Inquiry

[James Latham]

Dear Pike lovers:
Thanks for the very informative mailing list that you have created.
Is there any way to create a distributable pike program?
Ideally it would be all in one module.
Jim Latham
~~~

[Stephen R. van den Berg]

James Latham wrote:
>Thanks for the very informative mailing list that you have created.
>Is there any way to create a distributable pike program?

You forget to specify the target platform.

>Ideally it would be all in one module.

Dropping it inside a minimal docker could be considered a universal solution
these days, I guess.
--
Stephen.

[David Estopa]

Hi, a little question.

We have a roxen that connects correctly to a server without using ssl
encription, but from the command line (with pike), we cannot especify
the correct options in the optional mapping to force the Sql object to
connect to the same server bypassing the ssl protocol or similar. There
are a list of all supported mysql client options to use in pike well
documented? Or maybe the available options for this mapping, are the
same as the displayed on the 'mysql --help' client.

Apologies for the query. Pike is a great language, but sometimes the
documentation of some modules or options is very poor.

Kind regards

David Estopa.


El 20/5/22 a las 13:01, Stephen R. van den Berg escribió:

[Stephen R. van den Berg]

David Estopa wrote:
>We have a roxen that connects correctly to a server without using ssl
>encription, but from the command line (with pike), we cannot especify the
>correct options in the optional mapping to force the Sql object to connect to
>the same server bypassing the ssl protocol or similar. There are a list of
>all supported mysql client options to use in pike well documented? Or maybe

The connection string prefix normally determines the use of SSL or not
to the database.
In case of mysql, that should be either "mysql:" or "mysqls:", for
either plain or encrypted respectively.
--
Stephen.