On 26/11/2015 15:24, Joseph Garrett wrote:
> David,
> I would have done the pitch raise! It's worthless at that pitch imo. If strings broke, that would have driven home the need for an immediate replacement. If they didn't, (which I suspect would be the case), then the poor kid would, at least, have the correct pitch to listen too. Just my take on the situation.
> Since we in the U.S. have gotten most of the absolute garbage Over damper pianos, you are left with the better ones. One in that condition would not have been given a second thought, (by me), to raise the pitch. After all, that is a late model spring & loop that has a 7/8 plate, of substantial mass. And, it has, apparently, good solid construction.
> Next time, .... go for it!<G>
> Best,
> Joe
I didn't make it clear that the tuning pins are on the absolute
borderline of what will hold without CA treatment.
Would it be worth carrying out a CA treatment on a piano of zero
monetary value?
This is a family who own an expensive large house in a very good area. I
tried to nudge the lady towards a decent instrument for their daughter.
I accept that this spring & loop is better than most, but I really have
more-or-less had it witn the breed. The last several I tried had a
peculiar phenomenon, where the pins felt tight, but the whole structure
was spongey and the pianos just about untunatble, due to the lack of
solid structure. As I said, like trying to shape a bath sponge into a
delicate sculpture!
Although this is a better example of a spring & loop birdcage (and I
must be one of the few tuners here who actually carry, and have fitted,
new springs for these), its about 130 years old and was a lower-end
model when brand new. TIme to move on. I'd happily carry out a pitch
raise on a 1910 solid English overstrung upright in otherwise fair
condition. But not an 1880s spring & loop parallel-strung birdcage with
loose pins.
Best regards,
David.