I am making this proposal in the spirit of a "Strawman", to learn the shared goals among our "Physiosense" group and to determine what is possible with the capabilities we already have or may soon acquire in Physiology Data Acquisition and Measurement. Please let me know what subset or superset of these goals is possible and what desires/aims we share rather than just telling me what is impossible or what already exists elsewhere.
Emery Premeaux (MRE), our group owner, has presented the notion of Open Science./Open Lab Hardware on his blog and the possibility that hobbyist and Open Hardware Engineers can design inexpensive, powerful and cost-effective to meet the needs both of hobbyist science, and academic/professional laborabotories where the cost of existing laboratory equipment is prohibitive. Â In our area of interestÂ
electro/psycho/physiology equipment and self-tracking for the heallth & fitness enthusiast there is an existing set of laboratory data acquisition equipment such asÂ
http://www.biopac.com/data-acquisition-analysis-system-mp150-system-windows which allow attaching multiple analog physiology sensors (EEG, GSR, EMG, EOG {Eye Tracking}), the limitations of such existinge equipment include its cost (often in the thousands of dollars), its limitation to analog, electrode and Op Amp Sensors (as opposed to the appliance type digital sensors now available to hobbyists and health enthusiast like Neurosky, Zeo and SEEED SPO2 (Pulse Ox Sensor), and its lack of a wireless connection to the cloud or a Internet of Things Service.
I am wondering and opening up for discussion what sort of Open Hardware/Software System Based Laboratory Equipment we could develop for these needs possible with the help of Community Sourced Funding.
Please respond to my brainstorming in the spirit of a "Strawman" meant to encourage your participation rather than an "impossible" directive from "on high"
--Ira Laefsky