LPCXpresso v 7.6.2

306 views
Skip to first unread message

rhllr...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 8, 2015, 8:54:17 AM7/8/15
to pixy_fir...@googlegroups.com
Hi Rich,

I'm still testing: here are my results so far:

Text Machines
A) Samsung Netbook, Intel Atom, Windows 7 starter
B) Sony VGC-LV1S, Intel Core 2 Duo, Windows Vista pro
C) Dell Latitude E7240, Core i5, Windows 8.1

LPCXpresso Versions
7.8.0_426 (latest version)
7.6.2_326

Tests:
2. Run pre-existing make file in Device folder

Results

On machine A with v7.8.0 both tests built successfully and created hex files around 307K in size.  However, when deployed to the pixy I got the invalid address range error and tried quite a few things to try to resolve.  I figured it might be a linking issue. I have done a lot of dev on that machine and have versions of Cygwin and mingw and generally all sorts of stuff in the PATH..

I hadn't seen the other forum comment about versions but discovered you were on v7.6.2 from doing a GIT diff

On machine B with v7.6.2 I got a working hex file.

Replacing the version on on machine A with v7.6.2 and I got a working hex file from both tests.  Great!  

I did some comparison between the 2 versions.  The noticeable difference is that the 7.8.0 hex file lines start :10800 rather than :10000.  I.e.

:020000041001E9
:108000000000000000000000000000000000000070
:108010000000000000000000000000000000000060
:108020000000000000000000000000000000000050

rather than

:020000041400E6
:1000000000800020CD010014910100149301001420
:1000100095010014970100149901001400000000DC
:100020000000000000000000000000009B01001420

The build steps seemed to produce different results in the main_m0 project - the rest looked the same.

The cool thing is that it is working for me now on 7.6.2.  So it's worth updating the instructions here:
to specify 7.6.2 or add a GitHub readme.  I'm going to put in a couple more hours testing before cracking on with my project.  Happy to contribute directly to instructions or have a go at resolving on v7.8.0.  Whatever you think adds most value?

Thanks for all the effort you've put into this.

Rich 

Rich LeGrand

unread,
Jul 8, 2015, 10:01:06 AM7/8/15
to rhllr...@gmail.com, pixy_fir...@googlegroups.com
Hi Rich, 
Excellent info-- thanks!!   I just updated the readme doc.  

I suspect the regression has to do with this issue:


I just posted a follow-up to see if we can get some clues on how to fix.  They are pretty good about answering questions.

thanks!
--rich 



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pixy_firmware_sdk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pixy_firmware_...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pixy_fir...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pixy_firmware_sdk/da732b7a-a049-4e4b-b0d2-0c967be5949d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages