PEDOPHILIA = ZYD/Ivrai TALMUD'S Vile SECRET= Pedofilia w talmudzie

[Vechniy Zyd]

PEDOPHILIA:ZYD TALMUD'S DIRTY SECRET=Pedofilia w talmudzie

Pedofilia w talmudzie = ZYDS!

On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:14:00 -0500, in soc.culture.polish
"Szuja Inkowska" <szuja@inkowska> wrote:

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html


No such thing exists in Islam. It exists in the Jewish Holy book,
go to the link for copies from the Jewish Holy book or buy it
and check it yourself.

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html

PEDOPHILIA: THE TALMUD'S DIRTY SECRET

By Rev. Ted Pike
11 Oct 06

For nearly a century, the Jewish-dominated Hollywood film industry and
big media have conspicuously influenced Christian America away from
Biblical morals and values. (See, "Jews Confirm Big Media Is Jewish")

Yet, with the hippie rebellion of the early sixties, the Jewish media
found exponential opportunities to hasten America’s moral decline.
Encouraging drugs and pornography it persuaded America that "free
love" and living together outside of marriage were socially
acceptable. With astonishing rapidity the movie, TV, and print media
helped produce a generation of sexual libertines. By the end of the
sixties, it hastened the sexual revolution to its next stage,
homosexuality.

Now, more than 40 years later, even homosexuality has lost its
attraction to many children and grandchildren of the hippie
generation.
Pedophilia (sex with little boys and girls along with child
pornography) is the latest underground obsession sweeping America
and the world.

Last fall, I alerted the nation to the power of the pedophile lobby in
Congress; Sen. Edward Kennedy, long backed by homosexuals in
support of the federal anti-hate bill, betrayed them to favor the
evidently more powerful and rewarding pedophiles.
(See "How Kennedy and His Pedophiles Weakened the Child Safety Bill")

Rotten Roots

What kind of moral foundations do Jews of the media rest upon, that
they could consciously ignite and fan the flames of a sexual inferno
that continues to ravage our once Christian society?

Virtually all the media moguls who founded Hollywood and the big three
TV networks were immigrants, or their children, from predominantly
orthodox Jewish communities in Eastern Europe.

In the late 19th century, most European Jews were a people of the
book.
But their book wasn’t the Bible. It was the Babylonian Talmud.
To this day, the Talmud remains Judaism’s highest moral, ethical
and legal authority.

Does the Talmud share Christianity's foundation of wholesome moral
values?
Hardly. Instead, the Talmud is the sleazy substrata of a religious
system gone terribly astray; it is that code of Pharisaic unbelief
Christ described as "full of all uncleanness" (Matt. 23:27).
Shockingly, Judaism’s most revered authority actually endorses such
sins aslying, oath-breaking, and indirect murder. And it even
sanctions one of the greatest sins of all: child molestation.

Three Year Old Brides

When Christ accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s
spiritual children, He fully realized what they were capable of.
Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very
greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned
pedophilia—permitting molestation of baby girls even younger than
three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three
years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” 1

Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of
pedophilia as "halakah," or binding Jewish law. 2

Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews?
Hardly.
Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of
thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather
annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.

References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy
considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are
enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work,
Treatise Sanhedrin.

The Pharisees Endorsed Child Sex

The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting,
and quibbling debates.
But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year
old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of
dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear
passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well!
It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty
silences debate.

Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so
renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly
emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the
Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest
criticism. They only comment:
“Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” 3

In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic
rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai's endorsement of pedophilia:
"How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R.
Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the
marriage of the young proselyte?" 4

Out of Babylon

It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that
Judaism's leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia.
Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world.
For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished
within it.

As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man's
religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes.
Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared
whether a rabbi married a three year old girl.

But with expulsion of the Jews in the 11th century AD, mostly to
western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia
abruptly ended.

Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the
transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their
Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages
to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated
their vile practice.

Sex with a “Minor” Permitted

What exactly did these sages say?

The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine
years was not a “man” (See, "Judaism and Homosexuality: A Marriage
Made in Hell")
Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with
a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22)

One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested
her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that
the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real
connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not." 5

Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can't "throw guilt" on
the active offender, morally or legally. 6

A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even
being raised: "…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a
sexual act." 7

The Talmud also says, "A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits
with his deceased brother's wife acquires her (as wife)." 8

Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and
have sex with a nine year old boy.

Sex at Three Years and One Day

In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai's dictum that sex with a little girl
is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the
Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third
birthday.
She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape.

