They are just sadists who love to see their fellow professionals crawl with awe at their power.
Why did we elect them in the first place.
Yes time to boycott.
Ely Ouano
Sent from Mail for Windows
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Philippine Institute of Environmental Planners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to piepmembers...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CAL9R005FVUkGLuRpz8uuerT6WahHFQDpSvjFLYLfqRB2YrOeJw%40mail.gmail.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/PS2P216MB12499FF42A5FB2FCA0C090F8C3439%40PS2P216MB1249.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
Dear All,
One of the purpose of a professional organization is to assist the members in the practice of the profession NOT TO PUT ALL THE RED TAPES AND HURDLES TO MAKE LIFE DIFFICULT FOR ITS MEMBERS.
I would strongly suggest that we revise the way we elect our officials. Why don’t we have a more formal nomination process, say a month before the election and election could be done by electronic mail or by postal ballots. During the nomination process, it would be also time to update the membership dues.
I could not recall a time (may be once) that I was asked to vote for any officer of the organization.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/1560387392.1847207.1662826649507%40mail.yahoo.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/PS2P216MB12493069ED550380FACE867BC3459%40PS2P216MB1249.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
Hi Patrick,
So when we reached 20,000 members aside from being a member of the national chapter, we have also to be a member of the regional (upgraded current chapters), then at 40,000 to a provincial chapter as well, at 60,000 to a city or municipal chapter as well, at 80,000 to be a member of a barangay chapter as well, and 100,000 planners to a sitio chapter as well.
The only active involvement I got with my membership is this blog and somehow I either got struck out after some heated exchange of ideas or the blog just got lockdown during the COVID epidemic. The national convention cost lots of money and being a retiree the value of attending the national convention versus cost is just not there. I checked our webpage and facebook but there is not much of activity that I am interested.
With local chapters having membership lower than few 100s, I am just wondering the type of program that they could offer to justify the red tapes of being required to be a member if the national organization could not have substantial activities. Environmental planning covers a large number of discipline and it would have been interesting especially with the internet if the national chapter could organize an activity every month.
Those that are or are living before the age of the internet are the ones who need to have physical local chapters. With the internet, even the lone EnP operating in some distant island could actively participate with any of the events that interest them.
With the current communication technology, the only way I could see and justify the local chapter membership and physical contact is to get abreast local gossips and drinking sessions that could not be posted or in the internet without getting some flak. You may say well local issues or of local interest. With the internet is it not better to get a wider audience and even worldwide to include the lone EnP in some distant island? Wider exchange of experiences and ideas.
Well, I might as well propose to those members of the PIEP exclusive club to form our own chapter of “Exclusive PIEP Chapter” whose members must have license number less than 500, or have been an EnP for at least 40 years, and the membership is limited to 500. Even if somebody is qualified, new members are accepted when there is vacancy due to resignation or death. That is class.
Ely
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CAPs7oYoXi_5T9m7qU-p_kK0jJchWpdBVNqXHGTkfFW%2BZvSrpgQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/PS2P216MB1249F49334032132C4E583E8C3449%40PS2P216MB1249.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
"...3. Chapters ask for your identification to make sure that you are who you are. Each chapter has data privacy measures put in place. The same with PRC.
The chapter asks you to submit PRC ID Details, including your birthday to check your identity. This will be checked against what is on the chapter record. PRC asks you to submit a photo ID because this will be used in your renewed PRC ID.
PRC has a Terms of Use Notice on the Registration Page, and the Data Privacy statement is incorporated in that terms of use notice."
Rachel Guimbatan-Fadgyas
https://nikeprogramme.net/
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CAPs7oYo2WWhpn3LN8TuYce5-8fA%3DHDoQ1P%3D%2BW6dQFmqaAksR7A%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CAPs7oYoXi_5T9m7qU-p_kK0jJchWpdBVNqXHGTkfFW%2BZvSrpgQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Dear All,
Rather putting up chapters, I think it is more important to improve the services of the national chapter.
We are required to have certain number of continuing education points for renewal. Why don’t the national chapter prepare an annual program of CPD with the specific number of points. Hence, the members could also program the CPD course they would like to take rather than taking one just to comply with the number of CPD points. PIEP could charge extra for a session that a member will participate or increase the dues and give the members say 10 hours of internet meeting per year.
PIEP could recruit the lecturers. On my part I will give my lectures for free if asked. PIEP could get PRC accreditation well in advance.
Aside from CPD there are also other services that PIEP could provide to its members—such technical journal, on line magazine and journal lending ( may be subject to some copyright and distribution rights--), job advertisement, job fair for new EnP----lots of services.
I don’t see any reason to decongest. Decongest from what? As far as my interaction with PIEP it was my PRC ID renewal three years ago when I needed a certification that I am a member of good standing. There was no requirement for chapter membership then. I did not even have the opportunity to exercise my rights to vote because I did not attend the national convention.
I don’t know how the other members interact with the main PIEP that it needs to decongest.
Ely
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CANL9DGkxvQfvFW2JwP58DCvQjMQEadVa9fAuMmydV8u0zmxP8w%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/PS2P216MB12494399A871348711C3C210C3449%40PS2P216MB1249.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CAPs7oYrTnPXwWW2gP93rLvFthGoOmxks3hQ5hs9N5H_GymNzvA%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CAPs7oYrTnPXwWW2gP93rLvFthGoOmxks3hQ5hs9N5H_GymNzvA%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CAL9R004XkBCiB0P1u9QmfeOaWHxwvOzPy8MNaPKpJRFu53JxFQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CANL9DG%3DsLNJwr3Pgs6BEkGxzA27Qg1yYbo82kupysXC4P5BexQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Dear All,
I worked for the government for a very short time. Twelve months to be exact. With the workload I normally outline to my staff the content and tenor of the office memo, instructions replies etc. Before I do a John Hancock, especially if I expect a two paragraph memo and staff returns with a 10 page memo, I normally apply my four way test. I think I have posted my four test before but for the benefit of our recent members I am repeating it. My four way test( with acknowledgement to the Rotary Club) is :
To Patrick’s observation that it is just “prima nang prima---then getting paid” it seems the EnP failed even on test No.1. Should we have an in depth evaluation and self examination of the EnP laws, regulations, IRR etc as Patrick’s observations seem to challenge the raison d’etre of the profession itself.
I hope Noel Astillero is doing well and is very busy with his practice. If I recall in the previous blogs Noel challenged the scope of the professional practice and even the title of Environmental Planner. I hope Noel will enter into the fray once he has the time to do so.
Lastly, I am glad to learn the blog was discontinued for sometime and just revived. I thought I was censored for some heated exchange when I lost access.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/1865265934.2601357.1663003075364%40mail.yahoo.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CAPs7oYo2WWhpn3LN8TuYce5-8fA%3DHDoQ1P%3D%2BW6dQFmqaAksR7A%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/PS2P216MB124947AD2260A0845756F33FC3479%40PS2P216MB1249.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/piepmembers/CA%2BmkRgk5MQOBLwUSTR2-jmJk7pWFQfQ6Vfj650FC5F_poR8aew%40mail.gmail.com.