Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Darmowa energia z Takamaku w kuchence mikrofalowej

25 views
Skip to first unread message

a a

unread,
Feb 2, 2023, 9:02:21 AM2/2/23
to
Każdy może zbudować sferyczny Takamak w kuchence mikrofalowej

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER

A wszystko się zaczęło od przewiercania kuchenki i doprowadzenia zasilania do silnych elektromagnesów, generujących torroidalne pole magnetyczne

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_tokamak

Mikrofalową plazme latwo wytworzyc w kuchence, a nastepnie silne pole magnetyczne ksztaltuje chmurę plazmy torroidalnie lub sferycznie

Wcześniej pokazywałem kilka filmików z youtube, jak utworzyć koło z plazmy

Dlatego Takamak, bo to wersja mini.

Od dzisiaj kuchenka mikrofalowa to podstawowe akcesorium każdego laboratorium.

W czasie przerwy sniadaniowej, wykorzystywana do podgrzewania zupy, a potem już tylko darmowa energia, do końca świata.

Kuchenke możn a umieścić w komorze próżniowej i regulować zjawisko podciśnieniem.

A koszta sprzętu kieszonkowe + wlasna praca

Nalezy pamietac o ochronie zdrowia, bo kuchenka to duża moc mikrofal.

a a

unread,
Feb 2, 2023, 9:09:18 AM2/2/23
to
"Energy balance

Ideally, the energy needed to heat the fuel would be made up by the energy released from the reactions, keeping the cycle going. Anything over and above this amount could be used for power generation. This leads to the concept of the Lawson criterion, which delineates the conditions needed to produce net power.[3]

When the fusion fuel is heated, it will naturally lose energy through a number of processes. These are generally related to radiating terms like blackbody radiation, and conduction terms, where the physical interaction with the surrounding carries energy out of the plasma. The resulting energy balance for any fusion power device, using a hot plasma, is shown below.

P net = η capture ( P fusion − P conduction − P radiation ) {\displaystyle P_{\text{net}}=\eta _{\text{capture}}\left(P_{\text{fusion}}-P_{\text{conduction}}-P_{\text{radiation}}\right)} P_{\text{net}}=\eta _{\text{capture}}\left(P_{\text{fusion}}-P_{\text{conduction}}-P_{\text{radiation}}\right)

where:

P net {\displaystyle P_{\text{net}}} {\displaystyle P_{\text{net}}}, is the net power out
η capture {\displaystyle \eta _{\text{capture}}} {\displaystyle \eta _{\text{capture}}}, is the efficiency with which the plant captures energy, say through a steam turbine, and any power used to run the reactor
P fusion {\displaystyle P_{\text{fusion}}} P_{\text{fusion}}, is the power generated by fusion reactions, basically a function of the rate of reactions
P conduction {\displaystyle P_{\text{conduction}}} {\displaystyle P_{\text{conduction}}}, is the power lost through conduction to the reactor body
P radiation {\displaystyle P_{\text{radiation}}} {\displaystyle P_{\text{radiation}}}, is the power lost as light, leaving the plasma, typically through gamma radiation

To achieve net power, a device must be built which optimizes this equation. Fusion research has traditionally focused on increasing the first P term: the fusion rate. This has led to a variety of machines that operate at ever higher temperatures and attempt to maintain the resulting plasma in a stable state long enough to meet the desired triple product. However, it is also essential to maximize the η for practical reasons, and in the case of a MFE reactor, that generally means increasing the efficiency of the confinement system, notably the energy used in the magnets.
Beta number

A measure of success across the magnetic fusion energy world is the beta number. Every machine containing plasma magnetically, can be compared using this number.

β = p p m a g = n k B T ( B 2 / 2 μ 0 ) {\displaystyle \beta ={\frac {p}{p_{mag}}}={\frac {nk_{B}T}{(B^{2}/2\mu _{0})}}} \beta ={\frac {p}{p_{mag}}}={\frac {nk_{B}T}{(B^{2}/2\mu _{0})}}[4]

This is the ratio of the plasma pressure to the magnetic field pressure.[4][5] Improving beta means that you need to use, in relative terms, less energy to generate the magnetic fields for any given plasma pressure (or density). The price of magnets scales roughly with β½, so reactors operating at higher betas are less expensive for any given level of confinement. Conventional tokamaks operate at relatively low betas, the record being just over 12%, but various calculations show that practical designs would need to operate as high as 20%.[6]
Aspect ratio
The limiting factor in reducing[clarification needed] beta is the size of the magnets.[citation needed] Tokamaks use a series of ring-shaped magnets around the confinement area, and their physical dimensions mean that the hole in the middle of the torus can be reduced only so much before the magnet windings are touching. This limits the aspect ratio, A = R / a {\displaystyle A=R/a} {\displaystyle A=R/a}, of the reactor to about 2.5; the diameter of the reactor as a whole could be about 2.5 times the cross-sectional diameter of the confinement area. Some experimental designs were slightly under this limit, while many reactors had much higher A.

a a

unread,
Feb 2, 2023, 5:56:16 PM2/2/23
to
Microwave Spherical Tokamak (MST - SM, TM)
0 new messages