Possibility of applying PhyloNetworks to mitochondrial data
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Matheus Salles
unread,
May 2, 2024, 9:30:16 PMMay 2
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to PhyloNetworks users
Hello there,
I hope you're doing well!
I'm wondering if using PhyloNetworks for mitochondrial data is a good idea, and would be glad to hear your thoughts on this matter.
I've been thinking about it mostly because it's recommended to use independent genes in the analysis. However, splitting up mitochondrial genes into different partitions might not be the best option, for biological reasons. On the other hand, using the entire mitochondrial genome as one single partition might not be feasible for calculating concordance factors since this requires multiple genes, right?
So, is the only practical option here to combine nuclear and mitochondrial data (let's say, using 100 nuclear genes along with the whole mitogenome, totaling "101 genes" as input), or am I overlooking any other possibilities? Or should we not even consider using PhyloNetworks to analyze mitochondrial data?