Author Block:
D. G. Kaurin1,2, E. Marshall1,2, M. M. Zaini1,3, M. A. Lavilla2, L. E. Sweeney1,2, S. Mahendra1,2,1
Northwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, WA, 2Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, 3Skagit ValleyHospital Regional Cancer Center, Mount Vernon, WA
Abstract:
Purpose/Objective(s):
Our institution has two accelerators that are beam matched, one having a kevlar couchand the other carbon-fiber. We were concerned about couch attenuation for volume modulated arc therapy
(VMAT), as well as being able to switch patients to either unit without replanning. The couches were
characterized dosimetrically to determine if the couches needed to be included in the treatment plan, and if
patients could be treated on either couch without additional planning.
Materials/Methods:
Attenuation measurements of both couches were made by positioning an ion chamber with buildup cap on top of
the couch and measuring transmission of a 5cmx5cm beam at ten different posterior gantry angles (PA and then
every 10 degees up to 10 degrees below the horizontal) for 6MV and 10MV energies, relative to an unattenuated
beam.
Both couches were CT’d and imported into the treatment planning system (TPS). Attenuation measurements
were simulated in the TPS. The couches were contoured as shells of varying thickness and density, with air in the
middle of the couch, as the recommended TPS air threshold density for the entire couch attenuated the beam too
much. We had good measurement agreement for a kevlar couch model shell of 3-mm-thickness, and the carbonfiber
model shell of 4-mm-thickness, both with 0.65g/cc density. Both couches were stored in the TPS organ
model library.
To validate the couch models, five prostate patients (two 6MV, three 10MV cases) with test VMAT plans were
copied onto a cylindrical phantom with a central 0.13cc ion chamber and also a rectangular phantom with a 2-
demonsional diode array in a sagittal orientation. Doses and fluences were calculated for both phantoms, both
couches and no couch (30 plans); and measured (20 measurements).
Results:
Ion chamber results comparing the phantom plan with and without the couch gave a 1% improvement in
measured-to-calculated values. Planar fluences were evaluated using absolute dose with 3% in 3mm gamma
criteria, with comparisons between the phantom plan with and without the couch showing no improvement in
measured-to-calculated values (agreement range/average: 93.7-100/98.51% with couch, 97.2-100/99.1% no
couch). To further investigate the planar doses, calculated planar doses between the kevlar and carbon-fiber
couches were compared to each other; with differences only noticeable using a criteria of 1% in 1mm gamma
(agreement range/average: 92.1-100/97.1%).
Conclusions: Prostate patient treatment plans may benefit about1% with inclusion of the treatment couch. It will be fine clinically for patients to be treated using the couch they
were not planned with for several fractions. These results may not be applicable for other disease-sites that have
more of a posterior-beam component.
This electronic message transmission contains information which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please leave a message via telephone at (206) 624-1159, notify me by electronic reply, and delete this message. Opinions and ideas in this message that do not relate to official business are understood as neither given nor endorsed by the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance. To view our complete Notice of Privacy Practices, visit our web site at www.seattlecca.org.
-A.
I am going through the process of modelling the iBeam Evo carbon fiber couch in Pinnacle. In the very near future I won’t be able to get a CT scan study of the couch. I am asking to myself if it would make sense to ask for a “.roi” file for this type of couch that I could just import, being aware of the fact that densities should be measured or at least verify on site.
We are no treating patients, just going through the process of understanding Pinnacle modelling and the impact that the variation of different parameters have in clinical IMRT plans, by means of delivering the plans to a Phantom-2D Array system and performing Gamma Analysis against the RTDoses.
Any advice will be much appreciated
Ileana
There are plenty of ways (and opinions) on how to best do this. In the absence of a CT scan, I am old enough to remember how to use solder wire and a digitizer, so that is how I contoured my first (Novalis) couch. Maybe someone in this group would be kind enough to share with you a CT scan of their couch in question. Both a single contour and a shell would do the trick for attenuation, however we found that the shell typically works better because you don’t need to drop the air density threshold too low to cause problems.
-VF
Vladimir Feygelman, PhD
Associate Member, Radiation Oncology
tel: (813) 745-2757 | fax: (813) 745-7231 | email: vladimir....@moffitt.org
From: pinnacl...@googlegroups.com [mailto:pinnacl...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ileana
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:41 AM
To: pinnacl...@googlegroups.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "pinnacle3-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
pinnacl...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send email to
pinnacle3-us...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pinnacle3-use...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pinnacle3-users?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pinnacle3-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
pinnacle3-use...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:41 AM
Subject: [p3rtp] Re: Modelling treatment couch (Elekta)
--