The boards had screws with nuts to space them, and at certain
locations the screws would go past the top board to guide the unit
under test onto the top board. I usually used nuts to hold the unit
under test onto the tester, but one could also develop a hinged
overboard that holds the unit under test correctly.
The bottom board pads would terminate to appropiate connectors (in
this case JTAG, power, and an RS-232 connector)
I don't have the tester at hand, so I cannot provide pictures,
hopefully the description is adequate.
Previously I used a hardwood board. I drilled holes slight larger
than the pogo pins, stuck one end of a stripped wire in the hole, then
forced the pogo pin in. It was very fiddly, and rarely worked well so
I went to the PCB method. But for a few test points that are well
spaced apart, it should be fine.
If you have the flexibility for your development to make sure a few
mounting holes and all the test points are on a common 1/10" grid,
then you could make a fairly simple generic test bed.
-Adam
Adam, I would love to see a picture. How looks the pogo pins ?
(ok I'll search on google)
The bed of nails has a standardized positions for nails ? That means
the PCB designer should position the test points on the PCB according
on his bed of nails doccumentation, or the bed of nails could be
reconfigurable for a particular grid dimension used on PCB ?
thx,
Vasile
HTH
Dave.
> Vasile Surducan wrote:
>> The bed of nails has a standardized positions for nails ? That means
>> the PCB designer should position the test points on the PCB according
>> on his bed of nails doccumentation, or the bed of nails could be
>> reconfigurable for a particular grid dimension used on PCB ?
>
> I used to write drivers for "bed of nails" testers (Company was called
> Innovate; the 9000 was the largest, but they did smaller desk-based ones
> too, if anyone's ever seen one). As shipped from the factory, you get
> several thousand pins in a grid configuration, and that's it. What each
> client does, using the Gerbers for the PCB under test, is have an
> adapter board made up which breaks out the PCB test points - usually one
> per net - onto the bed of nails array. The tester then has to map the
> net test points onto the correct bed of nails pin using the software,
> and the test is run on that basis.
Another way to use them is to make a custom fixture for your custom test
setup. This allows your test setup to easily contact points in the circuit
that are not routed to connectors on the board. It also makes it
unnecessary for testing to plug in any connector you might have. Just place
the board in the fixture and everything you need (and have placed a pin
for) is contacted. For example the programming pins for ICSP.
It helps to identify those test nets when designing the schematic and make
sure they have an accessible via in the layout.
Gerhard
They have good pictures there. If you needed more than hobbyist
quantities I expect they could be found elsewhere for less. When I
ordered them they didn't have the holders. Now that they do you could
use a holder and one or two PCBs instead of the three PCB stack I
suggested earlier.
A pogo pin has at least three parts. A hollow tube, a spring, and a
rod. The bottom of the tube is crimped, the srping goes in, then the
bottom of the rod goes in, where the tube is crimped a little bit.
The rod can slide freely in and out, but is caught by the crimp so it
can't completely leave the tube. The spring pushes the rod
constantly, so it look and feels like a little pogo stick
The end of the rod is shaped for different purposes. Some are
chiseled, some are cup shaped, some flat, etc. I usually put a large
flat SMD pad with a small (via size) hole in the center and use the
pointy one.
I'm sure you can purchase huge bed of nail testers that have standard
positions and you simply load the pins you need. For anything more
than a few hundred uses, though, most places custom make a test
fixture which is designed around the PCB instead of the PCB being
designed with the test fixture in mind.
Usually the test fixtures sit on top of a generic bed of nails tester,
though, so they don't need to build a whole new tester each time, just
the board holder, pogo pin holder, and clamp setup.
I know some places even have automated test equipment, that move one
or more test points around. Very slow, but highly flexible.
Generally used for low quantity prototyping where high reliability is
more important than cost.
-Adam
On 10/29/06, Vasile Surducan <picl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Drop
> > the pogo pins in the holes and they make contact with the pads on the
> > bottom PCB.
> Adam, I would love to see a picture. How looks the pogo pins ?
That's the approach I took. We do 100% testing, so speed of test
directly impacts cost. After designing several testers for various
products, I developed a "generic" tester consisting of various modules
like ADC, DAC, relays, buffers, etc. These modules plug into a
motherboard of sorts (controlled by a PIC of course).
I'm not sure what size picture I can post, so I'll try a separate post
with a picture of the bed of nails with hinged cover.
of course it got rejected. If anyone really, really wants to see the
pictures I could put them on a webpage.
These pins look like the pins manufactured by Interconnect Devices, Inc.
http://www.idinet.com.
Paul
-Adam
Why don't you put it on Imageshack or something similar? Just an idea O:-)
(of course I am curious too) :-)
Regards
--
Metis Adrastea
http://metisadrastea.blogspot.com/
The factory where I did my apprenticeship made jigs with pogo pins which
contacted onto the pads where the wires were soldered when the PCB was
assembled into the final unit, and had suitable diameter brass pins which
went through the mounting screw holes, and a hinged brass frame around the
perimeter of the PCB to hold it down.
Pogo pins are available from Harwin in the UK, through Farnell. Search for
"Harwin probe" on the farnell website, and there is a whole variety pith
pointed, concave, or serrated ends.
http://www.neainc.com/pages/specs/Adobe/HP-Agilent3070.pdf
I worked on the SOC tester named 93000.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Help-building-a-Bed-of-Nails-Tester.-tf2529904.html#a7078854
Sent from the PIC - [EE] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dave
> >I purchased my pogo pins from
> >http://www.solarbotics.com/
> >In the pins section:
> >http://www.solarbotics.com/products/index.php?scdfa-250100084-viewC
> >ategory-categoryzq314=true&frm=sbsb
> >
> >They have good pictures there. If you needed more than hobbyist
> >quantities I expect they could be found elsewhere for less. When I
>
>These pins look like the pins manufactured by Interconnect Devices, Inc.
>http://www.idinet.com.
>
>Paul
>
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>View/change your membership options at
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
The only thing that helps me maintain my slender grip on reality
is the friendship I share with my collection of singing potatoes
\|/ ____ \|/
~@-/ oO \-@~
/_( \__/ )_\
\__U_/
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail...
but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying,
"Damn...that was fun!"
there seems to be some interest in this. I'll take you up on that. I'll
be glad to answer questions (and I welcome constructive criticism) once
the pictures are posted. Do keep in mind that was version 1.0. We've
made some refinements to version 2 (under construction right now, no
pictures available yet)
---
James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin
mailto:james...@piclist.com 1-619-652-0593 phone
http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786
PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: piclist...@mit.edu
> [mailto:piclist...@mit.edu] On Behalf Of peis...@ridgid.com
> Sent: 2006 Oct 30, Mon 08:04
> To: pic...@mit.edu
> Subject: RE: [EE] Help building a Bed of Nails Tester.
>
It's located at
http://www.ubasics.com/BedofNailsPCBAssemblyTester
-Adam
On 10/30/06, peis...@ridgid.com <peis...@ridgid.com> wrote:
I'm happy to provide further input if there is interest. I would love to
share everything, but I can hear managers uttering the words
"competitive advantage" already. We did spend a fair amount of resources
on this project. I probably won't be allowed to share pcb layouts,
Windows source code, etc. But certainly I should be able to share
concepts, partial schematics, problems encountered, etc.