VC6 vs VC9

[Louis Solomon [SteelBytes]]

Hi,

based on comments on http://windows.php.net/qa/ ...

why is the VC9 build compiled to used the CRT as DLLs instead of static?
yet I gather the VC6 isn't?

why can't the VC9 build be used with apache.org binaries?

and why do you have both a VC6 and a VC9 build?

just curious.

Louis

[Mario Brandt]

Hi Louis,

>why can't the VC9 build be used with apache.org binaries?

The build from apache.org is build with VS6. If you wanna try a VS9 build
from httpd you can try the build from apachehaus.com For me it works well
on Windows 2003 and Windows 7

>why is the VC9 build compiled to used the CRT as DLLs instead of static?

For most windows users it is easier to enable a dll as extension than compile it ;-)

>why do you have both a VC6 and a VC9 build?

I guess VS6 for compability and VS9 is the future.

regards
Mario

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] [mailto:lo...@steelbytes.com]
Gesendet: Fr 06.02.2009 02:48
An: php-w...@lists.php.net
Betreff: [PHP-WIN] VC6 vs VC9

Hi,

just curious.

Louis

--
PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php