Is this possible, or is this one to add to the list of desired
features (and how can I work around it in the time being) ?
Thanks
How variable does this need to be? Would there be a set of possible
options, or would you be typing in colors on the fly / using a color
picker / etc?
Usually page templates are the right way to do this kind of thing.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pkcontextcms" group.
> To post to this group, send email to pkcont...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pkcontextcms...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pkcontextcms?hl=en.
>
>
--
Tom Boutell
P'unk Avenue
215 755 1330
punkave.com
window.punkave.com
It seems to me that it would be simpler and more stylistically
integrated to choose from a coordinated set of classes than to define
all the style attributes one by one in the UI. I'm mainly thinking of
attributes such as border, background-image and background-color, but
it can include others of course.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/pkcontextcms?hl=en.
We haven't yet decided whether you'll be able to change the variant
for an existing slot, notably including a standalone slot that is not
part of an area. That has advantages.
Two issues we're considering are the extra UI (where are we going to
put this selector? What will it look like?) and the possibility that
not all variants will be convertible to one another (I'm thinking we
should simply forbid that as bad practice - if it's so radically
different that it can't accept data originally intended for another
variant, make a new slot class).
Designing a feature and its interface is not a small issue around
here. Apostrophe is good because it is design-driven, not
developer-driven. The latter gets you Drupal. (:
But it's clear from the discussion on this list, and from questions
that have come up here in the office, that we really do need variants
and that they solve a number of common problems well.
I'm inclined to introduce variants sooner rather than later because
with our impending Great Renaming of the plugins there is a natural
opportunity to introduce a new column in the slots table with no
additional aggravation.
In general the purpose of variants is to get a variety of behavior
from a single slot type in ways that don't complicate the
implementation of the slot very much. Really big differences are
better served by creating a new slot class.
This discussion definitely is pushing us to try to get it down sooner.
Geoff
--
Geoff DiMasi
P'unk Avenue
215 755 1330
I think the tools offered by fckeditor are quite usable, although you
have to be careful with svn update with fck's config file being part
of the external.
On Jan 23, 3:10 am, Geoff DiMasi <ge...@punkave.com> wrote:
> I think it is worth pointing out that we did open a ticket for this very issue last week on the Apostrophe Trac:http://trac.apostrophenow.org/ticket/18
>
> This discussion definitely is pushing us to try to get it down sooner.
>
> Geoff
>
> --
> Geoff DiMasi
> P'unk Avenue
> 215 755 1330http://punkave.com
On Jan 24, 2:36 pm, Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> wrote:
> The FCK styles menu might be something to allow in a rich text slot,
> but we're talking about styling the outermost container of the slot
> itself. For instance, if I want one particular video slot in an area
> to be aligned left, I can't currently do that.
>
> ...
>
> read more »
One problem is that as things stand you'd have to reconfigure our rich
text HTML filter to allow the proper styles to be specified freely,
which could have negative consequences as well. We prefer to keep rich
text simple and enhance slots to express more complex things without
the risk of trashing the layout etc.
It puts that control at the hands of the web admin which probably isnt
a good thing, so I offer it as a temporary solution without
disagreeing with anything already said!
On Jan 24, 11:53 pm, Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> wrote:
> That would style the text inside the div, not the div itself. I
> suspect that wouldn't be enough, but perhaps it would.
>
> One problem is that as things stand you'd have to reconfigure our rich
> text HTML filter to allow the proper styles to be specified freely,
> which could have negative consequences as well. We prefer to keep rich
> text simple and enhance slots to express more complex things without
> the risk of trashing the layout etc.
>
> ...
>
> read more »