Also, Ashish try to highlight the open electives in this brochures as this is a new addition to the curriculum and many companies like this concept. We should even focus on communication based companies because both branches have read courses like EMT which is traditionally not an instrumentation subject and is generally taught to communication guys. Going by previous trends ,its safe to say that almost all of us will be
placed in various instrumentation based industrial organizations.So, lets make our honest efforts in securing more challenging and better jobs in core electronics and communication based companies.
Cheers