Very exciting stuff Jon. We can talk more on Monday, but a few things about the article that stuck out:
1. From my readings, Tewari is one of the biggest names in robotic prostatectomies (his site is where we got a lot of pictures/videos from), so this is a very legit group working on this.
2. Its really helpful to know that they used rats, and claim this to be a "well-recognized model" for this very purpose. If we are going to propose an animal model, rat should probably be it.
3. I really like their idea of taking both low resolution images for "overall architecture information" and high resolution for cellular and local architecture. I'm not sure how this would work in-vivo, but its something to think about.
4. They actually use 740-780nm lasers that they say excite intrinsic fluorophores in most living cells. So we might want to also try with just the 830 nm light without the doubling effect to see what that gives us, since thats closer to this range.
5. Their second harmonic generation signal (which if I understood correctly is the analog of our second image) was collected at 390 +-35 nm, which is consistent with our best contrast coming around 407 nm.
Great finds on brother and papers Jon!
Peter