Hello,
Thanks for this, and thanks also for sending round what you typed in. I think it's really useful for people to know what did and didn't work, so thanks for sharing! Since you've raised a few points, I've replied in a semi-structured way below...
Not asking for DNA sequences when providing species/taxonIDs
pG tries to be intelligent, so if you give it taxon IDs to download it doesn't ask for DNA/species because it's already got those to be getting on with. The same goes for all command-line arguments: if you tell pG to align with MAFFT, it won't ask about alignment, it'll just do it. This is another advantage to using command line arguments: your analysis goes a lot quicker.
Giving pG existing DNA data
You can give pG sequences from multiple genes using the -dna argument; there's an example of this in the 'Sillwood Plants' demo folder. For example, "-dna C:\Documents\plants\rbcL_raw.fasta,C:\Documents\plants\matK_raw.fasta" would load two datasets (notice there are two absolute file paths, delimited by commas). pG uses the FASTA sequence format for raw sequences and alignments - look in the demos folder for examples.
A related question I sometimes get is how you can take DNA data from two runs and use them to build a single phylogeny. Say, for example, you were building a phylogeny of 100 mammals and then you realised you forgot ten. Just run those ten new species and then copy-paste the extra sequences into a new file containing both the sequences from the first run and then second. FASTA is a very simple format - you literally just open up the sequences from the first run in Notepad (Textwrangler, emacs, whatever), copy-paste the extra sequences from the second run, then save as a new file.
Gene name lookup table for GenBankI don't know of such a thing, but I wish there were one! I think the problem of labelling regions of sequences is a field in of itself, but this (
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) site is not a bad place to start looking.
I hope that helps. Please do let me know how you get on!