Dear Michał,
The answers to all of your questions are "yes": your abstract should describe both what you have done during the unofficial phase of the Challenge and what you plan to do during the official phase of the Challenge.
We understand and expect that your approach will evolve over the next several months, and you are able and encouraged to update your description of your approach for the CinC conference, so please do include details about your "stronger baseline" model, including the scores on the public leaderboard, as well as your plans for your actual solution. Of course, you should clearly differentiate between what you have already done and what you plan to do.
Importantly, please do not use your limited number of words to describe the Challenge, but instead focus on your current and planned methodology and observations. If you are using certain features or a certain model, then please tell us what and why. If you anticipate that some aspect of the data or task is important to address, and your current or planned methods address it in some way, then please say so.
Please see this part of the webpage for more advice about writing and submitting your abstract:
https://physionetchallenges.org/2026/#abstractsBest,
Matt
(On behalf of the Challenge team.)
Please post questions and comments in the forum. However, if your question reveals information about your entry, then please email info at
physionetchallenge.org. We may post parts of our reply publicly if we feel that all Challengers should benefit from it. We will not answer emails about the Challenge to any other address. This email is maintained by a group. Please do not email us individually.