Raspberry PI

[John Blackburn]

Hi,

One thing I was wondering about, why wasn't the PI Compute module CM4 used for the PiDP replicas rather than the standard PI; it woul;d have been much better mechanically and the 2 x 100 pin connectors footprint would have been convenient for the FPGA implementation too.

[John Blackburn]

I realise that the connectors would be the only SMD components on the PCB but, if it was cost effective for the PCB manufacturer to assemble these connectors, it would have been a nice result.

Just a thought

[Steven A. Falco]

Also there would have to be separate parts for Ethernet, USB, HDMI, etc. The PI SBCs provide all that rather inexpensively.

Steve

> image.png
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PiDP-10" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pidp-10+u...@googlegroups.com <mailto:pidp-10+u...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pidp-10/CAOKB5qacWj3VR_QUZRv4MDQDdHyg4ks4SadN46mEUD%3Dh21o6wg%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pidp-10/CAOKB5qacWj3VR_QUZRv4MDQDdHyg4ks4SadN46mEUD%3Dh21o6wg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.