R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day
may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s
brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. (Sanh. 55b)

A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by
cohabitation. . . .(Yeb. 57b)

A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by
coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she
becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)

It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under the
age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it
is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying
with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the
footnote says) surely was with them.(Yeb. 60b)

[The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] . . . fit
for cohabitation. . .
But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it
must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for
cohabitation. (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)

The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin
of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants
are "fit for cohabitation."

The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year
old boy is "not a sexual act" and cannot "throw guilt" upon her
because the little boy is not truly a "man.” 9

But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged
three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women," sexually
mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of
marriage.

The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the
rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for
marriage.
"At nine years a male attains sexual matureness…
The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three."

No Rights for Child Victims

The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested
children.
To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until
she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution.
She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and
she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes
of age. “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not
protest she cannot protest any more.” 10

The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the
possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and
spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen - an unthinkable
blasphemy!
But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence,
for, "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is
nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day)
it is as if one put the finger into the eye." The footnote says that
as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back
to the little girl under three years.” 11

In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female
victims of pedophilia.
Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud's amazing moral
advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts
favorably with "primitive" societies where the child would have been
stoned along with the adult perpetrator.

Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the
innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more
importantly, the pedophile.
They stripped a little boy of his right to "throw guilt" on his
assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus
providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the
Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.

Pedophilia Widespread

Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism. This is
illustrated from Yeb. 60b:

There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of
whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who
conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who
was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi
declared her eligible to live with a priest.

The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi
simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding
“halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai,
“A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is
permitted to marry a priest.” 12

These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b
confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not
permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on her marital
intercourse in the usual manner.”

In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his
children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting
curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure to have married off
one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says,
is as bad as one who “returns a lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) -
a deed for which “the Lord will not spare him.” 13

This passage says: “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children
whilst minors.”

The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were
sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such
child abuse, definitely practiced in the second century, continued, at
least in Babylon, for another 900 years.

A Fascination with Sex

Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent
preoccupation with sex, especially by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens
of illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the
Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.

The rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they
preached.
Yet to this hour,their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored
by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual
lights the world has ever known. A member of the earliest
"Tannaim," rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries
more authority to observant Jews than Moses.

Today, the Talmud’s outspoken pedophiles and child-rape advocates
would doubtlessly spend hard time in prison for child molestation. Yet
here is what the eminent Jewish scholar,Dagobert Runes (who is fully
aware of all these passages), says about such “dirty old men”
and their perverted teachings:

There is no truth whatever in Christian and other strictures against
the Pharisees,who represented the finest traditions of their people
and of human morals. 14

Aren’t Christ’s words more appropriate?

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are
within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye
also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of
hypocrisy and iniquity. (Matthew 23:27, 28.)

(Adapted from Ted Pike's book, Israel: Our Duty, Our Dilemma)

Endnotes:

1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
3 Sanhedrin 76a.
4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls
under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.
5 Sanhedrin 69b.
6 Sanhedrin 55a.
7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
8 Sanhedrin 55b.
9 Sanhedrin 55a.
10 Kethuboth 11a.
11 Kethuboth 11b.
12 Yebamoth 60b.
13 Sanhedrin 76b.
14 Dagobert Runes, A Concise Dictionary of Judaism, New York, 1959.

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html

Pedofilia w talmudzie

No wonder decent Christians really dislike the Christkiller ZYDS!


For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Or, other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE - www.zundelsite.org
IHR - www.ihr.org
Stormfront - http://www.stormfront.org
OSTARA - www.ostara.org
PAMYAT - http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
AL JAZEERA - http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage


Reply-To: Steve Horn -
Steven Craig Horn
aka KCOM aka Caduceus
1836 NW 11th St
Oklahoma City, OK 73106
(405) 524-0576
sh...@spamcop.net
kc...@breakthru.com
kc...@hushmail.com
kc...@earthlink.net

or KenM...@vex.net
Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Ken McVay invites callers,and visitors,to his homosexuals escorts
office: VISIT at:
#5 - 1601 - Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
Apt. 3108 - 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada
or call: 1-250-616-9431


Grosvenor may be gone - RIP - but his spirit lives on.
Now his work is being carried on by supporters around the world,
so that people may know about the problems of ZYDS.


Watch the filthy Christkillers and their disgusting shabbas-goy refuse
to answer the facts in the article.

Notice how parasitic criminals including diseased AIDS-spreaders,
drug dealers and child molesters, and Madoff type swindlers,
all refuse to answer facts detailed.

They are so delusional, from using illegal drugs and AIDS,
that whenever they see an article which they dislike, they blame
it on a grosvenor.

So, these vermin forge and fabricate articles, claiming that a nemesis
happily retired in muslim S. Philippines is haunting them.

[Vechniy Zyd]

[CUNTICA]

[CUNTICA]

[CUNTICA]